Per Se
#391
Posted 29 June 2010 - 07:39 AM
#392
Posted 29 June 2010 - 08:24 AM
What does everyone here do with the candies/truffles? Our waiter said only about twice a year does a table actually finish these. The two times I've been I've been stuffed and practically comotose by the time the silver tiered thing comes around, so we didn't make a dent in it. A waiter told us later that some people have it boxed up which they are happy to do, and I am haunted by the idea that they mnight have thrown it all away.
Not all of them are thrown away. Some get boxed up and taken home by the staff so significant others like me can eat them!!!
#393
Posted 29 June 2010 - 01:54 PM
#394
Posted 31 August 2010 - 01:35 AM
#395
Posted 31 August 2010 - 05:32 AM
#396
Posted 31 August 2010 - 05:48 AM
#397
Posted 31 August 2010 - 09:02 AM
i am going to Per Se for dinner next month and would like to have some wine pairing. I do not want to go for the full 9 course wine pairing. What would be a good strategy, to set a dollar cap on the price of wine pairing per pax or to set the number of pairing i want, say 4 pairing? How much should I set aside for wine pairing P/s: I do not want to faint upon seeing the final bill. Thanks!
In terms of formulating a good strategy and setting appropriate expectations for the final bill, I'd suggest looking at the wine menu ahead of time (prices include tip, but not tax):
http://www.tkrg.org/upload/ps_wine.pdf
In particular you'll want to look at the "Wines by the Glass" section, page 1 in today's menu.
If you are certain you want to stick to 4 glasses of wine, and using today's wine menu as a guide, then the final wine bill could range from a minimum of about $75 to a maximum of about $150pp if you pick the priciest wines on the list.
FWIW, I've definitely had meals where I told the staff I wanted to go lighter on wine that day, and wanted to limit myself to 4 or 5 glasses for the evening. Regardless of what you chose to do, I would definitely recommend you convey your budget and preferences when you discuss wine after sitting down, then let them figure the rest out.
Enjoy, and report back!
#398
Posted 01 September 2010 - 06:30 AM
#399
Posted 03 September 2010 - 08:31 AM
Don't they always offer a tour of the kitchen to all guests?
#400
Posted 03 September 2010 - 08:56 AM
I wasn't offered a tour of the kitchen until my 5th visit (my mother's 85th birthday celebration; we all enjoyed the tour very much!).Don't they always offer a tour of the kitchen to all guests?
Edited by ellenost, 03 September 2010 - 08:56 AM.
#401
Posted 08 September 2010 - 06:04 AM
I don't know when they offer, but if you ask you can get a tour on any visit.I wasn't offered a tour of the kitchen until my 5th visit (my mother's 85th birthday celebration; we all enjoyed the tour very much!).
Don't they always offer a tour of the kitchen to all guests?
Marc Shepherd
http://nyjournal.squarespace.com/
#402
Posted 09 November 2010 - 07:19 PM
#403
Posted 10 November 2010 - 05:05 AM
#404
Posted 08 April 2011 - 06:42 AM
I am not going to write a full review, but I'd have to say that I was most looking forward to Per Se, and it was the most disappointing of the three. Some of the dishes were sublime -- a foie gras terrine with thinly shaved apples on a vegetable aspic with candied pecans and other stuff..............wow, probably the best single dish I have ever eaten, and I've had many wonderful ones at top restaurants. But also a $40 surcharge on top of a very expensive meal.
The problem was that some of the dishes were just too rich, with at least 4 being served with over-reduced broth that was simply too salty. We were all too stuffed and by the end of the meal when all the little additional cookies, truffles, etc. came out we were even making jokes like "quick, let's leave before they bring us any more food!". The restaurant emotionally lost it's grip on us ~ 2/3 through the meal when some of the heavier dishes started piling on top of each other.
Am I glad I went? Yes. Would I recommend it to others? Sure, because it's Per Se, dammit! But consider going to other great restaurants for ~ half the price; you might get a better meal.
Lack of wit can be a virtue
#405
Posted 10 April 2011 - 09:58 AM
When I go I make sure to have a little something only in the morning to get ready (I also don't go for other cuisine in the same week but that's me).
Yeah, they do add on for the foie gras supplement because it is so expensive--and worth every penny to me.
Once you start getting the handmade chocolates, these are all meant to be little snippets of taste depending on your preferences; they fully expect you to ask for some to take with you as you go. I'm always tempted to ask for a full set of the chocolates but never do.
Hmm, I notice there's now a smaller tasting menu now also available. I can't wait for my 15th trip at the end of this month!
#406
Posted 11 April 2011 - 02:47 PM
It certainly was an experience, and one that I am very glad I had. Doubt I'll do it again, though.
Lack of wit can be a virtue
#407
Posted 18 April 2011 - 10:48 AM
I think you may have seen a lunch menu, where there is indeed a shorter option. At dinner in the main dining room, the menu remains $295 for nine courses. You can order à la carte in the Salon.Hmm, I notice there's now a smaller tasting menu now also available. I can't wait for my 15th trip at the end of this month!
Marc Shepherd
http://nyjournal.squarespace.com/
#408
Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:38 PM
Not that I would want such a thing.
Once again #10 on S Pellegrino's 50 Best Restaurants in the World, congratulations!
#409
Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:12 PM
I can't wait for my 15th trip at the end of this month!
I don't think you'll ever be a kid again, kiddo.
Check out my adventures, culinary and otherwise at http://corinnawith2ns.blogspot.com/
#410
Posted 24 September 2011 - 03:22 AM
Food (and wine) - 93/100
This will be a combine summary of my 2 meals at per se: summer 2009 and 2010. While the season was about the same, the experiences happened to be quite the opposite. The first time I visited here, I focused more on Keller’s classics and surely they did not disappoint. The oysters and pearls lived up to its name, delicious with different layer of texture and temperature. I enjoyed the oyster’s freshness, tapioca’s creaminess as well as caviar’s brininess. Some other memorable dishes were: the purity of white asparagus with smooth almond butter ‘sauce’, simple and sweet poached lobster, and lastly the perfectly cook and delicious roasted Elysian’s lamb. The ‘coffee and doughnuts’; hot and airy cinnamon doughnut served with creamy semifreddo – nice too though not among my top 10 desserts. I was very happy by the end of my meal and it certainly ranked among my best meal in the States.
Based on this great experience, I asked some of my foodie friends to have a meal here when I had a chance a year later. Somehow among New York’s top restaurants, they’ve never been here due to the difficulties to reserve they explained. Anyway, they made it finally. I told my captain what I had before and ensured that I would not repeat anything which she obliged. Unlike my first meal, this time was rather disappointing. My avocado mousse with caviar was alright though not as memorable as the oysters and pearls. The dover sole was overwhelmed by the vegetables ‘cream’ and sides. 4/5 of us opted for the foie gras supplement and we agreed that it’s weak in flavor (not rich), not really creamy and smooth. I had another lamb dish for my main: lamb loin cooked medium rare; while it’s tender, it’s not that tasty. The only great thing was a pair of langoustines a la plancha – sweet, with good texture, even better than my lobster a year ago. We’re busy talking about many things in the table, hence since the food is not that bad, we didn’t bother making any noise. Personally, I was kinda shocked (perhaps expecting too much) and this one certainly not a meal to remember.
Chef Keller and Benno were never in the kitchen in both occasions. I was not sure whether Chef Kaimeh still fine-tuning his kitchen which should not be the case (you have no room for mistake if you’re a 3-star place). Based on these two meals I concluded that per se still had an issue with consistency. However, I admire Keller’s capability and courage to change more than half of the menu nearly daily. I would give 2 ½* for the food here. I would not mind eating here again in the future, but not yet for any extended menu.
Service (and ambiance) - 95/100
The better thing about per se was its warm hospitality. It’s pretty much flawless on both occasions. When you eat alone, the maitre d’ would be more than happy to chat with you about many things. He/she also tried to maximize your experience – ask something, more likely than not they will make it happen for you (such as extra or off-the-menu dishes). When you eat in a group, the waiters would not be obtrusive, yet whenever any need arise, they will attend to it quickly. In short, the service is always professional, gracious and efficient. Furthermore, everyone is friendly and well-informed. The only negative aspect was that a new napkin will not be brought whenever you left the table – not that big of a deal. Besides the service, I thought the atmosphere (contemporary interior design) was wonderful here: High ceiling, well-spaced big table and comfortable chairs with a view of Central Park – isn’t it nice? It serves well for business occasions and leisure.
The beauty about Thomas Keller’s restaurants is that on the one hand, both per se and FL have the same philosophy/roots (and still serving Keller’s classics any time) … on the other hand, they don’t provide the same menu and both evolve to be two ‘different’ restaurants (not only because of different ingredients outsourcing). I like Keller’s method better than Joel Robuchon’s idea to make his l’atelier and fine dining places to serve the same dishes (> 80% of them) whether they’re in Vegas, Singapore or London. Even better if Keller can do what Ducasse does with Le Louis XV and Plaza Athenee – both serve completely different things except for the Rum Baba. Overall experience, I gave 94/100 (a high 2 1/2*)
For more detailed reviews: per se 1&2
For the dishes’ pictures: per se pictures
#411
Posted 24 September 2011 - 11:56 PM
#412
Posted 25 September 2011 - 06:07 AM
#413
Posted 25 September 2011 - 08:06 AM
Could you describe or share your story about the decline of per se? What 'ingredients' are lowered? Did you eat the same or similar dishes with 'worse' raw materials? I assumed this did not happen under Benno
Keller was very smart when he penetrated NY - a market known to be very critical to new comer especially if it's very expensive. per se entered "cheap" with $150 tasting menu and within 1-2 years, the price was increased by more than 50%. Ducasse would have fared better had he applied the same tactics with the Essex House ... not counting that French (who's trying to do smth over the top) usually was not that welcome in the States
#414
Posted 25 September 2011 - 01:19 PM
There has been absolutely no change in quality at Per Se over the last year.
#415
Posted 26 September 2011 - 04:58 AM
#416
Posted 26 September 2011 - 09:49 AM
Dear Seth, Would you please share when you have eaten at Per Se and why you feel there has not been a change? Another point of view would be interesting to me...thanks.
I went last week and there was absolutely no indication at all of any sort of drop in its usual extremely high quality products or dishes that result from them. Per Se is the last place that would start nickel and diming and saving a few bucks here and there on ingredients or quality.
#417
Posted 26 September 2011 - 02:51 PM
#418
Posted 11 October 2011 - 08:41 PM
#419
Posted 14 October 2011 - 10:44 AM
Well perhaps Sam Sifton's 4 star review in Wednesday's Times will provide enough proof of our non-disappointment.
Boy, he's really milking that expense account before leaving, huh?
#420
Posted 11 December 2011 - 08:34 AM
However, I was happy to learn that Per Se offered portions of its truffle menu in the Salon. So after a 4 course dinner at Jean George, we walked over to Per Se for our truffle fix.
Wonderful bread basket
Wish my humidor was packed with white truffles like those
White Truffle Risotto
Food was great, wine list is now on an iPad and service is friendly and knowledgeable as always. I still love Per Se but understand when people say they may not want to rush over there every year (even though I still find myself doing so).
Edited by percyn, 11 December 2011 - 08:45 AM.







