Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Q&A: Homebrewing


  • Please log in to reply
566 replies to this topic

#91 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 03 May 2006 - 06:19 AM

I may have a slight concern  :huh: . It is only 1 week and 3 days since I pitched my yeast and all activity has seemed to have ground to a halt. after 48 hours I had a nice layer of foam and now everything looks flat and very inactive.

Is this a situation where i should just leave it alone and let it look after itself or do i have a problem.

hopefully I wont have to go back to step one but if need be well it is only more practice.

Rom

View Post


Your situation sounds just fine. Fermentation begins with a big burst of activity as the yeast multiply and go on a feeding frenzy. That goes through most of the available sugars in your wort. After that finishes, the yeast keep on playing the role of little chemical reactors, and clean up after themselves by finishing any uncompleted reactions. The first part puts on a good show, while the latter does not. But both aspects of the fermentation are important to getting a good tasting beer.

So a few days to a week of showy foam, followed by a week of seemingly little going on is exactly what you should be seeing. You're on track.

As I'd mentioned above, rousing the yeast would be a good thing to do midway into the ferment, as lots of them have settled to the bottom. So give your fermentor a tilt and a swirl to bring some yeast back up into the beer so that that can play their role more effectively.

Edited by cdh, 03 May 2006 - 06:25 AM.

Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#92 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 03 May 2006 - 07:39 AM

I have a couple of "beginner" questions;

1- "rousing". I guess I'll do this today when I get back home, but is the goal here to disturb the layer of sediment on the bottom? Mine is about a good 1/2 inch now. What about the layer of foam on top? We are not to break or disturbn that right?

2- I noticed for the past couple of days that the foam layer has a couple of "holes" in it with the wort showing. Is that ok? Or does it mean that I really need to bottle the beer because it is exposed?

Looking -and very nervously- forward to the bottling class.

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#93 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 03 May 2006 - 08:11 AM

Elie-

1- Yup, rouse the sediment on the bottom. Foam on the top doesn't matter, don't worry about it too much.

2- The foam is not the only thing protecting the beer, so don't worry that it is dissipating. CO2 is denser than air, and hence falls. Observe the gasses coming off of dry ice. That principle means that all of the CO2 that got produced by your yeast and came out of solution is now sitting on top of your beer. It will take some time before it diffuses out through the room and comes to an equilibrium distribution. Your beer should be safe for another few days.
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#94 jsolomon

jsolomon
  • participating member
  • 2,534 posts

Posted 03 May 2006 - 08:28 AM

All activity may have appeared to cease, but more than likely, activity has simply slowed markedly. Remixing your beer will help re-awaken your fermentation. Oftentimes fermentations seem stuck, but they've simply slowed. That's why it's important to either use a hygrometer to know when you've used all of your fermentable sugar, or give sufficient time.

Elsewise, you'll have a mess post-bottling.
I always attempt to have the ratio of my intelligence to weight ratio be greater than one.  But, I am from the midwest.  I am sure you can now understand my life's conundrum.

#95 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 04 May 2006 - 06:58 AM

Elie-

1- Yup, rouse the sediment on the bottom.  Foam on the top doesn't matter, don't worry about it too much.

2- The foam is not the only thing protecting the beer, so don't worry that it is dissipating. CO2 is denser than air, and hence falls.  Observe the gasses coming off of dry ice.  That principle means that all of the CO2 that got produced by your yeast and came out of solution is now sitting on top of your beer.  It will take some time before it diffuses out through the room and comes to an equilibrium distribution.  Your beer should be safe for another few days.

View Post


Ok, I roused and swirled the fermenting jar last night and right away all the "foam" from the surface broke apart and fell down to the bottom. Also the smell of the wort is very nice, it actually smells like beer with a nice hop aroma.

Will the bottling class be posted tomorrow?

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#96 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 04 May 2006 - 07:39 AM

Also the smell of the wort is very nice, it actually smells like beer with a nice hop aroma.


It's not wort anymore... the yeast have worked their magic and it is beer now. Glad that it smells good to you... I was hoping for a crowd pleaser recipe.
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#97 Rombot

Rombot
  • participating member
  • 27 posts

Posted 05 May 2006 - 06:17 AM

Thanks for that, I was worried for a little while.

My wart/beer is also smelling rather nice and if it is indicitive of the of the final product it should great and well worth the effort.

I have just realised that the football world cup starts in 5 weeks and by that time the beer should be ready :biggrin: . Also the next batch may be ready as well, the timing could not be better. Gonna save it all for the comp and drink all but a few bottles (for tasting at 6 months or so) over the two weeks.

Well thanks again and yay for beer and football.

Rom

#98 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 05 May 2006 - 01:51 PM

Chris,
What is the best way to get a siphon going using the bottle filler. I mean I can think of one or two, but my concern is contamination. Since the bottle filler has that thing at the tip to prevent overfilling so "sucking" on it to get a siphon going is not possible. The only other way I can think of is filling the tube+bottle filler with water, dipping the tube end in the beer and hope the water will get a siphon going.

What exactly do you do?

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#99 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 05 May 2006 - 02:57 PM

The only other way I can think of is filling the tube+bottle filler with water, dipping the tube end in the beer and hope the water will get a siphon going.

What exactly do you do?

View Post


That's exactly what I do. Works just fine.
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#100 eGCI Team

eGCI Team
  • manager
  • 239 posts

Posted 06 May 2006 - 10:18 AM

Please note that the recipe for red ale in Class 3 has been changed. We inadvertently included an earlier version in the class yesterday; it's now corrected. We apologize for any inconvenience.

#101 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 08 May 2006 - 12:28 PM

I am happy to report that my beer was bottled with minimal spill this past Saturday.

Posted Image

I am keeping my fingers crossed that there was no contamination anywhere. Although as of today I can tell that the beer is getting carbonated (tiny bubbles appear on the surface...or am I imagining things). Also it cleared up significantly in the bottles and now looks like a nice amber beer with no haziness.

On another note, I remembered this weekend that my in-laws have a plastic margarita bucket that they got from a restaurant. It's the white thick plastic one with a spigot on the bottom and all. So, I am thinking this could be my bottling container going forward and I don't have to worry about getting a siphon going with the bottle filler. Any reason why I should not use it after careful sanitation?

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#102 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 08 May 2006 - 12:58 PM

Congrats on the successful bottling! Looking good. The beer should lighten and clear some as the yeast munch their way through your priming sugar and then drop out of suspension. Did you do a concentrated boil? That could have darkened your beer a bit, but it shouldn't end up quite that amber.

Feel free to use the margarita bucket. It would make for a fine bottling device after a good soak in a sanitizing solution. That's the kind of inventive spirit brewers are known for. Good thinking! :biggrin:
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#103 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 08 May 2006 - 02:40 PM

Yeah, I did do a concentrated boil, so maye that's why it is amber. I actually "had" to taste some of it while siphoning from the fermentor and it tasted excellent, but flat of course. So I am sooo looking forward to this stuff.

Chris, for the red ale we are doing next? Is this a 2 gallon batch as well? If so, I would like to double it and make a four or five gallon batch. So I just multiply everything by two?

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#104 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 09 May 2006 - 07:54 AM

Yes, indeed. That recipe is for 2 gallons. Scale everything proportionally and you'll be fine. 1 lb extract and 2.5 oz each grain per gallon, etc. I'll show you how to use online tools to calculate your hop needs once you figure out how big your boil will be.

Even if you're going to do a concentrated boil, you're going to need a much bigger pot than you've got if you want to make more than 2 gallons at a time. Even with a 20 quart pot, you'll not really be able to do a full boil of a 5 gallon batch because it needs the headspace for the foam to expand into...

The Walmart Tramontina pots are a good deal, so check into them if you've not gone shopping yet. You'll need a bigger fermentor too, so your homebrew shop should sell you a food grade 5 gallon bucket for something in the neighborhood of $10.

Edited by cdh, 10 May 2006 - 06:35 AM.

Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#105 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 09 May 2006 - 10:25 AM

Yeap, I do have a bigger fermentor and am planning on buying a bigger pot. I do not like to shop at Walmart but I think I found what I need at a local store. It's a stock pot sold and used mainly for steaming tamales :smile: and it is 16 quarts and sells for less than $20, I think I've seen it used for brewing on a brewing website. It actually looks pretty nice too and is non-reactive.

I will most certainly do a concentrated boil again Chris, boiling 5 gallons is no fun to boil or to cool. My plan is to boil about three galons and place one (or one and half to account for evaporation) in the fermentor and just add the wort to it. It will help it cool much faster and I will not have to boil 4 gallons.

If I use bottles gallons of drinking water, do I need to boil it first? Or can I add it straight to the fermentation bucket?

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#106 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 09 May 2006 - 10:40 AM

I think this is the exact pot I am talking about. It costs about $17 at a local store

click here

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#107 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 09 May 2006 - 10:52 AM

That kind of enameled pot should be just fine. The thing I like about the Brazillian pots is the thick layered base, which does provide a little extra protection against hot spots that can caramelize your wort while it is boiling... but that is not really a huge concern, particularly if you're aiming for more amber-colored brews.
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#108 Matty

Matty
  • participating member
  • 28 posts

Posted 10 May 2006 - 10:22 AM

I bottled my batch last night. I did a 1 gallon batch, so it was truly micro-brewery!

I had a load of emty bottles so I went the crown cap route. I think mine is quite amber-looking as well.

Posted Image

It tasted really good and I'm really fired up :cool: Hope the next two weeks goes quickly.


OT …

I thought i'd see if I could make an ale barm with the sludge left over. Never done it before but I made a 1:2 barm with sludge:flour+water and fermented overnight.

Posted Image

I've just baked the loaf this afternoon. Smelling pretty good but still cooling so I haven't tasted yet.

Posted Image

Looking forward to making the red ale.

Best Wishes,
Matt

#109 Rombot

Rombot
  • participating member
  • 27 posts

Posted 10 May 2006 - 08:19 PM

Hi all

Well I have bottled and had a little taste and it seems to be really good.

I like the idea of the bread Matty, I washed away all my yeast before seeing your post so I may try that next time but let us know how it is.

I might post a picture later on but all my brew is in dark bottles and so you cant really see much but it was about the same amber color as everyone else.

Taking a few days of work and uni and going fishing and camping this weekend but on my return I will be off to the brew shop to get the ingredients for the next brew.

I am very much looking forward to the Red Ale :smile:

Regards

Rom

#110 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 11 May 2006 - 10:27 AM

Glad to hear more reports of success! The bread trick is not something I've ever played with, though may have to now... Let us know how it turned out.

As to the amberness of your beers, they will lighten some when the yeast that are in there carbonating them drop to the bottom of the bottles. The color does appear to have uniformly darkened amongst all of you, however, which makes me wonder why. Must be caramelization during the boil, but since it was a full boil it shouldn't have darkened much... hmmm....

I guess now would be the time to reveal a trick for extract brewers to keep their beers as light as possible. That trick is called late extract addition. Add 3/4 of your extract in the last 10 minutes of your boil. That way very little of it will have the chance to caramelize and darken during the boil.

Doing this will require recalculating your hops usage, however, which is another trick I should explain. I generally use an online calculator to do this calculation, like the one at http://hbd.org/cgi-b...pator/recipator

I'll probably need to take some screenshots to properly explain the technique, so if you'd like to play with the recipe calculator, go ahead. I'll explain the details of what you need to deal with the late extract addition in a while.

Congratulations to everybody on the successes so far!
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#111 tim

tim
  • participating member
  • 803 posts

Posted 11 May 2006 - 07:06 PM

  The color does appear to have uniformly darkened amongst all of you, however, which makes me wonder why.  Must be caramelization during the boil, but since it was a full boil it shouldn't have darkened much... hmmm....

Congratulations to everybody on the successes so far!

View Post


Chris,

I have never had any carmelization even with high heat 60 minutes boils on my kitchen stove. The difference is a stainless stockpot with a 1/2" thick aluminum disk on the bottom. The thick disc diffuses the heat to eliminate hot spots and burning. The cost is about $50 for a 20 quart and about $85 for a $24 quart pot.

Tim

Edited by tim, 11 May 2006 - 07:10 PM.


#112 Matty

Matty
  • participating member
  • 28 posts

Posted 13 May 2006 - 02:55 AM

Posted Image

The bread tasted good, although was not quite perfectly proofed. I have made an ale barm before from a bottle conditioned ale (from a recipe in Dan Lepard's The Handmade Loaf) and this was more or less the same except the taste is coarser - the hoppy bitterness is more noticeable.

I don't know if that's because my beer is coarse, because it was from 1st stage fermentation beer, or that the proportion of yeast sludge was too high. I just used my standard sourdough recipe, so lots of potential for tweaking.

Can supply recipe & method if anyone needs it.


Best Wishes,
Matt

Edited by Matty, 13 May 2006 - 03:02 AM.


#113 MelissaH

MelissaH
  • participating member
  • 1,219 posts

Posted 13 May 2006 - 08:29 AM

Matt,

I would be interested in your recipe, particularly the ale barm part. My husband's a homebrewer, and I'm always looking for ways to make a direct connection between his beermaking and my breadmaking. (And the current eGCI course is also on homebrewing.)

Could you please paraphrase and share? Thanks!

MelissaH
MelissaH
Oswego, NY
Chemist, writer, hired gun

Say this five times fast: "A big blue bucket of blue blueberries."

foodblog1 | kitchen reno | foodblog2

#114 Matty

Matty
  • participating member
  • 28 posts

Posted 13 May 2006 - 04:14 PM

Hi Melissa,

I'm away for a week but will pm you the info w/c 22.5.

Best Wishes,
Matt

#115 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 15 May 2006 - 08:40 AM

Posted Image

The bread tasted good, although was not quite perfectly proofed. I have made an ale barm before from a bottle conditioned ale (from a recipe in Dan Lepard's The Handmade Loaf) and this was more or less the same except the taste is coarser - the hoppy bitterness is more noticeable.

I don't know if that's because my beer is coarse, because it was from 1st stage fermentation beer, or that the proportion of yeast sludge was too high. I just used my standard sourdough recipe, so lots of potential for tweaking.

Can supply recipe & method if anyone needs it.


Best Wishes,
Matt

View Post

Looks pretty good! Why didn't I think of that?? I will make sure to make some when I brew thew next batch.

BTW, Chris how long is the wait till the next class? No rush, I'm just curious.

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#116 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 23 May 2006 - 06:31 AM

BTW, Chris how long is the wait till the next class? No rush, I'm just curious.

View Post


Should be on the way Real Soon Now.

And, as a tip of my hat to the changed seasons, I'm thinking of replacing the last recipe with something that is more summery than a big dark abbey ale. I'm thinking something in the wheat family, which are much better summer beers. Maybe a Saison, maybe a Wit. I'm leaning towards the Saison, since its yeasts like to ferment in temperatures as high as the 90s.
Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#117 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 23 May 2006 - 06:47 AM

I finally cracked open a bottle (or two...) of my homebrew this weekend and gave it a taste. I have to admit, I was very impressed with this first try. It tasted great and was perfectly carbonated and not too bubbbly. I thought the hop flavor was just perfect, definitly distinct but not overpowering. I did detect a slight "salty" finish to the beer though. Sounds odd, but it is a tiny bit salty at the end. Certainly nothing to compalin about but I thought I should note it. Any idea why this might happen??

BTW, I did take a picture of the brew in the glass and will post it when I get a chance, it was more of a brown ale. Sort of like Newcastle.

Glad to hear the second brew class is almost ready. I guess I better do my shopping already. Well, I did get a 16 quart enameled stock pot, but nothing else.

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com


#118 Matty

Matty
  • participating member
  • 28 posts

Posted 23 May 2006 - 07:06 AM

I tried mine last night (a naughty 24hrs earlier than the two week wait) and it tasted good. Same sort of results as you Ellie and I'll check for the salty thing again later (3pm here … a little early for beer).

The second bottle I tried seemed less carbonated and more cloudy. My first retained a little layer of bubbles all the way drinking it, but this was quite flat. I've read that dishwasher chemicals left on glassware can affect the head - is that right Chris?

Of course now I utterly regret only brewing a tiny batch although I'm repeating the first batch again tonight to get some more in the pipeline.

Would be good to see your picture Ellie.

Matt

#119 cdh

cdh
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,119 posts

Posted 23 May 2006 - 07:48 AM

Elie- Hmm... salty? That has got to be your water supply. But you're in Dallas so your water table shouldn't be brackish, should it? No dried up salt lakes up there, are there? I've tasted vaguely salty tap water at some seaside locations.... but this is mysterious. Boil your tap water for a while to concentrate it a bit and see if the hint of saltiness comes through there too.

Matty- As to the strange behavior of that one bottle... did you thoroughly mix your priming sugar through the beer? It takes a bit of stirring to get the dispersion even. Maybe the flatter bottle just had less sugar for the yeast to eat.

Everybody else- Let us know how it turned out! I want to hear about any disappointments as well as the success stories. If something is weird, I'd like to help you figure out why it's so.

Edited by cdh, 23 May 2006 - 07:49 AM.

Christopher D. Holst aka "cdh"

----- De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est

Chris Holst, Attorney-at-Lunch

#120 FoodMan

FoodMan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,306 posts

Posted 23 May 2006 - 08:07 AM

Elie-  Hmm... salty?  That has got to be your water supply.  But you're in Dallas so your water table shouldn't be brackish, should it?  No dried up salt lakes up there, are there? I've tasted vaguely salty tap water at some seaside locations....  but this is mysterious.  Boil your tap water for a while to concentrate it a bit and see if the hint of saltiness comes through there too.

Matty-  As to the strange behavior of that one bottle... did you thoroughly mix your priming sugar through the beer?  It takes a bit of stirring to get the dispersion even.  Maybe the flatter bottle just had less sugar for the yeast to eat. 

Everybody else-  Let us know how it turned out!  I want to hear about any disappointments as well as the success stories.  If something is weird, I'd like to help you figure out why it's so.

View Post

Well, the finish was salty to me, but a friend of mine who was lucky enough to get a bottle from my batch (he is a microbrew lover BTW) said that he tasted a bit of orange in the finish! go figure. He did enjoy the beer very much though.

To get the priming sugar evenly dispersed, I dissolved it in a small quantity (< 1/2 cup I think) of sterilized water and mixed that in the beer. I think I read this on one of those brewing sites I've been frequenting lately.

E. Nassar
Houston, TX

My Blog
contact: enassar(AT)gmail(DOT)com