• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

  • product-image-quickten.png.a40203b506711f7664fc62024e54a584.pngDid you know that these all-volunteer forums are operated by the 501(c)3 not-for-profit Society for Culinary Arts & Letters? This holiday season, consider a tax-deductible Quick Ten Bucks to support the eG Forums and help us remain completely advertising-free. Thanks to all those who have donated so far!

seannymurrs

Cooking burgers sous vide, have some questions

129 posts in this topic

I'm having some people over for dinner tonight and am planning on cooking some burgers sous vide using my anova. I'm running into some complications due to everyone wanting their burger cooked to a a different degree of doneness. I need some cooked well done, some medium, and some medium rare. I'm going to lay out my plans on how to accomplish this and I'd like some input on whether or not it will work and/or if there's a better way.

 

According to the time tables I've looked at it should take about 75 minutes to cook and pasteurize the well done burgers in 160F water. If I put those in first and then as soon as they're done added some ice to the water to drop the temp down to 145F for the medium burgers and added those in. Those should take another 75 minutes or so to cook and pasteurize to the core. For the medium rare burgers it looks like if I add them during the last 45 minutes of cooking they should be cooked and pasteurized to the core and also relatively close to medium rare temps (may be a little overcooked but close enough). The only possible issue I see with this is the fact that, by the end, the well done burgers will have been in the water for about 2.5 hours. I've never cooked burgers that long sous vide before so am not sure if I'll run into any texture issues.

 

Any thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think 2.5 hours at a high of 160 then down to 145 will give you mushy meat.  it takes a lot longer in my experience, but I have

 

not done ground meat.

 

your ideas are interesting ones, and I hope you can tell us how it works out.

 

one added thought:  it might take some time for the 160 burgers to get to 145, so consider an ice bath for a 

 

few minutes to get them below 145 throughout then back in the 145 bath.

 

just a guess.


Edited by rotuts (log)
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me..you need to sear them after sous vide!!  Just me

 

I'd get them all up to your dsired temp , a little underdone for MR.  So up to 160 quick pasteurize --cool meat .. also  .. cool  water bath to 135 ish as a holdiong temp..   then grill  i spec

 

Then grill or sear them to finished temp.. adding the well first and so forth.

 

My thoughts..only

 

Just throwing it out there


Edited by Paul Bacino (log)
1 person likes this

Its good to have Morels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me..you need to sear them after sous vide!!  Just me

 

I'd get them all up to your dsired temp , a little underdone for MR.  So up to 160 quick pasteurize --cool meat .. also  .. cool  water bath to 135 ish as a holdiong temp..   then grill  i spec

 

Then grill or sear them to finished temp.. adding the well first and so forth.

 

My thoughts..only

 

Just throwing it out there

I plan on searing all the burgers after cooking on my cast iron griddle. I left that step out since I knew I'd be doing that regardless. Only stuff I'm not sure about is how to deal with the different cooking temps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'd give them two choices of doneness and cook them traditionally.  Hosting a bunch of people is tough enough without having to compulse over the doneness of burgers.

 

If you do do it SV, I'd do a practice run first to make sure you like it.

 

And definitely sear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I view this as a technically interesting problem.  not so much an interesting  Sur la Plate sort of thing.

 

but id like to hear back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I view this as a technically interesting problem.  not so much an interesting  Sur la Plate sort of thing.

 

but id like to hear back.

Yup.

I bet MC has something to say on this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a P.S.:

 

My guess its going to be very difficult to get a med rare burger SV w an added sear  ( both sides ? ) unless you chill that burger 

 

way way down first.

 

look forward to hearing differently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've you've got the time, you can cook/chill the well done and medium burgers several days in advance (or the morning of). I would probably even precook the med-rare ones since I would chill it a bit before searing so it doesn't overcook (depending on how thick of a crust you're looking to get). Just retherm the chilled ones to a warm core temp before searing so they're not cold in the middle.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've you've got the time, you can cook/chill the well done and medium burgers several days in advance (or the morning of). I would probably even precook the med-rare ones since I would chill it a bit before searing so it doesn't overcook (depending on how thick of a crust you're looking to get). Just retherm the chilled ones to a warm core temp before searing so they're not cold in the middle.

Not sure if I'll have time since the dinner is tonight. If I am able to go this route what temp should I warm the burgers up to before searing? Lower than 134-138?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can you talk about the meat a little more.. what sized patties.  also what is the point of sous vide'ing a burger.. what are you hoping to achieve. 

1 person likes this

“I saw that my life was a vast glowing empty page and I could do anything I wanted" JK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pre-sear I'd warm them to a pleasant serving temp that is below the desired doneness.  Done right, the sear will be real hot & quick and won't have much chance to warm the innards. 115 to 120?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's an idea. Limit it to medium-rare and medium-well. No one really know what they're talking about with their meat preferences, anyway. Restaurants know this ... 9 out of 10 medium rare burgers I've ever ordered came back the same shade of gray.

 

Make the the medium-rare burgers thick, like 1-1/4 inch. Make the medium-well ones more like 3/4 inch. 

 

Cook them all about 30-45 minutes in 56-57°C bath, or whatever you like most. 

 

Sear the thick burgers in a blazing hot pan, with a lot of oil. About a minute per side. For the thin burgers, let the pan come down to more conventional temperatures and sear them more like 3 minutes per side. Flip the thin ones every 20 or 30 seconds. This will heat them through more evenly without burning the crust.

 

To make the medium-rare burgers even more perfect, you can chill for a minute in an ice water bath right before searing. But I don't find this to be too critical. Even without they won't have much of an overcooked gradient.

 

I think if you do this you'll get all the pink out of the thin burgers, and the thick ones will pretty close to perfect, all with minimal fuss.

 

But you should force people to try a medium rare burger. Is it just pink aversion? If anyone's actually immune-compromised you can pasteurize the burgers by holding at 56C for an additional 70 minutes.


Edited by paulraphael (log)
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MC@H says SV at 129C for 45min then deep fry for a minute or two to get a crust.

 

So there's that.

 

 

RE pink aversion. We have a group over every year and one person insists on having burgers that are well-well done. It is the color for sure with her. My mother was the same. Hockey puck burgers.


Edited by gfweb (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't there some myoglobin-activating enzyme you could add to ground meat that would turn it the nasty gray people like so much, without wrecking the flavor and texture? 

 

You could also pass out sunglasses with just the right cyan tint to neutralize the pink.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could let it oxidize and turn gray. Cold fridge with a thin layer of ground beef left open for a day or two would do it.

 

Interestingly, I've found ground pork never turns gray, no matter how old it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

""   the flavor and texture  ""

 

let 'em have it their way if possible, and dont worry about it.  tastes differ. liver ? any way except Pate ? not for

 

me.

 

i like burgers w a crust, some bearnaise or hollandaise or bordelaise or any onther  ...aise on it .

 

And 'bleu' in the middle.  still wiggling.

 

wont claim its the 'best burger' but it suits me


Edited by rotuts (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point of a sous-vide burger is that it's probably the only way to cook a burger perfectly. The OP's dilemma is that half his guest want burgers that are cooked poorly, and to different degrees. Sadly, it's a pretty common one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"""    it's probably the only way to cook a burger perfectly  """

 

perhaps.  Id agree on a whole cut of meat w the proper 'finish' and sauce

 

as its a 'mince'  perfect is up to the Eater.  anyway you like it is good.  w the sauce, "Special' or " ...aise "

 

anyway I can see SV as a do ahead method in quantity, with a quick finish on a very hot grill.

 

Especially for a very thick burger.


Edited by rotuts (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point of a sous-vide burger is that it's probably the only way to cook a burger perfectly. T

 

Perfectly, meaning, for those without the proper cooking skills?   I don't what perfect means to you.. when you say perfectly, i am assuming you mean evenly.  but not necessarily providing the best results flavor or texture wise.  


Edited by basquecook (log)

“I saw that my life was a vast glowing empty page and I could do anything I wanted" JK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

""   evenly  ""

 

exactly.  esp. really thick burgers, made w $$$$ ingredients.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am so interested in this as I just think a lot of this comes from lack of basic skills. (obviously not the posters, i am not saying that at all)  Being able to cook meat at a proper temperature is like a corner stone of cooking..   I love the experimentation of cooking but, I just am concerned a lot of this experimentation comes without getting down the basics.. But, really, who gives a shit what i think.. I am fascinated by this and would love to see photos and follow the whole entire process if the original poster would indulge us.. I would also love if he would do a control test and just serve a proper cooked burger the traditional way to compare the two.. 

 

But please, if you can post photos of the process that would be great. 

 

I should also mention I have had one of those Poly Science immersion circulators for about 10 years. 


Edited by basquecook (log)

“I saw that my life was a vast glowing empty page and I could do anything I wanted" JK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A burger cooked sous vide and then deep fried is a thing of beauty.

 

 

The idea that there's a perfect way to cook a burger is silly. There are many different ways to do it well, and you can produce excellent results with various techniques. Thick burgers cooked over a wood fire grill? Awesome. Thin patties seared on a plancha? Yes please. Stuffed with butter and cooked on a nice charcoal or gas grill? Mmhmm. Cooked by the fires of hell under a screaming hot broiler? Delicious. These will all deliver different results and what is better or worse is a matter of individual preference.

 

I cook sous vide a lot. And by "a lot" I mean almost every protein I get my hands on (and I eat a lot of meat). I love the technique. But you know what? There are times when what I want - what I really want to eat - is a steak that has a thermal gradient and isn't uniform in color and doneness all the way through. The same is true with thicker burgers. Sometimes what I really want is a burger that goes from a nice char on the outside through medium/well and all the way down to rare in the center. Why? Because it's delicious, the texture is great, and it lets me experience the full spectrum of beef.

 

Other times I don't want that. What's "perfect" depends on your preferences.

 

I'd say the main advantage of a SV burger is consistency and precision. For inexperienced cooks/grillmasters, it can be difficult to tell when burgers are at the desired level of doneness. It's not easy to cook burgers for a large group of people who all have different desires. With SV, you can be sure that everyone's burger is cooked as they like it. Every. Single. Time.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By perfect, I mean evenly. But more importantly I mean avoiding overcooked edges. I've come close in a skillet, but even the best conventionally cooked medium-rare burgers will have a significant portion of meat that goes from medium to beyond well-done.

 

Some people say they like a variety of textures. I get that. But I don't believe anyone honestly wants that variety to include completely dried-out and flavorless. 180°F ground beef = destroyed. 

 

With sous-vide, you can have your ideal level of doneness from edge to edge. Or if you want a gradient from, say, bright pink to slightly pink, you can easily create that too. And then you can put a killer crust on it, by your way of choice. You can smoke it, if you want, or deep fry, sauté, or finish on a grill for grilled flavors. No compromises.

 

Another benefit: you can safely serve medium-rare burgers to immune compromised people. Just cook them long enough to pasteurize. It ads just over an hour to the unattended cooking time.


Edited by paulraphael (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

""   you can safely serve medium-rare burgers to immune compromised people  ""

 

130 F

 

excellent point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Franzisaurus_Rex
      FOOD BRETHREN!
      I need some advice. I have one last piece of pork belly confit in the fridge. I brined these bitches for about 5 days (brine included pink curing salt), vacuum sealed the squares of pork belly with lard and sous vide them at 158 F for 16 hours. I cooked this on 11/10/16 and its been in my refrigerator since. 
      Here is the general recipe I followed, with some modifications based on my taste: https://www.chefsteps.com/activities/...
      The last piece is still vacuum sealed and submerged (mostly) in lard. Any visible pork only has contact with the bag. 
      It's staring at me. And calling my name.
      I want to deep fry this sucker and have a little date night with the handsome devil I see in the mirror every morning, but the last thing I want is spoiled food. I can't find any conclusive information about how long pork confit lasts for. I've only seen references that duck confit or in general that the confit technique will last for months in the fridge. I have found no sources which directly addresses pork confit.
      Questions/Factors I'm Considering:
      - Does pork confit keep for as long as duck confit?
      - Does vacuum sealing have any effect on the length of preservation?
      - Does sous-vide cooking method affect the length of preservation?
      I know I am probably being a bit paranoid, but I thought I would do my due diligence before taking the plunge, so to speak. Any advice on these questions would be extremely helpful and appreciated!
      The Franzisaurus-Rex
      PS - you should totally make this if you are into sous vide, confit, food, or have any respect for the enjoyment of life. Flash-searing these things after cooking was OUT OF THIS WORLD.
    • By JoNorvelleWalker
      The NY Times has a current article in the science section "A Universe of Bubbles in Every Champagne Bottle".
       
      The article asserts that it is better to serve Champagne at warmer than refrigerator temperatures so that the bubbles are larger and convey more flavor.  Also to serve in a narrow glass.
       
      However Gerard Liger-Belair (who is referenced as an authority in the Times article) points out in his book Uncorked (forward by Herve This) that the colder the wine the more viscous and the more dissolved CO2.  Liger-Belair also prefers a goblet to a flute.  I bought Uncorked after reading about it in Liquid Intelligence from Dave Arnold.
       
      Discuss.
       
    • By weedy
      I made a Gellan based fluid gel that I think is 'too thick'.
      (One could say, I'd like more fluid and less gel!)
       
      Anyone know what the best way, if any?,there is to thin it so I can squeeze bottle it? at the moment it's spoonable but way thick.
       
      Could I add water and blender it again?
      or is there another idea?
       
      thanks in advance.
       
       
    • By Gary Burns
      Hello,
       
      This is my first post here -- apologies if I'm making any mistakes on protocol -- I have spent some time checking prior posts but this seemed the best place to jump in.
       
      I have a 13lb skin-on, loin attached pork belly I'm going to cook for Christmas dinner. Coincidentally I also have an Anova sous vide circulation heater and a new plastic tub with a lid.
       
      The recipes I've saw mostly call for seasoning, a water bath for 36 hours and then a deep or pan fry to crisp. Now I have the setup, and look at the combination of the roast and the container I realize I have some questions about what I'm doing -- I've attached a picture below of what we're starting off with. 
       
      Here are those questions:
       
      The fit seems a little tight to me -- is the container size fine? I was planning on seasoning, tying and double bagging it in large ziploc bringing bags ( water displacement, no vacuum sealer ). I've convinced myself the ziplock method is fine, but is standing the meat vertically in a space close to it's dimension for a 36 hour cook ok? After the 36 hours in water, it is Ok to refrigerate? The main recipe I've been using as a base calls for removing it, shocking it and then removing the liquids for sauce before deep frying -- would it be ok to shock, refrigerate for several hours, then bring to temperature in the bath again before proceeding with browning/bringing to temp? If this isn't a bad idea, how long would you keep in the water bath after refrigeration? Deep frying vs. a quick hot oven? I'll rub baking soda on this, and I'll fry if need be -- but does anyone have experience or thoughts on whether you'd be defeating the purpose of using sous vide in the first place if you just used a suitably hot oven to crisp the skin after cooking sous vide and drying the skin beforehand? I'd prefer not to to do an inside stove top fry for something this large right before dinner if it wasn't sacrificing too much.    
      Thanks for any help, would also be great to hear any other useful advice from anyone that's went through a similar process.
       
      Gary
       

    • By pmilas
      HI guys,
       
      I'm here for a bit of advice. We are building a house (in Croatia, Europe), and finally have a chance to build a kitchen as i want it
      We would like to get a professional combi oven, something like this new Rational (a bit pricey) or this UNOX (better price) so that we have a long term solution for our needs.
      The reason we are going for the professional oven is that, for example UNOX, is cheaper than "home combi ovens" from brands like Miele, Gaggenau, etc. and are much better than those.
       
      Does anyone have any experience with pro combis at home? i have only seen a couple of people, at least on the internet, that have them at home. I guess that setup would not be a problem, because we designed a water inlet and outlet for the oven, and the voltage is OK. is there anything we didnt think of? Will that oven have higher maintananace cost, even if its used only couple of days a week?
       
      Thanks for help
       
      P
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.