Thanks Sam, that's how I found out about Scanpan Steel. I am happy to read that you approve of Scanpan Steel. The reason why I think Paderno Grand Gourmet is more expensive is because I plan on buying about 10 -13 pieces. So a set would be the best way to go. And Paderno GG doesn't come in any sets. Therefore, in order for me to aquire any, I have to buy them individually. And they will cost a lot more since I need lids ! I do prefer glass lids more but none of the good stainless steel cookware w/out riveted handles come with glass lids. Same here, that's why I have given up on Demeyere. Though if I somehow win the lottery...... Yes, I was sad to read it, too. Since I have read your cookware guide and additional info I found on eGullet, I feel that I can forget about those bad reviews. Maybe those bad reviews listed under Profiserie is actually for the Cybernox line. I will avoid them. The differences are explained fairly well in the eGCI class section on different pan designs. Here they are in order from least expensive to most expensive: Sitram Profiserie: disk bottom design with a heavy SS body and 7 mm aluminum base -- least expensive Paderno Grand Gourmet: disk bottom design with a heavy SS body and 7 mm aluminum base (slightly heavier/more reinforced body, heavier lids and more ergonomic handles than Sitram Profiserie) Sitram Catering: disk bottom design with a heavy SS body and 2 - 2.5 mm copper base Demeyere Apollo: disk bottom design with a heavy SS body and 5 mm aluminum base Demeyere Sirocco: casseroles, sauté pans, saucepans and stock pots are an encapsulated disk bottom design with a heavy SS body and 2 mm copper base; woks, “conical sauteuses and simmering pots” and frypans are straight gauge pans of aluminum fully clad with SS havind an aluminum layer of 2.3 mm, 3.0 mm to 3.3 mm , and approximately 3.9 mm respectively. See the eGCI class for more details. Sitram Cybernox is useless crap and you should avoid it IMO. Thanks for the list, but I was referring to the differences between Profiserie and Cybernox since Sitram's website is not available. Yes, I will avoid Cybernox at all cost. How heavy do they need to be in order to be useful? I think the whole "lid fit and heaviness" thing is a marketing ploy used by some companies to justify higher prices. A heavy and/or tight-fitting lid is only important in things like enameled cast iron casseroles. Most pans do not require a lid anyway. I prefer to buy my pans without lids, as I already have lids that fit most any pan and would rather not pay the additional money for yet another lid. That said, Paderno Grand Gourmet lids are my default "all purpose" lid. But, Amy... no lid is worth an additional hundred bucks. I agree, I will never spend more than $15 on a lid. Again, I DO use lids! I wish all pans come with lids. That's why I am skeptic about Sitram Profiserie's lids since one of the reviews say their lids are very thin and bends easily. But I will trust you if you tell me otherwise. As stated, stay away from Cybernox. Personally, I prefer a straight gauge frypan over a disk bottom frypan. That leaves out Sitram, Paderno and Demeyere Apollo. Demeyere makes good ones for the Sirocco line, although extremely expensive. For that money, you might as well get copper. For less money you might also seek out a good deal on an All-Clad MasterChef frypan. Or, really, think about getting a nice carbon steel or black steel frypan if you don't think you'll be putting a lot of acid into it. You can't beat it for the price. Ummm, I was actually referring to Sitram Profiserie's frying pans. Should I stick with non-stick frying pans? I will mainly use it for eggs. Thanks so much for your explainations. Even though I am an amature cook, I still would like to have cookware that I WANT to use, not HAVE to use. And I want them to last as long as possible and not warp! Is it possible to add additional info about lids and handles on the cookware guide? They are determining factors on selecting cookware. NO?