Jump to content


Welcome to the eG Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Is Posting Restaurant Pics Actionable


  • Please log in to reply
159 replies to this topic

#151 wesza

wesza
  • participating member
  • 1,103 posts
  • Location:Seattle, Wa.

Posted 08 January 2006 - 03:29 AM

(1) The customer eating at a Restaurant is purchasing his serving of the food posted on the menu at the price it is offered.

(2) After the food is served or delivered to the customer he may do whatever he wishes to do with his food, eating it is a option, as is boxing it or taking it with him when he leaves the premises.

(3) Unless the Restaurant clearly states on their menu or posts where it is easily seen that "NO FOOD MAY BE PHOTOGRAPHED WITHOUT PERMISSION" there is no legal violation incurred, but a warning may be given with the following resolution if ignored.

Without this being posted a Restaurant can request that you do not take photos of your dishes. If you object, they may have a option of removing them from the table and asking the customer nicely to leave the premises, without charging the customer for anything he was not allowed to finish before being asked to leave the premises. In certain circumstances the Restaurant may be libel toward the customers since it wasn't clearly stated on the menu or premises under local laws. I doubt they have any legal rights to confiscate your camera or request your film as it's your private property, only to ask you to leave willingly.

I operated a Restaurant where we welcomed customers to enjoy our services and meals but never allowed any menus to be removed by patrons. We made sure to check before doing this that menus are our private property.

Taking Photos, using Cell Phones or any other activities are easily avoided by business simply advising that this is not permitted anywhere in your premise, but even then I'm not sure that without a warning it can be a copyright or legal liability. I heard that it's questionable that taking photo's without any flash attachments are often not easy to prove that they violated the purpose intended in public gatherings.

Irwin
I don't say that I do. But don't let it get around that I don't.

#152 SobaAddict70

SobaAddict70
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 7,549 posts
  • Location:Hobbiton, the Shire

Posted 10 January 2006 - 09:20 AM

He had all sorts of rules, two of which I remember.  Only one guest at a table could order a chicken dish and no two guests could order the same entree.

View Post


You're making this up. :blink: :blink: :blink:

#153 Holly Moore

Holly Moore
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,572 posts
  • Location:Philadelphia, PA

Posted 10 January 2006 - 11:09 AM

Nope. The curiosity side of me appreciates these rules. My hospitality side shudders.
Holly Moore
"I eat, therefore I am."

HollyEats.Com
Twitter

#154 monavano

monavano
  • participating member
  • 837 posts
  • Location:Alexandria, VA

Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:00 PM

Oh, this is good in a bad sort of way :wink:

http://washingtonian...2006/bucks.html

#155 Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 13,501 posts
  • Location:FL

Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:13 PM

In the words of George Takei, Star Trek's "Mr. Sulu" and the new announcer for the Howard Stern show,

OH MY.
Jason Perlow
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream

#156 rose_ayn

rose_ayn
  • participating member
  • 68 posts

Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:16 PM

Oh, this is good in a bad sort of way :wink:

http://washingtonian...2006/bucks.html

View Post



My first reaction is I hope "Chris" tipped very well for the stress he put the servers through. Whatever Greenwood's issues, it wasn't quite fair to do that do a decent staff.

Reading through some of the comments attributed to Greenwood via her staff I'm stunned. The quote that got me is "food is for eating, not presentation." Okay, then. If she doesn't care how the food looks leaving the kitchen then why would she care if people take pictures of it? Yeah, I know that's a simplistic view but it's mine and I'm sticking to it.

#157 My Confusing Horoscope

My Confusing Horoscope
  • participating member
  • 194 posts
  • Location:Colesville, Maryland

Posted 10 January 2006 - 01:58 PM

If the chef's entree was copyrighted, did I bring new meaning to the term "derivative work" when I digested it? :unsure:
Scorpio
You'll be surprised to find out that Congress is empowered to forcibly sublet your apartment for the summer.

#158 bigred93

bigred93
  • participating member
  • 54 posts

Posted 10 January 2006 - 02:28 PM

Oh, this is good in a bad sort of way :wink:

http://washingtonian...2006/bucks.html

View Post


Very funny... Turnabout is fair play! I do feel bad that they had to eat a nice steak well done to try and prove a point...

#159 Rebecca263

Rebecca263
  • participating member
  • 1,420 posts
  • Location:Frozen state of NJ

Posted 10 January 2006 - 06:52 PM

I wonder what any chef would say if I ordered my steak raw? :raz:
More Than Salt
Visit Our Cape Coop Blog
Cure Cutaneous Lymphoma
Join the DarkSide---------------------------> DarkSide Member #006-03-09-06

#160 Dryden

Dryden
  • participating member
  • 476 posts
  • Location:New York, NY

Posted 11 January 2006 - 03:34 PM

If they're not equipped to do tartare, probably get you to sign a waiver when you come down with listeria...
I want pancakes! God, do you people understand every language except English? Yo quiero pancakes! Donnez moi pancakes! Click click bloody click pancakes!