Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Poulet en vessie


cabrales

Recommended Posts

This question refers to my writing about my adventures poaching chicken, beef, and lamb (mostly) in Reynolds cooking bags, using these as a substitute for the traditional bladder. This allows you to poach meat without worrying about cooking it dry, and so permits you to add little or no liquid if you wish. You put the meat in the bag, tie it, and put it into a pot with water raised to a bare simmer, and leave it there for three (chicken) or four (beef short ribs) hours. The result is very tender meat surrounded by very flavorful juices, with the scum that you would usually skim away adhering to the sides of the bag. My pursuits of this nature have more or less come to an end with the disappearance of the small-size Reynolds cooking bag from my supermarket shelves. (I think the small one are actually called "medium" size.) Obviously, the large size ones can be used but they're much too big and cost too much. I've tried using the microwave-ready food storage bags with some success, but essentially this is something I don't do nearly as much as I used to. I'm not sure this answers your question: if not, prod me some more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John -- Thanks for the response. :wink:

Poaching in plastic bags is an interesting technique. It has even been applied to eggs by Elena Arzak in Spain, in her egg flower with dates dish. She places a bit of white truffle oil in the poaching sac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...