Jump to content


Welcome to the eG Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the society.

Photo

The era of the globetrotting chef


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
9 replies to this topic

#1 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,303 posts
  • Location:New York, NY

Posted 27 September 2005 - 06:55 PM

It seems that the era of the globetrotting chef is upon us: Ducasse, Vongerichten, Nobu, Puck . . . even artisans like Thomas Keller, thought to be the last holdouts against mitosis, are now operating multiple restaurants (including in Las Vegas). I'd be particularly interested to hear where Michael and Clark think the future is taking us with respect to multiple ownership. Will it ever again be possible to be a globally influential chef with just one restaurant, or are Adria and a few others the last of a breed (though even Adria is involved in many projects now)? Will this be good or bad for cuisine?

Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)


#2 M.X.Hassett

M.X.Hassett
  • legacy participant
  • 1,074 posts
  • Location:Bergen County NJ

Posted 27 September 2005 - 07:04 PM

This bring up the question of is Ducasse a chain, I believe you posted on this in another thread Steven.
Matthew Xavier Hassett aka "M.X.Hassett"

"Cocktail is a stimulating liquor, composed of spirits of any kind, sugar, water, and bitters-it is vulgarly called bittered sling and is supposed to be an exellent electioneering potion..."
- Balance and Columbian Repository. May 13, 1806

#3 Bux

Bux
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 12,211 posts
  • Location:New York City

Posted 27 September 2005 - 07:55 PM

This bring up the question of is Ducasse a chain, I believe you posted on this in another thread Steven.

View Post

Think of the whole forum as a fabric. :biggrin:
Robert Buxbaum
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.

#4 dvs

dvs
  • participating member
  • 450 posts
  • Location:Yountville, CA

Posted 27 September 2005 - 08:00 PM

should it be considered a bad thing?

#5 Michael Ruhlman

Michael Ruhlman
  • participating member
  • 466 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 05:20 AM

How can it be a bad thing if they create great restaurants?

The thing is, great restaurants are incredibly hard to create.

There are two issues that interest me. One: does the great chef, the one who has achieved some sort of truly original impact on diners, vitiate him or herself, dilute the gift, waste the talent by opening a series of four-star copies or lower end rollouts? Not if they've already left their mark. Indeed they stand to strengthen their work by expanding, if they can do it well. Chefs as we know have expanded with varying degrees of success. (Whatever happened to stephen pyles and star canyon?) The best, acting like CEOs, are able to spread their standards throughout their entire organization. Those whose standards don't trickle down have a spotty track record.

I think the real danger is young chefs who get into the business not with a four star restaurant as the goal, but with the goal of being CEO of a spread of four restaurants, and product and books, before they've developed any meaningful standards of their own or created anything of unique value in the culinary world.

Or perhaps worst of all, a generation of young chefs whose goal is to be globally influential. Can you imagine getting into this business with that as your goal?

Very interested in Clark's view on this subject.

#6 GordonCooks

GordonCooks
  • participating member
  • 2,550 posts
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 28 September 2005 - 07:09 AM

.........Or perhaps worst of all, a generation of young chefs whose goal is to be globally influential.  Can you imagine getting into this business with that as your goal?

View Post

Don't they call this "DiSpiritosis"?

#7 Mark PPX

Mark PPX
  • participating member
  • 7 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 08:14 AM

The future of multiple owneship might best be understood in part by understanding first the motivation on a chefs part for multiple ownership and second the ability to multiple task, delegate and execute. As an example you can use say Todd English compared to Vongerichten and a lessor degree Keller. I think the motiavetion in these three chefs vary and as a result the future for all three are going to be quite different.

#8 clark wolf

clark wolf
  • participating member
  • 11 posts
  • Location:New York, Las Vegas & Sonoma (Russian River)

Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:50 AM

I hear the concern but do not share it. If by artisan we mean servant then it's certainly time to end that run. Alain Senderens and other greats have come to realize that it is neither economically possible nor culturally necessary to stay at the stove for a lifetime. Western culture celebrates the talented and those stars in turn expect to make a good living and have a nice home, life, third wife...

And after all, who would you rather have as owner of a slew of restaurants? A wildly talented and accomplished chef or a real estate or money syndicate of greedy thugs?

A really good chef, like those listed, can create wonderful places for people to gather and enjoy and learn and grow - in the dining room and in the kitchen. Food is a birthright and a responsibility. This is just a logical evolution.

Marion Cunningham - author of the magical Fanny Farmer and other cookbooks - used to say the home made bread (so popular in the 70's) the was lousy is still simply lousy bread. Artisan, hand made, small bunch and all that is romantic in concept but actually needs to be really good to be worth our time and tummies.

Some cheffie globalists will crash and burn (Rocco...). Some will bump a bit but continue to thrive (Jean George Vongerichten, Ducasse...) And some will stay in Chicago where they belong (like the terribly self important but deeply limited Charlie Trotter). This is a series of individual efforts but all, I think for the better, as more good food and good cooking goes to an ever widening audience.

#9 Pan

Pan
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 15,544 posts
  • Location:East Village, Manhattan

Posted 28 September 2005 - 08:42 PM

At the risk of going on a tangent, it would seem that the reason Trotter isn't opening a restaurant in New York is that the cost spiralled out of control, not because he's "deeply limited." (Full disclosure: I've never experienced his cuisine, so I don't personally know what his strong points and limitations are.)

#10 akwa

akwa
  • participating member
  • 430 posts

Posted 28 September 2005 - 09:32 PM

imho
consolidation is an inevitable consequence of progress
it is not value laden however
i think what will be the defining characteristic of this transition to multinationals who are in fact branded people will include:
how integral is the personality?
how complete is the organizational system?
how financially viable is the model?

globetrotters legacy will depend primarily on their credibility, and in this way is no different from single unit operators/

it would be a shame if grand chefs were only "grand chefs" but there is no reason to think this must be the case, even if it seems likely and probable

even ferran is not ferran anymore, but he is a mature product, it is highly likely that the next baton wielder is not on the cultural radar

think china
think brazil

this is the real question, will globalization strengthen or undermine the powers that be