Jump to content


Welcome to the eG Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the society.

Photo

Research


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1 reply to this topic

#1 Jinmyo

Jinmyo
  • participating member
  • 9,879 posts
  • Location:Ottawa, ON, Canada

Posted 24 May 2002 - 07:56 AM

We've had many discussions about what a food writer did or did not know about a chef or a dish before writing their piece.

What kind of research would you as a writer tend to do? As an editor, how knowledgeable do you expect writers to be? As a reader?
"I've caught you Richardson, stuffing spit-backs in your vile maw. 'Let tomorrow's omelets go empty,' is that your fucking attitude?" -E. B. Farnum

"Behold, I teach you the ubermunch. The ubermunch is the meaning of the earth. Let your will say: the ubermunch shall be the meaning of the earth!" -Fritzy N.

"It's okay to like celery more than yogurt, but it's not okay to think that batter is yogurt."

Serving fine and fresh gratuitous comments since Oct 5 2001, 09:53 PM

#2 Jeanne McManus

Jeanne McManus
  • legacy participant
  • 43 posts

Posted 03 June 2002 - 02:51 PM

Are you talking about restaurant reviewers? I think they should learn as much about a chef or a dish as they can to convey their  opinion of it to a reader, which I guess means I don’t think they have to know if the chef trained with Paul Bocuse.

But as for any type of journalist, and his or her reporting, I think they should know as much as they possibly can before they even talk to a chef. We’re always surprised when we go to interview book authors and they’re surprised that we’ve read their book!