Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

collapsed chocolate shells?


akonsu
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello, several weeks after I moulded some ganache filled chocolates, their shells collapsed. I have attached a photo that demonstrates the problem. I am not sure why this happened. My guess is that this is because the ganache filling dried and shrank thus either making the candy hollow or maybe the internal pressure got lower, I do not know... What did I do wrong? How to prevent this? Keep them in an air tight container (which I did not)? Or in a fridge (which I did not either)?

 

Thanks!

konstantin

 

DSCN4857.JPG

Edited by akonsu (log)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Chris says about the filling losing moisture to the surrounding air, and some molds are worse than others for it - the square ones are really susceptible.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nickos said:

You have to let the filling rest for 12 hours and then close the mould.

 

so; make the shell, fill with a filling of your choice and let them set overnight and close the next day.

 

that definitely helps but you still can get evaporation even if you do this (I do this for all my fillings and some still shrink over time)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, keychris said:

 

that definitely helps but you still can get evaporation even if you do this (I do this for all my fillings and some still shrink over time)

For sure - but only certain fillings in certain molds give me this issue. I tend to back off very quickly. Can't recall the last time I let something sit overnight!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kerry Beal said:

For sure - but only certain fillings in certain molds give me this issue. I tend to back off very quickly. Can't recall the last time I let something sit overnight!

but you have an eztemper 😛

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kerry Beal said:

I tend to back off very quickly. Can't recall the last time I let something sit overnight!


I don't think I've let ganache sit overnight since the arrival of the EZtemper. I've also never had a shell collapse... knock on wood.

  • Like 1

It's kinda like wrestling a gorilla... you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm having the exact same problem and I know it's a combination of the shells being too thin and the filling drying out. It only became an issue when I switched to molds with small cavities and reformulated my ganache.  My espresso went from a 22 gram cavity to 9. and the best flavor balance is 5 grams of chocolate and 4 grams of filling.  The sides and bottom are fine, the top caves.  How long it takes to cave depends on the filling. 

 

I also wonder if the original poster and I are making fillings that just aren't meant for molded truffles.  Some of what I'm doing is altering a firm ganache, and I recently retooled my recipe to see if I could get a longer shelf life (and it worked, my AW value was about 6.8) but my new formula is definitely drying out and I need to reformulate it again..  I'll try more glucose but I didn't like the flavor when I did that. Would invert sugar be better? My rule of thumb has been glucose in molded truffles, invert sugar in any that gets enrobed or dipped.  I definitely won't use sorbitol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2019 at 10:00 AM, DJ Silverchild said:

I'm having the exact same problem and I know it's a combination of the shells being too thin and the filling drying out. It only became an issue when I switched to molds with small cavities and reformulated my ganache.  My espresso went from a 22 gram cavity to 9. and the best flavor balance is 5 grams of chocolate and 4 grams of filling.  The sides and bottom are fine, the top caves.  How long it takes to cave depends on the filling. 

 

I also wonder if the original poster and I are making fillings that just aren't meant for molded truffles.  Some of what I'm doing is altering a firm ganache, and I recently retooled my recipe to see if I could get a longer shelf life (and it worked, my AW value was about 6.8) but my new formula is definitely drying out and I need to reformulate it again..  I'll try more glucose but I didn't like the flavor when I did that. Would invert sugar be better? My rule of thumb has been glucose in molded truffles, invert sugar in any that gets enrobed or dipped.  I definitely won't use sorbitol. 

How about a combination of invert and glucose. Glucose about 50% of the free water and invert 5-7% of free water (I've also seen 2-3% of total weight of recipe).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fascinating. I did recently rework my ganache formula to get a better shelf life and it worked in that I got an AW value under 7 but now I have these problems.  I lowered the glucose from 8.81% to 5.8% of the total recipe.  For the entire recipe, free water changed from 20.45% water and 29.05% sugar to 21.73% water 26.48% sugar.
I just made a batch using the old formula and it came together much much better. I'll try it in shells next week.
 

Should glucose be 50% of the free water? 

 

Thank you Kerry!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2019 at 4:45 PM, DJ Silverchild said:

Fascinating. I did recently rework my ganache formula to get a better shelf life and it worked in that I got an AW value under 7 but now I have these problems.  I lowered the glucose from 8.81% to 5.8% of the total recipe.  For the entire recipe, free water changed from 20.45% water and 29.05% sugar to 21.73% water 26.48% sugar.
I just made a batch using the old formula and it came together much much better. I'll try it in shells next week.
 

Should glucose be 50% of the free water? 

 

Thank you Kerry!

yes - up to 50% of free water

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2019 at 4:45 PM, DJ Silverchild said:

Fascinating. I did recently rework my ganache formula to get a better shelf life and it worked in that I got an AW value under 7 but now I have these problems.  I lowered the glucose from 8.81% to 5.8% of the total recipe.  For the entire recipe, free water changed from 20.45% water and 29.05% sugar to 21.73% water 26.48% sugar.
I just made a batch using the old formula and it came together much much better. I'll try it in shells next week.
 

Should glucose be 50% of the free water? 

 

Thank you Kerry!

I have to ask:  The only scale I have seen for Aw readings is between 0 (for something completely solid) to 1 (for complete water). Is there a different scale that results in a reading of 7?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...