Jump to content

rama

participating member
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rama

  1. 50% loss in weight sounds about right, especially if you've got a bone-in butt. I've never thought to weight it beforehand though- good idea.

    Re: shredding, I've noticed that also, and wrote it off as different muscle groups having different grain alignment- so some just fall apart, and some are tightly interlaced and take some more aggression to shred. Perhaps the meat closest to the muscle gets saturated with bone marrow fats and/or heated higher as the bone conducts heat inwards also?

  2. pg 111 in my copyright 1984 copy of On Food and Cooking:

    ... the collagen in connective tissue requires more extensive cooking in order to be converted into soft gelatin. This process is in some ways the reverse of protein coagulation in the muscle fibers: tightly wound fibers of pure collagen come apart into more vulnerable single molecules as they heat up. The "shrink temperature," the temperature at which the ordered structure of this protein collapses, is about 140F (60C) in meat (a mere 105F (41C) in fish), and it is only at temperatures higher than this that the individual molecules separate from one another into the loose association we call gelatin.

    It goes on a bit more about compromises in cooking time/temp, but I've plagiarized enough. :unsure:

  3. But yeah, butt smoked for 8-10 hours tastes a lot smokier than butt smoked for 1-2.

    =R=

    And my local market always has skin on, bone in butts, and the guy knows to look for the biggest, fattiest one for me!

    Do you shred and eat the skin and fat afterwards? If not, it'd seem you'd be stripping a lot of the smoke flavor and "bark" by leaving the stuff on pre-smoke.

  4. I think you've answered your other questions in your own blog. :smile:

    Well finishing in the oven certainly produced a tasty product-- but I'm curious if/how it'd be different if it stayed in the smoker the entire time.

    Also, I haven't tried cutting the butt to increase surface area (yet).

  5. A couple of questions:

    1. Can you further describe (or show us a photo, even better) of your smoker)?

    2. Was your butt bone in and skin on? 

    3. Did you put the thing on as cold as possible? 

    4. What temps were you running in the smoker?

    5. Why chips and not chunks of wood?  I find that things in most smokers (except one of the box type) work better with chunks that are well soaked.

    And, I have never considered butterflying a butt (I only do skin on, bone in) because I'm afraid that all of that luscious fat and collegen would just go into the drip pan...

    1. here's my current setup. the internals consist of an electric hotplate with a castiron skillet, which can be seen here: http://blogs.sun.com/rama/entry/weekend_of_meat%2C_redux

    339318972_4068f5d436.jpg

    2. this particular butt didn't have a bone- and I've never seen one with "skin" before.

    3. i think its plenty cold-- if you read the description, I confess I had to finish in the oven because I struggled to maintain 225F in the smoker.

    4. It wasn't too consistent, but the temps fluctuated between 180-230F.

    5. chips instead of chunks because of the electric hotplate. I don't think there would be enough contact between the skillet and chunks to get them to smolder.

    I'm not sure where you're going with that series of questions though-- would my smoker setup or meat choices really have any affect on choosing to finish in the oven or butterflying the meat?

  6. Just read the whole thread- great stuff!

    As you can see here, it has been cut up, wrapped, and labeled.

    But, my labeling sometimes doesn't indicate what the cut it, but the intent.

    gallery_6263_35_677.jpg

    The smoking is going to have to wait for a bit.  But, I will report!

    Report, please. :biggrin: Did these pieces of meat get any smoker time-- and if so, what were the results?

  7. [HOST'S NOTE: The original discussion, "Behold my butt!"  became too large for our servers to handle efficiently, so we've divided it up. The first part of the discussion is here: Behold My Butt! (2003–2006)]

     

    I recently smoked my first Boston Butt: 2 hours in a smoker followed by 12 hours in the oven- and have a couple of questions, even after reading through the "smoking" threads here. (A full write-up on the smoking session, along with a couple unanswered questions reposted here, can be found at: http://blogs.sun.com/rama/entry/bbq_smoked_pulled_pork )

    339319027_5d1684111d.jpg
    339319080_604d29563f.jpg

    - Would a BBQ-only session produce significantly different flavor (than the 2 hour smoke, finish in the oven technique)-- it seems after the first few hours of smoking, the meat would form an impermeable protein layer and render additional smoking moot, and only the dry heat comes into play? (Surely this isn't the case, or people would just do a short intense smoking on the 'que and finish in the oven like I did-- but I haven't seen any scientific reasoning to dismiss such as approach.) EDIT: since writing this, I've read here that the chemical reactions responsible for the "smoke ring" stop above 140F, but what I'm really curious about is the flavor, especially given the low surface to mass ratio of a boston butt.

    - Would cutting the pork butt in half to increase surface area as well as shorten cook times have any adverse affect, such as moisture content? Cooking it whole until it reached an internal temp of 190F was *plenty* moist, so I'm not too concerned about dry meat. If anything, next time, I'll remove any visible fat prior to applying the dry rub. (I lost a lot of tasty "bark" this time when I removed a slab of external fat post cook.)

    The lazy cook in me wants to butterfly the butt, smoke for 2 hours and finish in the oven- probably close to 6 hours. Considering I finish the pulled pork with a sauce prior to serving, would this be a disservice?

    I'd appreciate any thoughts...

  8. if I've access to a smoker one piece may go on there

    How does that turn out?

    I avoid low-and-slow type cooking when you're talking about a piece of meat as lean as a loin-- my preference would be a brine, dry rub, then quick sear on the grill to leave the middle rare.

  9. None of the beers I purchase use twist-offs except sierra nevada. so the non macrobreweries certainly aren't using them. Maybe they're cheaper per bottle, but the bottling line equiment is much more expensive, so only large production shops do it?

  10. Is there any reason a person can't ship a few cases of wine to another person, from Paris to New York?

    Not sure if it applies to shipments, but when you fly, you're only allowed a certain amount through customs. I would check with whomever you plan on shipping it with.

    May I suggest you limit your initial purchase though? Besides what will likely be a large cost to ship due to the weight (and sending by the cheaper slow boat might subject the wine to harmful temperature variations), you may find your tastes have changed, or that the particular vintage you track down isn't comparable. Buying multiple cases of it up-front without tasting it first is a risky endeavor.

    my 2 cents...

  11. Just wanted to say hi (first post here) and thank Chad for a great sharpening guide. It prompted me to pick up a Spyderco Sharpmaker 204 and give my neglected chef's knife some much needed love. After 10 minutes with the sharpener, cutting tonights french fries was effortless and much safer. I had no idea my edge was that far gone. The paring knife and chisels are next.... :biggrin:

    Looking forward to learning and participating on the site...

×
×
  • Create New...