Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

Relative efficiency of braising cuts


Fat Guy

Recommended Posts

I'm surely not the first person to notice that, when you buy X pounds of meat for braising, you wind up with a lot less than X pounds of edible finished produce. But the extent of the inefficiency varies widely by cut.

For example, with beef short ribs (or, I suppose, the short ribs of any animal), you need to buy about a million pounds of short ribs per person. Not only do they shrink a lot, but also there's a lot of inedible tissue as well as all those bones. Whereas, with something like beef brisket, you also lose a lot of weight but not nearly as much.

I have never attempted to quantify any of this. Has anybody else? I'd love to see a chart. Or, barring that, what are your rough guidelines of per-person raw amounts for short ribs, shanks, brisket, chuck, etc., and why?

Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surely not the first person to notice that, when you buy X pounds of meat for braising, you wind up with a lot less than X pounds of edible finished produce. But the extent of the inefficiency varies widely by cut.

For example, with beef short ribs (or, I suppose, the short ribs of any animal), you need to buy about a million pounds of short ribs per person. Not only do they shrink a lot, but also there's a lot of inedible tissue as well as all those bones. Whereas, with something like beef brisket, you also lose a lot of weight but not nearly as much.

I have never attempted to quantify any of this. Has anybody else? I'd love to see a chart. Or, barring that, what are your rough guidelines of per-person raw amounts for short ribs, shanks, brisket, chuck, etc., and why?

As far as quantifying - no. No chart, either. But I generally follow the turkey guidelines - 1 pound per person (after trimming) should give leftovers.

OF course, for things like shanks and ribs, you gotta up the totals. 1 shank per person (if it's lamb), 1 good cut of osso buco per person (if it's veal).

Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"

Tasty Travails - My Blog

My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs

Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a brisket I'm usually not thinking about how much to make per person, but that it's not worth making a brisket (braised, "first cut" aka "flat end") less than 4 lbs, and more than 5 lbs is ideal, since it's no more work to make a larger one, and it gets better as it's reheated. I think I get a little more than two servings per pound usually.

The top round seems to shrink less than brisket when braised, but I haven't done the top round enough to be sure how significant the difference is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very interested in this topic. I broke down 10# of chuck this weekend and would estimate that I had 30% loss in the two dishes (chili and a braised Chinese dish). Next time I'll measure.

The per person question is moot for me since I usually am cooking batch and not worried about product cost per diner. I wonder what the CIA textbooks have to say on this matter....

Chris Amirault

eG Ethics Signatory

Sir Luscious got gator belts and patty melts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was tasked with determining the yield of brisket and whole pork shoulders when I worked at a BBQ place several years ago. I weighed individual briskets and shoulders (about 25 of each)before and after cooking. I no longer have the exact figures, but the average loss in weight for these cuts was 40-50%. Granted there are many variables at play here, but this is what I found given the meat we were buying and the cooking method. I should note that these numbers represent untrimmed cuts. Once prepped for service (i.e. removing the skin and large chunks of fat from the pork shoulder), the yield was reduced further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. Whenever I have a recipe developed well enough to consider it done, one of the standard last things I do is calculate yield.

E.g., back in August, 2006, I did a fake Memphis BBQ starting with a 10.18 pound picnic pork shoulder. After cooking for 16 hours in a 220 F oven and separating, I got right at 5 pounds of edible meat.

Have done the same for roasting eye of round for roast beef sandwiches.

Intend to do the same when return again to poached scallops.

What would be the right food and wine to go with

R. Strauss's 'Ein Heldenleben'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what the variance is between smoking (dry heat) and braising (wet heat).

Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A picnic pork shoulder has a pretty huge bone, no? A Boston butt, not so big.

If you took two "identical" briskets (I know that's impossible, but let's say two briskets that were pretty close to each other), braised one and cooked the other with dry heat, my guess would be a higher yield on the braised product. Additionally, if the braised brisket is allowed to rest overnight in the liquid, does it reabsorb some of that liquid?

Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"

Tasty Travails - My Blog

My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs

Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is that, with brisket, the most reabsorption is going to occur if you slice it after refrigeration and reheat the slices in liquid. The next time I cook a brisket I have to remember to record weights at the various stages in the process.

Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A picnic pork shoulder has a pretty huge bone, no? A Boston butt, not so big.

If you took two "identical" briskets (I know that's impossible, but let's say two briskets that were pretty close to each other), braised one and cooked the other with dry heat, my guess would be a higher yield on the braised product. Additionally, if the braised brisket is allowed to rest overnight in the liquid, does it reabsorb some of that liquid?

Yep, Mitch, I'd think the weight of the bone would be a big factor.

But, to the brisket. When I braise meat and rest it overnight in the 'fridge, I follow Wolfert's guidelines -- remove meat from liquid and store the meat very tightly wrapped with the liquid stored separately.

Further to the whole thing about smoked vs. braised meat (since they are often the same cuts), rarely do I serve the smoked meat the day I smoke it (it's a timing thing; you never know how long the darned thing will take to get past the stall). I wonder if we remove more fat once we've braised than after we've smoked the meat? I smoked a brisket recently (whole, with a nice fat cap) and the big part (deckle?) had a nice layer of fat in the middle. I didn't remove it. Would I have removed it had I braised it whole? Would it have just "bled out?"

Susan Fahning aka "snowangel"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...