Jump to content

grandcru

participating member
  • Posts

    120
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by grandcru

  1. I'd be interested to hear people's answers to a few questions:

    1.  Which is more important to you in wine?

      (a)  primary fruit

      (b)  secondary elements

    2.  Which rules?

      (a)  nose

      (b)  palate

    3.  Choose one...

      (a) Burgundy

      (b) Bordeaux

    4.  My attitude to new oak is...

      (a) Can't get enough

      (b) I'm starting to get tired of it

      © A few people know how to use it right...but it should only appear in limited cases

      (d) Save the forests...boycott tree killing winemakers!

      (e) Why does it get so much attention? Some people use it, some people don't

    5.  Which is more critical to balance and development (and I know they're both important, but play along and choose one)?

      (a) Tannins

      (b) Acid

    6.  You can only have one of the following. You choose:

      (a)  Geyserville

      (b)  Lytton Springs

    7.  At what price point does a wine need to be able to age (improve with, not just hold) to earn your interest and dollar?  (Please exclude wines like Condrieu, which obviously just don't fit the question.)

      (a)  At any level

      (b)  Over $20

      ©  Over $40

      (d)  Over $60 or higher

      (e)  Really don't care if it's nice and tasty now

      (f)  Don't have proper storage and don't want wines that need age

    8.  Super Tuscans are:

      (a)  Excellent...please send me some

      (b)  Okay if they've got plenty of Sangiovese and don't taste like trees

      ©  An abomination

      (d)  A good idea gotten carried away

      (d)  No longer Super Tuscans but IGT's.  So leave me alone...tradition is nonsense.

    Please hold off telling me that the answer you want to give is not listed.  Neither are the perfect answers on most personality tests, but the questions are chosen because the choice you make out of the limited options still says a lot.  If you don't like the questions, don't play.  I think the answers will tell a lot about our palates.

    Thanks for bearing with me,

    Jim

    To get your statistical sample rolling, Jim:

    1. b

    2. b

    3. a

    4. c

    5. b

    6. a

    7. a

    8. b

  2. Gordon, I am a bit confused by your use of Meritage. Were you under the impression that this wine is a Bordeaux blend? It is, in fact, varietally syrah, with a good dollop of petite sirah. If you were using Meritage in some other context, pardon the ring.

    I tasted the '99 a few years ago and, like Bill, found it undrinkable. Just too much for my finesse-craving palate. I knew then that unless I heard about something drastically different in the winemaking approach, it would remain a wine I didn't need to track.

  3. there's also another another cheese shop, I think in Costa Mesa?  Damn, I forget the name.  grandcru posted about it earlier, but I tried searching and couldn't find the post.

    That would be Picnics Deli, at 435 E. 17th St. Not a cheese superstore, by any means, but a well-chosen selection of a couple dozen, mostly imported cheeses. Very knowledgeable and helpful owner, always ready with a sample of something new.

  4. Just curious as a So Cal interloper into this topic, are the reasons an institution like Scoma's does not show up in these reccos due to quality/price reasons? Too "touristy"? Something else? I enjoyed a meal there ten years ago; the broth was tasty, the seafood fresh. I seem to read nothing but knocks against it from the foodie set. What gives? Are others just that much better?

  5. Why would you want to go to a place that people feel so private about, and protective of?

    I don't get it.  I mean, I get it on one level (so you can eat), but on the other hand...

    You're not Japanese. (Well, those of you who aren't, aren't.)

    Shouldn't their desires be respected?

    Just genuinely curious here, Tana. Would you ask the same of a group of Japanese who wanted to attend an expat American restaurant in Japan?

  6. You should look for our VM Clifford Bay as that is one of the best out of NZ only 200 cases come here.

    Barrel, the whole lot is done in stainless.

    Now you've done it, you've mentioned Clifford Bay! :shock: Folks, for those of you who have not tried this wine, and think that the pinnacle of Kiwi sauvvie is Cloudy Bay, I implore you to do whatever it takes to try one of the rare bottles that makes it to North America. It's a wowwer, worth the price, which will probably strike you as high. Suppress your frugal superego and buy this wine!

  7. The worst I've seen (but thank GOD didn't happen where I was working): a couple proceeds to place their darling little tyke on the tasting counter and CHANGE HIS FILTHY DIAPERS!

    Aww, cum'on, Carolyn! What's wrong with a little bretty aroma in the tasting room?! :raz:

  8. On Saturday, Oct. 25, the rag-tang band known as the Cellar Rats gathered at Slip 12, Dock A, in the shadows of the HMS Queen Mary’s trio of stacks in Long Beach. Present, accounted for, and ready to roll were Kirk and Ines Nyby, Jack Patterson and Nikki Tennant, Jim & Beth Hilbing, Dave Welch and Christine Votava, and your faithful scribe. We turned our vinous attentions Down Under, mostly to Australia with a few white Kiwi interlopers – not that there’s anything wrong with that!

    NV SEAVIEW SOUTH EAST AUSTRALIA SPARKLING WINE “BRUT” – Not much to report on this one, as few of us tasted it. The lion’s share went to Nikki who, in her own words, drank it all and was happy as a clam. Having recently explored the realm of clams up to my knees, I wonder if this is saying much. Cold, wet, and bubbly, one could do much worse.

    NV ENRICO MERCURI AUSTRALIAN SPARKLING WINE – No information on origin or grapes used here, maybe someone in Oz can chime in? This was interesting on the nose, and on the palate for a few seconds. It almost reminded me of an Asti spumante, but there were no familiar muscat notes on the nose. It was almost table grapey in its flavor profile. A bit cloying to be a truly attractive food wine, but it was ok with some of the nibbles we had.

    Our Kiwi trio steps in…

    2002 GIESEN MARLBOROUGH SAUVIGNON BLANC – Bright aromas of lime and gooseberry (according to Ines – I have never tasted a gooseberry), not as herbaceous as the other two.

    2003 NEUDORF NELSON SAUVIGNON BLANC – My favorite of the three on the night, this showed honeydew melon and bell pepper, and left the crispest finish. This was really a winner with Beth’s baked chile rellenos con queso fresco.

    2002 CLOUDY BAY MARLBOROUGH SAUVIGNON BLANC – Nothing to see here, folks, move along. Just another pleasurable bottle that was light on the tell-tale cat’s pee note.

    NZed was now laying down the gauntlet to their Antipodean cousins. They responded with…

    1996 MITCHELTON VICTORIA CHARDONNAY – Deep golden in the glass, it gave rise to worries about excessive oxidation. No worries, mate. Mouthwatering butterscotch and ripe banana on the nose and palate, and great supporting acids to round out the mouthfeel. This was the food/wine paring champion of the night when tried together with the grilled prawns and mango-black pepper dipping sauce.

    A resounding success! Advance, Australia! And from the jaws of victory, we snatch ignominious defeat.

    2002 ROCKFORD BAROSSA VALLEY ALICANTE BOUSCHET ROSÉ – This was the dog of the night, flaccid and completely lacking in any interesting edge or angle. It had a banal off-dryness that might make it a popular party quaff for those not too demanding of their pinks, but we all poured it out and left a half-full bottle for the fishes. The worst part? I brought it.

    Fortunately, the reds swung the tide back in our favor.

    2000 DEVIL’S LAIR MARGARET RIVER CABERNET SAUVIGNON – I was very happy that this was the first of a duo of WA wines we had on hand for the day, as I believe that the region offers a safe refuge from point-laden oozemonsters. Judiciously toasted oak frames dark berry and tanned leather notes, and the finish is decently long.

    Three of Rosemount’s top-tier wines, compared and contrasted.

    1998 ROSEMOUNT MCCLAREN VALE “GSM” RED WINE – Oddly enough (or maybe not), this drank more fully developed than the Balmoral, two years older. Replete with ripe cherry fruit and a turpentine-like funk likely due to the mourvèdre, this was a hit with Ines’ chicken satay skewers with peanut sauce. Ines’ second-day impressions were that the acids were going somewhat volatile, but that it still made for an enjoyable wine.

    1996 ROSEMOUNT MCCLAREN VALE “BALMORAL” SYRAH – This was the nice, slightly mousy girl you grew up next door to – give her some time, and she blossoms into a confident, sassy woman of substance. Initially, very closed, betraying a little brett and tarry aromatics. Mind you, we could still tell it was a very well-made wine. Ines’ later report confirms the truth, gorgeous dark fruit coming to the fore to match the bacon and clove secondary notes. A true vin de garde in the Australian paradigm. Ines wishes she had more; I wish I had some!

    2001 ROSEMOUNT MUDGEE “HILL OF GOLD” CABERNET SAUVIGNON – I tasted this late, and only briefly, but enough to appreciate a full-bodied, generously-oaked cab with noticeable eucalyptus and mint on the midpalate, finishing with a touch of chocolate. I liked it, but on balance I preferred the Rhônish wines above.

    An unexpected QPR winner was one of the consensus wines of the night.

    2002 FLINDERS BAY MARGARET RIVER SHIRAZ – I brought this wine, complacent nearly to a fault that this would be a laid-back, medium-bodied syrah demonstrating the difference a cooler climate makes. The wine had other ideas. Very extracted, with loud but inviting fruit, and nice dollop of toasty oak. Note to Jenise: this was Dave’s wine of the night, so that speaks volumes, but it was universally praised for different aspects. For me, the ample acidity kept it fresh on the palate, preserving a winning package retailing below US$20.

    Two wines highlighting the underappreciated (in these parts) enclave of Langhorne Creek.

    2002 BROTHERS IN ARMS LANGHORNE CREEK “NO. 6” RED WINE – This is a 50/50 cab/shiraz blend, medium-bodied with a mild touch on the oak. While a nice drop, I didn’t find anything extraordinarily compelling beyond the basic red-fruit profile. I can’t imagine a wine shutting down this soon, so maybe there’s just no more “there” there.

    2002 BLEASDALE LANGHORNE CREEK “FRANK POTTS” RED WINE – This was serious infanticide, but a pleasurable one at that, and an endorsement of further experience with this wine. A substantial wine of 78% cabernet, 13% malbec & 9% petit verdot, it shows plenty of deep plum and cherry fruit, mint and eucalyptus, and rides a structure of stiff tannins. This is another vin de garde, and finding out just how long it may go might require me to purchase a few more bottles. In its youthful size, though, it still never showed out of balance.

    We sipped & munched until we were the only remaining activity on A Dock, and probably for several docks around, then went our separate ways into the night. I could almost swear I heard the sing-songy strains of Waltzing Matilda in my head.

  9. GrandCru, I think it will be my turn to host our "ladies' book club  :wink: "  in February, and I'm thinking of a dessert wine gathering, with baklava and other sweet, and savory, snacks that might go with white dessert wines and champagne.  For a light pairing, what's your favorite with Sauternes?

    Though I was skeptical at first, as I am picky in how sweet and savory flavors are mixed, foie gras does indeed have an affinity with Sauternes. Lightly seared, served on toast points or tartlets, and you have yourself a winner that will produce a pairing epiphany for some, if not most, of your guests. Since you only need hors d'oeuvres-sized portions, a little lobe will go a long way. :wink:

  10. A friend brought a 1/2 of '01 La Tour Blanche to a recent gathering, and it reinforced my preference for young Sauternes. For many, they're glorious when aged, but the freshness of the fruit paired with the cleansing acidity made it ideal for me. Widely available for about US$30.

  11. The piquancy of this dish would seem to call for a wine with a bit of fruit-driven sweetness in a medium- to light-bodied package, and for that I would choose a New World rosé. I did a quick scan of the LCBO selection, and the Bonny Doon Vin Gris de Cigare is a good candidate from the Vintages selection. I'd ask one of the staff at your local store for what is available there since, in speaking with Canadian wine friends, what shows up available on the web is not always in stock.

  12. If you're breakfasting or lunching around Sutter Creek, try the Chatter Box Cafe. Very busy, and service can be commensurately slow, but the grub is really good.

    For the best selection of local wines, go to the Pokerville Market in Plymouth. Even if you miss a winery or two, the vast majority of them peddle some of their wares here at prices usually a little less than cellar door.

  13. Y'all amaze me. My last three:

    Railroad Cafe (one of the few decent places for breakfast in Livermore)

    International House of Pancakes (Livermore again)

    Mountain Mike's Pizza (Livermore)

    We don't get out much.

    Walt, I sallied through Liv a couple of years ago en route to Napanoma, and ate breakfast at the Railroad Cafe. I echo your endorsement, as it was a very good meal in a seemingly unlikely location.

  14. You really didn't have to post a picture of that paella, did you?! Ruined me for the day. Dayum, that looks good! :shock:

    I still think they're a fun visit, but I find BD's wines a bit inconsistent these days. Some hits and misses, and a lot of ground in between.

    Great report, glad you enjoyed your Left Coast swing.

  15. For reds, I like the wines of Phillipe Vatan's Ch. du Hureau. Their basic Saumur-Champigny and the upmarket Cuvée Lisagathe are very pleasing wines for the price, which is considerably lower than Rougeard (not that Rougeard is a rip-off, mind you).

×
×
  • Create New...