Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

JoNorvelleWalker

Methode Rotuts

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MetsFan5 said:

 

 

  Ok so what exactly is the point here? To make crappy wine somehow drinkable? And to get the drinker drunk? I know carbonation enhances people's reaction to alcohol. Why not just buy a good, drinkable wine? Isn't this on par with adding bubbles to coffee to get the caffeine high faster? Crappy wine is crappy wine. Is this a budget issue? 

 

Partly it might be a budget issue. But I like the idea to carbonate wines that usually would not be developed into sparkling wine. Finding a good sparkling Riesling is a pain, finding a good Riesling and carbonating it rather easy.

 

Damn. I just put one kitchen tool more on my next home leave shopping list. Thanks Rotuts ...

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"   crappy wine somehow drinkable  ""   is always going to be crappy.

 

as menitoned , its to make decent table wine a bit fizzy.   its the same thing bulk wine makes do to make ' champagne '

 

of note :   the 750 cc version

 

Mastrad A01900 Purefizz Soda Maker

 

https://www.target.com/p/mastrad-purefizz-soda-maker/-/A-15645358

 

no longer seems available

 

there is this :

 

SodaPlus SP76327 Soda Carbonating Starter Kit

 

I got one of these for a ' spare '

 

its not as nice as the 750 cc model as there is more dead space involved therefore you need more cartridges / trial

 

Im mongering if there was a liability issue.   you do have to carefully rfelease the pressure before you open the carafe

 

and the top etc on the larger one is exactly the same as the one on the smaller one

 

money-mouth.gif.87ea440b14466a18c5d48419867e03cd.gif

 


Edited by Smithy Adjusted links to be Amazon-friendly (log)
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, rotuts said:

and one last thing :

 

its fun !

And surely fun is what it is all about!   Life is much too short to think otherwise. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Duvel said:

Partly it might be a budget issue. But I like the idea to carbonate wines that usually would not be developed into sparkling wine. Finding a good sparkling Riesling is a pain, finding a good Riesling and carbonating it rather easy.

 

Damn. I just put one kitchen tool more on my next home leave shopping list. Thanks Rotuts ...

 

Riesling now on shopping list.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, JoNorvelleWalker said:

 

Riesling now on shopping list.

 

Riesling is always on my shopping list, I prefer the dry variety.  Trader Joe is currently selling Emma Reichart Dry Riesling for 4.99 and I like it.  Will probably like it carbonated much better...

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

""  Emma Reichart Dry Riesling for 4.99 ""

 

thanks   Ill look for it.  I too like dry Reisling

 

and TJ's price is right in the ball-park for a Fizz.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2017 at 11:17 PM, MetsFan5 said:

 

 

  Ok so what exactly is the point here? To make crappy wine somehow drinkable? And to get the drinker drunk? I know carbonation enhances people's reaction to alcohol. Why not just buy a good, drinkable wine? Isn't this on par with adding bubbles to coffee to get the caffeine high faster? Crappy wine is crappy wine. Is this a budget issue? 

 

 

I wasn't aware that carbonation enhanced absorption of whatever is in your stomach, although, without further research, I'm not willing to dispute it. The link sure seems inconclusive.

 

For me, if I had one of these carbonation devices, I'd use it mostly for tap water to make my own seltzer without having to carry it on a four mile round trip on foot. I would sometimes mix that with vodka, I admit. There is a lot appeal to fizzy drinks that don't contain alcohol or caffeine. Just ask the mega rich Coca Cola Corp. or their investors.

 

And yeah, a lot of the eG community is retired and some of us are more flush than others, but I don't know anyone in their right mind who wants to spend more than necessary to have a good end result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Thanks for the Crepes said:

 

I wasn't aware that carbonation enhanced absorption of whatever is in your stomach, although, without further research, I'm not willing to dispute it. The link sure seems inconclusive.

 

For me, if I had one of these carbonation devices, I'd use it mostly for tap water to make my own seltzer without having to carry it on a four mile round trip on foot. I would sometimes mix that with vodka, I admit. There is a lot appeal to fizzy drinks that don't contain alcohol or caffeine. Just ask the mega rich Coca Cola Corp. or their investors.

 

And yeah, a lot of the eG community is retired and some of us are more flush than others, but I don't know anyone in their right mind who wants to spend more than necessary to have a good end result.

 

 

  I've considered Soda Streams and similar items because I do love soda water but because it's almost the only carbonated beverage I like, I can't validate the cost. 

 

But if if it makes things fun for you guys then cheers! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎10‎/‎25‎/‎2017 at 11:13 PM, MetsFan5 said:

 

 

  I've considered Soda Streams and similar items because I do love soda water but because it's almost the only carbonated beverage I like, I can't validate the cost. 

 

But if if it makes things fun for you guys then cheers! 

 

Quite seriously consider a multifunction vessel like the iSi.  Works for pancakes, methode rotuts, whipped cream, Hollandaise*, pressure extractions, soda...or as at the moment a zinfandel carafe.  In a pinch I have used one as a vase.

 

 

*not that I employ mine for Hollandaise.

 


Edited by JoNorvelleWalker contemptible autocorrect (log)
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a new MR glass :

 

5a1070dbef10d_MRGl.thumb.jpg.083e7065bd07d7f6cb52e8c8ef66658b.jpg

 

sorry you can't see the bubbles.

 

I was In the Hunt for a new pan,  ended up w a Demeyere saucier    on sale 

 

http://www.zwillingonline.com

 

and then 

 

http://www.zwillingonline.com/zwilling-sorrento-double-wall-glassware.html

 

they had a sale on all these vacuum glasses.  there are many sizes.  this is 10 oz

 

about the right size for an initial MR.

 

it a fine glass and does not need a coaster or the rubber-band cloth system Id been useing

 

it large at the hand hold level , so might not work for a smaller hand

 

very light  and when soapy  very slippery  .

 

keeps the MR at just the right temp until the next refill.

 

 


Edited by rotuts (log)
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, rotuts said:

a fine glass and does not need a coaster or the rubber-band cloth system Id been useing

 

Nice glass!  Things are getting quite classy chez @rotuts - moving away from the "rubber-band cloth system" sounds very upscale indeed xD!

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the older system did have a certain Panache .

 

you will have to scroll way back to see my Methode.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just to save you some time :

 

Old Methode :

 

5a1075516fb1a_RotaryChamp.thumb.jpg.5ad8d1bed2017e22a07c42d429da67ce.jpg

 

that's a Baccarat Rotary G&T glass   I stumbled on Baccarat while in FR in the mid ' 80;s

 

everything was very inexpensive  @ 11 FF / USD

 

they no longer make Rotary  and I can no longer afford it but Im well stocked.

 

that glass on ebay might be 300 - 400 USD    if you have the box

 

maybe most of the panache comes from the glass ?  but Ive certainly moved it into its own

 

Dimension.   I only have 3    used to have 4.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I use a Sodastream to carbonate wine? Everyone seems to be using something else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

personally

 

SodaStream mightn't be the way to go

 

I highly recommend

 

SodaPlus SP76327 Soda Carbonating Starter Kor

 

or

 

Mastrad A01900 Purefizz Soda Maker

 

i think these two are very difficult to find

 

look for New on ebay or so

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Orbit said:

Can I use a Sodastream to carbonate wine? Everyone seems to be using something else.

 

But if you had a one liter iSi you could use it for MR and so much else.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the ones w a screw top :

 

Mastrad A01900 Purefizz Soda Maker

 

which seem to be no longer around , loose less fizz with pouring than the siphons w the release lever

 

but if that's all you can find , they are much better than soda stream I think

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@JoNorvelleWalker

 

are not iSi's siphons ?

 

isi.jpg.205f4f4e9442c65a35ac726ede9879d7.jpg

 

I guess you work them upside down.

 

Ive been needing a ' treat ' for a while now , to counter act all that Snow ....

 

which do you recumbent ?

 

for MR   I have two of the older nonexistent PureFizz   one 750  w headspace for the gas  and one 1 L with even more headspace

 

the 750 works much better as one bot. of Vin  needs only one ' charge ' for decent MR    the 1 L has a much larger headspace for 750 cc

 

and thus needs several charges to get the partialipressure needed in that space to give you the righter fizz in the wine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps a matter of definition:  a siphon has a tube through which fluid is forced up.  This I would call a siphon...

 

https://www.isi.com/us/culinary/products/detail/product/23/

 

 

What I use is an iSi Gourmet Whip...

 

https://www.isi.com/us/culinary/products/detail/product/3/

 

 

For optimally dispensing carbonated beverage the vessel is neither inverted nor cut in half.  If you squirt the MR from the nozzle you give up all the fizz.

 

I use three chargers as recommended somewhere by @nathanm.  The first charger is applied with the valve slightly open to expel air and clear the headspace.  The second and third chargers provide the carbonation.  I shake well after each one.  Possibly a single charger would give more than satisfactory results but I buy my chargers in bulk by the case when they are on sale.

 

After about an hour in the freezer (assuming there's no ice cream) I place the iSi on the counter in the upright position and slowly release the pressure.  When all is clear I unscrew the head and pour.  Replacing the head until the next glass.

 

I do recommend the optional silicone sleeve to prevent flesh from sticking to the stainless steel and marring the finish.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

So  ............

 

this is what you have for MR ?

 

https://www.isi.com/us/culinary/products/detail/product/3/

 

you whip  the MR ?

 

Wow !

 

Im not so sure on ' Clear Head Space '

 

that might put me on the Disabled List 

 

do you start w very very cold wine ?

 

do you start w a freezer iSi ?

 

WoW

 

Id guess Id have to get the 1 L , 

 

is that what you have ?    it might have air pocket larger than my 750 Fiizzer

 

if your recommend it

 

In on it to get a fair price

 

Wow

 

MR-JNW !

 

P.S.:  I like like the ones w the Red Tops !

 

money-mouth.gif.7a7ab60aa6ba9d65689e7197f212fcba.gif


Edited by rotuts (log)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, rotuts said:

So  ............

 

this is what you have for MR ?

 

https://www.isi.com/us/culinary/products/detail/product/3/

 

you whip  the MR ?

 

 

I have three

https://www.isi.com/us/culinary/products/detail/product/3/

 

Some people have three CSO's.

 

Don't forget the red silicone jacket...

https://www.isi.com/us/culinary/products/detail/product/25/

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thread. We tried this a few years ago at my gf's parents' house (they have a soda stream, and I'd just read Dave Arnold's post on whipping up faux champaign). We had an inexpensive bottle of California chardonnay and gassed it. All of us loved it. Even the sommellier who happened to be hanging out with us that night. The wine tasted better sparkling than it did flat. It did not, however, taste like champagne. Our sommelier friend suggested repeating with a less oaky white bordeaux, which we haven't tried yet.

 

On his podcast, Dave Arnold once went on a long rant against soda streams and the equivalent, talking about what a massive waste of money they are. He said it's cheap and easy to plumb in a full-sized CO2 tank with filtered water, and have bubbles on tap all day. He'd probably tweat you the details of his setup.

 

I don't have room for that (or even a soda stream, for that matter).

 

Those of you using an isi, are you staying within the volume recommendations of the siphon, and doing a maximum of 500ml in the 1l container? Or have you gone rogue and done a whole 750ml bottle in there?

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, paulraphael said:

Those of you using an isi, are you staying within the volume recommendations of the siphon, and doing a maximum of 500ml in the 1l container? Or have you gone rogue and done a whole 750ml bottle in there?

 

I am confused.  For the 1 quart iSi the max. filling volume is specified as 1 liter, and a liter of liquid comes to the max fill line marked on the vessel.  There is headspace above that.  Why would you use only 500 ml?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By ElsieD
      I got an e-mail this morning about the Modernist team's next project - pizza! 
       
      Modernist Pizza is Underway!
      After taking on the world of bread, we’re thrilled to announce the topic of our next book: pizza. Modernist Pizza will explore the science, history, equipment, technology, and people that have made pizza so beloved.

      Authors Nathan Myhrvold and Francisco Migoya, with the Modernist Cuisine team, are currently at work conducting extensive research and testing long-held pizza-making beliefs; this quest for knowledge has already taken them to cities across the United States, Italy, and beyond. The result of their work will be a multivolume cookbook that includes both traditional and innovative recipes for pizzas found around the globe along with techniques that will help you make pizza the way you like it.

      Modernist Pizza is in its early stages, and although we’ve begun to dig in, we still have a lot of work ahead of us. Although we can’t guarantee when it will arrive at your door just yet, we can promise that this book will deliver the complete story of pizza as it’s never been told before.

      In the meantime, we would love to hear from you as we continue to research pizza from around the world. Contact pizza@modernistcuisine.com to tell us about your favorite pizzerias and their pizza. Connect with us on social media to get all the latest Modernist Pizza updates.
    • By Tempranillo
      I have been tasked with putting together a team for a new kosher barbecue event in Arizona, happening sometime later this year. The event was supposed to be in mid-April, but the venue decided to cancel. The organizers are busy looking for a new venue, and have assured us that this will happen.
       
      Many details for the event are not quite settled yet, so, I am trying to prepare for all sorts of contingencies beyond the usual concerns about putting out good food. What is known is that we will be following the KCBS kosher rules. As far as I can tell, there were 10-12 such events held last year across the US. So, it's a pretty small world. I don't think there's a kosher championship ladder like the other barbecue events have, either. I think it's a good time to get in, get practice and see where it takes me.
       
      Now, I've been reading and watching videos online with all sorts of info on smoking/cooking for competitions. I have watched some of the TV shows, and one documentary. It's been kind of a mixed bag in terms of usefulness. No one has posted much about kosher barbecue, so I am making changes to recipes and procedures and running a lot of tests. I currently have access to my home kitchen which is small but adequate, the stove is electric and unremarkable and about 7 years old. It does maintain temperature well, and can be set to run anywhere from 140°F to 550°F.  I also have access to an outdoor kitchen at a friend's place, with a relatively large charcoal type grill. At most of the kosher barbecue events the event organizers provide smokers/grills plus meats and many ingredients to ensure that everything is truly kosher. If needed, my team sponsor is prepared to purchase a grill/smoker which I will need to research once I know I will need it.
       
      I should note that I am not Jewish and did not grow up around any kosher households, so I am also studying some of the finer points about running a kosher kitchen and learning about kosher ingredients. Modern competition barbecue is an odd mix of modernist techniques and ingredients, right alongside ordinary-folk foods like margarine, and bottled sauces.
       
      For reference, the 4 categories for kosher events are: Chicken, Beef Ribs, Turkey, and Beef Brisket -to be served in that order.
       
      So far, I have been running smokeless tests on chicken and beef ribs. Mostly learning to trim the chicken thighs (what a nightmare!) and seeing what happens at certain temperatures and times. I know things will be different with real smoking happening, but I want to see some baseline results so that I know what to strive for. I do have a bunch of thermometers, and have got some basic ideas about writing a competition timeline.
       
      The chicken perplexes me in several ways. First, some of the competition cooks recommend boning while others recommend bone-in. Second, I see some folks injecting and brining, while others maybe do a quick half hour marinade, and even others are full-on modernist with citric acid under the skin, etc. Third, the braise vs non- braise chicken where some people load up their pan with a pound of butter, margarine or a couple cups of chicken stock while others do not. Fourth, The bite-through skin is driving me insane. Some people swear by transglutaminase to reattach the skin for a better bite. Catch is, only some types are kosher, and I can see having issues explaining it. I have tested an egg white egg wash which seems to attach the skin pretty well without showing. I think I need to go for longer times to get more tender skin. Today I did a pan (with olive oil) of six as follows: one hour at 220°, one hour under foil at 230°, then glazed and 20 minutes on a rack at 350°. It was only partly bite-though and the taste-testers wanted more crispiness. I tried showing them pictures and explained that it wasn't ever going to be crispy, that we're looking to go even softer. I am going to run tests on longer cook periods and see how it goes.
       
      I want to ask people about the whole swimming in margarine thing which is in voque right now. people claim it makes the chicken juicy. I know that meat is mostly all about temperatures. I can see how the margarine acts like duck fat in a confit and helps prevent some oven-drying after hours and hours in the oven, but, in the end, isn't it just an insulator?
       
      I've been making corned beef and other brisket dishes for over 20 years, so, I think I have a good handle on that. I will practice it in a couple of weeks. I simply don't need as much help on this item.
       
      The turkey scares me. On TV, I see people dunking it in butter before serving it. This obviously is not kosher, and I don't want to do it with margarine I don't want to present anything in a competition made with margarine, there has to be something better! -Either cook the bird better or find a better dip, like maybe a flavorful nut oil or a sauce. That said, unlike ribs or brisket, it is not traditional to dunk turkey in a sauce.  I went with some friends to a chain place called Dickies to do a little research and their turkey breast was odd and kind of hammy. Not like Virginia ham, more like ham lunchmeat. It was very moist and unlike any turkey I have ever eaten. Ok, I admit to not being very fond of turkey, so my experiences with it have been a bit limited. I am assuming it was brined. Given the limited amount of time we will have (about a day and a half) to cook, I am planning on just cooking the breast. Other than that, I am open to suggestions. The internet has been least informative on the topic of turkey. People's videos and such just show rubbing the whole bird and letting it roast for a few hours. Any tips at all would be appreciated.
       
      Whew! Thanks for reading all of this, I look forward to any advice you can give.
    • By flippant
      I've had the CSO for a number of years now, but have yet to actually bake bread in it.
       
      Reading through the Modernist Bread thread on this forum I see many of you are using the CSO to great effect, which is heartening.
       
      To that end, I would like to know about your experience baking bread in it – what sort of extra equipment you use (pans, cast iron? etc), what breads work the best, any corrections you find yourself making, or anything you feel might be useful to someone else using the CSO.
       
      Thank you!
       
       
    • By Rho
       
      The space race trickled into kitchens in the 60s and 70s, including one curious tool that's faded away in the years since: the thermal pin, a heat pipe skewer that can halve cooking times for roasts:

       
      Heat pipes are thermal superconductors, transferring heat 500-1000 times more effectively than solid copper (some people in the sous vide thread have discussed copper pins). They're hollow tubes with the air evacuated and a small amount of working fluid, often water. The usable temperature range is limited by the triple point and the critical point, with additional constraints near the edges. Water is effective from 20C-280C /70F-530F, which comfortably spans most cooking temperatures.
       
      Modernist Bread has an excellent section on how bread bakes, including a diagram of the internal heat pipes that develop, summarized here. (click for a good photo!)
       
      Sous-vide solves the overcooking side of the gradient problem, but it's still limited by total heat diffusion time-- doubling the size of a cut quadruples the time needed for the center to reach temperature. Heat pipe pins should make larger cuts practical, or normal cuts cook faster. Here's a graph from "The heat pipe and its potential for enhancing the cooking and cooling of meat joints", showing average temperatures over time for 1kg joints of meat convection baked at 190C/375F for 110 minutes (foil removed for the last 30 minutes):

       
      Thermal pins were sold commercially from 1956 to about 1990. They're listed occasionally for about $20 on ebay. They even made potato baking racks with heat pipes-- though now you can easily par-cook a potato in the microwave and finish it in the oven.
       
      I don't know why production of thermal pins stopped, or what fundamental problems limited their usage. It seems like pans and commercial griddles would be improved by adding heat pipes to spread heat throughout and avoid hot or cold spots. Perhaps roasts fell out of favor as the culture of entertaining shifted away from monolithic centerpieces to smaller, more precisely cooked portions.
    • By philie
      Hey there, i hope to find some help in the wise hands of yours. after some research i am still having some problems concerning glazing:
       
      For a party i would like to make some cubes and rounded savoury cakes and foams out of silicone forms that have a ready bottom and a colour glazing. 
      Somehow i just do not manage to find a steady glazing ( one that does not run ) and is for texture reasons preferably hard or crisp that does not include sugar or syrup.
       
      can you help me or lead my way in a certain direction?
       
      thanks very much!
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×