Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Edit History

rotuts

rotuts

a few more thoughts :

 

i also have a set of 4 pans , w conventional lids for the Saute // two Sauce //

 

these are 2.5 mm , made in France , SS.  they were purchased a long time ago ( 25 years ? )

 

by friends of mine in the SF BayArea.  they knew I liked to cook , and I was visiting my father for

 

longer and longer periods of time, they gifted them to me ( under mild protest from me )

 

because they were way to heavy for them to use , and never used them.

 

I used them all the time w my father , and they eventually came to life w me in BOS.

 

note : these have a ' lip '   French restaurant and maybe high end Family pans do not.

 

the lip is a very nice feature .  the lipless pans are a PITA to clean , as they always 

 

' dribble ' down the sides.  lips pans do not.  Day to Day Physics @ home.

 

1546667136_2.5Saute.jpg.bc2e169a91616d069737049ce7543cd1.jpg

 

10 "  ( true inches , lip to lip )  saute.  wt :  2300 grams w/o lid

 

N.B.:  the white spot @ 4 O'Clock.  annoyed me greatly .  but it's a reflection , not a defect

 

1858088987_2_5fry.thumb.jpg.46a5af34119bc9cb94d85dcd957b92ea.jpg

 

10 " Fry.  note same lip and reflection .   1700 grams.  2.5 mm

 

note :  8 3/4 3mm fry :  1600 , no lip.   

 

these lived pans became my working pans when they moved East.  the significance of the

 

weight dif is dramatic.   even when Younger and w a Gym membership   the 10" 3mm

 

( probably 10 3/4 "   lipless  rarely got used .  Im Not Arnnold , after all 

 

If you want the full " French " effect , and think you can make your food ' jump '

 

and stay in the pan :  go for the 10 "  saute.  its wide enough to get a spatula in it

 

w/o any problems.  Jumping and keeping the jumpers in the pan is up tp your

 

and your skill lever.   the 2.5 mm pan is heavy , but doable.

 

Ive looked over the Mauviel page   :

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mauviel-6544-26-MHeritage-Copper-Frying/dp/B01N2WTHL6?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1

 

they are not giving this pan away !

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mauviel-MHeritage-6451-25-Stainless-Eletroplated/dp/B01M58FQSM?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1

 

9.5 " , but w lid.

 

Im sure this is a fine pan .  since Im very very accomplished at spending

 

other peoples money , for " really good stuff "   try your best to go w 2.5 mm

 

the difference in weight between my 3 mm and 2.5 was noticeable , the cooper effect

 

was noticable on the fry pans  I always picked the 3 mm fry's for salmon 

 

first in the pan , flipped , finished in the oven.  I could never maneuver the 10 + " 

 

3 mm saute , and the 10 " 2.5  was doable w very focused energy.

 

not so good with " Wine in the Kitchen "

 

I think you will get a far better cooper effect w 2.5 over 1.5

 

the price difference seems to be about $ 100.  

 

these pans are expensive.  but if can afford one , it will be a pleasure for you to use.

 

Ive always thought " hardware "  should be purchased , one grade up

 

from thoughtful requirements , if one could afford the difference.

 

why ?   your not going to take it back , and you do not want to be disappointed.

 

and stuck w thinking about the next step up.

 

So :  One pan , 2.5 mm  , saute for FR effect , Fry for a mighty fine pan.

 

N.B. :  the difference in weights for both 2.5 mm 10 " pans above

 

its significant for at least two reasons :

 

the actual cooking surface in the saute is larger , and the sides are taller.

 

good luck !  take your time , and you will certainly enjoy your purchase.

 

P.S.:  I noted the weights @ Amazon for the 2.5 and 1.5 saute :

 

2.5 = 7.7 lbs    1.5 = 5.0 lbs

 

w lid ( and id get this lid if you can and choose to afford it :

 

1.5 mm  364 $       2.5 mm   471 $$

 

a lot of money. take your time

 

BTW I got probably 14 - 15 pans , maybe a few more , ive forgotten

 

3 mm , lids for the sauce pans were " Restaurant style "

 

ie flat , a larger lid would work on a smaller pan.  

 

total USD  ( at the time , 11 FF to the dollar , no VAT , free airshiping

 

AirFrance , custom wooden box included :  $ 300 USD  )

 

as Ive said , the best deal of my life.

rotuts

rotuts

a few more thoughts :

 

i also have a set of 4 pans , w conventional lids for the Saute // two Sauce //

 

these are 2.5 mm , made in France , SS.  they were purchased a long time ago ( 25 years ? )

 

by friends of mine in the SF BayArea.  they knew I liked to cook , and I was visiting my father for

 

longer and longer periods of time, they gifted them to me ( under mild protest from me )

 

because they were way to heavy for them to use , and never used them.

 

I used them all the time w my father , and they eventually came to life w me in BOS.

 

note : these have a ' lip '   French restaurant and maybe high end Family pans do not.

 

the lip is a very nice feature .  the lipless pans are a PITA to clean , as they always 

 

' dribble ' down the sides.  lips pans do not.  Day to Day Physics @ home.

 

1546667136_2.5Saute.jpg.bc2e169a91616d069737049ce7543cd1.jpg

 

10 "  ( true inches , lip to lip )  saute.  wt :  2300 grams w/o lid

 

N.B.:  the white spot @ 4 O'Clock.  annoyed me greatly .  but it's a reflection , not a defect

 

1858088987_2_5fry.thumb.jpg.46a5af34119bc9cb94d85dcd957b92ea.jpg

 

10 " Fry.  note same lip and reflection .   1700 grams.  2.5 mm

 

note :  8 3/4 3mm fry :  1600 , no lip.   

 

these lived pans became my working pans when they moved East.  the significance of the

 

weight dif is dramatic.   even when Younger and w a Gym membership   the 10" 3mm

 

( probably 10 3/4 "   lipless  rarely got used .  Im Not Arnnold , after all 

 

If you want the full " French " effect , and think you can make your food ' jump '

 

and stay in the pan :  go for the 10 "  saute.  its wide enough to get a spatula in it

 

w/o any problems.  Jumping and keeping the jumpers in the pan is up tp your

 

and your skill lever.   the 2.5 mm pan is heavy , but doable.

 

Ive looked over the Mauviel page   :

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mauviel-6544-26-MHeritage-Copper-Frying/dp/B01N2WTHL6?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1

 

they are not giving this pan away !

 

https://www.amazon.com/Mauviel-MHeritage-6451-25-Stainless-Eletroplated/dp/B01M58FQSM?ref_=ast_sto_dp&th=1&psc=1

 

9.5 " , but w lid.

 

Im sure this is a fine pan .  since Im very very accomplished at spending

 

other peoples money , for " really good stuff "   try your best to go w 2.5 mm

 

the difference in weight between my 3 mm and 2.5 was noticeable , the cooper effect

 

was noticable on the fry pans  I always picked the 3 mm fry's for salmon 

 

first in the pan , flipped , finished in the oven.  I could never maneuver the 10 + " 

 

3 mm saute , and the 10 " 2.5  was doable w very focused energy.

 

not so good with " Wine in the Kitchen "

 

I think you will get a far better cooper effect w 2.5 over 1.5

 

the price difference seems to be about $ 100.  

 

these pans are expensive.  but if can afford one , it will be a pleasure for you to use.

 

Ive always thought " hardware "  should be purchased , one grade up

 

from thoughtful requirements , if one could afford the difference.

 

why ?   your not going to take it back , and you do not want to be disappointed.

 

and stuck w thinking about the next step up.

 

So :  One pan , 2.5 mm  , saute for FR effect , Fry for a mighty fine pan.

 

N.B. :  the difference in weights for both 2.5 mm 10 " pans above

 

its significant for at least two reasons :

 

the actual cooking surface in the saute is larger , and the sides are taller.

 

good luck !  take your time , and you will certainly enjoy your purchase.

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...