• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

paulraphael

ziplocks for cook-chill sous vide

25 posts in this topic

Dave Arnold and co. say yes, Nathan Myrhvold and co. say no.

 

Dave makes a good case for it and says that 90% of sous-vide cooking can be done without a vacuum, and that his food saver has been relegated to re-sealing potato chips. Nathan doesn't give a reason.

 

I don't understand why ziplocks couldn't be used for cook-chill applications. Don't we use them to store conventionally cooked food in the fridge?

 

Thoughts? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you and Arnold.

 

Only argument I can think of is that the zip loc might open in the fridge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does Myhrvold say no? From what I remember, he says you eliminate oxidation using vacuum bags which can increase keeping quality of cook chill foods. When you have a bajillion chamber vacuums like him, this is a no-brainer and he does stuff like chamber vac beans and water to hydrate them instead of just putting them in a bowl like a normal person.

 

For everyone else, just use ziplocks and don't think about it.


PS: I am a guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cook with sous vide bags, un-sealed.

 

It is very nice that I can taste test while the food is being cooked and adjust seasoning if required. For large piece of meat I can even probe temperature once in a while.

 

After cooking, I rinse the bags, turn them inside out and store them. After I have lots of them, I throw them in the clothes washer and they come out totally clean and good for the next round of cooking.

 

Bags are not cheap, and it take time to seal/unseal.

 

dcarch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a picture of the way you do it, Dcarch?

 

I'm trying to visualize an unsealed vacuum bag that isn't filled with air.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been using zip locks for years with no problems - even with cook chill.  That being said, here and there I've had a problem once in a while with doing high temp stuff in a ziplock - like a confit at 176 for several hours - here and there one bag would leak.  But for most things, especially below say 150degF I've had no problems, and it's much more convenient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where does Myhrvold say no? From what I remember, he says you eliminate oxidation using vacuum bags which can increase keeping quality of cook chill foods. When you have a bajillion chamber vacuums like him, this is a no-brainer and he does stuff like chamber vac beans and water to hydrate them instead of just putting them in a bowl like a normal person.

 

For everyone else, just use ziplocks and don't think about it.

 

I agree with you based on what I know. But Myhrvold does say otherwise.

 

 

“Strictly speaking, vacuum packing is only required (as a safety measure and to prevent oxidation) for cook-chill sous vide, in which the food is stored after cooking.”
 
and
 
“Zip closure bags are inexpensive and available at any corner store. Althought not suitable for cook-chill sous-vide, they can work well in a pinch for improvising sous-vide packaging”
 
I'm curious if there's any substance behind this. Might be that as you suggest, life without a vacuum machine is hust not a life he's ever imagined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest it hinges on how reliable the seal is.  With a chamber/FoodSaver, sealing involves essentially melting teh two sides of the bag into a single layer.  Ziplocs are good, but can potentially come unsealed under conditions where the temperature, and thus 'direction' of any pressure differential, are changing rapidly.  As when you put a hot bag in a bowl of ice and water.


Leslie Craven, aka "lesliec"
Host, eG Forumslcraven@egstaff.org

After a good dinner one can forgive anybody, even one's own relatives ~ Oscar Wilde

My eG Foodblog

eGullet Ethics Code signatory

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cook with sous vide bags, un-sealed.

 

It is very nice that I can taste test while the food is being cooked and adjust seasoning if required. For large piece of meat I can even probe temperature once in a while.

 

After cooking, I rinse the bags, turn them inside out and store them. After I have lots of them, I throw them in the clothes washer and they come out totally clean and good for the next round of cooking.

 

Bags are not cheap, and it take time to seal/unseal.

 

dcarch.

 

I can't see doing this.  Bags seal in well less than a minute, and take seconds to cut open.  It costs $2.00, in quarters, for me to do a load of wash.  New bags are 20 cents a piece, and I don't have to go out in the snow.

 

If I had a washing machine in my kitchen rather than a chamber vacuum sealer I might feel differently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice that Dave Arnold says, towards the bottom of the linked article, that one of the disadvantages of ziplocs is that they don't permit the same extended storage as vacuum bags.  Frustratingly, he never says how long he thinks ziplocs are okay for cook-chill, so the advice isn't very useful.  Personally I'd hesitate to rely on ziplocs for holding any longer than open leftovers (three days to a week, depending on fridge temp).  My experience with ziplocs when used for general storage (don't do cook-chill) is that they allow in air rather easily over a period of days even without the seal failing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice that Dave Arnold says, towards the bottom of the linked article, that one of the disadvantages of ziplocs is that they don't permit the same extended storage as vacuum bags.  Frustratingly, he never says how long he thinks ziplocs are okay for cook-chill, so the advice isn't very useful.  Personally I'd hesitate to rely on ziplocs for holding any longer than open leftovers (three days to a week, depending on fridge temp).  My experience with ziplocs when used for general storage (don't do cook-chill) is that they allow in air rather easily over a period of days even without the seal failing.

 

Isn't a week as long as you'd ever do cook-chill?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am.Test Kitchen did a 'study' of plastic storage bags for the freezer.  zip-loc's, zip-loc's w the extraction hole if you will, regular plastic

 

Food saver and the Weston ( 400 $$ ) system.

 

they found that after  ( paraphrasing here ) 1 - 2 months in the freezer ice crystals in the bag penetrated the plastic and the contents were t

 

then subjected to 'freezer burn'

 

the Weston system w the thicker 3.5 MIL bags did not do this and lasted .....

 

I got the Weston system 3 years ago or so to begin my SV studies.  none of these bags have failed me after I understood how clean and 

 

dry  the bags needed to be at the seal.

 

Ive had stuff SV in my freezer thats over a year old:  seal good, tastes fine.

 

so   cooking and saving for a brief period of time is one thing, freezing for a long time is another.

 

i also store my green coffee beans this way, but not in the freezer:  just a very cold basement.

 

so the thickness of the bag will determine who long the contents might keep,   + / -

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see doing this.  Bags seal in well less than a minute, and take seconds to cut open.  It costs $2.00, in quarters, for me to do a load of wash.  New bags are 20 cents a piece, and I don't have to go out in the snow.

 

If I had a washing machine in my kitchen rather than a chamber vacuum sealer I might feel differently.

 

As I said in the above post, there are more reason than just $. In any case, I use boil-able heavy duty bags which are $0.40 each. And recycling means a lot to me.

 

Shopping, buying takes time too.

 

dcarch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a picture of the way you do it, Dcarch?

 

I'm trying to visualize an unsealed vacuum bag that isn't filled with air.

 

Sure. Also someone had asked about how I weigh my bags down.

 

dcarch

 

bagweight_zps24a71d54.jpg

 

bagweight2_zpsbe4f4fc9.jpg

 

bagweight3_zpsc9417034.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a lot of air in the bag.

 

How do you deal with that? Fill the bag with fluid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like a lot of air in the bag.

 

How do you deal with that? Fill the bag with fluid?

 

There will be very little, if any, air inside.

 

The bag will have some marinade, seasoning, or sauce. The meat will give out some juice once heated. The hot water softens the plastic bag, and the heavy weigh holds down the bag to allow hydro-static pressure to squeeze out the air.

 

dcarch

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't a week as long as you'd ever do cook-chill?

Baldwin gives cook-chill times up to 90 days for very cold storage, presumably for vacuum bags though it's not expressly stated.  Indeed, in my understanding, this was one of the main advantages of sous vide when first developed as a commercial process.  Anyhoo, circling back to the OP, if you're only looking to hold for a week, I think even Nathan would agree ziplocs are okay.

 

And, gfweb, as for your question to dcarch, bear in mind that pressure from the water will evacuate the air, just as when loading ziplocs.  So long as the food stays below the water line, there's no way for the air above to get at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said in the above post, there are more reason than just $. In any case, I use boil-able heavy duty bags which are $0.40 each. And recycling means a lot to me.

 

Shopping, buying takes time too.

 

dcarch

 

If you are going to wash the bags I don't see why you could not reseal and reuse the same bag several times.  The 20 cent bags are boilable.  If your bags are retort bags that could be used in a pressure cooker I would probably be interested to buy some.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've done a lot of experiments with sealing in Ziploc bags.....they're not dependable in terms of staying sealed and some folks consider them quite permeable.

If you want to cook-chill foods with confidence....use better bags.


~Martin

Unsupervised rebellious radical agrarian experimenter, minimalist penny-pincher, self-reliant homesteader and adventurous cook. Crotchety cantankerous terse curmudgeon, nonconformist, contrarian and natural born skeptic who questions everything!

The best thing about a vegetable garden is all the meat you can hunt and trap out of it! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frustratingly, he never says how long he thinks ziplocs are okay for cook-chill, so the advice isn't very useful.  

 

Some Ziplocs stay sealed well for an extended period of time and some don't so it's impossible to honestly estimate how long they'll stay sealed.


~Martin

Unsupervised rebellious radical agrarian experimenter, minimalist penny-pincher, self-reliant homesteader and adventurous cook. Crotchety cantankerous terse curmudgeon, nonconformist, contrarian and natural born skeptic who questions everything!

The best thing about a vegetable garden is all the meat you can hunt and trap out of it! 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are going to wash the bags I don't see why you could not reseal and reuse the same bag several times.  The 20 cent bags are boilable.  If your bags are retort bags that could be used in a pressure cooker I would probably be interested to buy some.

I guess you are still missing part of what I said above"----It is very nice that I can taste test while the food is being cooked and adjust seasoning if required. For large piece of meat I can even probe temperature once in a while.---"

 

Each time you cut and seal, the bags get smaller, soon I will have close to a hundred bags of various sizes to manage. I have found that the cheaper bags have the problem of the "quilted" layer delaminating after a few cooks.

 

darch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I am missing something else, but if you are not using an edge sealer, why use quilted bags at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to see some experimental evidence on foods cooked to pasteurization in ziplock freezer bags and stored at a range of standard fridge temperatures. 

Not really a home experiment. You'd want lots of samples, a few different types of food, and a range of fridge temperatures. Real life fridges add a lot of variables with their temperature swings.

And you'd need a biology lab, and some agreed-upon standards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I am missing something else, but if you are not using an edge sealer, why use quilted bags at all?

 

A very good question.

 

1. I do, very seldom, vacuum and seal. Although I don't remember when was the last time.

 

2. I trust more the plastic used for boil-able  bags specifically designed for high temperature sous vide water baths. I made clotted cream yeaterday, at 180F for 10 hours.

 

3. And this unique use I came up with. As I said, I am interested in recycling and re-purposing materials.

 

 

dcarch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to see some experimental evidence on foods cooked to pasteurization in ziplock freezer bags and stored at a range of standard fridge temperatures. 

Not really a home experiment. You'd want lots of samples, a few different types of food, and a range of fridge temperatures. Real life fridges add a lot of variables with their temperature swings.

And you'd need a biology lab, and some agreed-upon standards.

 

To my knowledge, no such study has been done, which may expain why Dave Arnold was so vague.  But, again, if you're only looking to hold for a week, existing food handling protocols say that's okay, so long as the temp stays below 41F.  See FDA Food Code, § 3‑501.17(A)(1) (scroll down the page about two-thirds of the way).  Whether your fridge actually holds this temp is the bigger issue.  I monitor mine with a thermometer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Rugby
      Hello fellow eGullet members. I stumbled across this forum while looking for ways to improve my food here.
      I've been a technical type all my life and started assembling my kitchen 7 years ago piece by piece after quitting living from hotels for the previous 12 years.  
      I currently enjoy smoked foods and tweaking local / regional recipes by applying technique instead of hard boiling or large batch frying.  So far it's allowed me to enjoy and reinforce my knowledge of ingredients.
      Thank you everyone contributing here and those folks who laid the frameworks for dispelling myths and providing understanding of ingredients and flavours.
      Best regards and bon-appetit,
      Warren
       
       
    • By ltjazz
      Hey all,
       
      I've made thicker and creamier sorbets with 25% to 35% sugar strained fruit purees and sugar, syrups, and other stabilizers that have worked well. However, because it's so much fruit and little to no water it can be an expensive project.
       
      I am trying to make "Water Ice" or "Italian Ice" in my home ice cream machine. Think of textures similar to Rita's Water Ice, Court Pastry Shop, or Miko's in Chicago. It eats much lighter than a sorbet but isn't really icy, but it's also not thick like sorbet. Ritas uses "flavoring" and sugar, while the other two use fruit juice. I'm thinking of thinning the strained fruit juice with water and adding a stabilizer, but I'm having trouble getting this in my home ice cream machine without it freezing solid like granita.
       
      Can anyone suggest a way to use real fruit juice, water, and a combination and concentration of stabilizers to get a looser, frozen fruit dessert that isn't icy?
    • By paulraphael
      Does anyone have reliable tricks for getting good flavor out of garlic in a sous-vide bag? I'm talking about using it just as an aromatic, while cooking proteins, or as part of a stock or vegetable puree.
       
      The one time I forgot the maxim to leave raw garlic out of the bag, I ended up with celeriac puree that tasted like a tire fire.
       
      I see some recommendations to just use less, but in my experience the problem wasn't just too much garlic flavor. It was acrid, inedible flavor. Using less works fine for me with other mirepoix veggies.
       
      I also see recipes for s.v. garlic confit (listed by both Anova and Nomiku) and for some reason people say these taste good. How can this be?
       
      There was a thread questioning the old saw about blanching garlic multiple times in milk, which didn't come to any hard conclusions.
       
      I'm wondering if a quick blanch in water before adding to the s.v. bag, to deactivate the enzymes, would do the trick. But I don't know the actual chemistry behind the garlic tire fire, so am not confident this would work.
       
      Some cooks advocate garlic powder; I'm hoping to not resort to that.
       
      Thoughts?
    • By May10April
      I know there was a thread on this a few years ago, however it seems these scales are no longer made or newer better models are available.
      As I've become more serious about my baking, I've decided to get a kitchen scale. I'm debating between the My Weigh KD-8000 http://www.amazon.com/My-Weigh-Digital-Weighing-Scale/dp/B001NE0FU2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1297958394&sr=8-1 or the EatSmart Precision Pro Digital Scale. http://www.amazon.com/EatSmart-Precision-Digital-Kitchen-Scale/dp/B001N0D7GA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1297958443&sr=1-1 Originally I wanted the Taylor Salter High Capacity Scale because it looked cool, but I've noticed it received many mixed reviews. http://www.amazon.com/Taylor-Salter-Aquatronics-Capacity-Kitchen/dp/B004BIOMGU/ref=sr_1_24?s=home-garden&ie=UTF8&qid=1297958465&sr=1-24
      Here are my requirments:
      -Minimum capacity of 11 lbs
      -Minimum resolution of 1 g
      -Measure in Kg, lb, oz, g
      -Tare feature
      -Preferably have seamless buttons
      I want to get a nice scale. I don't want to get a scale with minimum features only to find in two years that I do enough baking/cooking that requires me to have something more sophisticated.
      Here are a few other questions:
      1. How important is it to have a scale measure fluid ounces?
      2. What about measuring lbs. oz (for example 6 lbs and 4.2 ounces)
      3. Is it important to have a scale measure in bakers %? I'd like to learn how to do these and have a cookbook that shows them next to the measurements. I'm not sure if this is something most people can figure out on their own or it would be handy to have them on a scale. The MW KD-8000 does this.
      The only problem with the MW-KD-8000 is it appears to be big and bulky and I don't have a lot of counter space so I'd probably keep it stored most of the time. The Eat Smart just seems to minimal. The Salter seems like an expensive scale for what it offers and somewhat of a risk.
      Thanks for any help in helping me choose the right scale. I do not know why this is becoming a chore to purchase! I just want to make sure I choose the right one right off the bat.
    • By bhsimon
      Recently cooked whole bone-in lamb shoulder sous vide for 8 hours @ 80°C. The results were like a typical braise. More interestingly, I weighed the different components after cooking for future reference. Here is the breakdown:
       
      Before cooking:
      2.1 kg lamb shoulder – whole, bone-in, untrimmed
       
      After cooking:
      621 g liquid
      435 g bones and fat
      1044 g meat
       
      Almost precisely half of the total weight was meat. Hopefully this will be helpful if you are trying to calculate portions.
       
      As an aside to this: we've been cooking our tough cuts (sous vide) whole, without any trimming at all, and removing fat and bones after cooking. It is so much easier and faster than trimming everything beforehand. The excess fat comes off in large pieces and connective tissue peels away cleanly. Lamb shanks, for instance, are tedious to trim before cooking but easily cleaned up after they come out of the bag. It's luxurious to have big, clean pieces of shank meat although some may prefer on-the-bone presentation. We have tried this with pork shoulder, too, and the unwanted fat is easily removed after cooking with lovely hunks of tender meat remaining for slicing, dicing or shredding.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.