The Michelin inspectors are headed since 2001 by a Briton, Derek Brown - which as you can imagine was a bit controversial fact at first in proud France! They're full-time employees, and all have a professional restaurant/catering background. There's 20 for France alone. My own very limited experience with them and their methods indicates that they are rather bureaucratic in style and preferences, that they are relatively autonomous only as far as 1-star and 'bib gourmand' restaurant go, and that the big 'political' decisions (i.e., the two- and three-star restaurants) are all made by Brown and the Michelin bigwigs. A marked turn to favor ever more modern cuisines is obvious in the past few years. Also an effort to reduce the bloated list of stars in France, where the overall quality level of restaurants is undeniably lower today than 10 or 20 years ago. Problem is, they're doing likewise throughout Europe, even in places where the trend has been just the opposite, i.e. to marked across-the-board improvements, as in Spain. The Michelin brass got an earful from Spanish restaurant critics in December when they went to Madrid to present the 2003 Spain guide and had to admit that there were no more stars in it than in the 1990 Spain guide - without being able to offer a plausible explanation for this fact, given that Spain's culinary explosion is such a well-documented story... But the French have a very hard time admitting that they may be going through a hollow period while others are buoyant. It's a bit ridiculous, because such pendulum swings have been common throughot culinary history, but they have real trouble facing that fact.