Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

FrogPrincesse

What Are You Cooking Sous Vide Today? (Part 3)

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, lemniscate said:

I make beef jerky with eye of round.

 

Good idea. I'd pound the crap out of it and make chicken-fried steak. But really, is there any more hopeless cut of beef than an eye-of-round steak?

  • Like 2

Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory

Eat more chicken skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, robirdstx said:

 

I would use it to make goulash.

 

I like goulash.  I haven't made it in forever.  I dug out the recipe.  Nope, not going to happen, never be able to masticate that beef.  Any young maidens dying to come over and prechew, please PM.

 

Grinding with bacon sounds the best suggestion.  Or better, just bacon.  But I have no bacon.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, rotuts said:

if you don't grind it up

 

you can of course SV it to tenderness , at your desired " done-ness '

 

but it wont be too tasty.  so add some flavor to the bag before hand

 

diced mushrooms ?  teriaki sauce  ? etc

 

rare  130 F  1- 2 days   go for somewhere in between 

Yes,  and a good bit of salt will help palatability

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rouladen. Pound it thin, salt and pepper, wrap it around a bratwurst and a dill pickle spear, wrap that in bacon. Brown. Simmer in red wine with caraway and juniper berries for an hour or so.

 

Guaranteed tender and tasty. Tastier, the better bratwurst and pickle you use.

 

Greatly assisted by some red cabbage and German potato salad.

 

 

 

  • Like 6

Don't ask. Eat it.

www.kayatthekeyboard.wordpress.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From tonight's episode of "Name That Steak" a friend kindly took me to Shoprite after work.  No chuck eye steak, but they did have something called "chuck fillet steak" that looked attractive and it was labeled USDA Choice.

 

Sous vide suggestions?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turbo-marinating pork tenderloin in tamari, apple-syrup, and ginger at 60 C. 


It's almost never bad to feed someone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JoNorvelleWalker

 

I wonder if it has representation on a 7-bone chuck ?

 

all the cuts there , except one do well @ 130 for 24 - 48

 

except the Blade  , which can come as a steak or a roast.   you can tell the steaks as they have a thick membrane between the two

 

muscles .  very delicious cut of meat.  but the steaks are not large as they are cut vertically from a horizontal blade roast

 

and that roast is not that thick "  6 " or so ?

 

any pics of the cut ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, rotuts said:

@JoNorvelleWalker

 

I wonder if it has representation on a 7-bone chuck ?

 

all the cuts there , except one do well @ 130 for 24 - 48

 

except the Blade  , which can come as a steak or a roast.   you can tell the steaks as they have a thick membrane between the two

 

muscles .  very delicious cut of meat.  but the steaks are not large as they are cut vertically from a horizontal blade roast

 

and that roast is not that thick "  6 " or so ?

 

any pics of the cut ?

 

The package consists of two oddly shaped small steaks, each about right for my appetite.  I'll try for a picture tomorrow.  I must say it looked really good for an inexpensive bit of meat.  No membrane that I remember.  And that USDA Choice sticker sucked me in.  I'm not completely broke at the moment and my eye flirted with the Prime boneless rib eye not that much further down the display.

 

But much more fun to learn something!

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎2‎/‎27‎/‎2019 at 8:03 AM, rotuts said:

any pics of the cut ?

 

As promised!

 

ChuckFilet02282019.png

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you

 

trim out some of the globs of fat , tie back together

 

and SV   @ 130  for 36 - 48.

 

that's what Id do

 

although I can't see what's under the label

 

this might be a ' butterflied ' pice of meat , just looking at that top

 

might be tender and tasty after 36 - 48.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I did a large batch of Costco bone-in chicken thighs yesterday, so big I had to pull out the old Dorkfood sous vide controller (my first one) with the Betty G crockpot.  Now that's "old school".   "New school" Joule was also employed.


Edited by lemniscate (log)
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, rotuts said:

thank you

 

trim out some of the globs of fat , tie back together

 

and SV   @ 130  for 36 - 48.

 

that's what Id do

 

although I can't see what's under the label

 

this might be a ' butterflied ' pice of meat , just looking at that top

 

might be tender and tasty after 36 - 48.

 

You don't think this is the same thing as the mythical chuck eye steak?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really can't say.  

 

is the hunk under the label  "" similar "  i.e. a mirror image of the hunk we can see.

 

this has nothing to do with anything , buy the way,

 

I know Chuck from the " 7 bone " slab.      that bone being the clavicle

 

other than that , " chuck " is always a bit of a mystery for me.

 

I can be a tasty mystery , but a mystery none the less

 

way back when I began my SV Studies , chuck SV'd for  the time indicated above

 

turned out tender and tasty and rare.

 

then from time to time id get a ' mealy ' piece , and gave up on it.

 

Ive never run into a Chuck Eye , so I moved on to other cuts.

 

and blade-roasts in my area are very rare, at any price.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JoNorvelleWalker said:

 

You don't think this is the same thing as the mythical chuck eye steak?

 

I actually found a chuck-eye steak!  I shopped at Publix yesterday and was looking for the equally mythical (at least in my area) tri-tip and there they were!!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Kim Shook said:

I actually found a chuck-eye steak!  I shopped at Publix yesterday and was looking for the equally mythical (at least in my area) tri-tip and there they were!!!

Where do all the tri tips go in the East?  I can find one at Wegmans and WF occasionally, but mostly they are scarce.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, gfweb said:

Where do all the tri tips go in the East?  I can find one at Wegmans and WF occasionally, but mostly they are scarce.

Exactly.  I think I've seen one once at Wegman's.  I'm quite sure that our butcher could get them for us.  She does whole animals.  I mean it's in there somewhere.  I just don't think to ask.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Kim Shook said:

I actually found a chuck-eye steak!  I shopped at Publix yesterday and was looking for the equally mythical (at least in my area) tri-tip and there they were!!!

 

According to Wikipedia chuck filet steak is sold as chuck eye steak.  @Dave the Cook do you have any more information on the mystery?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got 4 tri-tips , carefully trimmed right in front of me , and ' Prime '

 

and on sale to boot !

 

cut them up at home into smaller pieces , and SV'd them

 

what I didn't do , which would have been smarter 

 

was to look up on the Internet the Tri-tips different grain directions 

 

and used that info in breaking the meat down

 

was very tasty never the less.  and this was before trying the RB40  refrigerator cure.

 

if you do find a TT , study its anatomy a bit before you work with it.   it makes a bit of a difference

 

but not an overwhelming difference.

 

if I ever run into TT again , Im sure to use the RB40 Rx as I like it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, rotuts said:

RB40

 

Please explain, rotuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Red Boat 40    

 

a fish sauce

 

https://www.amazon.com/Red-Boat-Premium-Fish-Sauce/dp/B004M050W2

 

its" $ 4.something " at Trader Joes , and twice the price a Whole Foods.

 

it will last you a long time.  don't drop the bottle in your kitchen !

 

the procedure is in the SV threads

 

here :

 

https://forums.egullet.org/topic/154537-what-are-you-cooking-sous-vide-today-part-3/?page=29&tab=comments#comment-2153643

 

 

may 10th , may 11 th  5af5eafd92371_WSs4.thumb.jpg.bfb149dba2a0c8b859a55f4b216315e8.jpg.f72de4a644912cf54759e90b44921d4e.jpg

 

 


Edited by rotuts (log)
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, JoNorvelleWalker said:

 

According to Wikipedia chuck filet steak is sold as chuck eye steak.  @Dave the Cook do you have any more information on the mystery?

 

 

 

I've never heard of a "chuck filet," and what you've got there doesn't resemble any (culinary) filet I've ever seen. But when you get down to individually-sized chunks of meat, especially beef, people can apply whatever name they wish, it seems (see, e.g., "Delmonico" steak, "club" steak, sometimes even "rib-eye" steak). 

 

Having complained thus, those look a lot like chuck-eyes. They're definitely chuck, anyway, and they appear to be cross-cut, which is correct. So I'd treat 'em as if they were chuck-eyes. @Anna N's advice of 56°C/24 hours is a good starting point, though I prefer them closer to medium, say 59.5°C. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory

Eat more chicken skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Dave the Cook

 

excellent analysis

 

Chuck labels in the Market are indeed all over the place.

 

I try to use the 7-Bone chick slab as my reference

 

in the markets I go to , they will tell me where the item of choice 

 

meats that 7-bone

 

we all like our meat to what we like

 

Id like to encourage those to do the meat at 130.1 f

 

and then sear or what ever you do.

 

just take the time in the SV Bath to get that meat very very tender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, rotuts said:

I try to use the 7-Bone chick slab as my reference

 

in the markets I go to , they will tell me where the item of choice 

 

meats that 7-bone

 

 

This is excellent advice; however, in my markets, it's harder to find a seven-bone than a chuck-eye! Sometime back, I showed how to fabricate a chuck-eye by cutting up an underblade chuck roast. It's here: https://forums.egullet.org/topic/117531-the-chronicles-of-chuck/?do=findComment&comment=1589141.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory

Eat more chicken skin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By kostbill
      Hello.
      I would like to buy some pectinex ultra sp-l.
      However I am worried about the temperature during the shipping time.
      I read that the storage temperature should be between 2 and 8 C. It works best from 15 to 50 C, and if it stays a lot of time in 25 C, it will gradually be deactivated.
       
      It needs a week to come here (Greece), then will it affect its abilities?
       
      Do you know if I can find a document somewhere that explains the gradual loss of power as a function of time and temperature?
      Did you have any experience with pectinex not working well due to bad storage?
       
      Thanks.
    • By Galchic
      Hello, folks, thanks for reading.
       
      My husband thinks, I should start selling my popcorn seasonings (which I make for my family), it’s a good product. But I'm not sure if it’s interesting to other people... So, what do you think, guys?
       
      Our story: 
      We’ve bought an air popper machine, but popcorn came out pretty tasteless. Then, we’ve bought different “popcorn seasoning” mixes... But it always ends with all the seasoning at the bottom of the bowl. Then, we've added butter, oil and so on before seasoning...  we got soggy, chewy popcorn. Lot’s of disappointments…
       
      When we almost gave up… the magic happened! I figured out the way to make seasonings that:
      Stick to popcorn, but not sticky to fingers (or T-shirt  , Easy to apply, May be pre cooked in bulk and stored… And popcorn appears crunchy, tasty, thoroughly covered with seasoning.  
      Sounds good, yep? Now, when I want to treat myself  - I only need 2 mins to turn tasteless popped popcorn to a real treat.  
      The only moment - it request 1 extra effort: after you toss it over popcorn, you need to microwave it for 1 min, and stir after.
       
      So, I was wondering, if you like popcorn like myself - would this seasoning be interesting for you to purchase? Are you ready for a little extra work (microwave & stir) in the goal to flavor popcorn, or it feels too much effort?
       
      As I have no experience in manufacturing and retail, your answers would help me to make a very important decision - to dive in or not... 
       
      Thanks in advance for your answers, it means the world to me.
       
    • By lindaj1
      Is there any recipe from the modernist universe or any other galaxy to make ketogenic (low carb) puff pastry and strudel type doughs?  Unusual ingredients OK.  There must be a way...
    • By haresfur
      I got to thinking after the disgusting job of separating globs of fat from sous vide short ribs and debating never doing them that way again. If the fat renders out in a braise, but not in the sous vide, what temperature would you need to turn the fat liquid to get rid of it? Is it below well-done or do you really have to cook the shit out of it? Is it just temperature or a time&temperature thing?
       
      Along those lines, what happens with marbled, tender cuts? where is the sweet spot between solid fat and something more palatable?
    • By Daily Gullet Staff
      By John Sconzo

      The Daily Gullet is proud to present this, the first in a multi-part, front-row report on the recent "Spain and the World Table" conference. Watch for subsequent installments in this topic.

      In his introduction of Ferran Adria, Thomas Keller -- perhaps the most celebrated American chef ever -- described four elements that go into making a great chef. The chef must be aware. Once aware of one’s culinary and other surroundings that chef can then be inspired, which leads to the ability to interpret those surroundings. But a great chef does not stop there. Instead, the great chef continues to evolve. Ferran Adria, perhaps more than any other chef who has ever lived, is the embodiment of those four elements.

      The moment that Ferran Adria strode towards Thomas Keller on the stage at the CIA/Greystone’s World of Flavors’ “Spain and the World Table” Conference was electric -- as if a giant Van de Graf generator had been turned on. The feeling didn’t subside when Adria took the stage from Keller; it only became more pronounced as the packed crowd rose to its feet, raining applause, admiration and love on the Spanish master. Adria accepted the response with aplomb, and gave it right back to the audience -- and to his fellow Spanish cocineros, who were standing off to the side. He brought each one up to join him on the stage for a rousing thank-you to the conference organizers, sponsors and participants. Once this emotional release subsided, Adria got down to what everyone had been waiting for -- his discussion and demonstration.

      Ferran Adria, with eyes sparkling like the finest cava, began speaking Spanish in a voice as gravelly as the beaches of the Costa Brava, while Conference Chairman Jose Andres translated. The crowd, hushed and straining for every word, moved forward in their seats as Adria explained El Bulli and himself, with a lesson in recent culinary history thrown in. Ferran explained that El Bulli is not a business. While offshoots of El Bulli are operated on a for-profit basis, the restaurant runs without profit as a primary motivation. For example, he said, the greatest difficulty they have is distributing reservations. Given the extraordinary demand and the severely limited supply, he explained that they could simply raise the price of a meal to the point where the supply and demand met. Indeed, the price of a meal at El Bulli is in itself quite reasonable given the stature of the restaurant and well within means of most motivated diners should they be able to get there, and this is how Adria prefers it. He stated that he was not interested in cooking solely for those with the most money. He prefers to work for people with a true interest in exploring the limits of cooking with him. To this end he showed a short film depicting “A Day in the Life . . .” of El Bulli set to the Beatles’ song of the same name. The film showed a couple’s response to the experience.

      Ferran’s voyage into creativity began with a visit to Jacques Maxima at Le Chanticleer Restaurant in Nice, France. He learned from Maxima that to be creative is not to copy. This idea changed his entire approach to cooking -- from making classic cuisine to making his own. Aware of elaborate books of French cuisine, Adria resolved to catalogue his work, the results of which are the richly detailed El Bulli books, published by period. These books, as wonderful as they are, are huge and extremely expensive. During his presentation, Adria announced -- and demonstrated -- that the individual dishes photographed and described in a chronology within each book are all now available online at elbulli.com.

      He finished the philosophical discussion by talking about the general style of haute cuisine that he and others are engaged in. While others have coined the term “molecular gastronomy” to highlight the scientific component of the creativity involved, Adria rejected it, saying that all cooking is molecular: most of his techniques are in fact rather simple and don’t employ radical new technology. Most of the technology that they do use has been around for some time; they have simply adapted it to their own purposes. Nevertheless, he applauds contributions to gastronomy from Harold McGee and other food scientists, and welcomes their collaboration in the kitchen. He has yet to find a term that describes the movement: as of now, he feels that there really is no good name for this style of cooking.

      More than any other single thing, Ferran Adria is known for the use of “foams” in cooking. While he is proud of his achievements with foams, he stressed that while appropriate in some circumstances, the real utility of foams is limited. He bemoans their ubiquity -- and wishes to not be blamed for others’ poor deployment of the concept. In the course of describing this and other techniques, Adria made a point of stating that using them should not be inferred as copying. Techniques and concepts are to be used and shared. He invited everyone to learn and harness whatever they found interesting, and to employ it in to their own pursuits.

      Another set of techniques discussed and demonstrated by the master and his assistant, Rafa Morales from Hacienda Benazuza, included three types of spherification. These included the use of calcium chloride (CaCl) and sodium alginate as well as the converse, and exploration of a new agent, gluconodeltalactone. The original combinations of alginate into CaCl for “caviar” production, and CaCl into alginate for larger “spheres” have chemistry-related limits as to what can be sphericized. In private correspondence, Harold McGee explained to me that Adria described encapsulating a mussel in its own juice. While this would make the dish technically an aspic, unlike conventional aspics it remains a liquid. Adria said that though gluconodeltalactone is very new, and they are just beginning to get a handle on it, he is very excited by it. He also demonstrated a machine for spherification on a larger scale than they had originally been able to do, as well as liquid nitrogen and freeze-drying (lyophilization) techniques. At the conclusion of his demonstration -- and thus the Conference -- the audience once again awarded him a standing ovation.

      While Adria’s appearance was the culmination of the conference, the energy it produced was not just because of his stature in the world of gastronomy -- it was also due to the excitement generated by the conference that preceded it. If there had previously been any doubt, Thomas Keller’s welcome of Adria was a clarion: Spanish cuisine has landed on North American shores and is finding a niche in the North American psyche. Spanish cuisine -- in its multifaceted, delicious entirety -- lives here, too.

      + + + + +

      John M. Sconzo, M.D., aka docsconz, is an anesthesiologist practicing in upstate New York. He grew up in Brooklyn in an Italian-American home, in which food was an important component of family life. It still is. His passions include good food, wine and travel. John's gastronomic interests in upstate northeastern New York involve finding top-notch local producers of ingredients and those who use them well. A dedicated amateur, John has no plans to ditch his current career for one in the food industry. Host, New York.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...