Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

JoNorvelleWalker

Methode Rotuts

Recommended Posts

N2O makes for a wicked MR, particularly when it is unexpected.

I thought you were meant to drink it, not sniff the bubbles.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tonight, just for fun, I went with one silver cylinder and one gold, as encouraged by Dave Arnold.  Not bad (and I didn't spill it) but I sort of think I prefer either all silver or all gold.

 

The night before I had liberal Soave but uncarbonated.  It sort of depends upon the food.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A possibly interesting anecdote:  last night I was enjoying my MR with a baguette, apple (granny smith), and cheese.  At one point I mistakenly grabbed a pressure vessel that had not yet been carbonated (or whatever your vapors of choice).  Horrible flat stuff, it was all I could do to choke it down.

 

The glass, that is.  The rest of the vessel soon enough became MR.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"someone I know"  who might live "nearby"  MR's some dryish white from a box  [ed.:  :blink: ]

 

it was ice cold on a warm day, they said 

 

and the fizz took over and was OK

 

that's the story Im sticking to

 

TJ's 3 L   $$  11  in MA

 

probably cheaper near you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This perhaps could go almost without saying, but MR is not nearly as efficacious when prepared with previously used cylinders, no matter your vapor of preference.  Ask me how I know this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i make it a point to remove used cylinders immediately from the M.R. prep. area.

 

I have yet to be disappointed by this plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that I have a PureFizz, I’m ready to join the MR fan club. 

 

I’ve now tried it once with Monsieur Rotuts’ preferred TJ cuvée with okay but underwhelming results.  I saw lots of little bubbles but somehow they didn’t register on the palate, if that makes sense.  A bit of a sour flavor.  Luckily Santa also gave me a few boxes of the CO2 cylinders so I’m ready to try again.

 

My PureFizz came with minimal directions on the packaging and a few tips in the enclosed “recipe” book.  I learned more from reading here and in MC but still have a few questions.

 

According to the PureFizz info, the bubbles get smaller the more you shake the bottle. Has anyone worked out the optimal number of shakes?  I got very small bubbles but no bubble sensation in the drinking, so perhaps I was over-enthusiastic.

 

PureFizz also says that the more you let the bottle sit, the fizzier it gets.  How long do others let it rest after adding the CO2?  MC recommends an hour, but from what I’ve read here, no one waits that long for MR.

 

Also wondering if the “sour flavor” is a matter of finding the right still wine for my palate, or is it something in my technique?

 

I do not own a Baccarat flute. Perhaps that is the problem.

 

 


Edited by LindaK correct formatting (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, LindaK said:

I do not own a Baccarat flute. Perhaps that is the problem

:D:D:D

 

Did you taste the wine pre-Fizz?  I would recommend using a wine that you know you enjoy.  I usually go with a dry rosé because the pink bubbles look especially festive.  I haven't done carefully controlled studies but when I've stored the Fizzed product in the fridge for a couple of hours, I thought the bubbles were finer.  But as you have noted, do we really have that sort of time on our hands?????  Of course, I defer to M. Rotuts on all of the above.

 

A side note.  Over the summer, I was thinking it would be nice to have a spare PureFizz bottle and looked into buying a second unit as a spare.  My, but they were hard to come by and pricy, too!  Just the other day, I broke down and ordered one of these SodaPlus units.  I bought an Amazon Warehouse deal (slightly damaged packaging) for ~ $50, including a box of 10 chargers.   It arrived yesterday and except for the 1.2L container, everything is identical to the PureFizz, down to the wording of the manual.   Haven't used it yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blue, I don;t know where Santa found the PureFizz. Good to know about SodaPlus if I decide that I need a cold canister available at all times!

 

I thought the wine was fine pre-fizz, but the flavor had changed with addition of CO2.  I'm going to try getting it colder too, maybe the hour in the fridge wasn't enough.


Edited by LindaK correct formatting, remove admin comment (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is what I have :

 

http://www.amazon.com/Mastrad-A01900-Purefizz-Soda-Maker/dp/B00FKVRY1M/ref=pd_sxp_redirect

 

he SodaPluss looks very similar, and might be made by the same company.  It also larger.  my PZ holds 750 cc

 

same a my TJ's

 

indeed try a white you would like to drink flat.

 

keep the wine and container very cold.  I add very cold wine to the bottle and that's been in the freezer.

 

I sometimes them lay the full PF on its side after I charge it up.

 

I think it can handle two CO2 charges.

 

and yes, not just MR, but Life tastes better w Baccarat

 

Ive given up on my B's flute collection for MR

 

I use the Gin and T 'Rotary' 'bar' glass.  less trips to the PF

 

enjoy !

 

P.S.:  just remember that M.R. is not just a Personal Beverage, Its a P.B.++

 

568566912841d_surprised.gif.8bc59ad754c5

 

so make it your Own !

 

I might be having some MR soon, myself !

 

xD


Edited by rotuts (log)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LindaK said:

Now that I have a PureFizz, I’m ready to join the MR fan club. 

 

I’ve now tried it once with Monsieur Rotuts’ preferred TJ cuvée with okay but underwhelming results.  I saw lots of little bubbles but somehow they didn’t register on the palate, if that makes sense.  A bit of a sour flavor.  Luckily Santa also gave me a few boxes of the CO2 cylinders so I’m ready to try again.

 

My PureFizz came with minimal directions on the packaging and a few tips in the enclosed “recipe” book.  I learned more from reading here and in MC but still have a few questions.

 

According to the PureFizz info, the bubbles get smaller the more you shake the bottle. Has anyone worked out the optimal number of shakes?  I got very small bubbles but no bubble sensation in the drinking, so perhaps I was over-enthusiastic.

 

PureFizz also says that the more you let the bottle sit, the fizzier it gets.  How long do others let it rest after adding the CO2?  MC recommends an hour, but from what I’ve read here, no one waits that long for MR.

 

Also wondering if the “sour flavor” is a matter of finding the right still wine for my palate, or is it something in my technique?

 

I do not own a Baccarat flute. Perhaps that is the problem.

 

 

 

 

Welcome to the group!  Uncorked by Gerard Liger-Belair Princeton University Press, 2013 is a fine treatise on the science of bubbles, and a good place to start.  And a nice place to end up.  Recommended by Dave Arnold and by me.  Gerard Liger-Belair does not use a flute!  But rather a goblet.  I would add, a large goblet.  Mine are of course Baccarat.

 

Bubbles increase in size the further they travel towards the surface.  If you desire larger bubbles maximize this distance.  But possibly you're just not getting enough carbonation.  I chill my wine in the freezer.  Though sometimes it gets too cold and starts to turn to slush.  I don't use a PureFizz, so cannot offer specific recommendations.

 

By the way, cylinders are cheaper by the case.  This is what I buy (and I can recommend the company):

http://www.creamright.com/product/SODA-360-KAY.html

 

Just for fun I might use a flute tonight.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an experiment tonight I made a one CO2 cylinder MR.  Not to save expense, mind you, as of course you know I purchase cylinders by the hundreds.  Even though I am not always as profligate as to make the full Modernist Cuisine three cylinder recipe.

 

I guess one might call this MR cremant.

 

Obviously one can make MR to taste, depending on one's vapors of choice and how happy one wants to be.  As I recall Dave Arnold favors a ratio of something like 3:2.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive settled on one cylinder / 750 cc of substrate.   I tried 2 but it was too fizzy for me.

 

they only key Ive seen is that everything should be very cold.

 

PS   I wonder what's going on with the pure fizz :

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/like/111552425969?lpid=82&chn=ps&ul_noapp=true

 

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FKVRY1M/?tag=soda-maker-20

 

this looks to me to be the same thing more or less :

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CEAPDME/ref=pd_lpo_sbs_dp_ss_2?pf_rd_p=1944687582&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=B00FKVRY1M&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0PCEPDY5GWJKW4K3TP01

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be interesting to get a nitrous oxide cylinder for the MR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what would you be looking for, i.e. in a fizzy drink   vs  whipping cream ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fizzy drink with a bit of polypharmacy

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah  Yes.  PolyPharmacy.

 

well    your not going to get anything out of the N2O with the fizz.

 

not from personal experience    

 

but some time ago I was familiar with Uptake and Distribution.

 

not going to happen here re N2O

 

but Id try it to see if the Fizz has other interesting properties if I had a cartridge or two of Cream-Whip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This time I intended to make a 1:1 batch of MR.  I looked and looked but could not find my nitrous oxide.  I know I have several boxes somewhere.  I hate when I misplace essential kitchen staples.  So, sadly, tonight's MR ended up all carbon dioxide.

 

Life could be far worse.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now studying wine formally, I have come across MR as it is referred to in the wine world: Pompe Bicyclette.


Edited by nickrey (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/20/2016 at 1:06 PM, rotuts said:

Ah  Yes.  PolyPharmacy.

 

well    your not going to get anything out of the N2O with the fizz.

 

not from personal experience    

 

but some time ago I was familiar with Uptake and Distribution.

 

not going to happen here re N2O

 

but Id try it to see if the Fizz has other interesting properties if I had a cartridge or two of Cream-Whip

 

Not so sure you won't get a little buzz from inhaling the headspace prior to a sip.

 

I like to think that one would.

 

But you do have a point about U and D.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/14/2015 at 11:12 PM, JoNorvelleWalker said:

A possibly interesting anecdote:  last night I was enjoying my MR with a baguette, apple (granny smith), and cheese.  At one point I mistakenly grabbed a pressure vessel that had not yet been carbonated (or whatever your vapors of choice).  Horrible flat stuff, it was all I could do to choke it down.

 

The glass, that is.  The rest of the vessel soon enough became MR.

 

 

  Ok so what exactly is the point here? To make crappy wine somehow drinkable? And to get the drinker drunk? I know carbonation enhances people's reaction to alcohol. Why not just buy a good, drinkable wine? Isn't this on par with adding bubbles to coffee to get the caffeine high faster? Crappy wine is crappy wine. Is this a budget issue? 


Edited by MetsFan5 (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MetsFan5 said:

 

 

  Ok so what exactly is the point here? To make crappy wine somehow drinkable? And to get the drinker drunk? I know carbonation enhances people's reaction to alcohol. Why not just buy a good, drinkable wine? Isn't this on par with adding bubbles to coffee to get the caffeine high faster? Crappy wine is crappy wine. Is this a budget issue? 

 

 

That's more than two years ago and I don't remember what the wine in question was.  But it wasn't good.  Particularly when I was expecting it to be carbonated.  Ever been served a flat coke?  I was trying several different vintages to see which carbonated best.

 

My go to white wine is Folonari Soave -- wonderful wine -- carbonated or not.  It is a great budget wine.  Eternal thanks to Eric Asimov.  I do not carbonate my wines to get drunk.  Getting drunk has never been a challenge.  Upperclassmates charged only a modest markup.*  Funny I was just having this conversation with a visiting collage friend over dinner this evening.

 

But yes, I confess this is a budgetary issue.  In my pensionary years I cannot afford vintage Grand cru at every meal.

 

 

*Technically speaking they charged only Pennsylvania State Store prices but they purchased in volume out of state.  Let's hear it for free enterprise.  I trust the statute of limitations has run out.

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Daily Gullet Staff
      By John Sconzo

      The Daily Gullet is proud to present this, the first in a multi-part, front-row report on the recent "Spain and the World Table" conference. Watch for subsequent installments in this topic.

      In his introduction of Ferran Adria, Thomas Keller -- perhaps the most celebrated American chef ever -- described four elements that go into making a great chef. The chef must be aware. Once aware of one’s culinary and other surroundings that chef can then be inspired, which leads to the ability to interpret those surroundings. But a great chef does not stop there. Instead, the great chef continues to evolve. Ferran Adria, perhaps more than any other chef who has ever lived, is the embodiment of those four elements.

      The moment that Ferran Adria strode towards Thomas Keller on the stage at the CIA/Greystone’s World of Flavors’ “Spain and the World Table” Conference was electric -- as if a giant Van de Graf generator had been turned on. The feeling didn’t subside when Adria took the stage from Keller; it only became more pronounced as the packed crowd rose to its feet, raining applause, admiration and love on the Spanish master. Adria accepted the response with aplomb, and gave it right back to the audience -- and to his fellow Spanish cocineros, who were standing off to the side. He brought each one up to join him on the stage for a rousing thank-you to the conference organizers, sponsors and participants. Once this emotional release subsided, Adria got down to what everyone had been waiting for -- his discussion and demonstration.

      Ferran Adria, with eyes sparkling like the finest cava, began speaking Spanish in a voice as gravelly as the beaches of the Costa Brava, while Conference Chairman Jose Andres translated. The crowd, hushed and straining for every word, moved forward in their seats as Adria explained El Bulli and himself, with a lesson in recent culinary history thrown in. Ferran explained that El Bulli is not a business. While offshoots of El Bulli are operated on a for-profit basis, the restaurant runs without profit as a primary motivation. For example, he said, the greatest difficulty they have is distributing reservations. Given the extraordinary demand and the severely limited supply, he explained that they could simply raise the price of a meal to the point where the supply and demand met. Indeed, the price of a meal at El Bulli is in itself quite reasonable given the stature of the restaurant and well within means of most motivated diners should they be able to get there, and this is how Adria prefers it. He stated that he was not interested in cooking solely for those with the most money. He prefers to work for people with a true interest in exploring the limits of cooking with him. To this end he showed a short film depicting “A Day in the Life . . .” of El Bulli set to the Beatles’ song of the same name. The film showed a couple’s response to the experience.

      Ferran’s voyage into creativity began with a visit to Jacques Maxima at Le Chanticleer Restaurant in Nice, France. He learned from Maxima that to be creative is not to copy. This idea changed his entire approach to cooking -- from making classic cuisine to making his own. Aware of elaborate books of French cuisine, Adria resolved to catalogue his work, the results of which are the richly detailed El Bulli books, published by period. These books, as wonderful as they are, are huge and extremely expensive. During his presentation, Adria announced -- and demonstrated -- that the individual dishes photographed and described in a chronology within each book are all now available online at elbulli.com.

      He finished the philosophical discussion by talking about the general style of haute cuisine that he and others are engaged in. While others have coined the term “molecular gastronomy” to highlight the scientific component of the creativity involved, Adria rejected it, saying that all cooking is molecular: most of his techniques are in fact rather simple and don’t employ radical new technology. Most of the technology that they do use has been around for some time; they have simply adapted it to their own purposes. Nevertheless, he applauds contributions to gastronomy from Harold McGee and other food scientists, and welcomes their collaboration in the kitchen. He has yet to find a term that describes the movement: as of now, he feels that there really is no good name for this style of cooking.

      More than any other single thing, Ferran Adria is known for the use of “foams” in cooking. While he is proud of his achievements with foams, he stressed that while appropriate in some circumstances, the real utility of foams is limited. He bemoans their ubiquity -- and wishes to not be blamed for others’ poor deployment of the concept. In the course of describing this and other techniques, Adria made a point of stating that using them should not be inferred as copying. Techniques and concepts are to be used and shared. He invited everyone to learn and harness whatever they found interesting, and to employ it in to their own pursuits.

      Another set of techniques discussed and demonstrated by the master and his assistant, Rafa Morales from Hacienda Benazuza, included three types of spherification. These included the use of calcium chloride (CaCl) and sodium alginate as well as the converse, and exploration of a new agent, gluconodeltalactone. The original combinations of alginate into CaCl for “caviar” production, and CaCl into alginate for larger “spheres” have chemistry-related limits as to what can be sphericized. In private correspondence, Harold McGee explained to me that Adria described encapsulating a mussel in its own juice. While this would make the dish technically an aspic, unlike conventional aspics it remains a liquid. Adria said that though gluconodeltalactone is very new, and they are just beginning to get a handle on it, he is very excited by it. He also demonstrated a machine for spherification on a larger scale than they had originally been able to do, as well as liquid nitrogen and freeze-drying (lyophilization) techniques. At the conclusion of his demonstration -- and thus the Conference -- the audience once again awarded him a standing ovation.

      While Adria’s appearance was the culmination of the conference, the energy it produced was not just because of his stature in the world of gastronomy -- it was also due to the excitement generated by the conference that preceded it. If there had previously been any doubt, Thomas Keller’s welcome of Adria was a clarion: Spanish cuisine has landed on North American shores and is finding a niche in the North American psyche. Spanish cuisine -- in its multifaceted, delicious entirety -- lives here, too.

      + + + + +

      John M. Sconzo, M.D., aka docsconz, is an anesthesiologist practicing in upstate New York. He grew up in Brooklyn in an Italian-American home, in which food was an important component of family life. It still is. His passions include good food, wine and travel. John's gastronomic interests in upstate northeastern New York involve finding top-notch local producers of ingredients and those who use them well. A dedicated amateur, John has no plans to ditch his current career for one in the food industry. Host, New York.
    • By docsconz
      About Jose Andres
       
      Throughout his career, Jose’s vision and imaginative creations have drawn the praise of the public, the press and his peers. José has received awards and recognition from Food Arts, Bon Appetit, Food & Wine, Saveur, the James Beard Foundation, Wine Spectator, and Wine Advocate. In addition, José has been featured in leading food magazines such as Gourmet as well as the New York Times, the Washington Post, Good Morning America, Fox Sunday Morning News with Chris Wallace, the Food Network, and USA Today.
       
      Widely acknowledged as the premiere Spanish chef cooking in America, José is a developer and Conference Chairman for the upcoming Worlds of Flavor Conference on Spain and the World Table at The Culinary Institute of America at Greystone, November 2 – 5, 2006.
       
      In 1993, Jose moved to Washington, DC, to head the kitchen at Jaleo. From there, Jose took on executive chef responsibilities at neighboring Café Atlantico and later Zaytinya. In July of 2003, Jose embarked on his most adventurous project to date with the opening of the minibar by jose andres at Cafe Atlantico. A six-seat restaurant within a restaurant, minibar by jose andres continues to attract international attention with its innovative tasting menu. In the fall of 2004, Jose opened a third Jaleo and Oyamel, an authentic Mexican small plates restaurant and launched the THINKfoodTANK, an institution devoted to the research and development of ideas about food, all with a view toward their practical applications in the kitchen.
       
      Every week, millions of Spaniards invite Jose into their home where he is the host and producer of “Vamos a cocinar”, a food program on Television Española (TVE), Spanish national television. The program airs in the United States and Latin America on TVE Internacional.
       
      Jose released his first cookbook this year, first published in English, Tapas: A Taste of Spain in America (published in the United States by Clarkson Potter) and shortly after in Spanish, Los fogones de José Andrés (published by Planeta). The book is an homage to Spanish cooking and to tapas, one of Spain's gifts to the world of good cooking.
       
      Jose Andres is passionate, intelligent, dedicated, witty and a fan of FC Barcelona.
       
      Jose has been a member of the eGullet Society since 2004.
       
      More on Jose Andres in the eG Forums:
      Cooking with "Tapas" by Jose Andres
      Vamos a Cocinar - cooking show with Jose Andres
      Jaleo
      José Andrés' Minibar
      Zaytinya
      Oyamel Cocina Mexicana, Crystal City
      Cafe Atlantico
       
      Jose Andres recipes from Tapas in RecipeGullet:
      Potatoes Rioja-Style with Chorizo (Patatas a la Riojana)
      Moorish-Style Chickpea and Spinach Stew
      Squid with Caramelized Onions
    • By gibbs
      With Modernist Cuisine I waited a couple of years and ended up with a copy from the 6th printing run the advantage of this was that all errors picked up in the erratta had been corrected in the print copy.  I am looking to get modernist bread soon and wondered if someone had purchased it recently to check or if someone knew of hand if they have printed any additional corrected runs 
    • By TdeV
      I'm thinking that one isn't supposed to add salt to meat which is about to be sous-vided. I have no idea from whence the idea came, nor whether it's correct.
       
      Also I'm thinking that raw onion is ok in the sous vide bag, but not raw garlic (because it imparts a harsh flavour).
       
      Either of these impressions have value?
    • By Fabio
      Last year I had dinner at Belcanto in Lisbon and one of the dishes featured a "tomato water snow" or "tomato water cloud" (translated from the original Portuguese: "Nuvem/neve de agua de tomate") that I'm trying to replicate without success. Imagine a thick and solid foam of tomato water that immediately liquefies when you put in your mouth. The cloud was atop smoked fish and olive oil was drizzled over it.
       
      I whipped a mixture of tomato water and albumin powder (2 tsp albumin, 2tbsp tomato water) along with a pinch of cream of tartar, getting to the stiff peaks point after some effort. Trying to dehidrate the foam even as low as 150F didn't work; the foam collapsed. I then tried the savory meringue approach with some sugar and salt. The result was indeed a meringue that tasted like tomato but completely different from what I had at Belcanto. What am I missing? I've attached a photo of the dish so you can see what the cloud looks like.
       
      Thanks!
       

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×