Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

adey73

Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques & Equipment (Part 3)

Recommended Posts

I always start with fresh, clean water but maybe that's because I have OCD. :biggrin:

Even if the food is not in direct contact with the water your hands/tools are. I don't want to transfer any little bugs to my food by mishandling it after messing in water that I have any doubts about. But that's just me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone tried to make fried chicken using sous vide.. Brine the chicken, sous vide with Buttermilk and spices, then deep fry.. Sounds like it would be pretty damn good to me..

I ask this because one of my favorite Fried Chicken places in Manhattan, Forte Baden Baden, does rotisserie first, then deep fries..

Daniel, I've done fried chicken that way. Cook the chicken on the pink side since it will cook some more when you fry it. You need to drain the juices off of the SV chicken (save 'em for another purpose) and dry it so you can do the dredging / battering. I think it works better if you chill the SV'd chicken before battering. Frying will bring it back to temp, and cook the last bit of pink out (for those who are squeamish about pink chicken).

Crunchy on the outside, moist and steamy on the inside. :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am have been serving these fried Sweatbreads at Bite Club and was thinking about doing SV with them first.. Though, I dont want to start experimenting while people are visitng.. I was thinking it would be great for the sweatbreads and then my wandered off to chicken..

Do you but buttermilk in the vacuum pack?

Thanks for sharing that, I will post when I do it..


Edited by Daniel (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use buttermilk in the marinade, but wipe most of it off before the chicken goes into the SV pouch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone tried to make fried chicken using sous vide.. Brine the chicken, sous vide with Buttermilk and spices, then deep fry.. Sounds like it would be pretty damn good to me..

Daniel, when I've made it, I've done a simple brine and then sous vide with lemon and herbs. Then I the dredge the chicken in buttermilk and a mixture of flour, garlic powder, onion powder and cayenne. You could probably double dredge this if you want. I haven't tried cooling down the chicken first, but I might soon. I'm making fried chicken for Christmas dinner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, after running into some difficulties sourcing ingredients (car broke down, snow storm, no duck legs on the store shelves, no short ribs to be found!) I was finally able to return to testing the PID controller and the whole SV cooking thing.

First the duck legs (which Kerry Beal supplied from her freezer!). After an initial 24-hour cure in salt, I packed them in FoodSaver bags with 2 tablespoons each of solid duck fat and into the rice cooker they went for 12 hours at 80C:

gallery_6903_111_60581.jpg

I started with water at close to target temperature (78C) and after an initial “wobble” with some overshoot to 81C the PID settled down to 80C after 30 minutes and I placed the packages in the water and left them alone for 12 hours.

Here’s the result:

gallery_6903_111_29774.jpg

I made duck rillettes with one leg and the second I intend to freeze unopened for later consumption.

The short ribs proved to be another challenge. Although the package from the store looked “right”, when I opened it the ribs literally fell apart:

gallery_6903_111_99391.jpg

gallery_6903_111_47103.jpg

I removed the bones, tied up the remaining ribs into what looked about the right thickness. I made a stock from the bones by browning them, deglazing with wine and cooking them low and slow in the oven for a couple of hours. I then defatted and reduced the stock, froze it and added the frozen stock to the package with the ribs.

This time I started with room temperature water in the rice cooker (22C) and again, after an initial overshoot to 56C, it settled after 30 mins to 54C and never waivered for the full 36 hours. I checked twice to ensure that the water level was OK and found that there was negligible evaporation.

Here’s the result:

gallery_6903_111_116848.jpg

gallery_6903_111_75582.jpg

The colour and the texture are strange to me. Closer to a steak or a roast than to a braise and I am not too fussy about the flavour. Despite cooking off the wine in the deglazing process, it remains a bit too prominent for my liking. However, I am going to slice these ribs up and serve them cold with a horseradish cream on crostini and get an opinion from a variety of people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The colour and the texture are strange to me.  Closer to a steak or a roast than to a braise and I am not too fussy about the flavour.  Despite cooking off the wine in the deglazing process, it remains a bit too prominent for my liking.  However, I am going to slice these ribs up and serve them cold with a horseradish cream on crostini and get an opinion from a variety of people.

Yes, this is all characteristic of SV.

Low temperture SV, even for 36 hours, is not going to give you a classic braise texture. If you want that, you need to use traditional braising temperatures - 170F/77C to 190F/88C.

Low temperatures - say 130F/54C in tender meat will be medium rare - like a steak or roast. Tender cuts (say a fillet mignon) cooked for a short time (long enough to bring it to temperture) will have at texture exactly like conventional cooking (but with less gray overcooked meat at the edges). A tender cut cooked for a couple hours SV will be more tender than that, but still similar to conventional cooking.

If you cook a tough cut of meat at 130F for long enough - say 36 hours (I have done up to 72 hours on very tough cuts of meat) then you a unique texture - medium rare color and taste, and a tenderized texture that is not the same as a conventional cooking, nor is it like a braise.

Wine or other seasons in the bag can be overpowering - when the meat is in the bag there is no place else for the flavors to go, so they tend to affect the meat more. In conventional cooking the flavors often evaporate into the air (which is why it smells good in the kitchen).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did a short rib with bone in for 70º C for 34 hours. I was planning on 24 hours, but I kinda forgot it was cooking.

The colour was just pink, the texture wonderful. Like braised, but a tiny bit more firm.

I browned the rib first, deglazed the pan with some red wine and veal glace viande. Cooked the wine and glace down to a thick syrup. I froze that on a piece of parchment and added it to the bag before sealing.

The PID unit was set at P=15, I=0, D=0 and it held the temperature steadily the entire time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if all the folks with an Auber Instr. (or other) sous-vide set-up could post their basic setup and their thumb's-up thumb's down on the unit.

It seems like everyone is pretty happy so far.

Is there anyone unhappy with their purchase?

Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using a big old crockpot with the sous vide magic PID. It's taken me a little while to figure out the settings, but thanks to the suggestions on this thread and help from manwith8ovens for whom I'm beta testing this unit, I think I have it working quite well.

No thumbs down so far. I'm very happy with what I've accomplished so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The colour and the texture are strange to me.  Closer to a steak or a roast than to a braise and I am not too fussy about the flavour.  Despite cooking off the wine in the deglazing process, it remains a bit too prominent for my liking.  However, I am going to slice these ribs up and serve them cold with a horseradish cream on crostini and get an opinion from a variety of people.

Yes, this is all characteristic of SV.

. . .

Nathan - thanks - I totally understand about the different temps to get to braise-like quality but my first concern here is not so much the cooking but the testing - that's what I am doing - as I do more testing I hope to also develop some recipes that suit me. What I am trying to say is that cooking to please my palate is secondary to observing and reporting both objectively and subjectively on the set up that I have and the test requirements that I have been given. Your input is very valuable and I am stashing it away for when the testing is done and the cooking can begin. :biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was wondering if all the folks with an Auber Instr. (or other) sous-vide set-up could post their basic setup and their thumb's-up thumb's down on the unit.

It seems like everyone is pretty happy so far.

Is there anyone unhappy with their purchase?

Thanks in advance!

I have the Auber sous vide controller and an 18qt Nesco roaster. Loving it so far, holds steady temp-wise, seems to be well insulated (the nesco, that is). So far I've done short ribs, salmon, a steak (don't remember the cut right now), and last night did the eggs at 150F, they were intriguing...

Guess that makes this a "thumbs up" :biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did my first experiments with pork tenderloin and was really happy (140F more or less for about 2 hrs) with the results. The meat was very tender and had a great mouthfeel.

One tenderloin was vac'ed with a few tablespoons of a marinade made of roughly equal parts soy sauce, rice vinegar and mirin rice wine and little bit of sugar. The result complimented the sweetness of the pork without overpowering it. The other tenderloin had been rolled in my favorite bbq dry rub and left to sit in the fridge for a few hours before being bagged (with a little bit of cider vinegar added to the bag) and cooked.

I also wanted to add that after a lot of experimentation with chicken breasts (which I prefer done at 140F for enough time to sterilize but not much longer than that since increasing the time doesn't seem to improve the sublime texture) that it is pretty clear that the quality of the chicken makes a much bigger difference in the result than any other form of preparation that I have tried with chicken breasts. So, if anyone is doing chicken breasts with standard grocery store brands, I recommend trying premium chicken from smaller providers. My wife is still raving about the chicken that we had the other night. It came out amazingly well despite the temperature swinging more than usual during cooking (between 138 and 146).

--Emonster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was wondering if all the folks with an Auber Instr. (or other) sous-vide set-up could post their basic setup and their thumb's-up thumb's down on the unit.

It seems like everyone is pretty happy so far.

Is there anyone unhappy with their purchase?

Thanks in advance!

I have tested it with a small rice cooker with good results. What I discovered was that if I put the rice cooker into "keep warm" mode, full power is just enough to hold 140°F which gives me an alternate way to more tightly control down around 130°F.

To date, my only concern is with the fragility of the sensor wiring. It does get crimped where it enters the cooker so I need to put some spacers in to keep the lid from resting on the wires.

I am going to use it to control a Hot Tray which has a tendency to overheat. But I am still looking for a good way to thermally couple the sensor to the surface with a low thermal inertia.

Doc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used my Auber controller with a quite energetic hot plate (2000W/220V) and I initially had problems with overshooting since the reaction time of the plate is long and when it finally gets hot, it gets really hot for quite a long time (high effect and large thermal mass). However, setting P really high (250-300) and D to 60-90 seems to do the trick. Setting I to zero seems to work the best for me.

However I think I'm going to try a new setup with a simple immersion heater (of the USD 10 variety) and a small submersible pump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone actually experimented with tender beef cuts such as a strip or rib steak? I've been thinking of trying to do a steak sous-vide. I'm thinking it would be better not to go with a slow cooking approach but rather just an hour to bring the steak to temperature and then a quick aggressive sear in a cast iron skillet to form a crust on one side.

Thoughts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Has anyone actually experimented with tender beef cuts such as a strip or rib steak?  I've been thinking of trying to do a steak sous-vide.  I'm thinking it would be better not to go with a slow cooking approach but rather just an hour to bring the steak to temperature and then a quick aggressive sear in a cast iron skillet to form a crust on one side.

Thoughts?

I have cooked many market steaks/rib eyes and even some filets. I cook for about an hour or so at 128 and then toss the steak into a cast-iron skillet that has very hot (on a high gas flame for about 10 minutes prior to putting the steak in). It only takes 30 seconds per side for a very nice crust.

Thickness is important. With steaks 1.5 inches and thicker the result is amazing and much better than simple pan-frying. With steaks 1.25 inches and thinner, the results are less stunning.

With the thick steaks there is a softening of the fat that is otherwise hard to achieve when cooking to rare/medium-rare. I cooked a nice filet at my wife's behest and was amazed that it too improved by being brought to temp sous-vide before crusting.

--E

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done this with a 6 inch thick porterhouse steak and some other steaks of lesser size. Sous vide it up to temperature, then blast in a hot pan to finish. You can see some pictures of the dinosaur steak here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why thickness makes such a difference. Is cooking time the issue, because that should be about the same, right? I mean, I guess with more mass the thicker steak might take a little longer to come up to temperature, but can't a thinner steak be left to cook for just as long anyway. Reading through some of the earlier posts, my understanding is that there shouldn't be much difference between cooking a steak for an hour or cooking it for two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point e-monster was making is that, with <1.5-inch steaks, once you finish browning the steak, the difference is not tremendously different from regular pan cooking. Personally, I'm not sure I agree with that. It depends on how you brown the steak, for one (blowtorch being recomomended if you want good external browning with minimum penetration). I'd also say that 1.5 inches as a reference point is a bit too thick. I've seen a marked difference using this technique for strip steaks as thin as one inch. Below maybe 0.75 inches you're really starting to get so thin that by the time you brown the steak (unless using a blowtorch) you have undone a lot of the careful temperature work you did with the sous vide process.

This is all assuming you would like to brown the exterior of the steak in a hot pan. If you're using a blowtorch or if you do not want to brown the exterior of the steak at all, you could get good results at most any thickness.

Where sous vide is really handy is when you have an extra-thick steak. Then you can get an even medium rare with a nice crust but otherwise very little penetration of "doneness" beyond medium rare that would be extremely-challenging-to-impossible using any other method.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have about 8 lamb hearts.. Anyone have any suggestions on how to cook them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggestions from above:

First question (well..two questions): I'm thinking of cooking ox heart sous vide, since it works so well for tough muscles that are typically braised. What would my cooking time and temperature be for something like this? Also should I pre-slice it into the serving sizes or wait until it's done to cut it up?

Heart muscles is TOUGH because it is constantly in use. I would try 180F/82C for 8 hours. This ought to be enough, but you may need to take it longer. This will create a texture similar to a traditional braise, which is probably what you are familiar with.

I would cut it into serving portion and bag each separately.

You could cook it down to 140F/60C but then it would require days and that may not be what you are looking for.

Some experimentation will be necessary to get the results you want.

Just wanted to report that the ox heart cooked sous vide (per NathanM's 180F/82C for 8 hours suggestion) came out fabulous. The heart was sliced into about 1/2" thick slices. I kept it real simple, just s/p and some frozen cubes of stock. I cooked it the day before, then chilled and reheated just before serving with an orange-cognac gastrique and a mizuna salad with mandarins and crispy pig's ear (see below for more info on that).

Beautiful rose-pink color, fork tender. Although one of my dinner guests who is a big heart lover said it was maybe too tender--that he missed the chewiness. However another guest said you could have served it to anyone without telling them it was heart and they would have had no idea!


Edited by slkinsey (log)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Kerry, check THIS out. I'm going to have to get around to getting some form of SV equipment. I've looked at the PID/rice cooker stuff and the price is right but I keep telling myself to hold out for the immersion circulator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the point e-monster was making is that, with <1.5-inch steaks, once you finish browning the steak, the difference is not tremendously different from regular pan cooking.  Personally, I'm not sure I agree with that.  It depends on how you brown the steak, for one (blowtorch being recomomended if you want good external browning with minimum penetration).  I'd also say that 1.5 inches as a reference point is a bit too thick.  I've seen a marked difference using this technique for strip steaks as thin as one inch.  Below maybe 0.75 inches you're really starting to get so thin that by the time you brown the steak (unless using a blowtorch) you have undone a lot of the careful temperature work you did with the sous vide process.

This is all assuming you would like to brown the exterior of the steak in a hot pan.  If you're using a blowtorch or if you do not want to brown the exterior of the steak at all, you could get good results at most any thickness.

Where sous vide is really handy is when you have an extra-thick steak.  Then you can get an even medium rare with a nice crust but otherwise very little penetration of "doneness" beyond medium rare that would be extremely-challenging-to-impossible using any other method.

That makes more sense.

So if I was just doing the sous-vide and no browning afterward, and I want the steak to wind up slightly less than med-rare, is 128 degrees the right water temperature or should I go a little lower? And if I wanted to brown in a skillet on just one side would that also be cause to lower the water temperature a degree or two?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best temperature to use probably depends on the quality/precision/stability of your set-up. My setup has a few degrees F of fluctuation (which I am hoping to reduce by adding a PID in the near future). I didn't want my tempt to drop below 125 while cooking. If your system is more accurate than mine, I would experiment to find what works best for you. When I do 128-130, I get something that I equate with the rare side of medium rare but distinctly not rare.

slkinsey has more or less summarized the reasoning behind my comment. I don't have a blowtorch; so, I can say nothing about what to do with a blowtorch.With pan-browning, I have found (with quite a few trials leading to the same results) that sous vide of a cut like a rib-eye that is 3/4 inch or less yields product not sufficiently different from pan fried steak to merit the effort. On cuts an inch or thicker the difference is pretty noticeable. My personal preference is for nice thick cuts in the 1.25 to 1.75 inch range. The softening of the fat all the way through is something that is hard to get without sous vide.

I was underwhelmed by my one attempt at sous-vide steak without browning afterward--because I really missed the flavors you get from the maillard reaction.

Browning on one side should work fine but I have no experience. I stopped experimenting once I found something that was so close to my ideal.

Anyway, that is just my experience filtered through my personal taste. I encourage experimentation so that you can fine-tune to your taste.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • By lindaj1
      Is there any recipe from the modernist universe or any other galaxy to make ketogenic (low carb) puff pastry and strudel type doughs?  Unusual ingredients OK.  There must be a way...
    • By haresfur
      I got to thinking after the disgusting job of separating globs of fat from sous vide short ribs and debating never doing them that way again. If the fat renders out in a braise, but not in the sous vide, what temperature would you need to turn the fat liquid to get rid of it? Is it below well-done or do you really have to cook the shit out of it? Is it just temperature or a time&temperature thing?
       
      Along those lines, what happens with marbled, tender cuts? where is the sweet spot between solid fat and something more palatable?
    • By Daily Gullet Staff
      By John Sconzo

      The Daily Gullet is proud to present this, the first in a multi-part, front-row report on the recent "Spain and the World Table" conference. Watch for subsequent installments in this topic.

      In his introduction of Ferran Adria, Thomas Keller -- perhaps the most celebrated American chef ever -- described four elements that go into making a great chef. The chef must be aware. Once aware of one’s culinary and other surroundings that chef can then be inspired, which leads to the ability to interpret those surroundings. But a great chef does not stop there. Instead, the great chef continues to evolve. Ferran Adria, perhaps more than any other chef who has ever lived, is the embodiment of those four elements.

      The moment that Ferran Adria strode towards Thomas Keller on the stage at the CIA/Greystone’s World of Flavors’ “Spain and the World Table” Conference was electric -- as if a giant Van de Graf generator had been turned on. The feeling didn’t subside when Adria took the stage from Keller; it only became more pronounced as the packed crowd rose to its feet, raining applause, admiration and love on the Spanish master. Adria accepted the response with aplomb, and gave it right back to the audience -- and to his fellow Spanish cocineros, who were standing off to the side. He brought each one up to join him on the stage for a rousing thank-you to the conference organizers, sponsors and participants. Once this emotional release subsided, Adria got down to what everyone had been waiting for -- his discussion and demonstration.

      Ferran Adria, with eyes sparkling like the finest cava, began speaking Spanish in a voice as gravelly as the beaches of the Costa Brava, while Conference Chairman Jose Andres translated. The crowd, hushed and straining for every word, moved forward in their seats as Adria explained El Bulli and himself, with a lesson in recent culinary history thrown in. Ferran explained that El Bulli is not a business. While offshoots of El Bulli are operated on a for-profit basis, the restaurant runs without profit as a primary motivation. For example, he said, the greatest difficulty they have is distributing reservations. Given the extraordinary demand and the severely limited supply, he explained that they could simply raise the price of a meal to the point where the supply and demand met. Indeed, the price of a meal at El Bulli is in itself quite reasonable given the stature of the restaurant and well within means of most motivated diners should they be able to get there, and this is how Adria prefers it. He stated that he was not interested in cooking solely for those with the most money. He prefers to work for people with a true interest in exploring the limits of cooking with him. To this end he showed a short film depicting “A Day in the Life . . .” of El Bulli set to the Beatles’ song of the same name. The film showed a couple’s response to the experience.

      Ferran’s voyage into creativity began with a visit to Jacques Maxima at Le Chanticleer Restaurant in Nice, France. He learned from Maxima that to be creative is not to copy. This idea changed his entire approach to cooking -- from making classic cuisine to making his own. Aware of elaborate books of French cuisine, Adria resolved to catalogue his work, the results of which are the richly detailed El Bulli books, published by period. These books, as wonderful as they are, are huge and extremely expensive. During his presentation, Adria announced -- and demonstrated -- that the individual dishes photographed and described in a chronology within each book are all now available online at elbulli.com.

      He finished the philosophical discussion by talking about the general style of haute cuisine that he and others are engaged in. While others have coined the term “molecular gastronomy” to highlight the scientific component of the creativity involved, Adria rejected it, saying that all cooking is molecular: most of his techniques are in fact rather simple and don’t employ radical new technology. Most of the technology that they do use has been around for some time; they have simply adapted it to their own purposes. Nevertheless, he applauds contributions to gastronomy from Harold McGee and other food scientists, and welcomes their collaboration in the kitchen. He has yet to find a term that describes the movement: as of now, he feels that there really is no good name for this style of cooking.

      More than any other single thing, Ferran Adria is known for the use of “foams” in cooking. While he is proud of his achievements with foams, he stressed that while appropriate in some circumstances, the real utility of foams is limited. He bemoans their ubiquity -- and wishes to not be blamed for others’ poor deployment of the concept. In the course of describing this and other techniques, Adria made a point of stating that using them should not be inferred as copying. Techniques and concepts are to be used and shared. He invited everyone to learn and harness whatever they found interesting, and to employ it in to their own pursuits.

      Another set of techniques discussed and demonstrated by the master and his assistant, Rafa Morales from Hacienda Benazuza, included three types of spherification. These included the use of calcium chloride (CaCl) and sodium alginate as well as the converse, and exploration of a new agent, gluconodeltalactone. The original combinations of alginate into CaCl for “caviar” production, and CaCl into alginate for larger “spheres” have chemistry-related limits as to what can be sphericized. In private correspondence, Harold McGee explained to me that Adria described encapsulating a mussel in its own juice. While this would make the dish technically an aspic, unlike conventional aspics it remains a liquid. Adria said that though gluconodeltalactone is very new, and they are just beginning to get a handle on it, he is very excited by it. He also demonstrated a machine for spherification on a larger scale than they had originally been able to do, as well as liquid nitrogen and freeze-drying (lyophilization) techniques. At the conclusion of his demonstration -- and thus the Conference -- the audience once again awarded him a standing ovation.

      While Adria’s appearance was the culmination of the conference, the energy it produced was not just because of his stature in the world of gastronomy -- it was also due to the excitement generated by the conference that preceded it. If there had previously been any doubt, Thomas Keller’s welcome of Adria was a clarion: Spanish cuisine has landed on North American shores and is finding a niche in the North American psyche. Spanish cuisine -- in its multifaceted, delicious entirety -- lives here, too.

      + + + + +

      John M. Sconzo, M.D., aka docsconz, is an anesthesiologist practicing in upstate New York. He grew up in Brooklyn in an Italian-American home, in which food was an important component of family life. It still is. His passions include good food, wine and travel. John's gastronomic interests in upstate northeastern New York involve finding top-notch local producers of ingredients and those who use them well. A dedicated amateur, John has no plans to ditch his current career for one in the food industry. Host, New York.
    • By docsconz
      About Jose Andres
       
      Throughout his career, Jose’s vision and imaginative creations have drawn the praise of the public, the press and his peers. José has received awards and recognition from Food Arts, Bon Appetit, Food & Wine, Saveur, the James Beard Foundation, Wine Spectator, and Wine Advocate. In addition, José has been featured in leading food magazines such as Gourmet as well as the New York Times, the Washington Post, Good Morning America, Fox Sunday Morning News with Chris Wallace, the Food Network, and USA Today.
       
      Widely acknowledged as the premiere Spanish chef cooking in America, José is a developer and Conference Chairman for the upcoming Worlds of Flavor Conference on Spain and the World Table at The Culinary Institute of America at Greystone, November 2 – 5, 2006.
       
      In 1993, Jose moved to Washington, DC, to head the kitchen at Jaleo. From there, Jose took on executive chef responsibilities at neighboring Café Atlantico and later Zaytinya. In July of 2003, Jose embarked on his most adventurous project to date with the opening of the minibar by jose andres at Cafe Atlantico. A six-seat restaurant within a restaurant, minibar by jose andres continues to attract international attention with its innovative tasting menu. In the fall of 2004, Jose opened a third Jaleo and Oyamel, an authentic Mexican small plates restaurant and launched the THINKfoodTANK, an institution devoted to the research and development of ideas about food, all with a view toward their practical applications in the kitchen.
       
      Every week, millions of Spaniards invite Jose into their home where he is the host and producer of “Vamos a cocinar”, a food program on Television Española (TVE), Spanish national television. The program airs in the United States and Latin America on TVE Internacional.
       
      Jose released his first cookbook this year, first published in English, Tapas: A Taste of Spain in America (published in the United States by Clarkson Potter) and shortly after in Spanish, Los fogones de José Andrés (published by Planeta). The book is an homage to Spanish cooking and to tapas, one of Spain's gifts to the world of good cooking.
       
      Jose Andres is passionate, intelligent, dedicated, witty and a fan of FC Barcelona.
       
      Jose has been a member of the eGullet Society since 2004.
       
      More on Jose Andres in the eG Forums:
      Cooking with "Tapas" by Jose Andres
      Vamos a Cocinar - cooking show with Jose Andres
      Jaleo
      José Andrés' Minibar
      Zaytinya
      Oyamel Cocina Mexicana, Crystal City
      Cafe Atlantico
       
      Jose Andres recipes from Tapas in RecipeGullet:
      Potatoes Rioja-Style with Chorizo (Patatas a la Riojana)
      Moorish-Style Chickpea and Spinach Stew
      Squid with Caramelized Onions
    • By gibbs
      With Modernist Cuisine I waited a couple of years and ended up with a copy from the 6th printing run the advantage of this was that all errors picked up in the erratta had been corrected in the print copy.  I am looking to get modernist bread soon and wondered if someone had purchased it recently to check or if someone knew of hand if they have printed any additional corrected runs 
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×