Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

FrogPrincesse

What Are You Cooking Sous Vide Today? (Part 3)

Recommended Posts

It's great quality stuff that Cape Grim.  I wish I could get some locally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/7/2018 at 8:33 PM, ImportantElements said:

Did some steaks last weekend in the sous vide. 

 

2 hour at 110, then super fast grill sear for 1 minute on each side, and a baked potat :)

 

 

110 degrees is unusually low, but that certainly looks beautiful inside.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some may not appreciate SVEverything

 

but once you get over their ' Style ' ,  adjust their seasonings to your personal prefs , and Time/ temps you prefer

 

there is a lot to learn :

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UDFO-ifqC8

 

this compares defrosting methods for Steak SV.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too much other testing (usually more carefully and scientifically done) contradicts them for me to take any advice from them. 

He leaves in way too many variables and inconsistencies in his “tests” to make any conclusions meaningful. 

 

but they are entertaining as as far as it goes. 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taste is scientific ?

 

good to know.

 

its all about calibrating and offsetting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rotuts said:

.......

this compares defrosting methods for Steak SV.

 

Thanks for posting this as it was a question in my mind. I suspected all along that slow defrosting over a 24 hour period in the refrigerator would yield the best results.  But being that I never know what I want to eat until it’s almost mealtime I’m equally pleased to know that using the sous vide to defrost is a close runner up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

way before SV

 

I recall reading that the slower you defrost the better

 

it your defrost-tee is in a sealed bag

 

all the better

 

I try to do this myself

 

I think the differences are not enough  to remember one vs the other

 

when only doing one.

 

side by side , easier to tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, rotuts said:

side by side , easier to tell.

 I think I would be inclined to up my game and go for the slow defrost if I had a piece of really high-quality meat. Side by side comparisons are not something most of us try at home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For example:

 

if you dropped the frozen steak into the bath 30 mins or so before the thawed one (because you shouldn’t be counting THAWING time as cooking time, just like you’re not for the refrigerator thawed sample) and then took them both out an hour or two later, I don’t believe the difference would be much if anything. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, weedy said:

For example:

 

if you dropped the frozen steak into the bath 30 mins or so before the thawed one (because you shouldn’t be counting THAWING time as cooking time, just like you’re not for the refrigerator thawed sample) and then took them both out an hour or two later, I don’t believe the difference would be much if anything. 

 

 

When my ship comes in I shall buy a bunch of steaks and reach my own conclusions. xD  In the meantime I have to rely on others and when their conclusions lineup with my thought experiments then I’m happy to accept their results. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I re-therm Fz SV all the time.

 

its already cooked of course , the rapid chill -> Fz.

 

I like to do an overnight thaw before I re-therm for dinner.

 

can't say its analogous to the above info.

 

Ive always though the slower something defrost the better.

 

that might not hold for fish , possibly .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Anna N said:

When my ship comes in I shall buy a bunch of steaks and reach my own conclusions. xD  In the meantime I have to rely on others and when their conclusions lineup with my thought experiments then I’m happy to accept their results. 

 

pretty sure that other reputable sources have weighed in that cooking SV from frozen is just as good (whether that's Food Lab or Chefsteps or individual chefs) 

 

and it's what I've found.

 

those 'SV Everything' guys say a lot of things that many others disagree with.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, weedy said:

those 'SV Everything' guys say a lot of things that many others disagree with.

 

Indeed.  But they confirm my own biases.xD

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, rotuts said:

Taste is scientific ?

 

 

Very much so. In that evaluating taste requires more scientific rigor than most other senses. Scientific methods are designed to eliminate the influence of bias. Bias (expectations, associations, moods, habits) play a huge role in taste. Scientific methods also work against experimental bias (biases toward one result or another that are inadvertently built into the experiment), unrelated variables, and chance.

 

It's not so uncommon today, when one chef says to another "X method tastes better than Y method," to ask, "did you do a blind triangle test?"  10 years ago no one would have known what that meant. Soon it's going to be Triangle-Or-It-Didn't-Happen. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, weedy said:

For example:

 

if you dropped the frozen steak into the bath 30 mins or so before the thawed one (because you shouldn’t be counting THAWING time as cooking time, just like you’re not for the refrigerator thawed sample) and then took them both out an hour or two later, I don’t believe the difference would be much if anything. 

 

 

I do this all the time because, like Anna said, I often don't know what I want to eat until close to time to eat.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5adca266a5cc6_rs1.JPG.833453e7c7dc0369f0e83c9589a98247.JPG

Today, SV was an interim step in the cooking process. It's steak tips and rice, planned for Sunday dinner. I went pawing through the freezer for the couple of top sirloins I was pretty certain were in there, and only found one. One top sirloin will not do dinner for four, not when one of the four is a big ol' boy of 6'4", 250, and the other three have middling decent appetites. So I looked further. Found a two-pound package of round steak.

 

H'mm, sez I. I brought it in, pitched it in the SV bath in the vac-packed bag in which it came from the butcher (part of my quarter-steer), after peeling off the label, and let it go at 130 for eight hours overnight. Pulled it this morning, cubed it up, tossed the cubes in seasoned flour, browned it, and let it simmer 30 minutes in a combo of the jus and beef broth. Pulled out the son-in-law's portion, added caramelized onions and sauteed mushrooms to the remainder. (The boy's odd; he won't do either onions OR mushrooms. Sigh.)

 

5adca28497b94_rs2.JPG.71c114800b2bdd5b6f77b04e9bb23ef5.JPG

 

5adca2947646f_rs3.JPG.e1023c4b3637ed308d0ad06c029b7756.JPG

A quality control sample indicates a success. We shall see, come noonish.

 

  • Like 2
  • Delicious 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can imagine that with some very lean, delicate proteins there could be an advantage to defrosting before cooking. At least with larger portions. Not because the speed of defrosting makes a difference, but because defrosting and cooking in one step will necessarily lead to the outer portions staying at cooking temperature longer than if you started thawed (the outside will defrost quickly; the insides much more slowly as they're getting heated by conduction). This could lead to the outsides being a bit drier. But I haven't tested this. It's possible that other people have and found no problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fair enough.

 

as with keeping a braise in the refrig for the next day , as its ' better '

 

Im wondering if a slow defrost adds ' jus ' ( from the freezing process , which damages membranes )

 

back into those da

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@kayb

 

nice

 

testimony to " sauce "

 

so important.

 

yours looks very very tasty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: The finished product.

20180422_130447.thumb.jpg.2de4da7e71b431acf23f078311a00d06.jpg

 

Over rice, with peas and corn, and a side of cucumber salad as it was starch heavy. Steak was perfect.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SV shrimp with pimenton, garlic, butter and sherry vinegar. 15 min 139 F.   A tasty tapas-ish thing. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fwiw I’m not suggesting it’s a scientific ‘proof’ that something ‘tastes better’

 

those guys are entitled to their taste. 

 

But they often compare one item to another with multiple variable differences. 

I’m just saying their ‘testing’ is pretty loose. 

I don’t feel that way about chef steps or food lab. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As Ive posted before :

 

I boned out two Fz TurkeyBr

 

and removed the tendons

 

the SV's them  at my usual :   142.5  or 6 hrs

 

nothing new there

 

Ive discovered this year

 

that cold smoking both the TB's and the St.P's corned beef

 

after the SV

 

gave me outstanding results.

 

those have been posted before

 

here is a thing of Great Beauty :

 

5ae4a1e379abf_TBSmoke.thumb.jpg.9e48fa81f2dd3d6f38252412ff84f7c6.jpg

 

using the Weber very early in the AM for cold smoking 

 

8 packets of TB's

 

as before

 

however

 

this time I took a bit of the Jus from the packets :

 

5ae4a231323ba_TBJus.thumb.jpg.cb5883d5619a69576e158ab0033a93c2.jpg

 

which I freeze and save for adding to Gravy 

 

one might note that 1/2 of the dirt cheap but very reusable container 

 

is missing 

 

I decided to add a large TB of the jus that came from 2 TB's  i.e. 8 tied up TB's after SV

 

I then froze them

 

as in the past

 

as delicious as these TB's  are for sandwiches or reheat for a Turkey Dinner

 

Ive noted that they are a tiny bit dry

 

its such a small thing 

 

I hesitate to mention it

 

tender , juicy these TB's are

 

Ive just decided to take one out and have it for some TB's sandwiches now

 

what is my point of this post ?

 

all most all of the Jus that I added to the bag had been reabsorbed by the TB meat.

 

interesting Id say

 

and Im looking forward to some tasty and juicy sandwiches soon.

 

cheers

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a neat trick @rotuts - adding the jus from sous-videing one batch of meat to the sous vide bag for another of that meat. I still have some chicken jelly with citrus juice from citrus-roasted chicken. Do you suppose that adding the citrusy chick jelly to a sous vide bag worth of chicken breast would be a good thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

to be a bit more clear :

 

the jus was from the SV'd batch that I then opened and did a cold smoke on

 

they got re-bagged in fresh bags for the freezer after their enjoyment of the Smoke.

 

why not , I had it ?

 

and I think the jus added to the final p smoked TrBr's

 

the second bag did not get SV'd  just cold smoked.

 

in your case you are asking if previous SV Jelly can new added to a new SV batcxh

 

of something similar , starting from scratch.

 

Id say yes.

 

if your process is similar to the first batch

 

you are going to add flavor to the new batch

 

and get more Jelly after the SV

 

for the next batch

 

more or less like

 

Old Fashioned Balsamic vinegar  

 

but w a moder tasty twist.


Edited by rotuts (log)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Daily Gullet Staff
      By John Sconzo

      The Daily Gullet is proud to present this, the first in a multi-part, front-row report on the recent "Spain and the World Table" conference. Watch for subsequent installments in this topic.

      In his introduction of Ferran Adria, Thomas Keller -- perhaps the most celebrated American chef ever -- described four elements that go into making a great chef. The chef must be aware. Once aware of one’s culinary and other surroundings that chef can then be inspired, which leads to the ability to interpret those surroundings. But a great chef does not stop there. Instead, the great chef continues to evolve. Ferran Adria, perhaps more than any other chef who has ever lived, is the embodiment of those four elements.

      The moment that Ferran Adria strode towards Thomas Keller on the stage at the CIA/Greystone’s World of Flavors’ “Spain and the World Table” Conference was electric -- as if a giant Van de Graf generator had been turned on. The feeling didn’t subside when Adria took the stage from Keller; it only became more pronounced as the packed crowd rose to its feet, raining applause, admiration and love on the Spanish master. Adria accepted the response with aplomb, and gave it right back to the audience -- and to his fellow Spanish cocineros, who were standing off to the side. He brought each one up to join him on the stage for a rousing thank-you to the conference organizers, sponsors and participants. Once this emotional release subsided, Adria got down to what everyone had been waiting for -- his discussion and demonstration.

      Ferran Adria, with eyes sparkling like the finest cava, began speaking Spanish in a voice as gravelly as the beaches of the Costa Brava, while Conference Chairman Jose Andres translated. The crowd, hushed and straining for every word, moved forward in their seats as Adria explained El Bulli and himself, with a lesson in recent culinary history thrown in. Ferran explained that El Bulli is not a business. While offshoots of El Bulli are operated on a for-profit basis, the restaurant runs without profit as a primary motivation. For example, he said, the greatest difficulty they have is distributing reservations. Given the extraordinary demand and the severely limited supply, he explained that they could simply raise the price of a meal to the point where the supply and demand met. Indeed, the price of a meal at El Bulli is in itself quite reasonable given the stature of the restaurant and well within means of most motivated diners should they be able to get there, and this is how Adria prefers it. He stated that he was not interested in cooking solely for those with the most money. He prefers to work for people with a true interest in exploring the limits of cooking with him. To this end he showed a short film depicting “A Day in the Life . . .” of El Bulli set to the Beatles’ song of the same name. The film showed a couple’s response to the experience.

      Ferran’s voyage into creativity began with a visit to Jacques Maxima at Le Chanticleer Restaurant in Nice, France. He learned from Maxima that to be creative is not to copy. This idea changed his entire approach to cooking -- from making classic cuisine to making his own. Aware of elaborate books of French cuisine, Adria resolved to catalogue his work, the results of which are the richly detailed El Bulli books, published by period. These books, as wonderful as they are, are huge and extremely expensive. During his presentation, Adria announced -- and demonstrated -- that the individual dishes photographed and described in a chronology within each book are all now available online at elbulli.com.

      He finished the philosophical discussion by talking about the general style of haute cuisine that he and others are engaged in. While others have coined the term “molecular gastronomy” to highlight the scientific component of the creativity involved, Adria rejected it, saying that all cooking is molecular: most of his techniques are in fact rather simple and don’t employ radical new technology. Most of the technology that they do use has been around for some time; they have simply adapted it to their own purposes. Nevertheless, he applauds contributions to gastronomy from Harold McGee and other food scientists, and welcomes their collaboration in the kitchen. He has yet to find a term that describes the movement: as of now, he feels that there really is no good name for this style of cooking.

      More than any other single thing, Ferran Adria is known for the use of “foams” in cooking. While he is proud of his achievements with foams, he stressed that while appropriate in some circumstances, the real utility of foams is limited. He bemoans their ubiquity -- and wishes to not be blamed for others’ poor deployment of the concept. In the course of describing this and other techniques, Adria made a point of stating that using them should not be inferred as copying. Techniques and concepts are to be used and shared. He invited everyone to learn and harness whatever they found interesting, and to employ it in to their own pursuits.

      Another set of techniques discussed and demonstrated by the master and his assistant, Rafa Morales from Hacienda Benazuza, included three types of spherification. These included the use of calcium chloride (CaCl) and sodium alginate as well as the converse, and exploration of a new agent, gluconodeltalactone. The original combinations of alginate into CaCl for “caviar” production, and CaCl into alginate for larger “spheres” have chemistry-related limits as to what can be sphericized. In private correspondence, Harold McGee explained to me that Adria described encapsulating a mussel in its own juice. While this would make the dish technically an aspic, unlike conventional aspics it remains a liquid. Adria said that though gluconodeltalactone is very new, and they are just beginning to get a handle on it, he is very excited by it. He also demonstrated a machine for spherification on a larger scale than they had originally been able to do, as well as liquid nitrogen and freeze-drying (lyophilization) techniques. At the conclusion of his demonstration -- and thus the Conference -- the audience once again awarded him a standing ovation.

      While Adria’s appearance was the culmination of the conference, the energy it produced was not just because of his stature in the world of gastronomy -- it was also due to the excitement generated by the conference that preceded it. If there had previously been any doubt, Thomas Keller’s welcome of Adria was a clarion: Spanish cuisine has landed on North American shores and is finding a niche in the North American psyche. Spanish cuisine -- in its multifaceted, delicious entirety -- lives here, too.

      + + + + +

      John M. Sconzo, M.D., aka docsconz, is an anesthesiologist practicing in upstate New York. He grew up in Brooklyn in an Italian-American home, in which food was an important component of family life. It still is. His passions include good food, wine and travel. John's gastronomic interests in upstate northeastern New York involve finding top-notch local producers of ingredients and those who use them well. A dedicated amateur, John has no plans to ditch his current career for one in the food industry. Host, New York.
    • By docsconz
      About Jose Andres
       
      Throughout his career, Jose’s vision and imaginative creations have drawn the praise of the public, the press and his peers. José has received awards and recognition from Food Arts, Bon Appetit, Food & Wine, Saveur, the James Beard Foundation, Wine Spectator, and Wine Advocate. In addition, José has been featured in leading food magazines such as Gourmet as well as the New York Times, the Washington Post, Good Morning America, Fox Sunday Morning News with Chris Wallace, the Food Network, and USA Today.
       
      Widely acknowledged as the premiere Spanish chef cooking in America, José is a developer and Conference Chairman for the upcoming Worlds of Flavor Conference on Spain and the World Table at The Culinary Institute of America at Greystone, November 2 – 5, 2006.
       
      In 1993, Jose moved to Washington, DC, to head the kitchen at Jaleo. From there, Jose took on executive chef responsibilities at neighboring Café Atlantico and later Zaytinya. In July of 2003, Jose embarked on his most adventurous project to date with the opening of the minibar by jose andres at Cafe Atlantico. A six-seat restaurant within a restaurant, minibar by jose andres continues to attract international attention with its innovative tasting menu. In the fall of 2004, Jose opened a third Jaleo and Oyamel, an authentic Mexican small plates restaurant and launched the THINKfoodTANK, an institution devoted to the research and development of ideas about food, all with a view toward their practical applications in the kitchen.
       
      Every week, millions of Spaniards invite Jose into their home where he is the host and producer of “Vamos a cocinar”, a food program on Television Española (TVE), Spanish national television. The program airs in the United States and Latin America on TVE Internacional.
       
      Jose released his first cookbook this year, first published in English, Tapas: A Taste of Spain in America (published in the United States by Clarkson Potter) and shortly after in Spanish, Los fogones de José Andrés (published by Planeta). The book is an homage to Spanish cooking and to tapas, one of Spain's gifts to the world of good cooking.
       
      Jose Andres is passionate, intelligent, dedicated, witty and a fan of FC Barcelona.
       
      Jose has been a member of the eGullet Society since 2004.
       
      More on Jose Andres in the eG Forums:
      Cooking with "Tapas" by Jose Andres
      Vamos a Cocinar - cooking show with Jose Andres
      Jaleo
      José Andrés' Minibar
      Zaytinya
      Oyamel Cocina Mexicana, Crystal City
      Cafe Atlantico
       
      Jose Andres recipes from Tapas in RecipeGullet:
      Potatoes Rioja-Style with Chorizo (Patatas a la Riojana)
      Moorish-Style Chickpea and Spinach Stew
      Squid with Caramelized Onions
    • By gibbs
      With Modernist Cuisine I waited a couple of years and ended up with a copy from the 6th printing run the advantage of this was that all errors picked up in the erratta had been corrected in the print copy.  I am looking to get modernist bread soon and wondered if someone had purchased it recently to check or if someone knew of hand if they have printed any additional corrected runs 
    • By TdeV
      I'm thinking that one isn't supposed to add salt to meat which is about to be sous-vided. I have no idea from whence the idea came, nor whether it's correct.
       
      Also I'm thinking that raw onion is ok in the sous vide bag, but not raw garlic (because it imparts a harsh flavour).
       
      Either of these impressions have value?
    • By Fabio
      Last year I had dinner at Belcanto in Lisbon and one of the dishes featured a "tomato water snow" or "tomato water cloud" (translated from the original Portuguese: "Nuvem/neve de agua de tomate") that I'm trying to replicate without success. Imagine a thick and solid foam of tomato water that immediately liquefies when you put in your mouth. The cloud was atop smoked fish and olive oil was drizzled over it.
       
      I whipped a mixture of tomato water and albumin powder (2 tsp albumin, 2tbsp tomato water) along with a pinch of cream of tartar, getting to the stiff peaks point after some effort. Trying to dehidrate the foam even as low as 150F didn't work; the foam collapsed. I then tried the savory meringue approach with some sugar and salt. The result was indeed a meringue that tasted like tomato but completely different from what I had at Belcanto. What am I missing? I've attached a photo of the dish so you can see what the cloud looks like.
       
      Thanks!
       

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×