Jump to content
  • Welcome to the eG Forums, a service of the eGullet Society for Culinary Arts & Letters. The Society is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization dedicated to the advancement of the culinary arts. These advertising-free forums are provided free of charge through donations from Society members. Anyone may read the forums, but to post you must create a free account.

The search for good meat in America


mattwb

Recommended Posts

The search for good meat in America.

Part One. Some problems.

Americans love meat.

Actually I would go so far as to suggest that even more American than the proverbial Apple Pie would be a nice thick juicy steak.

However, I have to go one further and suggest that sadly it isn’t a lovely, marbled piece of well-aged Beef that most defines America…

It’s a Burger.

And what a burger it is. What a piece of work.

A huge amount of money, time and energy have gone into the business of producing burgers. The business of transforming a noble protein into garbage. The business of taking a simple, classic and satisfying dish and turning it into what amounts to a weapon of mass-destruction. Now this may sound like alarmist nonsense to some of you. However, consider some of the facts.

Whether you know it or not factory farming produces nearly all of the animal products (I hesitate to call a lot of it food) in the United States. John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, puts it thus, "Americans have to pretend factory farms don't exist. They turn their eyes away, because there's no alternative, there's no choice". These methods of intensive meat production cause harm on many levels. Even if one discounts any considerations regarding animal welfare, the processes and products have serious consequences and the results are harmful to humans.

Fact. It can be proved and it has been. It could even destroy the planet.

Factory-reared livestock no longer stroll and graze on rolling green pastures. They are intensively raised in sheds, cages or pens and fed (mostly) GM grain and soy. Cattle alone account for 70% of annual US grain-production. Just to produce the fertilizer for that grain adds 40 million tons of CO2 to the US national carbon-footprint. Then all those tractors, combine harvesters and transport trucks etc add another 60 million tons. The basic tasks of animal-husbandry as well as milk production account for another 30 million tons. These figures don’t take into account the amount of CO2 that would have been absorbed by those rolling pastures and the effect of de-forestation for the purposes of cattle production. And then there’s methane.

Methane is another ‘greenhouse gas’, for those who don’t know these are the emissions which hang around in the atmosphere soaking up the heat from the Sun and thereby causing Global Warming. CO2 is pretty bad for this but Methane is a monster! Methane is regarded as "20 to 30 times more effective at absorbing infrared radiation" than Carbon Dioxide. In total, an estimated 104 million tons of methane is released annually by cattle alone.

That could equate to the ecological nastiness of 24 YEARS of CO2 damage, caused in a single year, EVERY YEAR. For burgers. And not even tasty ones.

"The voluminous evidence now strongly suggests that unless we act boldly and quickly to deal with the underlying causes of global warming, our world will undergo a string of terrible catastrophes including more and stronger storms like Hurricane Katrina, in both the Atlantic and the Pacific."

(Al Gore – An inconvenient truth)

Wouldn’t a straightforward way to tackle one of the underlying sources be to reject factory-produced meat and meat products? This involves a simple decision to eat less meat, pay more for it, but to eat better as a result.

But these are long-term issues that might not kill anyone for ages…..

Forget the big, planet-size problems. What about the really tiny virus-sized ones?

In the scientific study, ‘The effect of commercial production and product formulation stresses on the heat resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (NCTC 12900) in beef burgers’ the production method of processing, storing and cooking burgers was replicated under laboratory conditions.

This study found that commercial processing and product formulation have profound effects on the heat resistance of E. coli O157:H7 in beef burgers.

Put in simple terms it shows that the way burgers are made, stored and served commercially, actually makes this killer bug stronger.

So how bad can E. coli be? Well, in May 2000, 1,300 cases of gastroenteritis were reported and six people died as the result of E. coli contaminating drinking water in Walkerton, Ontario. So it can kill you. Oh and by the way health authorities investigating that very case determined that the most likely source was cattle manure runoff.

Manure from dairy cows is also thought to have contributed to the disastrous Cryptosporidium contamination of Milwaukee's drinking water in 1993, which killed more than 100 people, made 400,000 sick and resulted in $37 million in lost wages and productivity.

This should tell you something about commercial food processing. Not only are the products unpalatable, they are dangerous. The food that results from these processes is unappetizing, unhealthy and unnecessary. And as a completely unforeseen by-product they are ‘beefing-up’ E. coli (sorry, couldn’t resist)

So there you have it. Cheap beef kills people. Sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly. Sometimes not at all. Sometimes it’ll just make you wish you were dead. But it doesn’t have to be like that.

Edited by mattwb (log)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what are the healthier alternatives?

You painted a negative picture, now help me understand how to make the situation better.

I've been in close touch with a grass fed Angus producer who wants to bring his product to market, so you're preaching to the choir, but I want to hear what you have to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what are the healthier alternatives?

You painted a negative picture, now help me understand how to make the situation better.

I've been in close touch with a grass fed Angus producer who wants to bring his product to market, so you're preaching to the choir, but I want to hear what you have to say.

I'll post some solutions later this week....

I understand that pretty much everyone here on eGullet represents the choir, but when I looked into how bad things were I was really shocked.

I lived in Notting Hill, West London where we had a daily Farmer's Market right through the year and you couldn't move without tripping over organic meat and produce.

Now I live in Boulder, Colorado and despite Boulder's 'green' reputation it is very hard to find ethically produced food in regular stores. In our local Safeway there was not a single free-range chicken to be had and it wasn't because they had sold them all!

Still hopefully the chicken issue is soon to be solved by becoming the producers ourselves! We'll let you know how it goes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how much grazing land it would take to produce the same amount of organic beef?

Well, it would take a huge amount. Probably a prohibitively large amount.

So the real question is.... given that we can't produce the same amount of Beef ethically as we can un-ethically, isn't it the case that we shouldn't be producing as much Beef?

As I say in the article. we need to eat less meat, pay more for it but ultimately eat better as a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the poor?  Let them eat cake?

The poor could probably benefit the most from such a change of diet.

Just because it's possible to produce a Hamburger retailing at 99c doesn't mean you should. And you certainly shouldn't eat them.

A great local store in Boulder, Lucky's, will sell you a bunch of Organic Spinach for that same 99c. It should be a no-brainer. It is sad that it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I see, let them eat spinach. The poor should be vegetarians. I'm not talking about chain burgers, I'm talking about ground beef. Ground beef is a staple in many poor households, not to mention chicken and cheap pork cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I see, let them eat spinach.  The poor should be vegetarians.  I'm not talking about chain burgers, I'm talking about ground beef.  Ground beef is a staple in many poor households, not to mention chicken and cheap pork cuts.

You misunderstand. I don't advocate vegetarianism for the poor or indeed anyone.

However I do believe that the food choices people make don't have to be guided by one's budget and they certainly shouldn't be guided by a red-headed clown.

Ground Beef is indeed a staple and there's nothing wrong with it per se.

The problem comes when people think it should cost $1.05 a pound.

Compounding that problem by then introducing a box of Hamburger Helper into the equation is just an unfortunate issue of taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mentioned organic spinach, I wonder how many acres of farm land it would take to producde the same amount of organic spinach?

Well it doesn't take farmland, rather watered beds. Also the cumulative effect is far nicer to the environment. No pesticides, no antibiotics, and you don't need fields of GM grian and soy so you can feed the Spinach 'Frankenstein foods' to make it grow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However I do believe that the food choices people make don't have to be guided by one's budget...

Ground Beef is indeed a staple and there's nothing wrong with it per se.

The problem comes when people think it should cost $1.05 a pound.

Food choices are guided by budget and ground beef is nowhere near $1.05/lb. Having been poor I can understand the need for cost effective shopping and again I'm not talking about fast food. We all would like to have the ability to buy organic foods but you could not feed 300 million + people using only organically grown/raised foods. If you tried, it would be ecologically harmful to the enviroment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However I do believe that the food choices people make don't have to be guided by one's budget...

Ground Beef is indeed a staple and there's nothing wrong with it per se.

The problem comes when people think it should cost $1.05 a pound.

Food choices are guided by budget and ground beef is nowhere near $1.05/lb. Having been poor I can understand the need for cost effective shopping and again I'm not talking about fast food. We all would like to have the ability to buy organic foods but you could not feed 300 million + people using only organically grown/raised foods. If you tried, it would be ecologically harmful to the enviroment.

Wow. Raising organic food is harmful to the environment?

Food industrialisation is responsible for a catalogue of ills in the US and abroad.

Many cultures know how to feed themselves well and cheaply.

It is a shame that in such a multi-cultural society as America, these skills are being lost to generations only interested in McNuggets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Raising organic food is harmful to the environment?

Food industrialisation is responsible for a catalogue of ills in the US and abroad.

Many cultures know how to feed themselves well and cheaply.

It is a shame that in such a multi-cultural society as America, these skills are being lost to generations only interested in McNuggets.

Don't you know that Americans consuming flash frozen farm raised shrimp from Zimbabwe is better for the environment than a local tomato?

Visit beautiful Rancho Gordo!

Twitter @RanchoGordo

"How do you say 'Yum-o' in Swedish? Or is it Swiss? What do they speak in Switzerland?"- Rachel Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think factory farming is here to stay for the foreseeable future. It would be very hard to turn back the clock and develop the kind of infrastructure and education needed to produce such a change in a short period of time.

I also think, however, that there is an increasing awareness of the ecological and health problems associated with factory farms and their products. I live in a pretty progressive town but local products are still not to be found in grocery stores (and they're merely given lip-service at Whole Foods). On the other hand, the farmers markets are always packed and people I talk to seem to have the sense that local products are better for you and the environment.

The trick might be to convince these people that local and ecologically friendly products are not just a special thing, but that they can be had daily, weekly, or monthly depending on a person's time/budget. Learning about what is produced in your area and making relationships with farmers involves a lot of initial work but once that's over, it gets much easier. It's also more enjoyable to buy food from a person that picking it up from a cold case in a supermarket. Getting the word out about what is available and where to get it in your area, in addition to the arguments about ecology and health, might be effective for changing a few minds.

josh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it!

This article and the ones to follow really require a response from the reader.

There will be people who agree and they unfortunately will probably get least from this whole thing.

Then there are those who kind of know but don't have access to alternatives or time to find them themselves. For these guys, keep checking in and reading, you're in for a wonderul time!

Then there are the other people. Now I don't ask, expect or require people to agree with me.

However, if you really disagree with this first article and vehemently defend the industrialisation of the food that you and your families are being asked to eat, you need to have a moment of pause.

Really, truly look inside yourself and ask yourself what you are defending.

And what is it that I am promoting that you don't like so much....

Anyhoo, enjoy!

MWB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it!

This article and the ones to follow really require a response from the reader.

There will be people who agree and they unfortunately will probably get least from this whole thing.

Then there are those who kind of know but don't have access to alternatives or time to find them themselves. For these guys, keep checking in and reading, you're in for a wonderul time!

Then there are the other people. Now I don't ask, expect or require people to agree with me.

However, if you really disagree with this first article and vehemently defend the industrialisation of the food that you and your families are being asked to eat, you need to have a moment of pause.

Really, truly look inside yourself and ask yourself what you are defending.

And what is it that I am promoting that you don't like so much....

Anyhoo, enjoy!

MWB

I'm not sure whether you're responding to my post at all, but what you're saying here is not news to me (or many many others). I haven't been to a supermarket for about 7 months (for food--I still have to buy toothbrushes, paper towels, etc., there) and I buy all of my meat from local organic producers (luckily for me, its available year round except for chicken). Its double the price but I've begun to eat half the meat (it balances out that way).

I appreciate the enthusiasm with which you are arguing your case, but sometimes that enthusiasm gets in the way too. Most people don't want to spend the time to seek out local products or cut their consumption of meat in half. Some people can't afford to shop this way because of their budget. If you suggest to people that only radical change is the answer, they will shut off. I'm trying to offer some thoughts about practical ways to begin changing people's thinking about food.

josh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it doesn't take farmland, rather watered beds. Also the cumulative effect is far nicer to the environment. No pesticides, no antibiotics, and you don't need fields of GM grian and soy so you can feed the Spinach 'Frankenstein foods' to make it grow.

OK, so now you want to make spinach too expensive for the poor. I wonder what the cost basis is for watered beds vs field grown spinach. I don't think they use antibiotics on spinach nor do I believe do they feed it "frankenstein foods" to make it grow. Again, it would be nice to have a selection of organic foods at our local stores but to feed our population we do need "food factories".

I would like my food to be humanely treated as much as possible. I don't want my chicken to be drop kicked before it's killed nor do I want my beef to be skinned alive. Nothing's perfect so I expect some problems like this to creep into the system, people are not perfect. To be honest though, if it takes the occasional kicked chicken to put some meat on the table of a poor family I don't mind.

Another thing, up thread you mentioned having a farmer's market. It's a wonderful thing, something I've brought up with our Mayor. The poor shop for the lowest prices to stretch their food budget, that means chain stores. Farmer's Markets are for people who have the leisure time to shop. When I was a young child (before the advent of a grocery store every few blocks) my Mother bought meat from the butcher, greens from a produce stand and groceries from the corner store. Milk was delivered and in the Summer you would have trucks drive down the ally hawking fresh produce. Since then our population has almost doubled and continues to grow.

You cannot expect to feed a growing population using organic methods without price increases. Price increases hurt the poor disproportionately, look at what happened to corn prices when the U.S. switched from MTBE to ethanol. Should the poor in Mexico, Central & South America make do with less corn for tortillas and other staples?

If you have a problem with fast food, that's fine, more power to you. Having been in a position where all I could afford to eat was rice for a month I can see where this push for organic foods, regardless of the consequences, would seem offensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Raising organic food is harmful to the environment?

Food industrialisation is responsible for a catalogue of ills in the US and abroad.

Many cultures know how to feed themselves well and cheaply.

It is a shame that in such a multi-cultural society as America, these skills are being lost to generations only interested in McNuggets.

Don't you know that Americans consuming flash frozen farm raised shrimp from Zimbabwe is better for the environment than a local tomato?

Beautiful! I love your sense of irony. But there are those who can't detect cyber-sarcasm. Still as an added bonus, whilst flying sub-standard seafood around the world, wrecking oceanic eco-systems and depriving hard-working American fishermen of a time-honored trade we can also prop-up a crypto-fascist genocidal regime in Africa. Bottom line though, it doesn't even taste good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it!

This article and the ones to follow really require a response from the reader.

There will be people who agree and they unfortunately will probably get least from this whole thing.

Then there are those who kind of know but don't have access to alternatives or time to find them themselves. For these guys, keep checking in and reading, you're in for a wonderul time!

Then there are the other people. Now I don't ask, expect or require people to agree with me.

However, if you really disagree with this first article and vehemently defend the industrialisation of the food that you and your families are being asked to eat, you need to have a moment of pause.

Really, truly look inside yourself and ask yourself what you are defending.

And what is it that I am promoting that you don't like so much....

Anyhoo, enjoy!

MWB

I'm not sure whether you're responding to my post at all, but what you're saying here is not news to me (or many many others). I haven't been to a supermarket for about 7 months (for food--I still have to buy toothbrushes, paper towels, etc., there) and I buy all of my meat from local organic producers (luckily for me, its available year round except for chicken). Its double the price but I've begun to eat half the meat (it balances out that way).

I appreciate the enthusiasm with which you are arguing your case, but sometimes that enthusiasm gets in the way too. Most people don't want to spend the time to seek out local products or cut their consumption of meat in half. Some people can't afford to shop this way because of their budget. If you suggest to people that only radical change is the answer, they will shut off. I'm trying to offer some thoughts about practical ways to begin changing people's thinking about food.

Radical change is AN answer, but much more preferable would be ANY change from people. There are some truths that a lot of people don't want to face though.

Good food doesn't have to be expensive. But cheap, processed food is never good.

It's not a nice thing to have to think and upon reflection realise that you are lazy and thoughtless. And irresponsible. But what if it's true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love it!

This article and the ones to follow really require a response from the reader.

There will be people who agree and they unfortunately will probably get least from this whole thing.

Then there are those who kind of know but don't have access to alternatives or time to find them themselves. For these guys, keep checking in and reading, you're in for a wonderul time!

Then there are the other people. Now I don't ask, expect or require people to agree with me.

However, if you really disagree with this first article and vehemently defend the industrialisation of the food that you and your families are being asked to eat, you need to have a moment of pause.

Really, truly look inside yourself and ask yourself what you are defending.

And what is it that I am promoting that you don't like so much....

Anyhoo, enjoy!

MWB

I'm not sure whether you're responding to my post at all, but what you're saying here is not news to me (or many many others). I haven't been to a supermarket for about 7 months (for food--I still have to buy toothbrushes, paper towels, etc., there) and I buy all of my meat from local organic producers (luckily for me, its available year round except for chicken). Its double the price but I've begun to eat half the meat (it balances out that way).

I appreciate the enthusiasm with which you are arguing your case, but sometimes that enthusiasm gets in the way too. Most people don't want to spend the time to seek out local products or cut their consumption of meat in half. Some people can't afford to shop this way because of their budget. If you suggest to people that only radical change is the answer, they will shut off. I'm trying to offer some thoughts about practical ways to begin changing people's thinking about food.

Radical change is AN answer, but much more preferable would be ANY change from people. There are some truths that a lot of people don't want to face though.

Good food doesn't have to be expensive. But cheap, processed food is never good.

It's not a nice thing to have to think and upon reflection realise that you are lazy and thoughtless. And irresponsible. But what if it's true?

I agree with you for the most part, but saying that "radical change is AN answer" isn't really enough. If you try to change people's minds by blasting them out of the water and calling them lazy and irresponsible, you're not going to get a good reaction. The problem with conventional food production is real but you haven't offered a solution or even an attempt at one that is realistic. Radical change is an answer, but its not a realistic one. Change involves compromise and you have to meet people at their level. If you don't acknowledge the kind of economic arguments that JimH brings up, no one will take you seriously. This issue should be in the center of people's minds when they are shopping. If you marginalize your position by offering radical solutions and not giving enough attention to serious objections, you are doing more harm than good in my opinion.

josh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it doesn't take farmland, rather watered beds. Also the cumulative effect is far nicer to the environment. No pesticides, no antibiotics, and you don't need fields of GM grian and soy so you can feed the Spinach 'Frankenstein foods' to make it grow.

OK, so now you want to make spinach too expensive for the poor. I wonder what the cost basis is for watered beds vs field grown spinach. I don't think they use antibiotics on spinach nor do I believe do they feed it "frankenstein foods" to make it grow. Again, it would be nice to have a selection of organic foods at our local stores but to feed our population we do need "food factories".

I would like my food to be humanely treated as much as possible. I don't want my chicken to be drop kicked before it's killed nor do I want my beef to be skinned alive. Nothing's perfect so I expect some problems like this to creep into the system, people are not perfect. To be honest though, if it takes the occasional kicked chicken to put some meat on the table of a poor family I don't mind.

Another thing, up thread you mentioned having a farmer's market. It's a wonderful thing, something I've brought up with our Mayor. The poor shop for the lowest prices to stretch their food budget, that means chain stores. Farmer's Markets are for people who have the leisure time to shop. When I was a young child (before the advent of a grocery store every few blocks) my Mother bought meat from the butcher, greens from a produce stand and groceries from the corner store. Milk was delivered and in the Summer you would have trucks drive down the ally hawking fresh produce. Since then our population has almost doubled and continues to grow.

You cannot expect to feed a growing population using organic methods without price increases. Price increases hurt the poor disproportionately, look at what happened to corn prices when the U.S. switched from MTBE to ethanol. Should the poor in Mexico, Central & South America make do with less corn for tortillas and other staples?

If you have a problem with fast food, that's fine, more power to you. Having been in a position where all I could afford to eat was rice for a month I can see where this push for organic foods, regardless of the consequences, would seem offensive.

Make up your mind. I'm either offending you for advocating the 99c Organic Spinach or I'm offending you by trying to price it higher for some reason.

I'm simply putting information out there that I don't think people have.

It is an easy thing to do to reach for the 69c a lb chicken parts in the mega-mart.

(price-checked at King Soopers today. 10lb of frozen Chicken Quarters for $6.90)

I understand that. However, given all the facts, knowing everything about that Chicken I think a lot of people would buy a smaller amount of meat, add some extra veggies and feel alot better about the food they were eating.

It really doesn't come down to rich or poor. It comes down to knowledge.

It is easier to not think. It's easier to ignore stuff. But if you are poor in America, you really ought to think because you better not get sick. And there are way too many unscrupulous companies who'll take your thoughtless dollar in exchange for garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. Raising organic food is harmful to the environment?

Food industrialisation is responsible for a catalogue of ills in the US and abroad.

Many cultures know how to feed themselves well and cheaply.

It is a shame that in such a multi-cultural society as America, these skills are being lost to generations only interested in McNuggets.

Again I'm not talking about fast food, I'm addressing groceries from the store. Again, just how many more acres of land would have to be cleared to grow the same amount of organic "anything" vs the industrialized "anything". That additional land would have its trees cut down and of course you then have the additional run-off silting rivers. Dredging rivers is not enviromentally friendly. Then you also have the increasing the size of dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico. While you may be raising vegetable "X" organically you still have to replace lost nitrogen in the soil. Even organic nitrogen can have a negative affect on these dead zones.

"Food industrialization is responsible for a catalog of ills..."

It also feeds 300 million + people and our poor enjoy a feast as compared to the poor in other nations. The overflow actually does go to other nations to help feed their poor.

"Many cultures know how feed themselves well and cheaply."

Yes, necessity is the mother of invention.

"It is a shame that in such a multi-cultural society as America, these skills are being lost to generations only interested in McNuggets."

You have to get past this fast food thing, nobody is pointing a gun at someone to get them to buy the happy meal. Even in this fine forum there seems to be a fascination with convenience foods & confections. People still have the choice of where to get their food and what food to eat. You stroke with too broad a brush I think, otherwise I'd see Happy Meal Illustrated rather than Cooks Illustrated and this fine forum would be dedicated to the art of eating fast food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The search for good meat in America.

Part Two. Some solutions.

Like I said… cheap beef kills people.

Sometimes quickly, sometimes slowly. Sometimes not at all. Sometimes it’ll just make you wish you were dead.

But it doesn’t have to be like that.

No it really doesn’t. Like many intelligent people I’m sure that from time to time you take a look at the world and really want to change some things. Maybe things concern you like Global Warming, dependence on foreign oil and the environment. Maybe it really bothers you. Keeps you awake even.

But then you think about it a bit and changing things seems really hard.

Or impossible.

Well if you think of it in a certain way it is impossible.

You can’t single-handedly make the United States sign up to the Kyoto Protocol on global warming. Maybe you don’t even know what that is.

You can’t make people give up their SUVs for Hybrids.

You can’t build a wind-farm. No-one has voted for you and probably won’t.

But you can make a difference in lots of ways.

Now I’m not about to tell you to be a vegan or weave your own moccasins from your own hair. I am not a hippy and you probably shouldn’t be one either.

But there are some practical solutions. Here are some you can try at home.

Three words. Stop buying garbage. Simple as that. No more factory-produced meat. No more eggs that are not from free-range birds. And definitely no more fast junk food. In fact try to forego anything that has been processed at all.

Buy raw ingredients. Buy whole cuts of meat from reputable sources.

Buy fresh fruit and veggies. Don’t buy food that requires scientists to create it.

Try making your own bread. You know what bread is… flour, water, yeast.

A little salt. That’s it. Stop reading this for a minute and go get a loaf of commercially produced bread from your kitchen. Look at the list of ingredients. Do you know what more than half of them are? Why are they there? Is that for your benefit or for the guys who sell the bread?

Bread-making is easy. Also it’s not time-consuming. No really. It isn’t.

Let me explain. Bread-making is all about very simple recipes and a little technique. Overall it does take some time to produce a loaf but your presence is only required in short energetic bursts interspersed by natural things happening on their own. Imagine the time you spend on any given evening watching some fine American television programming. All the time of yours it takes is the bits when the adverts are on. Not really precious time. In fact it’s time you would prefer not to have. Convert it into something really precious.

Google bread recipes. Bake a little bread. Make your life a little better.

Re-examine your relationship with the food you eat. Like any worthwhile relationship it takes a little effort to really feel the benefit, but to labor the analogy, a little effort is well worth it. So try and get closer.

Get closer to what your food is. Chickens don’t naturally come in nugget-form.

You (or your kids) want nuggets? Buy a decent chicken. Take the breasts off and pop them in a bowl. Next take the legs off, pop them in a bag, put the bag in the freezer. Put the resulting carcass in a pot with some chopped up carrots and onions, cover with water and boil. Take the wings off those breasts. Toss them in a little flour and throw in a hot oven for 15 minutes.

Those are yours. As a treat. Shake a little Hot Sauce over them and crack open a Beer. You see… you are already being rewarded!

Cut the breast meat into nuggety pieces. Toss in the flour you had left over and then into a little beaten egg. Then into some breadcrumbs. Then bake off in that oven of yours that is still hot. 15 minutes later you’ll have your nuggets.

While the nuggets are in the oven, peel and boil some potatoes, make some mash. And the boiling bones? Reduce them, thicken with a little cornstarch and you have some gravy. All from scratch, all pretty tasty home-cooking and all without having to deal with fake colonels with dodgy beards. And best of all, you aren’t buying garbage.

Get closer to where your food is from…

Shop local. Reward the producers near to you who take pride in the goods they sell. It also cuts down on road-trips to the mega-mart. If you have a good local butcher, for the sake of all that is holy please use them. They’ll get to know you and reward you. They may occasionally give you some free meat, but they’ll always give you meat free from fecal coliform.

Walk around a Farmer’s Market. You’ll see fantastic produce that will inspire you. You’ll see vegetables fresh from the field with no more packaging than a little of the earth they grew in. You’ll probably meet the very people who grew or raised the food you’re going to buy and eat. You’ll start to actually enjoy your food shopping.

Buy local. (There is a difference) Think about what it takes in order for your food to get to the point of sale. There’s little credit to your vegetarianism if all your veggies are being flown halfway round the world to you. I believe the moral high-ground is mine if I buy a Lamb Chop from a farm a mile down the road while your guacamole is made from avocados who clock up more air-miles than Richard Branson. If you make the decision to buy local you can enjoy the changing seasons and you’ll end up with a much more varied diet instead of just eating stir-fried Chilean mange-tout all the time. Which is boring.

And while you are at it, stop creating so much garbage too. Of course you should re-cycle but go a step further. Or rather go a step smarter. Think about the amount of trash you are creating. Buy products that have minimal packaging or none at all. Re-use shopping bags. Stores will actually give you money for doing this!

Oh and while you enjoy your tasty burger, made by you from steak you ground in your own kitchen from beef reared by a committed artisan farmer on a low-intensity farm, give yourself a pat on the back with the other hand.

Allow yourself few pats. A well-deserved pat for your humane attitude toward animal husbandry, another for not contributing to the rampant obesity clogging America and yet another for not poisoning yourself nor helping fund the poisoning of others. And perhaps a final one for not destroying all life on planet Earth. A nice bonus (and a tasty burger).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really doesn't come down to rich or poor. It comes down to knowledge.

It is easier to not think. It's easier to ignore stuff. But if you are poor in America, you really ought to think because you better not get sick. And there are way too many unscrupulous companies who'll take your thoughtless dollar in exchange for garbage.

No, it comes down to whether or not you have the $$ for food. If a poor person was fully educated, to your satisfaction, and given the choice between lovingly raised free range chicken legs for $1.50/ lb and industrialized chicken from the mega chicken slaughter house for $0.79/lb they would still take the lower price. I think the difference here is priviledge. I've had the priviledge of being poor and I understand the difference between want and need.

ETA: "Its easier not to think"

It's also easier to not to think analytically.

Edited by JimH (log)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...