• Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create an account.

  • product-image-quickten.png.a40203b506711f7664fc62024e54a584.pngDid you know that these all-volunteer forums are operated by the 501(c)3 not-for-profit Society for Culinary Arts & Letters? This holiday season, consider a tax-deductible Quick Ten Bucks to support the eG Forums and help us remain completely advertising-free. Thanks to all those who have donated so far!

AVFOOL

Sous vide short ribs, times, and temperatures

175 posts in this topic

I tried to cook BBQ Baby Back Ribs last week. I vacuum pack my ribs with salt and pepper and a light clothing of BBQ sauce and SV for 24 hours at 68 deg C. It turn out dry with a lot of liquid in the bag. I tried to BBQ on grill at high heat for a short time for the BBQ taste. The area that is on the grill is freally dried but over-all result is not good even with a generous layer of my favourite BBQ sauce. Have any one SV baby back rib beore and what is your experience?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dry means overcooked. (A lot of liquid in the bag confirms this, imo.) 24 hours seems excessive to me. I have not done BBs sous vide though.


Kevin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What made you choose 68C? That temperature is way too high.


Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What made you choose 68C?  That temperature is way too high.

I cook mine higher yet (180), but for only 6-7 hours. I do so to render the fat. Once they come out, they get brushed with BBQ sauce and quickly broiled. Works to my satisfaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dry means overcooked. (A lot of liquid in the bag confirms this, imo.) 24 hours seems excessive to me. I have not done BBs sous vide though.

I use the recomendation by Douglas Baldwin from his article Practical Guide to Sous Vide - the only info I have on SV baby back ribs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What made you choose 68C?  That temperature is way too high.

I will try your temp and time next time. Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have many people SV'd ribs? If I were going to cook ribs for 6+ hours and then fininsh them w/ BBQ sauce I would just smoke them in the first place.

Seems like another technique taken to far. Maybe you can serve them w/ a Sweet Baby Ray's foam? :raz:

Jeff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have many people SV'd ribs? If I were going to cook ribs for 6+ hours and then fininsh them w/ BBQ sauce I would just smoke them in the first place.

Seems like another technique taken to far. Maybe you can serve them w/ a Sweet Baby Ray's foam?  :raz:

Jeff

Probably worth mentioning that I live in a Manhattan Apt :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus, it can be a good way to control the cooking. Smoke only flavors the meat for a finite amount of time at the beginning of the cooking process. After that, there is really no advantage to keeping the meat in the smoker. If you are able to get some good smoke flavor into the meat, and then cook to exactly the texture you want using sous vide techniques, you should be able to end up with a superior product. In addition, you could batch-smoke a whole lot of ribs and other meats for the "smoke flavoring period," then bag, freeze and finish cooking them individually sous vide whenever you liked, which would be very convenient and attractive for those people whose living situation or schedule makes firing up the smoker more than a couple of times a year problematic.


Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have many people SV'd ribs? If I were going to cook ribs for 6+ hours and then fininsh them w/ BBQ sauce I would just smoke them in the first place.

Seems like another technique taken to far. Maybe you can serve them w/ a Sweet Baby Ray's foam?  :raz:

Jeff

Probably worth mentioning that I live in a Manhattan Apt :-)

Well said except to SV to the right internal temp is easier said than done. I am keeping a log on all my SV and hoping to eventually have a list of perfect SV time and temp for all my cooking. I was hoping that list is available in the www. What I find is we have to try all those publish temp and time and see if it is really the correct ones. At least I can say for baby back ribs 68 deg C and 24 hr. is too long. Next time I will try 180 deg F for 6 hrs.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Smoke only flavors the meat for a finite amount of time at the beginning of the cooking process. 

Smoke particulates continue to stick to meat surfaces as long as they are present. One can easily experience this: Leave something too long in smoke and it tastes 'oversmoked', i.e., too strong with, often, sharp or bitter notes.

The only thing that is limited is the formation of the smoke ring, the chemical reaction that causes the meat to form a red ring from the surface inward. This stops as the meat's temp rises but has nothing to do with smoke adherence or smoke flavor.


Kevin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Have many people SV'd ribs? If I were going to cook ribs for 6+ hours and then fininsh them w/ BBQ sauce I would just smoke them in the first place.

Seems like another technique taken to far. Maybe you can serve them w/ a Sweet Baby Ray's foam?  :raz:

Jeff

Probably worth mentioning that I live in a Manhattan Apt :-)

Touche-even though I would get a stovetop smoker and finish in a low oven. If it works for you though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Plus, it can be a good way to control the cooking.  Smoke only flavors the meat for a finite amount of time at the beginning of the cooking process.  After that, there is really no advantage to keeping the meat in the smoker.  If you are able to get some good smoke flavor into the meat, and then cook to exactly the texture you want using sous vide techniques, you should be able to end up with a superior product.  In addition, you could batch-smoke a whole lot of ribs and other meats for the "smoke flavoring period," then bag, freeze and finish cooking them individually sous vide whenever you liked, which would be very convenient and attractive for those people whose living situation or schedule makes firing up the smoker more than a couple of times a year problematic.

Hmmm I'd like to taste a side by side there, however the batch smoking could have some merit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to ask why you are trying to sous vide ribs rather than simply brining and slow roasting to fall-off-the-bone tenderness then a fast saucing to a chin-dribbling succulent finish. Absolutely foofproof and delicious. Credits to Feiniger and Milliken's City Cuisine


eGullet member #80.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends on what texture you want your ribs to be. When I think ribs, I don't picture medium-rare meat and so use a higher temperature.

The amount of liquid in the bag does not just depend on temperature but also on time: at 140F/60C, beef cooked for 24 hours loses about 31% of its weight while beef cooked for only one hour loses only about 7% of its weight (Bouton and Harris, 1981).

I rather doubt you will notice much of a difference between ribs cooked at 180F/82C for 6 hours and 155F/68C for 24 hours. When I cook pork spare ribs at 155F/68C for 24 hours or at 176F/80C for 8 hours they both come out moist and very tender (even when I skip brining).


My Guide: A Practical Guide to Sous Vide Cooking, which Harold McGee described as "a wonderful contribution."

My Book: Sous Vide for the Home Cook US EU/UK

My YouTube channel — a new work in progress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have to ask why you are trying to sous vide ribs rather than simply brining and slow roasting to fall-off-the-bone tenderness then a fast saucing to a chin-dribbling succulent finish.  Absolutely foofproof and delicious.  Credits to Feiniger and Milliken's City Cuisine

I usually salt and pepper my ribs than slow roast in the oven before finishing on the BBQ with sauce. I do not do it enough to be consistent in my slow roasting and sometimes it get dried. So I thought I can SV to the perfect internal temperature more consistently because there are a big window of perfect doneness (so I thought). However, I do not know what is the perfect internal temp for ribs so I choose 68 deg C. It may be a little high. Brining before SV may be the answer too. I believe if done right SV can achieve a better bite to the meat (instead of following off the bone and a little muschy) and may be more consistent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It all depends on what texture you want your ribs to be.  When I think ribs, I don't picture medium-rare meat and so use a higher temperature. 

The amount of liquid in the bag does not just depend on temperature but also on time:  at 140F/60C, beef cooked for 24 hours loses about 31% of its weight while beef cooked for only one hour loses only about 7% of its weight (Bouton and Harris, 1981). 

I rather doubt you will notice much of a difference between ribs cooked at 180F/82C for 6 hours and 155F/68C for 24 hours.  When I cook pork spare ribs at 155F/68C for 24 hours or at 176F/80C for 8 hours they both come out moist and very tender (even when I skip brining).

I first like to thank you for your great article on Sous Vide. It is more useful than Thomas Keller's "Under Pressure" (I have yet try to cook one of its recipe). I consulted your article for every SV I have done.

I think with any long SV brining may be the answer to prevent drying. Can I SV the ribs at 60.5 deg C for 24 hours to achieve med rare and would that also alliviate this drying problem (without brining)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since this topic is a couple years old, I am wondering if there is consensus now on best temperature & time combination for Baby Back Ribs Sous Vide.

Any suggestions?

My main SV references (Roca and Keller) do not really mention baby back ribs.

I would appreciate any ideas.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Modernist Cuisine suggests smoking for 7h at (I think) 150F followed by 48h sous vide at 60C. I just tried that over the weekend and found the texture too soft for my liking. To be fair, my smoking temp ranged between 160-200F, so that may have had something to do with it, aside from a difference in taste. I smoked another batch yesterday and followed it up with SV for only 24h. Haven't tried those yet, though.


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Douglas Baldwin claims "The amount of liquid in the bag does not just depend on temperature but also on time: at 140F/60C, beef cooked for 24 hours loses about 31% of its weight while beef cooked for only one hour loses only about 7% of its weight (Bouton and Harris, 1981)."

While I realize cooking for 24 hours makes the meat more fall apart tender, losing 31% of juice makes it dry doesn't it? The sauce is just covering up the lack of juice.

Is there a better time/temperature combination? I'm especially curious for the best times for Short ribs. I know 140F for 24 hours is common, but I find the meat "mealy" and the texture dry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I cooked baby back ribs twice over the weekend. I used a three step process and I like the results.

-Cooked them sous vide at 60C for 24 hours

-After the bath, smoked them for about 20 minutes in a Webber grill

-After the smoke, seared them in a gas grill, primarily to improve their look.

The first batch did not have any spices/rub prior to the bath. The second batch was brined + had a simple BBQ rub.

I need to be careful on the smoking step, make sure that I just have enough coals to produce smoke without creating much heat.

I will continue cooking ribs this way.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done baby back ribs at 155F for 30 hours and they came out incredibly moist and tender. I seared them on an outdoor grill set on high for only a few minutes, brushing them with BBQ sauce. I would classify them as "fall off the bone" tender. From what I understand, for every 10C change you need to double the time. So you could accomplish the same tenderness at 140F for 60-72 hours or increase the temperature to 165F and cook for around 12-15 hours or increase even further to 180F and cut the cooking time to 6-8 hours. They should all achieve roughly the same texture.


Artie

Silicon Valley Sous Vide Home Chef

The Art and Presentation of Sous Vide

www.siliconvalleysousvide.shutterfly.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a rub with brown sugar, cumin, cayenne and a few other spices. Sous vide 48 hours at 145F. Brushed them with Hot Bone Sucking Sauce and grilled long enough to char the sugar.

Best ribs I have ever had in my life.

Used the liquid in the bag to make gravy for mashed potatoes.


Edited by Kim D (log)

If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. - Carl Sagan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like people are smoking/grilling afterwards......what about smoking before? I have my ribs with a rub right now and was going to put it (along with a tri tip roast) for a smoke for about 1 hour @ 150F, then SV them at 140F for 24-30 hours. A few smoking buddies only smoke their ribs for an hour because they think thats about all the meat should support for taste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smoking before versus after gives you two different flavors: I like them both, they are just different. And how much smoke flavor you like in your ribs is a matter of personal preference, though I agree that at some point you stop having "smoke flavored ribs" and start to have "rib flavored smoke." I just think it's a bit more than an hour.


Chris Hennes
Director of Operations
chennes@egullet.org

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By May10April
      I know there was a thread on this a few years ago, however it seems these scales are no longer made or newer better models are available.
      As I've become more serious about my baking, I've decided to get a kitchen scale. I'm debating between the My Weigh KD-8000 http://www.amazon.com/My-Weigh-Digital-Weighing-Scale/dp/B001NE0FU2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1297958394&sr=8-1 or the EatSmart Precision Pro Digital Scale. http://www.amazon.com/EatSmart-Precision-Digital-Kitchen-Scale/dp/B001N0D7GA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1297958443&sr=1-1 Originally I wanted the Taylor Salter High Capacity Scale because it looked cool, but I've noticed it received many mixed reviews. http://www.amazon.com/Taylor-Salter-Aquatronics-Capacity-Kitchen/dp/B004BIOMGU/ref=sr_1_24?s=home-garden&ie=UTF8&qid=1297958465&sr=1-24
      Here are my requirments:
      -Minimum capacity of 11 lbs
      -Minimum resolution of 1 g
      -Measure in Kg, lb, oz, g
      -Tare feature
      -Preferably have seamless buttons
      I want to get a nice scale. I don't want to get a scale with minimum features only to find in two years that I do enough baking/cooking that requires me to have something more sophisticated.
      Here are a few other questions:
      1. How important is it to have a scale measure fluid ounces?
      2. What about measuring lbs. oz (for example 6 lbs and 4.2 ounces)
      3. Is it important to have a scale measure in bakers %? I'd like to learn how to do these and have a cookbook that shows them next to the measurements. I'm not sure if this is something most people can figure out on their own or it would be handy to have them on a scale. The MW KD-8000 does this.
      The only problem with the MW-KD-8000 is it appears to be big and bulky and I don't have a lot of counter space so I'd probably keep it stored most of the time. The Eat Smart just seems to minimal. The Salter seems like an expensive scale for what it offers and somewhat of a risk.
      Thanks for any help in helping me choose the right scale. I do not know why this is becoming a chore to purchase! I just want to make sure I choose the right one right off the bat.
    • By bhsimon
      Recently cooked whole bone-in lamb shoulder sous vide for 8 hours @ 80°C. The results were like a typical braise. More interestingly, I weighed the different components after cooking for future reference. Here is the breakdown:
       
      Before cooking:
      2.1 kg lamb shoulder – whole, bone-in, untrimmed
       
      After cooking:
      621 g liquid
      435 g bones and fat
      1044 g meat
       
      Almost precisely half of the total weight was meat. Hopefully this will be helpful if you are trying to calculate portions.
       
      As an aside to this: we've been cooking our tough cuts (sous vide) whole, without any trimming at all, and removing fat and bones after cooking. It is so much easier and faster than trimming everything beforehand. The excess fat comes off in large pieces and connective tissue peels away cleanly. Lamb shanks, for instance, are tedious to trim before cooking but easily cleaned up after they come out of the bag. It's luxurious to have big, clean pieces of shank meat although some may prefer on-the-bone presentation. We have tried this with pork shoulder, too, and the unwanted fat is easily removed after cooking with lovely hunks of tender meat remaining for slicing, dicing or shredding.
    • By Franzisaurus_Rex
      FOOD BRETHREN!
      I need some advice. I have one last piece of pork belly confit in the fridge. I brined these bad boys for about 5 days (brine included pink curing salt), vacuum sealed the squares of pork belly with lard and sous vide them at 158 F for 16 hours. I cooked this on 11/10/16 and its been in my refrigerator since. 
      Here is the general recipe I followed, with some modifications based on my taste: https://www.chefsteps.com/activities/...
      The last piece is still vacuum sealed and submerged (mostly) in lard. Any visible pork only has contact with the bag. 
      It's staring at me. And calling my name.
      I want to deep fry this sucker and have a little date night with the handsome devil I see in the mirror every morning, but the last thing I want is spoiled food. I can't find any conclusive information about how long pork confit lasts for. I've only seen references that duck confit or in general that the confit technique will last for months in the fridge. I have found no sources which directly addresses pork confit.
      Questions/Factors I'm Considering:
      - Does pork confit keep for as long as duck confit?
      - Does vacuum sealing have any effect on the length of preservation?
      - Does sous-vide cooking method affect the length of preservation?
      I know I am probably being a bit paranoid, but I thought I would do my due diligence before taking the plunge, so to speak. Any advice on these questions would be extremely helpful and appreciated!
      The Franzisaurus-Rex
      PS - you should totally make this if you are into sous vide, confit, food, or have any respect for the enjoyment of life. Flash-searing these things after cooking was OUT OF THIS WORLD.
    • By FrogPrincesse
      Host's note: this delicious topic is continued from What Are You Cooking Sous Vide Today? (Part 2)
       
       
      Duck breast, 57C for 90 min, pre and post sous-vide sear.
       

       
       

       

       
       
      So the texture was not significantly different from what I get with my usual technique, which is grilling over charcoal. But it's more uniformly pink, and there are no slightly overdone spots. I am pleased with the results even though searing in the house means a ton of smoke and duck fat everywhere!   (I did it on the stove in a cast iron skillet, next time I will place the skillet in the oven)
    • By TdeV
      Is it possible to put a rub on a sous vide item?
       
      I'm cooking pig wings here and I'm trying to figure how to finish them. This looks good but would require a rub.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.