• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

  • product-image-quickten.png.a40203b506711f7664fc62024e54a584.pngDid you know that these all-volunteer forums are operated by the 501(c)3 not-for-profit Society for Culinary Arts & Letters? This holiday season, consider a tax-deductible Quick Ten Bucks to support the eG Forums and help us remain completely advertising-free. Thanks to all those who have donated so far!

adrianvm

Chicken liver mousse, sous vide, astringent aftertaste

12 posts in this topic

I've been making chicken liver mousse by frying some chicken livers.  I cook some shallots, deglaze the pan with port, reduce it, and then combine all of the above with butter in the food processor and strain it.  It seems like the results are kind of variable.  I believe this has to do with the step of cooking the livers.  Sometimes I get them more cooked, sometimes less.  The product often has a kind of gritty texture that some of my family don't like. 

 

In the recent posts on modernistcuisine they mentioned making chicken liver mouse by cooking the livers sous vide.  In fact, the chef who did this specifically noted the problem of improper cooking of the livers.  However, no information was given as to the temperature he used. 

 

So I cooked the livers at 131 F for 2 hours and then followed the procedure above.   The resulting product was extremely smooth.  But it had an astringent aftertaste that ruined the mousse.  In fact, I ended up throwing it away.  

 

This brought to mind a different chicken liver preparation I had tried in the past where raw chicken livers were pureed with eggs and butter and the mixture was cooked sous vide.  That product also had an astrigent taste. 

 

So I'm wondering where this astringent taste is coming from and what is necessary to eliminate it.  If I sous vide cook the livers at some higher temperature will I be able to get a result which is smooth, and has a flavor similar to the flavor I got when I pan fried the livers? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cdh, I think the livers were properly cleaned.  I get my livers from the same place and didn't do anything different than when I cook them normally, and normal cooking does not produce the astringent taste.  I observed the astrigent taste every time I cooked liver sous vide, which is 4 times, I think.  Is it possible that the bile is destroyed by high heat cooking but not by lower heat? 

 

CatPoet, it sounds like you're saying you blanch the livers before cooking them.  I have heard of this practice, though it's not clear what blanching is supposed to accomplish.  The best explanation I've seen is that it makes it easier to remove membranes, perhaps more of an issue with veal liver than chicken?  I have never done this and have always gotten good results (other than possibly issues with overcooking) by simply salting and pan frying livers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard it makes for a smoother mousse / paté and well it works so I have kept doing it for  some 20 years now.


Cheese is you friend, Cheese will take care of you, Cheese will never betray you, But blue mold will kill me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure the bile glands were completely removed from the livers? Bile is bitter and astringent.

 

That was my thought, too; even a little bit of leaking bile can ruin the flavour. As far as I know, heat (high or low) does not soften the flavour of bile. Once it's in there, that's pretty much it.


Michaela, aka "Mjx"
Manager, eG Forums
mscioscia@egstaff.org

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if bile acid/bile alcohols might act like certain herbs in sous vide - their volatility in braises and other cooking methods might mean the astringent compounds cook out, while they may remain in the food in a sealed sous vide bag.  

 

I think you need to make a single batch - split in two and cook two ways to see if the astringency is only in the sous vide prep.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually now that you mention it, I have actually done that.  I had one package of livers that was fairly large, so I used one portion for my customary fried preparation, and it came out as usual with no astringent flavor.  I used the other portion for the experimental sous vide liver mouse where I combined the raw liver with eggs and butter in the blender and then cooked it sous vide.  And it developed the astrigent taste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be exploring some other temperatures. 131F (55C) is much lower than the temperature that you would get with frying. I'd probably try 61C (142F). To cook and pasteurise to core would only take  36 minutes (thank you sous vide dash). A much shorter cooking time may decrease the likelihood of off flavours developing.


Nick Reynolds, aka "nickrey"

"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four.
Unless there are three other people." Orson Welles
My eG Foodblog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe  this one of the things who doesnt get better by sous vide?   


Cheese is you friend, Cheese will take care of you, Cheese will never betray you, But blue mold will kill me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the first try doesn't work, it is not a reason to discard the process.


Nick Reynolds, aka "nickrey"

"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four.
Unless there are three other people." Orson Welles
My eG Foodblog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I was inspired to use sous vide because Modernist Cuisine posted that they got a reliably smooth texture that way, and texture has been a problem when I fry them.  I asked Modernist Cuisine directly for advice and they suggest soaking the livers in salted milk over night to remove residual bile and blood before cooking at 60 C.  They thought that sous vide cooking does make the off flavors worse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By FeChef
      This year i decided to take a 22lb turkey and remove the Leg quarters and sous vide @165F for 6 hours. I also removed the turkey crown and sous vide it @ 150F for 4 hours. Both were immediately ice chilled and put into the fridge. The plan is to reheat back in the sous vide @ 135F and right before serving time, deep fry in the turkey fryer for a few minutes to crisp up the skins.
       
      I just am just not sure the time needed to bring this pretty large whole deboned (3-4 inch at the thickest spot) turkey breast up to temp. The leg portion is about the same thickness maybe slightly thinner. Given there is 4 hours till serving time, I am wondering what effect 135F would have if left in for 4 hours? I am looking for traditional textures. Relatives will not eat if any hint of pink.
       
      Anyway, 1,2,3,4 hours @ 135F from 38F already pre cooked. 3-4 inches thick.
      thanks
    • By TdeV
      I've just cooked two lamb shanks sous vide for 72 hours at 141F in separate bags. When I opened the first bag, the shank looked and smelled great.
       
      The second bag, however, smelled bad (to me). The shank was covered in gelatinous red stuff. My husband is less smell-impaired than I, so he ate that one.
       
      The two shanks were purchased from the meat market associated with the Department of Animal Sciences at the local university where the students will have butchered the animals.
       
      I'm wondering if what's possible is that one of the shanks did not have all the blood drained out. And that the smell which I've associated with "bad" is actually the smell of blood.
    • By ulterior epicure
      Can anyone illuminate me on the appeal of cooking meat by putting it in a plastic bag and boiling it? I've had this at many a (fine) restaurant and I fail to appreciate the ecstasy at which some seem to undergo when encountering (or offering) this preparation...
      Short of sounding absolutely ignorant, I realize that the technique affords great advantages to some products (like foie gras), but chicken? pork? Tender as they may be, I prefer a more natural way of "sealing" food - perhaps the age-old bladder or other non-porous offal
      I ask only because I wish that I could be "enlightened" and join the swooning masses when offered this preparation at a restaurant...
      U.E.
    • By bhsimon
      I want to make mint spheres for use in a hot sauce. (Think lamb with mint caviar.)   Can this be done? Is it possible to make heat-stable spheres?   What is the most effective way to extract mint flavour from the raw leaves? I don't want the resulting spheres to contain alcohol as it will be served to children. My cursory investigations indicate that glycerol may be an alternative—has anyone done this?
    • By boudin noir
      I recently did some halibut steaks sous vide. They were about 1 1/2  inches thick. I did them for 30 minutes at 122 degrees. When i took them out to brown them, they were very fragile. As I browned them they fell apart. They were delicious, perfectly cooked from an eating point of view, but ugly. Too hot, too long or both?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.