Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

Darienne

Home Made Ice Cream (2015– )

Recommended Posts

I just wrote a long post about ice cream stabilizers, including information on customizing your own blends. This is pretty heavy going but I hope helpful for anyone who's been struggling with the topic. There's a lot of information here that you won't find elsewhere.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/30/2016 at 0:11 AM, JoNorvelleWalker said:

I've been successfully using the PHMB for over a year now, as I recall. 

 

I remember you also had a lot of success using Ruben's method. Are you using the PHMB to utilize same basic theory? (ie, 30-60 minutes at 162 degrees, etc)

 

Since I also like to play with chocolate, I'm quite interested in this gizmo. However, I don't have the space for a KA mixer so I would likely get the standalone version. Since I wouldn't have the mixer itself, I guess I'd still be standing there stirring but at least I wouldn't have to worry about the temperature.

 

Have you found that the temperature remains consistent, even if it differs from what reads on the display?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, paulraphael said:

 

Looking forward to this one. I have frequent, animated, high-volume discussions about stabilizers with my girlfriend who refuses to eat ice cream that contains them. I like to point out that the unfortunately named guar gum is no less natural than her precious kale, yet she refuses to yield to my logic. So I just trick her. My ice cream has no labels on it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, cwfenn said:

Been doing custards the traditional way-How long did it take to get the custard to temperature in the PHMB?

 

It took 30 minutes from refrigerator cold to reach 143 deg F.  Unfortunately I did not record enough data points to answer the question.  Reading eGullet, even sober, does that to one.

 

@sweettreateater I've gratefully been using Ruben's method since I first tried it, although my mix is higher in butterfat and lower in sugar than Ruben's recipes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, sweettreateater said:

 

I remember you also had a lot of success using Ruben's method. Are you using the PHMB to utilize same basic theory? (ie, 30-60 minutes at 162 degrees, etc)

 

Since I also like to play with chocolate, I'm quite interested in this gizmo. However, I don't have the space for a KA mixer so I would likely get the standalone version. Since I wouldn't have the mixer itself, I guess I'd still be standing there stirring but at least I wouldn't have to worry about the temperature.

 

Have you found that the temperature remains consistent, even if it differs from what reads on the display?

 

Sorry, I missed some of this question when I last replied...

 

As I recall at least one eG chocolate person reported problems with the PHMB.  I have never tried the PHMB for tempering chocolate so I cannot comment.  Kerry Beal makes a chocolate tempering machine and that is what I would look to if chocolate making were my thing...though it costs rather more than the PHMB and I'm not sure how great it is for making ice cream.

 

If the lid is on, the PHMB actual temperature approaches the set temperature asymptotically.  See my experiments last year.  With the lid off and the contents being stirred, the PHMB will not reach close to setpoint, but will hold a constant temperature.  I have found a setpoint of 198 deg F. gives an actual temperature of 162 deg F.  Note that this probably depends somewhat on the speed at which you mix.  Once you get the parameters worked out I am convinced the results are reproducible.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having thought about this some more, I would not recommend purchasing the PHMB without a mixer for making ice cream.  But as a slow cooker, quite possibly, yes.  For ice cream you just don't save enough effort.  Invest in a Thermapen Mk4 or learn to read a thermometer upside down while you stir the ice cream mix on the stove.

 

But with a mixer and PHMB you can just set a timer and walk away, while you read eGullet or paint your nails.

 

If KitchenAid doesn't float your boat, Kenwood makes what looks like a similar product.  Namely an induction heated mixing bowl on a stand mixer.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why more people don't use an immersion circulator for ice cream. Precise, repeatable, and if you don't already have one, you need one!

 

I haven't made ice cream any other way since I've bought mine. 

 

A Thermomix looks like it would d a good job too, but I've never used one (they don't seem so common in the U.S.). And a lab hotplate with magnetic stirrer and thermocouple should be great, but those are expensive compared with the more conventional options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, paulraphael said:

I don't know why more people don't use an immersion circulator for ice cream. Precise, repeatable, and if you don't already have one, you need one!

 

No evaporation if you cook sous vide.  And, yes, I've tried.  Besides it is a pain or a mess (depending on one's skill and equipment) to vacuum seal a bag of ice cream mix.

 

When the Anova first came out I asked Anova Jeff about the possibility of a lab-like circulator that I could use to heat a vessel such as a KitchenAid bowl.  Turns out someone else has a patent on this method.

 

The induction heated PHMB is supposedly (from memory) good to one degree which while poor by Anova standards is more than OK for most of my ice cream cookery.

 

Your mileage may vary.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/1/2016 at 0:02 AM, JoNorvelleWalker said:

 

Kerry Beal makes a chocolate tempering machine and that is what I would look to if chocolate making were my thing...though it costs rather more than the PHMB and I'm not sure how great it is for making ice cream.

 

Just to correct the record:  Kerry Beal's EZtemper machine does not directly temper chocolate (or make ice cream).  The user places solid cocoa butter in it, and the machine creates a semi-melted product (called "cocoa butter silk") and holds it at a set temperature practically forever.  The silk can be used to temper chocolate quickly and with less mess than when using small already-tempered pieces of chocolate and has other uses, such as tempering/crystallizing gianduja, meltaways, and ganaches.  It speeds up the production of chocolates quite noticeably and especially makes the crystallization of slabbed ganaches faster and more reliable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It just seems to me that evaporation is a bug and not a feature. I don’t see how it’s possible without elaborate measures to simultaneously control evaporation and the the degree of cooking.

 

The rate of evaporation will vary not just with temperature, but with the size and shape of the vessel, the quantity of mix, the rate and type of stirring, and the ambient temperature and humidity.

 

So if you’re cooking to a set time/temperature, the evaporation will vary. If you cook to a set evaporation (by stopping and measuring frequently?) the cooking time will vary. 

 

If you want to increase milk solids, add nonfat dry milk. There are zero downsides. Use a good brand and it will be pure skim milk, spray-dried at a lower and better controlled temperature than what you’ll ever manage in the kitchen. There’s a reason that most of the best pastry chefs do it this way.

 

If I didn’t do sous-vide, my first choice would probably be a lab hotplate, with a pan lid drilled for the thermocouple probe.

 

Edited to add: 1° accuracy should be more than good enough for ice cream. Is there a way to cover the KA heated bowl while it's working?


Edited by paulraphael (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hobart type planetary mixers like the KitchenAid are not easy to cover.  The only semi practical way I can think of is to purchase the hand guard attachment and cover the openings with foil.  If you mean is there a way to cover the bowl while it's heating but not being mixed, just put the lid on it.

 

Though if you cover the bowl you don't get evaporation...which I want.  I am aware there are a lot of variables, but as I have said before, once the process is worked out the results should be quite consistent.  Except for ambient temperature and humidity (and atmospheric pressure) the mix formulation, bowl size, temperature, RPM, and mixing time are all controllable or fixed.

 

 

Edit:  plastic wrap would probably be better and easier than foil.

 


Edited by JoNorvelleWalker afterthought (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On May 31, 2016 at 4:51 PM, paulraphael said:

I just wrote a long post about ice cream stabilizers, including information on customizing your own blends. This is pretty heavy going but I hope helpful for anyone who's been struggling with the topic. There's a lot of information here that you won't find elsewhere.

Many thanks-I've been looking into different stabilizers and this looks good.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/1/2016 at 8:24 PM, JoNorvelleWalker said:

I've gratefully been using Ruben's method since I first tried it, although my mix is higher in butterfat and lower in sugar than Ruben's recipes.

 

I've also had really good success with Ruben's method. This week, I tried a comparison test where I used the exact same proportions of ingredients but just dumped everything in the pot, brought it to 162, let it simmer for about 5 minutes, and then put in an ice bath. The result was OK but definitely did not have that unique creaminess.

 

I wonder what are the biggest contributors? Is it the reversible protein unfolding and denaturing? Or is it mainly just due to evaporating so much water out of the base, which is ultimately what would contributing to any iciness?

 

Also, I realized recently that I've been setting up all my percentages BEFORE reducing it. Then I realized that since the actual amount of base that gets churned is 13% lighter, (since I've removed about 13% of water from the base with evaporation), it also means that my ingredient percentages all increase quite a bit. I noticed today that Ruben mentions this on his site (ie, arrive at the proper mix composition AFTER heating) but I didn't see it before.

 

The ice creams have been pretty soft at 5 degrees out of the freezer (though I kind of like that consistency), and now I think that's because I have a higher percentage of sugar in the base than my pre-reduction numbers indicated which suppresses the freezing point...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, sweettreateater said:

I wonder what are the biggest contributors? Is it the reversible protein unfolding and denaturing? Or is it mainly just due to evaporating so much water out of the base, which is ultimately what would contributing to any iciness?

 

 

100% the latter. By evaporating water, you're increasing both the nonfat solids and the fat. 

 

There is possibly some effect from denaturing the whey proteins, but I don't believe you're going to notice it in these recipes. Mainly because they are very heavy on egg custard, so they have more than adequate added emulsifiers already. 

 

There is some research suggesting that with prolonged cooking, whey proteins can aggregate with casein proteins, forming a hydrocolloid with thickening / stabilizing ability. But this seems difficult to accomplish. Even Jeni Britton-Bauer of Jeni's Splendid—who's a pioneer in using milk proteins as emulsifiers in egg-free ice cream—adds starch as a stabilizer.

 

If you want to increase the fat and nonfat solids of an ice cream, evaporation is a way to do it. But you'll have an easier time and get more consistent results by just using a higher percentage of cream and dry milk. 

 

In my experiments, cooking milk proteins to varying degrees in a formula that's lower in fat and much lower in egg yolk than Ruben's formulas, I find the effect to be extremely subtle. It's likely that you will only see any effect if you're using milk that's been pasteurized at low temperatures (and dry milk that's been spray-dried at low temperatures). 

 

Edited to add: 

There's something I'm leaving out. The differences aren't 100% evaporation; some of the difference is from adequately thickening the egg custard. Contrary to what used to be taught in cooking school, custard consistency is a factor of not just concentration and temperature, but also time. An egg custard brought to 162F for two minutes will thicken very little compared with one held at that temperature for 15 minutes. Dr. Cesar Vega confirmed this in tests done with a rheometer.


Edited by paulraphael (log)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I spun another batch of ice cream, the second half of same mix as a couple days ago.  It came out of the Cuisinart at -5.5 deg C.  After 24 hours in the freezer the ice cream was just too soft and the texture was OK but not great...well OK, not really OK.  The texture had been better right out of the Cuisinart.  I measured the ice cream temperature from the freezer at -8.4 deg C.  Something's not right.  This temperature seems far too high.

 

And then I measured the temperature again with a different thermometer but the same result.

 

The previous batch was soft too, but not this soft.  And after the last batch I defrosted the freezer to try to get the temperature lower.  (And then waited a day for the freezer to get back down to temperature before spinning the ice cream.)

 

When I last measured my freezer temperature it was -21.1 deg C.  But this was in 2013.  I have a bottle of technical alcohol chilling now to take a reading.  Maybe I should just drink it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, JoNorvelleWalker said:

 I have a bottle of technical alcohol chilling now to take a reading.  Maybe I should just drink it.

 

That should really make a zombie with a lasting effect!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment the ice cream is down to -11 something deg C.  Texture is improved.  Meanwhile the bottle of alcohol measures -16.3 deg C.  Still not good enough.

 

We shall see what the morrow brings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Freezer problems are a drag. The freezer in my old place could be set to -5F / -20C and hold it comfortably. My current freezer struggles to maintain -1F / -18C, and it makes a big difference. Even with all the improvements I've made in my formula, it's hard to get the ice cream as smooth as it was with the better freezer.


Edited by paulraphael (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did measurements over almost 24 hours.  The freezer varies between -10 and -16 deg C.  I can drink the bottle now.

 

But at least the ice cream is harder than when I started.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had some of the ice cream just now.  (The same batch I have been discussing.)  Hardness was acceptable and texture was still lovely.  So I stuck a thermometer in it:  -11.8 deg C. again.  What a difference from -8.4 deg C the other day.  Difficult for me to comprehend the difference in quality from a delta of a (very) few degrees.

 

But I'm concerned that after twenty four hours in the freezer the ice cream had only chilled down less than three degrees.  That's just not right and it almost defeats all my love and care.  I'd be ashamed to serve -8.4 deg C. ice cream to my grandkids...and I'd never hear the end of it.

 

As an (in)sanity check I just now pulled the bottle of technical alcohol and took a reading:  -19.0 deg C.  No zombies were harmed in this experiment.  The freezer is acting a little more like its old self.  Maybe a freezer takes more than a few days to cool down after defrosting?  So much I do not know about freezer technology.

 

But this has me thinking, what is a reasonable freezer temperature for ice cream?  I know I'd prefer the serving temperature of my ice cream colder than -11.8 deg C.  I understand the standard storage temperature for ice cream, at least in the US, is -28.9 deg C.  But I'm typically holding ice cream for only a few days at most.  Not weeks.  On the other hand, the quicker the ice cream cools to storage temperature, the smaller the ice crystals.  And all else being equal, the colder the initial temperature of the freezer, the faster the ice cream will cool.

 

This of more than theoretic interest as I find myself again window shopping for freezers I can ill afford.  I think I can rule out -20 deg C. freezers as not cold enough.  Is -25 sufficient?  -30?  -45?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll bet you hit it on the head, and it just took the freezer a long time to recover from defrosting. It can take a fridge / freezer 24 hours just to stabilize after changing the thermostat setting. Not sure why it takes so long.

 

Ideal freezer temperature is a tricky issue, since at home we use the same freezer for hardening, for storage, and for serving.

 

According to Dr. Cesar Vega, the ideal hardening cabinet is -33°C / -27°F. Most actual hardening cabinets are -40, and conventional wisdom is that the colder the better, but Vega says (somewhere) that if you freeze ice cream too cold, the water turns to water glass, rather than crystalline ice, and this can lead to large crystals forming when it warms up. But most of us don't have to face this problem.

 

For storage, he says typical ice creams are completely stable at -25°C / -13°F or below. Ice crystals won't grow, because all the water is solid. 

 

For serving, standard practice is -14 to -12°C /  6 to 10° F. Ice cream shop scooping cabinets are probably somewhere around there. Too warm for everything else you use a freezer for.

 

In my experience, -20C / -5°F worked well for everything. It was the coldest my old freezer would go, so I couldn't compare lower temps. It hardened the ice cream quickly and gave great texture, and the ice cream only took a few minutes to soften after you pulled it out. The only drawback I found was energy use. It wasn't the newest of fridges and you could tell it was cycling on a lot. 

 

Edited to add

I've looked into the idea that a hardening cabinet shouldn't be colder than 33°, and don't think there's anything to back it up. In order for water to form a glass (amorphous ice) it has to freeze to a temperature lower than this in milliseconds. Which is not going to happen when you put a pint container into the freezer. This is something you might think about when making liquid nitrogen ice cream (and it's the whole idea behind dippin' dots). 

 

Probably the conventional wisdom is right, and colder is better in a blast freezer.


Edited by paulraphael (log)
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The information in underbelly is great!

 

I particularly liked the 'Discussion' section in Basic Ice Cream Examples, where you showed how a change in the recipe can result in unexpected deficiencies, but then how to counter that effect by changing other parts of the formulation. It really demonstrates the crucial balancing act that ice cream-making is! And it really helps make clear what each part of the formulation does.

 

One thing that I would personally really like to see is an entire posting on Solids: how to calculate them from your ingredient list, how to add them in when needed, how to counter them when they come in too high. I find the whole Solids component the trickiest part to understand well. It was covered in How To Build a Recipe but I wouldn't mind seeing more, especially how to manipulate the percentage.

 

For instance, how would you get enough solids if you were making a watermelon ice cream? You need a ton of watermelon juice to get enough flavor (because it's a relatively non-intense juice next to say, lemon), but then how do you maintain a high enough solid percentage without diluting the flavor?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sweettreateater said:

The information in underbelly is great!

 

I particularly liked the 'Discussion' section in Basic Ice Cream Examples, where you showed how a change in the recipe can result in unexpected deficiencies, but then how to counter that effect by changing other parts of the formulation. It really demonstrates the crucial balancing act that ice cream-making is! And it really helps make clear what each part of the formulation does.

 

One thing that I would personally really like to see is an entire posting on Solids: how to calculate them from your ingredient list, how to add them in when needed, how to counter them when they come in too high. I find the whole Solids component the trickiest part to understand well. It was covered in How To Build a Recipe but I wouldn't mind seeing more, especially how to manipulate the percentage.

 

For instance, how would you get enough solids if you were making a watermelon ice cream? You need a ton of watermelon juice to get enough flavor (because it's a relatively non-intense juice next to say, lemon), but then how do you maintain a high enough solid percentage without diluting the flavor?

 

You might want to take a look at the ice cream geek calculator:

 

http://www.icecreamgeek.com/?page_id=817

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By fanny_the_fairy
      So I'm not sure whether you remember it or not but a few month ago I posted a new thread here because I was slightly scared with an upcoming internship.
       
      Now I am actually an intern at Pierre Hermé and I thought you'd like to have some update.
       
       
      Thanks for all the amazing feedback you guys provided!!!
       
       
      Love
       
       
      - fanny
       
       
      First week: Ispahan, Emotions, Sensations & baked treats
       
       
      Just one week after I arrived from New Zealand I'm already off to Paris for the long awaited internship at Pierre Hermé.
       
       
      After waking up at 4.30, I head towards the 15° arrondissement shop, enter the apparently empty shop sur la pointe des pieds. Where is everyone? Luckily I quickly stumble onto Sebastien, the morning team head chef, who gives me the locker keys. I can finally go downstairs and get changed.
       
       
      Hmmmmm the pâtissier outfit! While I was over-excited when I bought it because it represented the first step towards my dream, this outfit is anything but dreamy. Think oversized jacket, high-waist pied-de-poule pants and Pierre Hermé baseball cap; the most fashionable item being the shoes – white sabots.
       
       
      Honestly, who could look good wearing that? Well ok, some girls do but I don’t. And just in case I still had some hopes, one of the guys said 'oh mais fanny vous etes beaucoup plus belle comme ca, vraiment' [fanny you look way better with these clothes on] when he saw me leaving the building wearing my normal everyday clothes. He looked shocked, trust me!
       
       
      Once this first step is checked and I've understood how pointless it is to look at myself in the mirror, I can actually go upstairs and meet the chefs. Before that, I have to put an apron – well two actually: a cotton one and a plastic one; but this is only an anticipatory action as I know I tend to get quite dirty (and this is a total euphemism) when I cook.
       
       
      Then I arrive in the laboratoire, wash my hands and shake everyone's hands. At this point, I am completely lost. Who is who? Hmmm names, so many different names. Luckily, I'm quite good with names so after a few minutes I am familiar with everyone just like we've known each others for years. That's totally not true though, and the use of vous is here to remind it.
       
       
      Indeed saying vous instead of tu is like the first basic rule in the pastry shop survival guide.
       
       
      The second one being to say chaud [litteraly: hot] whenever you're carrying something (usually really heavy) and not necessarily hot, as the term suggests, and you don't want anyone to get in the way. Basically, chefs say chaud not to be gross and say 'dégage' although the meanings of both words are really close. Once this rule is mastered, you have to start applying it. And believe me it feels quite weird to yell chaud every other minute. Though, it appears to be quite useful because you don't want to spill 118°C sugar syrup on your boss, do you? Well some of you might - sometimes, but please before doing so you should strongly consider a career change and/or an escape from your country, a face makeover and a name change.
       
       
      By now it's just after 6am and I am awake (holly jetlag). Like not just awake – I am widely concentrated on everyone's moves and there are many many moves. In the morning team, everyone is here to produce all the cakes, entremets, emotions, yeasty treats... with the most dedicated passion.
       
       
      The variety of tasks makes for the most interesting job. While every member of the team is responsible of a specific area, I wander from poste to poste to help the chef do the tasks they can't do because of their super-extra-busy schedules.
       
       
      Thus in one week I got to do many different things: from sorting almonds to prepare candied lemon peels.
       
       
      I started by weighing the ingredients for the crème onctueuse au chocolat. This was straightforward and was the perfect task to give me confidence on the first day.
       
       
      However, I was quite – and happily – surprised when the manager told me to go with Simon to decorate the Ispahan entremets.
       
       
      The Ispahan entremets are definitely one of the it-pastries at Pierre Hermé, so I was really excited to know that I was about to decorate them.
       
       
      This part was overwhelming – first I had to arrange raspberries on the rose-flavoured buttercream, fill with chopped and fragrant litchis, and then decorate the top macaron by piping a drop of glucose on rose petals and then sticking them, along with some raspberries, on the macaron.
       
       
      Assembling the Emotions was also a great job. Emotions are Pierre Hermé's signature desserts presented in glasses and eaten with a spoon - well unless you like to lick your fingers!
       
       
      I had the chance to make both Emotions Mosaic (griotte jelly, pistachio jelly, pistachio mascarpone cream) and Celeste (rhubarb compote, fresh strawberries, passion fruit and mascarpone mousse, passion fruit marshmallows).
       
       

       
       
      These are entertaining to make (basically I piped a fixed quantity of jelly with a piston into glasses - see Sensations below for more details) and are really yummy. I must say I have a weak spot for the passion fruit guimauves, even though it was a really-teeny (don't want to sound like I'm complaining because I am not) pain when I had to separate hundreds of them and roll them in icing sugar.
       
       
      As you might imagine I was happy to get to make so many different things and I was really proud when they actually let me make a whole batch of Sensation Celeste. Sensations are glasses filled with different jellies and generally topped with a macaron.
       
       
      First, I had to make the rhubarb compote: gelatine, rhubarb purée, lemon juice and sugar, pour a fixed quantity of it into small glasses with a piston, and allow to set before doing the same with both strawberry and passion fruit jellies.
       
       
      On the same note, I also piped some banana and strawberry jelly into small round shapes for the entremet Désiré, which is totally delicious by the say.
       
       

       
       
      However, I couldn't do just what I had to and couldn't restrain myself from peeking here and there. Anna, who I didn't really get to work with, is responsible for all the treats that have to go through the oven step. Hence, she makes all the brioches, croissants and other yeasty treats. But she also makes the cannelés and millefeuilles.
       
       
      The cannelés are probably the best ones I've ever had: fresh, soft and fragrant.
       
       

       
       
      As for the millefeuille I picked a Mosaic millefeuille because I love the pistachio-cherry combination. This was a real winner: the slight tanginess of the griottes nicely balances the creaminess of the pistachio cream. I can't wait to work in the dough team because their feuilletage is excellent! Hopefully in two weeks...
       
       

       
       
      Next week: c'est la folie des macarons [it's all about macarons].
       
    • By pastrygirl
      Something I wonder about but have yet to attempt ...
       
      i usually make Swiss or Italian meringue buttercream with egg whites. Occasionally I make egg yolk buttercream if I have excess yolks. 
       
      Is there any reason why one couldn’t make whole egg buttercream?  Whole eggs whip up plenty fluffy for genoise, what if you added hot syrup and cool butter? 🤔
    • By ChrisZ
      Hoping for some help.  I accidentally melted an old mould that is very important to us and I've had no luck searching around for a replacement.  
      If anyone knows where I could buy one - or even has one to spare they would be willing to sell - please send me a message.
      The mould (label attached below) was originally labelled as "Easy as ABC gelatin mould", although we just call it the alphabet mould.  Yes there are lots of alphabet moulds around, including new silicone ones, but we need the specific designs on this one to replace the one I damaged.  Depending on the cost, I would consider paying for postage internationally (to Australia).
      Thanks in advance!

    • By pastrygirl
      If so, what was it like?  Sounds similar to kouign-aman ... https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-44486529
       
       
    • By highchef
      we're all used to the Wednesday/Sunday food sections of newspapers far and wide, national and local. I see corrections in the local or regional columns when called for, but there's never a way to critique the ones published on a national scale because the content is behind a paywall. I get the WSJ, but don't want to pay additional (I should get access to it all on line for free-the newspaper is not cheap) for their online edition. Very frustrating to try a recipe and have major problems with it and not be able to point out some serious issues. Specifically, the WSJ published a recipe from Dee Retalli, a pastry chef in London who's recipe is in the cookbook 'Rustic' by Jorge Fernandez and Rich Wells. 
      I have made this cake 3 times.
      First time was a total runover disaster, which I should have foreseen. This cakes calls for a 10" springform or if you don't have that, a 10" cast iron skillet. I went for the latter because that is what I had. Almond mixtures tend to really smoke when they run over, just so you know.
      Tried again later with a deeper than normal 9 " springform. Happened again. Think it has to do with the 2 teaspoons of baking powder and quick activation in a 350º oven.
      Invested in a 10" springform for '3rd times a charm' try. I was successful, but not because I followed the directions, rather I became a little obsessed with making this work. Checked my oven, followed with the recipe and eyed it warily. It came up to the brim...and stayed. 45 minutes later it was supposed to be done but while it was beautiful, it was a bowl of jello in the center. It was also browning at an alarming rate- the almond flour again? So I placed a sheet of tinfoil over it (beautiful top crust) and turned the oven down to 325º and carefully watched and tested for almost another hour. That's a big time difference. 
      I found the recipe on cooked.com - credited to the above authors and cookbook albeit in Euro style measures and temps. All seems the same, so what are the odds that the recipe was misprinted twice from 2 different media?
      All I can think of is somewhere down the line (in the cookbook itself?) the cook time and temp were off. The time on both reads 45 min. The recipe took at least 1hr and 45 minutes. methinks someone left out the hour...
      The temp. thing is a little more obvious. Celcius to farenheight 350ºF does not equal 180ºC, more like 176ºC. Over almost 2 hours, I think that could make the difference between cooked and burnt? Sooo, I turned it down when I saw how fast it was browning to 325.
      The cake stays in form while you pour the honey over it, then orange water, then 2(!!!) cups of sliced toasted almonds. I put 1 cup and there is no way another cup would have stayed on that cake. I cup settled up to almost an inch on a 10" cake...
      Has anyone else tried this recipe or have the cookbook? It's a wonderful cake if you correct the time and temp., But I'd be really curious to see if anyone followed it exactly as written with success?
       
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×