Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Baking Steel ...Chemists.. Machinists.. Wiseacres.. is S275 Steel Food Safe?


adey73

Recommended Posts

I want to get my own steel chopped for oven insertion and pizza production.

 

The problem is I want to know if 'mild' steel of structural use is safe for food use.

 

I'd buy in the UK where S275 is easily available and somewhat comparable to the famed A36.

 

BUT EU specs & US specs aren't the same... anyone know probabilities of heavy metals leeching out etc?

Edited by adey73 (log)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any steel should be food-safe. You only see exotic alloying elements in higher grade steels, and these are common in knives.

 

A baking steel is also something that's going to be dry and that's going to make relatively brief food contact, and that's going to end up covered with oxidation and probably carbonized oil. There's about zero chance of anything leaching from it—even if there was something bad to leach from it. 

 

FWIW, S275 is just a plain old low-carbon steel. It's got nothing in it but a bit of carbon and manganese. The rest is iron, and the trace impurities that are in every steel. This is the general kind of steel that makes the most sense for what what you're talking about, because it's cheap to buy and cheap to work with.

  • Like 2

Notes from the underbelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Paul Fink said:

won't that be redundant?

BTW @paulraphaelis correct. Any steel is food safe.

Not if there's good conductivity between the ceramic and the steel.  The ceramic has a higher heat capacity (it requires more joules to raise it to a given temperature) than the steel does.  The steel has a higher rate of heat transfer, which is why some people prefer it for some tasks.  When you put someting on the steel to cook, it will transfer heat into the thing that's being cooked, and cool off.  If there's a good conductive transfer between the steel and the stone, the stone will transfer heat into the steel, increasing the amount heat dumped into the food.  When you take the food out, as long as the stone is still hotter than the steel, it will continue to transfer heat into the steel.  That gets the steel up to temperature again faster. 

 

That's the theory.  I doubt it makes much difference, because the bond bewteen the two is so poor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, dscheidt said:

When you take the food out, as long as the stone is still hotter than the steel, it will continue to transfer heat into the steel.  That gets the steel up to temperature again faster. 

 

That's the theory.  I doubt it makes much difference, because the bond bewteen the two is so poor. 

 

Sort of.  This analysis ignores the effect of infrared radiation that would otherwise heat the bottom of the steel.  The cordierite would basically take the bottom element out of the equation.

 

The "recovery" isn't a giant problem anyway.  If it is, your steel is too thin.  3/8 to 1/2 is about right.  Any thicker and you risk charring the bottom before the toppings are done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, dscheidt said:

Not if there's good conductivity between the ceramic and the steel.  The ceramic has a higher heat capacity (it requires more joules to raise it to a given temperature) than the steel does.  The steel has a higher rate of heat transfer, which is why some people prefer it for some tasks.  When you put someting on the steel to cook, it will transfer heat into the thing that's being cooked, and cool off.  If there's a good conductive transfer between the steel and the stone, the stone will transfer heat into the steel, increasing the amount heat dumped into the food.  When you take the food out, as long as the stone is still hotter than the steel, it will continue to transfer heat into the steel.  That gets the steel up to temperature again faster. 

 

That's the theory.  I doubt it makes much difference, because the bond between the two is so poor. 

 

 

You have the physics correct. I say its redundant because if the steel is thick it has good heat capacity.

The ceramic has  higher heat capacity per mass but a 1/4" thick hunk of steel is going to be heavier 

than that pizza stone. Think caste iron fry pan.

Edited by Paul Fink (log)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The downside of adding heat capacity, of course, is the added time and energy to preheat the thing. I have a 1/2" thick steel (weighs around 32 lbs) and it takes my oven at least 75 minutes to preheat it to 550°F. 

 

If you not extra heat capacity (which has been shown to make a big difference when baking multiple pizzas back-to-back, but a very minor difference when baking a single one) the simplest way to get it is with a thicker steel. You maintain the conductivity of the metal all the way through, you have a blackened surface on both sides to absorb radiant heat, and no issues of transferring heat from one piece to another.

 

You can buy steel in whatever thickness you and your oven rack can manage. My advice to most people would be 3/8". That strikes a nice balance. 1/2" is fine if everyone who's going to deal with it has a strong back. If you have big pizza parties and steel-toed shoes, maybe  5/8" would make sense (never heard of anyone using it, though). None of them should be left in the oven full-time. 

Edited by paulraphael (log)
  • Like 2

Notes from the underbelly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2017 at 5:45 AM, Paul Fink said:

 

 

You have the physics correct.

 

Not really.  Specific heat is usually expressed in tems of mass.  For instance, helium has roughly 6x the specific heat of brick.  Bad physics to suggest that an oven sparged with helium will hold as much heat as the same one lined with brick.

 

My 1/2" pizza steel weighs 42 pounds, and that is significantly more mass than a 1/2" Cordierite tile of the same volume.

Edited by boilsover (log)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, boilsover said:

Not really.  Specific heat is usually expressed in tems of mass.  For instance, helium has roughly 6x the specific heat of brick.  Bad physics to suggest that an oven sparged with helium will hold as much heat as the same one lined with brick.

 

My 1/2" pizza steel weighs 42 pounds, and that is significantly more mass than a 1/2" Cordierite tile of the same volume.

 

i think that is what i said or at least what I tried to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Paul Fink said:

i think that is what i said or at least what I tried to say. 

 

OK, sorry.  When dscheidt said: "The ceramic has a higher heat capacity (it requires more joules to raise it to a given temperature) than the steel does", you said: "You have the physics correct".    Unless the Cordierite tile is: (a)  6X the thickness of the steel; and (b) thermally bonded to it,  the physics do not work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...