OK, here it goes. I believe that it was during the 60 minutes interview where he proudly stated that he can fully evaluate a wine within 5 seconds of it entering his palate. If this is not egotistical nonsense, I don't know what is. I, however, feel that he sincerely believes this, and this is why his tasting is fundamentally flawed. Such an approach, particularly in the context of his marathon 100+ wine tasting sessions, does not allow for any reflection on a wine's subtleties or even the opportunity for a more elegant, acid-structured wine to show those subtleties. What it not only allows for, but makes an inevitability, is that the samples that make an impression are--low and behold--the so called hedonistic, sledgehammar-on-the-palate examples. Wines possessing too much ripeness, oak and alcohol. Wines showing everything they're capable of showing in their first 5 seconds--even if they subsequently have nothing more to offer in the glass that afternoon or in the bottle over the next 5-10 years.