Jump to content

Sneakeater

participating member
  • Posts

    4,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sneakeater

  1. (My last post was directed more at Daisy, who seems to be under the impression that she CAN'T EVER EAT THERE.)

    Yeah, I've thought about going in and just sitting at the bar (which is always my preference anyway) but the whole "declared" 5:30/10pm thing for us common folk had so far just pissed me off too much. I recognize that many restaurants do this without making a statement about it. This is the NY dining attitude I just can't deal with. There are great burgers elsewhere.

    What's funny about MT is that if you call them to ask for a reservation, they don't tell you it's impossible. They do what everybody else does: they make a show of looking in their book, and then say that all they have is 6 and 10. (Sometimes they tell you they're totally booked, even at 6 and 10 -- which I assume is honest.) So except for that one slip -- which they later recanted -- they don't have a "declared" policy but rather have the same hypocritical policy as every other hot restaurant in New York.

    Frankly, I liked it better those five minutes or so when they were honest about it.

    (It's more than just great burgers, I should add.)

  2. To clarify, Minetta Tavern has made clear that if you're not a friend of the house, you won't get A RESERVATION any time other than 5:30/10:00 PM. There are tables reserved for walk-ins during more normal times, and I've seen waits vary from a couple of minutes to 45 minutes to 2 hours.

    Minetta Tavern is very good for what it is, and I am a fan, but I don't think it's on quite on the level the O.P. was asking for. Then add the high level of uncertainty about when they would be seated, and I would scratch it off the list for a 3-day stay.

    I couldn't agree more.

    (My last post was directed more at Daisy, who seems to be under the impression that she CAN'T EVER EAT THERE.)

  3. Minetta Tavern has made it clear that unless you're a celebrity you're not getting any time other than 5:30/10pm. Lovely.

    To clarify, Minetta Tavern has made clear that if you're not a friend of the house, you won't get A RESERVATION any time other than 5:30/10:00 PM. There are tables reserved for walk-ins during more normal times, and I've seen waits vary from a couple of minutes to 45 minutes to 2 hours.

  4. Exactly. It took Mendes over a year and a half to get Aldea open -- a time period during which Mendes wasn't in my face constantly reminding me about the delay to the point where he and his restaurant became something of a media joke.

    You're right that nobody had tried the blog thing before so it wasn't clear that it was a bad idea. But it was.

    I think part of the problem is that you're naturally sympathetic and interested as an industry insider. But people who aren't colleagues viewed it differently. I think it's hard to deny that it had a bad effect on Tailor.

    And like oakapple, I was a fan. I went there pretty frequently.

  5. Equal parts Campari and sweet vermouth, splash of soda, a twist or even a slice of citrus.

    Sort of like a Negroni without the gin. (Or a Campari and soda with vermouth.)

    One of the few cocktails native to Italy.

    BUT it gets worse. "Americano" also is the name of an aperitivo from the Piedmont. Try ordering one of THOSE and getting what you want (even if, as at L'Artussi, you can see it on their shelf).

  6. I've ordered a few hundred Americano's for breakfast at Morandi and not once did they not know what it was, despite 10's of different servers over the years. That said, I do agree - it has happened to me a few times in NY where (unexpectedly) the servers had no clue what I was asking for (most recently Bar Americain comes to mind).

    You have cocktails for breakfast?

  7. 1. I don't think I've ever ordered an Americano in an Italian restaurant in New York and had the server OR bartender know what I was talking about. I ALWAYS get the espresso. (I'm not saying that to defend Maialino -- I think it sucks everywhere it happens.)

    2. I like Lupa A LOT. But putting the matchless (in New York) salumi aside, I have NEVER had ANYTHING at Lupa as good (and as well-prepared) as the pig's foot antipasto at Maialino, or the coda di vaccinara segundo. And frankly, I thought the pastas we had at my table -- the long pasta (I don't remember which one) with cod and light tomato sauce, and the malfatti with roast pork -- were as good as Lupa pastas (which I agree is saying a lot).

  8. But Le Barnardin and per se aren't "Vegas."

    If anything, most would complain that they aren't flashy enough.

    I think that there IS a New York esthetic. That's why so many people have been turned off by the dining room at SHO -- for not being consistent with it.

  9. 1. DO NOT GO to One If By Land, Two If By Sea. Just don't.

    2. The best steak in New York is still at Peter Luger's. If you don't feel like going to Brooklyn (although it's not very far into Brooklyn), and if you want someplace that takes credit cards (Luger's requires cash), you might prefer to go to Wolfgang's instead. Happily for you, the midtown branch of Wolfgang's is nicer than the downtown branch.

    The steak at Minetta Tavern is great. But you won't be able to get in. (Give them a call and try, though. Now.)

    3. You should consider going to Momofuku Ssam Bar. After all this time, I think it's STILL the most exciting restaurant in New York. But note that it's a lot less staid than most other places you've mentioned, if that's a problem for you. (I personally think Gramercy Tavern is boring. But that's very far from the consensus on this board.)

  10. I've eaten at per se when Chef Keller was there, and I've eaten there when he wasn't.

    It didn't seem very different to me either way.

    If the main difference is whether he personally invites you to the kitchen to meet him, that seems immaterial to me.

  11. I'm surprised you'd say that about Sifton's DBGB review, Janet.

    I don't know whether it hurts or helps that I'd been to the restaurant several times before the review came out, but I thought it gave a pretty vivid picture of what eating there is like. (The only thing I think he underemphasized is the din in the bar area -- which is not felt in the dining room.)

  12. I believe Gourmet, over the course of many years of reviewing restaurants, never awarded stars or ranked numerically.

    I think that, all other things being equal -- awareness of the issues, ability to separate personal short-term business gain from long-term issues of theory, etc. -- a practitioner's opinion about any given creative endeavor carries more weight than the opinion of a non-practitioner. But those things tend not to be equal. There's no need to insult chefs, musicians or any other group of creative artists to say that. Practitioners tend to be hard-working people concerned about the next paycheck. They create the art but at the same time tend to focus on the practical and short-term. And we already know that, practically and in the short-term, stars are good for business.

    That's what even the most academic of chefs and restaurateurs will tell you off record: they think the stars are silly and reductive, but they're good for business. On record you'll not likely get anything out of people in the industry, because they're not about to try to fight city hall. Nor should they be expected to.

    Chefs and restaurateurs are practitioners of gastronomy, but gastronomy as an art exists separate from them and separate from any other group of people such as consumers or critics. Judgments about gastronomy, what's good for it, bad for it, supportive of it, insulting to it, need to be made on the merits of the arguments, not based on opinion polls of any given group.

    There's a fairly famous remark made by the composer Sibelius.

    He much preferred the company of bankers to that of artists, he said. Bankers like to talk about art, he explained. Whereas artists only want to talk about money.

  13. There is a fine dining restaurant around the 59th ST. area of Central Park, F.G. mentioned in a post awhile back, which has a excellent value for lunch, If I am recalling correctly (which is a gamble:) I am searching the forums for the name. Can anyone please post if you recall?

    Perhaps you may consider a great lunch too?

    You must be referring to Jean Georges.

×
×
  • Create New...