Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

Porthos

Seeking Recommended eGullet threads for a Sous Vide neophyte

Recommended Posts

Baldwin recommends brining for pork.  I tried it following his method and I did not have good results.  Not to mention the mess in the refrigerator.  That he did not have to clean up.

 

But I have never brined my sous vide chicken.  And I've not had anything but good results from unbrined sous vide chicken, thighs or breasts.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎6‎/‎5‎/‎2016 at 8:11 PM, Porthos said:

So now that my southern faire season is over I had time to try out my Anova circulator.  I went simple with chicken breasts. I seasoned them, put them in a bag and did an hour at 153F. My DW was pleased with the moistness. I did something out of character and picked up no-name house-brand boneless skinless breasts. Poor choice, they were moist but they were stingy. When I do breasts again I will go with Foster Farms. I have been consistently pleased with FF over the years.

 

Things I learned. I used too large of a stock pot, a cheap thin-walled one that I usually reserve for cooling down steamed hard-cooked eggs when doing batches of 5 dozen eggs. It took way too long to come up to temperature. I will try using my heavy-walled 12 qt stock pot when I try SVing some tri-tip Monday night. On the good side suspending the bag clipped to a long wooden spoon made positioning very easy.

 

Because storage space is a bit of an issue I will buy a lidded plasic tub to store it in and keep it in the storeroom. I'm being lazy on this. I want to keep the circulator in the pot clamp. Otherwise I would just use the packaging it came in.

 

For the tri-tip I am planning on a mesquite dry rub from Garlic Fesival, and instead of a ziploc I will vacumm-seal it in an 8" bag. The gallon bag is almost the diameter of the 12 qt pot and I want freely-circulating water.

 

I did a bit of reading from some of the links provided and the information gleaned was very helpful.

 

Thank you one and all for helping launch me into the world of SV.

 

@Porthos having gone back to read this thread again, "stringy" sounds like the temperature was way too high.  (Disclaimer, I do not mind stringy chicken, myself.)

 

In my experience, even with the inexpensive thin walled pot I use, the anova comes up to temperature in seconds.  Literally just a few seconds.  And I've timed it recently.  Admittedly I have the original anova which may be higher wattage than the one you have.

 

For your wife consult Douglas Baldwin's table of pasteurization times for poultry:

http://www.douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html#Poultry_and_Eggs

 

Lastly in my experience and from my measurements, with the anova you do not need a lot of "freely-circulating water".  The anova has a good pump.  Use your own thermometer and draw your own conclusions.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JoNorvelleWalker said:

For your wife consult Douglas Baldwin's table of pasteurization times for poultry:

http://www.douglasbaldwin.com/sous-vide.html#Poultry_and_Eggs

 

I have bookmarked the page and already printed out the beef pasteurization table, still need to print out the poultry table. And, yes, after more reading my temperature was too high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/5/2016 at 11:34 AM, rotuts said:

PS  a rub with salt will not get your TT corned at 6 - 7 hours.

 

On 6/5/2016 at 11:31 AM, rotuts said:

 

...  Penzies Chicago steak ...

 

 

I made to Penzies yesterday afternoon. I purchased nothing but will be taking my DW there Saturday when we go to cook a dinner for my FIL. Penzey's is about 2 miles from is home.

 

As soon as I saw the smell-testing vessel of Chicago Steak Seasoning I knew it was out of the running. The second ingredient is pepper. One of the balancing acts I do is peppering foods that I prepare. My DW had weight loss surgery 7 years ago and one of the unexpected changes was that she became very sensitive to any kind of pepper as a taste issue. I can use small amounts but if I peppered a steak the way I think it should be done she would be unable to eat it. I keep a pepper grinder next to me at dinnertime to add pepper to my servings. The majority of their seasoning mixes had predominant amounts of pepper. There are a few others that I want my DW's opinon on.

 

I do appreciate the suggestion and it did get me off my keister to finally go there.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when you stop by Penzey's ask about blends that have no pepper

 

Ive used Mural of Flavor ( relatively expensive , no salt and freeze dried shallots ) and Fox point   ( cheaper, has slot )

 

Im sure there are others .   good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@rotuts I think I liked the Mural. We will see what my Sweetie thinks Saturday.

 

Has anyone used the Reynolds Oven Bags for SV?

 

On to my trip-tip. Only a couple of pictures.

 

This was a small tri-tip. After trimming only 40mm thick. I did a light rub of Garlic Festival brand Mesquite Grill and sealed it into a Food-saver pouch.

 

Prepped Tri-tip.jpg

 

I SVed it for 4 1/2 hours at 134 F.  I then patted it dry and seared it in a cast iron pan with corn oil heated to about 400 F.

 

I served it with Ranch Style Beans and steamed carrot slices with butter and Trader Joe's 21 Seasoning Salute (which my Sweetie reminded me has a lot of pepper in it - oops)

I put a generous dusting of fresh-cracked pepper on mine after taking this picture.

 

Plated Tri-tip.jpg

 

I was pleased with the results. It was tender and very flavorful. The flavor from the rub had penetrated the meat deeply and I especially liked that; I had not expected that much flavor from a lightly-applied rub. My Sweetie was pleased with it.

 

When I realized that my SIL was going to be later coming home from his job than I had thought he would be, I turned the Anova back on, put his portion in a ziptop bag and put it back into the bath so he could have it served warm. I was jazzed about that benefit.

 

I know I have a lot to learn but I am encouraged both by finding a cooking technique that aids in preparing food that for a while had not been accessible to my Sweetie, and for it opening a new vista of ways to cook meat. Outside of pasteurizing in-the-shell eggs I don't see myserlf branching out in other directions for a long time, if at all.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boneless pork loin chops tonight from my local supermarket. Nothing special.  20mm thick. Salt and Lawry's Garlic Powder.  140 F for 2 hours, then seared. Quite moist enough. Flavor was good but nothing spectacular.

 

I will be putting the circulator away for now since my schedule says no more time to use it at the moment.


Edited by Porthos (log)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed a great post.. Thanks for sharing all this great info. I will be using a trick or two from what has been mentioned in making my future preparations! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been using the Sous Vide Index that nickrey posted the link to and I've been using Douglas Baldwin's tables to understand the minimum time required for pasteurization.

 

The amount of information in the Sous Vide Index is daunting to say the least. Here is the help I could use. I am looking for information on the other end of the timing spectrum; How long for a given piece of beef do I have (as a starting point) before the meat starts to turn mushy?

 

I am going to be SVing a 30 mm top sirloin steak today at 134 F. Baldwin's chart tells me to cook it for a minimum of 2 hours. Would it be mush at 6 hours? If this is discussed somewhere in the items linked to in the Sous Vide Index could someone point me to it. I can't seem to find it if it is there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, haven't done top sirloin (to my recollection) but do bottom (tri-tip) from time-to-time.  That I routinely cook 8 hours, as I find it benefits from some collagen reduction.  I think top would be okay at six.

 

No idea about your general question, btw.  Decided fairly early on that I was better off working out times to my own preference.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An easy way to think of beef is to divide into "steak" cuts and "butcher" cuts.  The steaks, tenderloin, t=bone, strip and ribeye, do not need the tenderizing that the butcher cuts do.  I use roughly 1 hr/inch for steaks.  Have tried shortcut a tenderloin once and had it in bath for less than 2 hours (meeting a schedule) and the beef looked right, temped right, but had a raw consistency when chewing.   Have not had any problems with steak going to mush when left in for 1.5x cook time.

 

The butcher cuts are the tougher pieces that need to break down while in the bath.  Including the sirloin.  For these I'll look at a 6 - 8 hr bath for 2-3 inch thick pieces, longer for a roast.  I've not done a brisket SV but would think that would be the longest cook for a piece of cow.

 

That said the 30mm (1 inch?) sirloin would be properly cooked in two hours.  Better cooked in about 4 hours.  Fine in 6 hours. 

 

My difficulty with Baldwins tables is that he seems focused only on proper pasteurization and forgets that we started cooking to eat.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@daveb Meal timing has dictated that I am going for 5 hours, then a quick sear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pls report back w pics.  Too late to talk you into 131F?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, daveb said:

Pls report back w pics.  Too late to talk you into 131F?

I'm not comfortable going that low. My DW's immune system isn't in tip-top shape and I put a little "Personal Comfort" factor into my temp.

 

No pics of it prepped but I will try to snap a shot of it plated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, I don't think there's much difference in the outcome at those temps (and I use 131ºF for beef).  And, yeah, bumping the temp a few degrees is prudent if you've got immune system issues to deal with.  EnriqueB has argued for years here (sorry, no link handy) that there aren't as many studies at the lower temp as we'd like.

 

ETA: Here's a post by EB I particularly had in mind, which links to various earlier discussions of the lower limit issue.

ETA2: I use 131º for short cooks of beef.  For long cooks, I don't go below 135º, in part because of this issue.


Edited by pbear (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMAG1165.jpg

 

I was not pleased woth the outcome. Not mushy exactly, but losing the resistance and texture of beef. Flavor was just ok but I don't think I seasoned it very well.

 

I have one more piece of this meat. I will season it better and use 133 F for 4 hours.

 

That is homemade kasespatzle for the starch. I enjoyed it more than the meat, and I'm a die-hard carnivore.

 

Note the sad face in the conclusion:

sad face.jpg


Edited by Porthos (log)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Porthos said:

 

I was not pleased woth the outcome. Not mushy exactly, but losing the resistance and texture of beef. Flavor was just ok but I don't think I seasoned it very well.

 

 

As a tender cut, you just need to reach temperature at core and, if desired, add time for pasteurization. Given your water temperature and meat thickness, you would have needed just about 1:30 h according to SousVideDash, and about 2:30 h for pasteurization. Meat kept at a given temperature in the water bath is ok for a good amount of time, but your profile doubled the required pasteurization time, so that's likely the reason for bad texture, typical of too long cooking of tender cuts.

 

If you salted the meat in advance that would not help neither. Never salt meat tender cuts before sous-viding unless you're looking for a kind of "cured" texture, do it after, just before searing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, pbear said:

Frankly, I don't think there's much difference in the outcome at those temps (and I use 131ºF for beef).  And, yeah, bumping the temp a few degrees is prudent if you've got immune system issues to deal with.  EnriqueB has argued for years here (sorry, no link handy) that there aren't as many studies at the lower temp as we'd like.

 

ETA: Here's a post by EB I particularly had in mind, which links to various earlier discussions of the lower limit issue.

ETA2: I use 131º for short cooks of beef.  For long cooks, I don't go below 135º, in part because of this issue.

 

 

I though my messages in this sense were largely ignored by the community here, so happy they are useful for someone   :D

 

Some recent research points out possible problems in the same vein as the ones highlighted in the post you link. The article Genetic determinants of heat resistance in Escherichia coli shows some strains of E. coli that survive core temperatures of 71ºC, which, extrapolated to our usual sous-vide core temperatures would imply much much longer times that Baldwin or SousVideDash tables currently provide.

 

On the other hand, those bad news are somehow compensated with new research (don't have the links now with me) that suggests that many facultative anaerobic pathogenic bacteria die a bit faster inside the vacuum bag that they do when cooked exposed to air. Current tables assume the same die rate as has been studied without taking into account the vacuum, so that would be very good news.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@EnriqueB   

 

nope.  Ive paid attention.  and Im fairly average, so that suggest The Average here has paid attention

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Porthos said:

I was not pleased woth the outcome. Not mushy exactly, but losing the resistance and texture of beef. Flavor was just ok but I don't think I seasoned it very well.

 

That's why we do trials.  It takes a little time to dial in what works for you and sometimes the answer is conventional.  For example, I don't like low temp steak, nor seafood cooked to pasteurization.  Both of those I cook conventionally.

 

ETA: I do like seafood cooked very low temp, but that generally only can be done safely with stuff that's been frozen to kill parasites.


Edited by pbear (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, pbear said:

Frankly, I don't think there's much difference in the outcome at those temps (and I use 131ºF for beef).  And, yeah, bumping the temp a few degrees is prudent if you've got immune system issues to deal with.  EnriqueB has argued for years here (sorry, no link handy) that there aren't as many studies at the lower temp as we'd like.

 

ETA: Here's a post by EB I particularly had in mind, which links to various earlier discussions of the lower limit issue.

ETA2: I use 131º for short cooks of beef.  For long cooks, I don't go below 135º, in part because of this issue.

 

 

I had forgotten about that linked topic.  It has good depth (thank you, @EnriqueB and others) and is good additional reading for us neophytes. One of my immediate takeaways is the importance of rapid chilling unless the food is to be finished and served quickly.

 

Thanks for that post link, pbear.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, rotuts said:

@EnriqueB   

 

nope.  Ive paid attention.  and Im fairly average, so that suggest The Average here has paid attention

 

Glad to hear. Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By ElsieD
      I got an e-mail this morning about the Modernist team's next project - pizza! 
       
      Modernist Pizza is Underway!
      After taking on the world of bread, we’re thrilled to announce the topic of our next book: pizza. Modernist Pizza will explore the science, history, equipment, technology, and people that have made pizza so beloved.

      Authors Nathan Myhrvold and Francisco Migoya, with the Modernist Cuisine team, are currently at work conducting extensive research and testing long-held pizza-making beliefs; this quest for knowledge has already taken them to cities across the United States, Italy, and beyond. The result of their work will be a multivolume cookbook that includes both traditional and innovative recipes for pizzas found around the globe along with techniques that will help you make pizza the way you like it.

      Modernist Pizza is in its early stages, and although we’ve begun to dig in, we still have a lot of work ahead of us. Although we can’t guarantee when it will arrive at your door just yet, we can promise that this book will deliver the complete story of pizza as it’s never been told before.

      In the meantime, we would love to hear from you as we continue to research pizza from around the world. Contact pizza@modernistcuisine.com to tell us about your favorite pizzerias and their pizza. Connect with us on social media to get all the latest Modernist Pizza updates.
    • By Tempranillo
      I have been tasked with putting together a team for a new kosher barbecue event in Arizona, happening sometime later this year. The event was supposed to be in mid-April, but the venue decided to cancel. The organizers are busy looking for a new venue, and have assured us that this will happen.
       
      Many details for the event are not quite settled yet, so, I am trying to prepare for all sorts of contingencies beyond the usual concerns about putting out good food. What is known is that we will be following the KCBS kosher rules. As far as I can tell, there were 10-12 such events held last year across the US. So, it's a pretty small world. I don't think there's a kosher championship ladder like the other barbecue events have, either. I think it's a good time to get in, get practice and see where it takes me.
       
      Now, I've been reading and watching videos online with all sorts of info on smoking/cooking for competitions. I have watched some of the TV shows, and one documentary. It's been kind of a mixed bag in terms of usefulness. No one has posted much about kosher barbecue, so I am making changes to recipes and procedures and running a lot of tests. I currently have access to my home kitchen which is small but adequate, the stove is electric and unremarkable and about 7 years old. It does maintain temperature well, and can be set to run anywhere from 140°F to 550°F.  I also have access to an outdoor kitchen at a friend's place, with a relatively large charcoal type grill. At most of the kosher barbecue events the event organizers provide smokers/grills plus meats and many ingredients to ensure that everything is truly kosher. If needed, my team sponsor is prepared to purchase a grill/smoker which I will need to research once I know I will need it.
       
      I should note that I am not Jewish and did not grow up around any kosher households, so I am also studying some of the finer points about running a kosher kitchen and learning about kosher ingredients. Modern competition barbecue is an odd mix of modernist techniques and ingredients, right alongside ordinary-folk foods like margarine, and bottled sauces.
       
      For reference, the 4 categories for kosher events are: Chicken, Beef Ribs, Turkey, and Beef Brisket -to be served in that order.
       
      So far, I have been running smokeless tests on chicken and beef ribs. Mostly learning to trim the chicken thighs (what a nightmare!) and seeing what happens at certain temperatures and times. I know things will be different with real smoking happening, but I want to see some baseline results so that I know what to strive for. I do have a bunch of thermometers, and have got some basic ideas about writing a competition timeline.
       
      The chicken perplexes me in several ways. First, some of the competition cooks recommend boning while others recommend bone-in. Second, I see some folks injecting and brining, while others maybe do a quick half hour marinade, and even others are full-on modernist with citric acid under the skin, etc. Third, the braise vs non- braise chicken where some people load up their pan with a pound of butter, margarine or a couple cups of chicken stock while others do not. Fourth, The bite-through skin is driving me insane. Some people swear by transglutaminase to reattach the skin for a better bite. Catch is, only some types are kosher, and I can see having issues explaining it. I have tested an egg white egg wash which seems to attach the skin pretty well without showing. I think I need to go for longer times to get more tender skin. Today I did a pan (with olive oil) of six as follows: one hour at 220°, one hour under foil at 230°, then glazed and 20 minutes on a rack at 350°. It was only partly bite-though and the taste-testers wanted more crispiness. I tried showing them pictures and explained that it wasn't ever going to be crispy, that we're looking to go even softer. I am going to run tests on longer cook periods and see how it goes.
       
      I want to ask people about the whole swimming in margarine thing which is in voque right now. people claim it makes the chicken juicy. I know that meat is mostly all about temperatures. I can see how the margarine acts like duck fat in a confit and helps prevent some oven-drying after hours and hours in the oven, but, in the end, isn't it just an insulator?
       
      I've been making corned beef and other brisket dishes for over 20 years, so, I think I have a good handle on that. I will practice it in a couple of weeks. I simply don't need as much help on this item.
       
      The turkey scares me. On TV, I see people dunking it in butter before serving it. This obviously is not kosher, and I don't want to do it with margarine I don't want to present anything in a competition made with margarine, there has to be something better! -Either cook the bird better or find a better dip, like maybe a flavorful nut oil or a sauce. That said, unlike ribs or brisket, it is not traditional to dunk turkey in a sauce.  I went with some friends to a chain place called Dickies to do a little research and their turkey breast was odd and kind of hammy. Not like Virginia ham, more like ham lunchmeat. It was very moist and unlike any turkey I have ever eaten. Ok, I admit to not being very fond of turkey, so my experiences with it have been a bit limited. I am assuming it was brined. Given the limited amount of time we will have (about a day and a half) to cook, I am planning on just cooking the breast. Other than that, I am open to suggestions. The internet has been least informative on the topic of turkey. People's videos and such just show rubbing the whole bird and letting it roast for a few hours. Any tips at all would be appreciated.
       
      Whew! Thanks for reading all of this, I look forward to any advice you can give.
    • By flippant
      I've had the CSO for a number of years now, but have yet to actually bake bread in it.
       
      Reading through the Modernist Bread thread on this forum I see many of you are using the CSO to great effect, which is heartening.
       
      To that end, I would like to know about your experience baking bread in it – what sort of extra equipment you use (pans, cast iron? etc), what breads work the best, any corrections you find yourself making, or anything you feel might be useful to someone else using the CSO.
       
      Thank you!
       
       
    • By Rho
       
      The space race trickled into kitchens in the 60s and 70s, including one curious tool that's faded away in the years since: the thermal pin, a heat pipe skewer that can halve cooking times for roasts:

       
      Heat pipes are thermal superconductors, transferring heat 500-1000 times more effectively than solid copper (some people in the sous vide thread have discussed copper pins). They're hollow tubes with the air evacuated and a small amount of working fluid, often water. The usable temperature range is limited by the triple point and the critical point, with additional constraints near the edges. Water is effective from 20C-280C /70F-530F, which comfortably spans most cooking temperatures.
       
      Modernist Bread has an excellent section on how bread bakes, including a diagram of the internal heat pipes that develop, summarized here. (click for a good photo!)
       
      Sous-vide solves the overcooking side of the gradient problem, but it's still limited by total heat diffusion time-- doubling the size of a cut quadruples the time needed for the center to reach temperature. Heat pipe pins should make larger cuts practical, or normal cuts cook faster. Here's a graph from "The heat pipe and its potential for enhancing the cooking and cooling of meat joints", showing average temperatures over time for 1kg joints of meat convection baked at 190C/375F for 110 minutes (foil removed for the last 30 minutes):

       
      Thermal pins were sold commercially from 1956 to about 1990. They're listed occasionally for about $20 on ebay. They even made potato baking racks with heat pipes-- though now you can easily par-cook a potato in the microwave and finish it in the oven.
       
      I don't know why production of thermal pins stopped, or what fundamental problems limited their usage. It seems like pans and commercial griddles would be improved by adding heat pipes to spread heat throughout and avoid hot or cold spots. Perhaps roasts fell out of favor as the culture of entertaining shifted away from monolithic centerpieces to smaller, more precisely cooked portions.
    • By philie
      Hey there, i hope to find some help in the wise hands of yours. after some research i am still having some problems concerning glazing:
       
      For a party i would like to make some cubes and rounded savoury cakes and foams out of silicone forms that have a ready bottom and a colour glazing. 
      Somehow i just do not manage to find a steady glazing ( one that does not run ) and is for texture reasons preferably hard or crisp that does not include sugar or syrup.
       
      can you help me or lead my way in a certain direction?
       
      thanks very much!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×