Jump to content

mattsea

participating member
  • Posts

    79
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mattsea

  1. Saw it, but cannot enter since I live north of the US border (Canada). The auditions are in 10 days, if anybody is interested.

    The only downside for me is Ramsey. I do not beleive that beiing yelled at gets productive results in any way in a kitchen. It puts on a nice show for the general public and that is it.

    Yes, he does seem a strange choice.

    MasterChef Australia went the opposite route, with the show praised for its non-harsh attitude towards contestants. It was apparently (I didn't watch it) a softer, friendlier reality show. The ratings were through the roof.

  2. This is where the pressure cooker really shows off its stuff. Risotto takes 7 minutes at high pressure.

    This is an attitude I'll never be able to understand. A risotto, cooked traditionally, will take somewhere in the region of 17-20 minutes to cook. Are those 10-13 minutes *that* important? I enjoy cooking, and I suspect you do too! I just don't understand.

  3. I had no idea they're notoriously tricky! Mine is about 6 foot tall, and produces more leaves than I could ever use!!

    I do suspect that Rhode Island has slightly different weather to Western Australia though, which may explain the difference.

    Mine likes full sun (and I mean FULL), and I tend to water it every 2-3 days in summer. It's in a large pot with good drainage.

    They also seem to like being pruned. I regularly massacre mine and it comes right back with growth spurts.

  4. My understanding is that the current French Laundry technique for poaching a lobster tail (ie. poaching in beurre monte controlled by an immersion circulator) is a hybrid of the classic TFL technique (a traditional poach) and the technique used at Per Se in the early days (cryo-vac'd tail with small amount of butter).

    As to why they've chosen to use this hybrid technique I don't know.

    I do know that it's delicious.

  5. Re #7, I don't mind a name, but I don't want him/her in my mental space. The waiter is not my dinner companion. Take the order, be quiet, be knowledgeable, be present, never interrupt a conversation. If I'm a regular, be friendly, but not a "pal".

    Agreed, but I think there is a considerable middle ground between a stiff, formal, servile server who refrains from giving his/her name, and the "pal" who is over-friendly as you describe. I'd like someone in the middle. Someone human, but not in my face.

  6. For me, most of these "offenses" fall into the category of "I don't really care"

    Yes, I agree. The only possible exception would be if these occurred in truly top restaurants for which you were paying a significant amount of money (like Per Se or Le Bernardin or something). Other than that, I think adherence to these rules would make things too fussy for me.

    The "no names" rule really strikes me as odd and somewhat archaic.

  7. It does seem to show an inconsistency (or growth?) in the judges... I recall them harping on someone who was playing with the idea of coq a vin, but used a hen, yet these kind of nouveau terms aren't fazing them much. I guess once you've whipped out the agar and the nitrogen, all bets are off.

    She wasn't playing with the idea of coq au vin, she said she had cooked coq au vin, which she hadn't.

    Surely coq au vin, as the name of an individual dish, is in a different class to words like "confit" or "carpaccio" or "sashimi" that describe a technique or method of preparation.

  8. .

    At least I haven't harped on the "tomato confit" issue this year--until now. I seem to have heard one of the Cheftestant's using the term on one of this season's episodes. I'm not a big fan of tomatoes stewed in duck or goose fat, but I guess we live in times where anything can be called a "confit"--a liberal description of what is a specific form of cooking. Tomato "sashimi" or tomato "confit"--I suppose in the end what matters most is what the judges tasted.

    I thought Eli's eggplant "confit" in this episode was basically slow-roasted eggplant with liberal amounts of olive oil, but I suppose "confit" works as shorthand.

  9. I thought Mike V's bitchiness about Kevin's dish was really poor form, and it shows a complete lack of maturity. Is he suggesting that refined, well cooked food that uses traditional methods is always inferior to dishes cooked using cutting-edge techniques? Surely not. I thought he was too mature for that, and that his work for Jose Andres would have shown him that both approaches can yield equally delicious results. That seems to be the entire premise of the Bazaar, at which Mike V was Chef de Cuisine.

    Speaking of Andres, the "tomato sashimi" element of Mike's plate looked very familiar.

  10. I have too much faith in Tom C to believe that he would allow the producers to steer the results in that way.

    Although she has been faltering, and could plausibly have been sent home this week or last week, I think the judges decisions in both cases were entirely defensible on merit grounds.

  11. ON the more laughable side, Jane Kennedy has released "Jane's Kitchen". Kennedy isn't a chef, either professionally or on TV. She's not a food writer, journalist, or blogger. IN fact, her main claim to fame is to have been a TV personality about 15 years ago and popping out 5 kids. For some reason, she thinks the world wants to know what she cooks.

    The sad thing is, she'll probably sell more copies of that than many chefs will sell of their books.

  12. True, I'm sure he's a great cook, I'm just a bit put off by his on-screen demeanour. I'm aware that his TV persona might not quite match his personality, and that even if it does he might still be a great cook.

    Haven't been to Zaytinya, but I had a fantastic meal at Oyamel last year, and I'll be going to The Bazaar in LA next month.

×
×
  • Create New...