Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

minas6907

Pâte de Fruits (Fruit Paste/Fruit Jellies) (Part 2)

Recommended Posts

After following @gfron1's kind advice I now have a first batch of Blackcurrant pâte de fruit.  They set very well and it was easy to cut the pieces with a large knife.  I hit a problem with the final stage, I was certain that I had a jar of tartaric acid but when I went to get it I found that in fact it is cream of tartar.  A little research told me that the cream of tartar isn't a substitute and since I don't have time to go out in search of the proper thing today I resorted to sugar with grated lemon zest.  I will certainly order tartaric acid for the next batch.

 

The pâte tastes fine, I think another time I would want to reduce the sugar just a little, also the pectin if the latter can be reduced without losing setting capacity.  Perhaps I scaled wrongly when adapting quantities given to account for the additional 40g purée. 

 

As I said yesterday I should have followed the recipe to the letter and used a bread pan as a mould.  I would then have produced cubes instead of slabs but I am quite happy with my first slabs!

 

Many thanks again to @gfron1 for the time taken to set out such an excellent guide for someone with limited home cooking skills, also to others who kindly gave advice about sourcing the right pectin.  

 

image.jpeg

 

I am well aware that I failed to produce equally sized pieces, more care needed next time!  

 


Edited by DianaB (log)
  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yay! They look right. Instead of adjusting the sugar, you should plan ahead to get different purees. Currant is a low-tone flavor that needs some spikes to get past the sugar. But if you did a lemon currant or something with high notes you may not notice the sweetness as much. The other thing is the acid. That's why people add it to their coating - cut into the sweetness.

 

I'm also curious why you want to reduce the pectin. My guess is that these are too firm for you. If that's the case, don't cut the pectin but stop cooking a degree or two earlier. I gave you the standard instructions but I prefer my PDF softer and cook 2 degrees less.

 

But, great job!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, gfron1 said:

Yay! They look right. Instead of adjusting the sugar, you should plan ahead to get different purees. Currant is a low-tone flavor that needs some spikes to get past the sugar. But if you did a lemon currant or something with high notes you may not notice the sweetness as much. The other thing is the acid. That's why people add it to their coating - cut into the sweetness.

 

I'm also curious why you want to reduce the pectin. My guess is that these are too firm for you. If that's the case, don't cut the pectin but stop cooking a degree or two earlier. I gave you the standard instructions but I prefer my PDF softer and cook 2 degrees less.

 

But, great job!

 

Thanks again gfron1, you seem to be able to read my mind in respect of your latest advice.  The idea of reducing the pectin was indeed to achieve a slightly less firm product but I'll stop cooking at 105c next time.  Also I'll ensure I have tartaric acid to hand, it's easy enough to find.  We usually have apples in the house but I'm guessing something tart like a bramley might be better than our normal Pink Lady.  We have a couple of apple trees and I have stacks of purée cooked unsweetened  and frozen last autumn.  I have 1kg passion fruit purée (90% passion fruit, 10% sugar), that might be the base of my next attempt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DianaB said:

 

Thanks again gfron1, you seem to be able to read my mind in respect of your latest advice.  The idea of reducing the pectin was indeed to achieve a slightly less firm product but I'll stop cooking at 105c next time.  Also I'll ensure I have tartaric acid to hand, it's easy enough to find.  We usually have apples in the house but I'm guessing something tart like a bramley might be better than our normal Pink Lady.  We have a couple of apple trees and I have stacks of purée cooked unsweetened  and frozen last autumn.  I have 1kg passion fruit purée (90% passion fruit, 10% sugar), that might be the base of my next attempt.

 We have a like button and an unlike button  and even a report this post button but this conversation about PDF makes me wish we had a button that  proclaims "this is what eG is all about -- members helping members". DianaB your PDF looks delicious.  I might even put this confection on my bucket list of things I'd like to make.   Thanks for sharing your technique and recipe gfron1. 

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a peach PDF this weekend.  My two biggest issues when making PDFs are (1) sweetness.  No matter what the fruit, everything just tastes like sugar to me.  There is so much sugar in the recipe, that the sweetness just overpowers the flavor of the fruit.  I will try mixing the acid into the sugar coating.  Does it have to be citric acid or does tartaric work as well?  How much of the acid do you mix in with the sugar?  The second issue is the speed with which it sets.  I cook to 107* and it is setting as I am pouring it out of the pan into a frame.  No big deal for candies or for enrobed bonbons, but if I want to use it in a molded bonbon, there is no way I could pipe it.  By the time it cooled enough to put in chocolate shells, it would be way too firm to pipe.  How do people do molded bonbons with a PDF layer?  I see it on different chocolatier websites all the time, so there must be a way.  


Edited by Bentley (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PDF are sweet by nature, so I think peach might be too subtle a flavour to try. Passionfruit, raspberry, cassis, lemon have all worked well for me. In terms of piping, you can blitz the PDF after it has set and then pipe it. Some people also add a little alcohol when blitzing to loosen it even further.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I made my PDF recently I also thought it would make a good centre for mould end chocolates, just cut the finished product to the appropriate size and place in mould cavities before capping.  I've not tried yet but can't see why it shouldn't work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, gap said:

PDF are sweet by nature, so I think peach might be too subtle a flavour to try. Passionfruit, raspberry, cassis, lemon have all worked well for me. In terms of piping, you can blitz the PDF after it has set and then pipe it. Some people also add a little alcohol when blitzing to loosen it even further.

Blitzing?  Not a term I'm familiar with.  Can you tell me what that means?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Bentley said:

Blitzing?  Not a term I'm familiar with.  Can you tell me what that means?

In cooking, blitzing refers to mixing something up usually with an immersion blender or in a food processor or blender. To puree a soup, you might blitz it with an immersion blender.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The setting up too quickly is what you should expect. But realize, I prefer my PDF a touch softer, AND not all thermometers read correctly. Using your thermometer (since its what you know and have experience with), back off one or two degrees. Who knows what the real temp is, and it doesn't really matter. You know that 107º is too firm for your liking, so go to 105º and see what you think.

 

But as was said, for moldeds, often times you just blitz first (or I use a warmed depositor).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, gfron1 said:

The setting up too quickly is what you should expect. But realize, I prefer my PDF a touch softer, AND not all thermometers read correctly. Using your thermometer (since its what you know and have experience with), back off one or two degrees. Who knows what the real temp is, and it doesn't really matter. You know that 107º is too firm for your liking, so go to 105º and see what you think.

 

But as was said, for moldeds, often times you just blitz first (or I use a warmed depositor).

Once you taken a PDF and blitz it, will it firm up again once piped or will it have a consistency like jam?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will firm up because you're doing it straight off the pot while its still hot. It sets as it cools.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In regard to using PDF as a filling for chocolates:  Instead of trying to get the PDF into a mold, you could (after the PDF has set and cooled) cut it into pieces and dip them in chocolate.  To deal with the sweetness, you could use a quite dark chocolate.  And to make it more interesting you could add a complementary layer, e.g., passion fruit PDF paired with lemon or vanilla ganache; mango PDF paired with lime ganache; cherry PDF paired with almond gianduja.

 

A propos the sweetness issue:  I don't use PDFs often because of the excessive sweetness mentioned previously.  A couple of times I tried Pomona's pectin, which calls for considerably less sugar (and less cooking, which helps with retaining the fruit flavor).  I'm not sure why chocolatiers/confectioners don't use it more often and would be interested in others' views on that subject.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Jim D. said:

 A couple of times I tried Pomona's pectin, which calls for considerably less sugar (and less cooking, which helps with retaining the fruit flavor).  I'm not sure why chocolatiers/confectioners don't use it more often and would be interested in others' views on that subject.

 

The high levels of sugar act as a preservative. With the Pomona pectin, you can set it with calcium and drastically reduce the sugar content, however you may end up with a jelly that has a much shorter shelf life.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, keychris said:

 

The high levels of sugar act as a preservative. With the Pomona pectin, you can set it with calcium and drastically reduce the sugar content, however you may end up with a jelly that has a much shorter shelf life.

 

Good point.  I had not thought of that.  I might experiment this summer by using Pomona's in a PDF and keeping it for a while to see what happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, keychris said:

 

The high levels of sugar act as a preservative. With the Pomona pectin, you can set it with calcium and drastically reduce the sugar content, however you may end up with a jelly that has a much shorter shelf life.

1 hour ago, Jim D. said:

 

Good point.  I had not thought of that.  I might experiment this summer by using Pomona's in a PDF and keeping it for a while to see what happens.

 

Could someone make one with Pomona's and then run a water activity test?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MelissaH said:

 

Could someone make one with Pomona's and then run a water activity test?

 

I'm glad you brought that up.  Recently I was making a Notter recipe that calls for a layer of raspberry piped into a mold, then another layer of orange-flavored dark chocolate.  The raspberry isn't quite the firm texture of a PDF (Notter calls it a coulis--which is not exactly accurate), but the method is the same and quite a bit of sugar is involved.  I have an Aw meter and tested the two fillings.  I was startled to see a 0.93 reading for the coulis--.07 higher and it would have been all water!  I am not sure what to conclude from this.  Perhaps the high amount of sugar in a PDF preserves it in spite of the high water content?  I checked books from Wybauw, who is fanatical about shelf life.  Surely, I thought, he won't include any PDFs in his chocolates.  But in fact he does, though interestingly he does not ordinarily include the Aw reading for these.  Maybe water activity is irrelevant for PDFs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jim D. said:

 

I'm glad you brought that up.  Recently I was making a Notter recipe that calls for a layer of raspberry piped into a mold, then another layer of orange-flavored dark chocolate.  The raspberry isn't quite the firm texture of a PDF (Notter calls it a coulis--which is not exactly accurate), but the method is the same and quite a bit of sugar is involved.  I have an Aw meter and tested the two fillings.  I was startled to see a 0.93 reading for the coulis--.07 higher and it would have been all water!  I am not sure what to conclude from this.  Perhaps the high amount of sugar in a PDF preserves it in spite of the high water content?  I checked books from Wybauw, who is fanatical about shelf life.  Surely, I thought, he won't include any PDFs in his chocolates.  But in fact he does, though interestingly he does not ordinarily include the Aw reading for these.  Maybe water activity is irrelevant for PDFs?

 

With a reading that high, you can't legally sell it. (At least in Utah). It would mold very quickly. I guess if you were going to consume within a few days, it wouldn't be a problem.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How is this raspberry layer made?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, MelissaH said:

How is this raspberry layer made?

 

190g of raspberry purée is combined with 50g sugar and 30g glucose and brought to a boil.   Combine 9g pectin and 15g sugar, then add to the purée, then 1g lemon juice.  Then the directions differ a little from the usual PDF (no temp is mentioned):  Boil for 3 minutes or "until the mixture coats the back of a spatula."  Cool and then pipe into molds.  I have found that 3 minutes is far too long and produces a firm substance that cannot be piped.

 

Do you see any clues in the recipe that would account for the very high Aw reading?  It is, of course, possible that I made an error in taking the reading, but I was so startled by the 0.93 reading that I have shied away from the recipe (though the combination of the raspberry layer with an orange-infused dark chocolate layer is delicious).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Jim D. said:

 

190g of raspberry purée is combined with 50g sugar and 30g glucose and brought to a boil.   Combine 9g pectin and 15g sugar, then add to the purée, then 1g lemon juice.  Then the directions differ a little from the usual PDF (no temp is mentioned):  Boil for 3 minutes or "until the mixture coats the back of a spatula."  Cool and then pipe into molds.  I have found that 3 minutes is far too long and produces a firm substance that cannot be piped.

 

Do you see any clues in the recipe that would account for the very high Aw reading?  It is, of course, possible that I made an error in taking the reading, but I was so startled by the 0.93 reading that I have shied away from the recipe (though the combination of the raspberry layer with an orange-infused dark chocolate layer is delicious).

@Kerry Beal is my go-to for questions about water activity, and I don't know enough to make an educated guess. But that 0.93 reading does sound high to me. I'd be interested to know what you get if you test just the raspberry puree for Aw, because that *should* be higher than puree that's been sugared and boiled!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MelissaH said:

I'd be interested to know what you get if you test just the raspberry puree for Aw, because that *should* be higher than puree that's been sugared and boiled!

 

Good point.  I made the purée myself:  frozen raspberries, thawed and drained, then into the food processor, then strained to take out the seeds.  Not reduced since I prefer the raspberries uncooked.  It's definitely thicker than the usual purchased purées (many of which--even Boiron--seem watery to me).  I'll test it next time I make some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at those numbers 190 g of puree, 50 grams of sugar - there isn't a whole lot of particles to sequester water. Most regular PDF recipes use almost equal amounts of puree and sugar and then boil it to remove a whole lot of water.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Made a key lime PDF this weekend and was less than successful.  I think I had the heat too high because by the time I got to 225 degrees, the mixture was dark and once it cooled it had a burnt taste and I could see little flecks of burnt sugar in the jellies.  What heat do you guys use for your PDFs?  I have a Wolf gas range and I am using a medium high heat.  Maybe I should lower it and let the mixture cook longer?  It will still reach 225* eventually right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By artiesel
      Does anyone know of a natural alternative to using potassium sorbate as a marshmallow preservative???
       
      Would citric acid or sorbitol suffice???
    • By secast1992
      So I've been experiencing cracks on the foot of my bonbons that I've been unable to find the cause of, hoping to reach out to the community to get to the bottom of this costly problem. 
       
      I work for a small chocolate company that makes our own bean to bar couverture. We use a continuous tempering machine with enrobing belt attachment. 
      The process: ganache is made and then piped into round silicone molds, which are then footed with tempered chocolate before being placed in the freezer until frozen enough to pop out of the molds. They are then set up right and left to thaw and dry out overnight on a equipped with fans aimed at the bonbons. The next day we send the bonbons through the enrober, and then they are transferred to a speed rack to set up, either at room temp (generally around 68-70 degrees F) or in a homemade cooling cabinet (an insulated box equipped with an air conditioner + dehumidifier + fans) that generally fluctuates between 50-56 degrees F (I know, large range). 
       
      Problems occur with both milk and dark couverture, with bonbons kept at room temp or in cabinet, thickness of foot doesn't seem to make a difference (we've tried thicker and thinner). Crack doesn't immediately appear; it usually takes a couple of minutes after being completely set before showing. It looks as though the foot is popping out, cause a hairline crack between the shell and the foot. I've attached pictures. You'll notice in the photos, that when the bonbon is cut in half, the foot separates from the shell pretty significantly. 
       
      Thoughts? Suggestions? Similar experiences? 
       





    • By artiesel
      Does anyone have any experience using Knobel depositing machines?
       
      My one shot plate is leaking chocolate out of the top and I can't determine why.
       
      Any help would be appreciated
       
    • By artiesel
      Has anyone ever performed chocolate panning in a large industrial machine and used a single vessel for the panning AND the polishing steps?  The place i work has only one drum and I'd like to make use of it without purchasing a second drum.
       
      Any advice would be appreciated!
       
       
    • By artiesel
      I was curious if anyone has any experience making aerated chocolate candy (similar to those demonstrated by Grewling in Chocolates and Confections) that does NOT use a warmed ISI siphon to achieve this affect...  https://www.pinterest.com/pin/827255025273299428/
       
      I was wondering if it might be possible to adapt a large siphon so that you could attach a large tank of compressed CO2 or NO to avoid the expense of all the little gas canisters?
       
      Or am I just dreaming of something that's impossible?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×