Regarding the use of my term "foodies" in the post above, nothing derogatory is meant by it. I am referring to people who seriously enjoy food, like myself. This restaurant caters I think to this group - its an experience that demands attention and investment by the customer. Take for example the physical layout of the entry. A fairly narrow hall leads to the front desk, which sits like a guard station monitoring access as if to the temple within. Its an entirely uncomfortable spot to wait if you arrive early prior to your companions. There is a small bench under a semi-frosted window that allows glimpses of the kitchen within (and of the customer arrivals by the kitchen). While this may be entertaining, fascinating or just amusing to a foodie, I would think many diners would prefer a comfortable chair. Or for instance, after sitting down we were asked if we would start with a glass of champagne. Now in restrospect, after eating the food I understand that of course such a restaurant would want patrons to start with champagne as its one of the best ways to cleanse the palate, spark the appetite etc. However, as no context was provided it seemed very odd. My reaction was, why not ask if anyone wants a cocktail? Of course, the reason is the restaurant only serves wine, which was never explained, presumably because the diner is supposed to know that such a temple of food would not serve a beverage that did not perfectly compliment the courses. Instead, it seemed like the waiter was trying to foist some pricey champagne on us. Before even having an opportunity to ask a question, however, we were on to the discussion of the various types of bottled water available...lets see, so I can get 4 different types of water but not a martini - definitely a foodie restaurant. to tanabutler - "sour grapes" is not a particularly apt metaphor but was an attempt to use something appropriate to a discussion board about food.