pumpkin
#1
Posted 23 September 2004 - 07:20 PM
#2
Posted 24 September 2004 - 07:10 AM
Booze Muse, Spiritual Advisor
Cheers!
Bartendrix,Intoxicologist, Beverage Consultant, Philadelphia, PA
Captain Liberty of the Good Varietals, Aphrodite of Alcohol
#3
Posted 24 September 2004 - 09:12 AM
#4
Posted 24 September 2004 - 11:07 AM
Booze Muse, Spiritual Advisor
Cheers!
Bartendrix,Intoxicologist, Beverage Consultant, Philadelphia, PA
Captain Liberty of the Good Varietals, Aphrodite of Alcohol
#5
Posted 25 September 2004 - 06:22 AM
we didn't have dessert, because we were stuffed by this time. the decor is cute, the room is loud. i'm happy to see curtains by the front door, for when winter weather comes. one odd note: the bathroom has a sign on it that says 'handicapped accessible bathroom' and it has the bars and sink knobs and things in it--but it's up a step from the dining room. i don't really see how that's handicapped-accessible, but then again i'm not handicapped. but it may make a difference to some of you.
overall, very nice little place. i hope it thrives.
#6
Posted 26 September 2004 - 02:58 PM
Thanks in advance.
Tom
#7
Posted 26 September 2004 - 04:03 PM
#8
Posted 26 September 2004 - 04:25 PM
#9
Posted 14 December 2004 - 02:13 PM
A gratin of kielbasa (when's the last time you saw that on a menu!), potato and raclette was delicious-- the perfect thing to start with after walking over there in the cold. I sampled a bit of a scallop salad as well. Described as 'scallops with beet vinaigrette', it was actually a salad of spinach and diced beets with a vinaigrette and some very fresh seared scallops on top. For entrees, a couple of us including myself had the whole Branzino, which was grilled perfectly. The veal and pork chops (over French lentils) I tasted were nicely tender and flavorful-- they're obviously getting some high quality meat and seafood here.
I'm not sure whether they have a pastry chef yet (I doubt it, as there was only three dessert choices), but we tried a citrus shortbread. Essentially a thick slab of pate sucree baked in a tartlet shell, this took some serious chiseling to break off a bite. Despite the difficulty in eating it, it was fairly tasty, especially with the blood orange sorbet and lemon curd on top. I think the other two desserts were a Vahlrona pot de creme and a blackberry and walnut linzertorte.
A frend brought along an unusual wine-- a Petit Verdot from Virginia (AmRhein). It was surprisingly good.
#10
Posted 14 December 2004 - 05:17 PM
The veal and pork chops (over French lentils) I tasted were nicely tender and flavorful-- they're obviously getting some high quality meat and seafood here.
You know, the grilled pork loin was the one dish I had at Pumpkin that really disappointed me (though the lentils were awe!some): I thought it was kinda bland. But then, I tend to think that the loin and chop of the pig are the blandest parts, so maybe it was just me.
But that disappointment aside, it's a neat little place. Gotta head back there soon. That gratin sounds cholesterolerrific, and I can't wait to try it...
#12
Posted 23 January 2005 - 04:08 PM
Best of all, though, is the chocolate pot de creme. The dark pudding is so stunningly creamy and bittersweet rich, that the whole evening suddenly slows for a moment as each spoonful takes its time to melt.
How about that. Well, they definitely deserve the good press; good for them!
#13
Posted 23 January 2005 - 09:55 PM
We did end up having a lovely dinner at Rx instead though. Definitely worth trekking into the Hinterlands of University City for such a great and graciously presented meal. The Gnocchi and the Short Ribs were real standouts. A diver scallop amuse was a lovely surprise too.
Booze Muse, Spiritual Advisor
Cheers!
Bartendrix,Intoxicologist, Beverage Consultant, Philadelphia, PA
Captain Liberty of the Good Varietals, Aphrodite of Alcohol
#14
Posted 23 January 2005 - 10:02 PM
we called last night hoping that because of the storm we'd be able to get in. no such luck. i spoke to a neighbor of our today and he said they were in there after 10 and people were still coming in waiting for a table.
really i'm quite happy about that, even if it means i can't go there that often. i've been living basically on the block for 12 years now, and pumpkin's success is really a validation that this is a great neighborhood. i couldn't be happier for them.
#15
Posted 23 January 2005 - 10:15 PM
i made short ribs tonight; you should have come over.
we called last night hoping that because of the storm we'd be able to get in. no such luck. i spoke to a neighbor of our today and he said they were in there after 10 and people were still coming in waiting for a table.
really i'm quite happy about that, even if it means i can't go there that often. i've been living basically on the block for 12 years now, and pumpkin's success is really a validation that this is a great neighborhood. i couldn't be happier for them.
Thanks sweetie! That's really nice, but I was off in Elkins Park watching the playoff game and cheering on the Iggles. Some other time perhaps? I'll always bring the wine...
'Tis true that Graduate Hospital neighborhood is no longer the urban frontier that it once was. And having a great restaurant right in the 'hood is always welcome. Not to mention how great the upswing is for property values and such.
Booze Muse, Spiritual Advisor
Cheers!
Bartendrix,Intoxicologist, Beverage Consultant, Philadelphia, PA
Captain Liberty of the Good Varietals, Aphrodite of Alcohol
#16
Posted 24 January 2005 - 12:30 PM
Edited by stephenc, 24 January 2005 - 12:30 PM.
#17
Posted 24 January 2005 - 03:13 PM
Reference "A Prayer for the City", by Buzz Bissinger.
Outstanding read for fans of urban history and development.
Uh, to keep this on-topic, I really got stop to by the place soon.
Of course, I could say that about Melograno, Matyson, Rx, Marigold...
Tom is not my friend.
#18
Posted 25 March 2005 - 03:42 PM
Started with the endive and gruyere gratin and the grilled romaine salad. The endives had been braised until golden and had a nice thick layer of gruyere melted on top. Tender, slightly sweet, slightly bitter, warm, melty goodness. The grilled romaine I want to try making at home when I finally buy a grill pan and/or an outdoor grill -- a whole heart of romaine, lightly touched by the grill, drizzled with a "parmigiano vinagrette" (Caesar dressing, essentially). The other apps I can remember were mussels, scallops, and grilled quail. Prices for apps: $7-$10.
Entrees: grilled pork loin with spaetzle, sauerkraut, bacon, and onions(?) for me; grilled Hawaiian swordfish with some kind of ginger foam/sauce and couscous for my friend. The pork was slightly dry (unfortunately, most pork loin is) but immensely improved by the bacon/spaetzle/sauerkraut mixture -- smoky, sour, delicious. I only got a bite of the swordfish, but it was good as well. I was surprised by the relative lack of fish choices, though, since I had been expecting at least two or three seafood dishes and probably only one or two meat entrees. The other entrees available last night were a steak (strip, I believe, with a red wine sauce, mushrooms, mashed potatoes), duck confit with French lentils (I should have gotten this!), roasted chicken breast, and a vegetarian (possibly even vegan) choice. Prices for entrees: I think the vegan was $15; the steak was $26. Everything else was somewhere inbetween. Quite reasonable.
Shared a spice cake with poached PEAR and vanilla creme fraiche for dessert. This is probably something I could make at home (easily) but still quite good. I love spice cake. I liked the olive oil (with cloves of roasted garlic), too, though the baguette could have been better. Will go back to try a whole fish whenever they have one next.
Drank a Chilean sauvignon blanc (Reserve Morande Terrarum, 2003) and a Yellowtail Shiraz (2004...hey, we ARE college students).
In short, if you haven't been here yet, go! Check it out.
Edited...because I can't believe I spelled "pear" incorrectly!!
Edited by Diann, 25 March 2005 - 08:15 PM.
#19
Posted 25 March 2005 - 03:46 PM
Evan
Had dinner here last night. Wow -- probably the smallest restaurant I've ever been in, even compared to Caffe Casta Diva and Melograno. But it's cute. I wish I had come with a larger party so I could have sat at the table with the pumpkin-colored couch in the alcove. Small menu, too, which unfortunately means I can't bring some of my pickier friends here (I think there were five apps and five or six entrees). I didn't have a reservation, but I went early (6:30) and was promptly seated.
Started with the endive and gruyere gratin and the grilled romaine salad. The endives had been braised until golden and had a nice thick layer of gruyere melted on top. Tender, slightly sweet, slightly bitter, warm, melty goodness. The grilled romaine I want to try making at home when I finally buy a grill pan and/or an outdoor grill -- a whole heart of romaine, lightly touched by the grill, drizzled with a "parmigiano vinagrette" (Caesar dressing, essentially). The other apps I can remember were mussels, scallops, and grilled quail. Prices for apps: $7-$10.
Entrees: grilled pork loin with spaetzle, sauerkraut, bacon, and onions(?) for me; grilled Hawaiian swordfish with some kind of ginger foam/sauce and couscous for my friend. The pork was slightly dry (unfortunately, most pork loin is) but immensely improved by the bacon/spaetzle/sauerkraut mixture -- smoky, sour, delicious. I only got a bite of the swordfish, but it was good as well. I was surprised by the relative lack of fish choices, though, since I had been expecting at least two or three seafood dishes and probably only one or two meat entrees. The other entrees available last night were a steak (strip, I believe, with a red wine sauce, mushrooms, mashed potatoes), duck confit with French lentils (I should have gotten this!), roasted chicken breast, and a vegetarian (possibly even vegan) choice. Prices for entrees: I think the vegan was $15; the steak was $26. Everything else was somewhere inbetween. Quite reasonable.
Shared a spice cake with poached pair and vanilla creme fraiche for dessert. This is probably something I could make at home (easily) but still quite good. I love spice cake. I liked the olive oil (with cloves of roasted garlic), too, though the baguette could have been better. Will go back to try a whole fish whenever they have one next.
Drank a Chilean sauvignon blanc (Reserve Morande Terrarum, 2003) and a Yellowtail Shiraz (2004...hey, we ARE college students).
In short, if you haven't been here yet, go! Check it out.
#20
Posted 25 March 2005 - 04:18 PM
How was the sauvignon blanc?Drank a Chilean sauvignon blanc (Reserve Morande Terrarum, 2003) and a Yellowtail Shiraz (2004...hey, we ARE college students).
I should make an effort to get to Pumpkin sometime soon. It's right around the corner, and I used to go all the time back when I didn't really need a reservation...
#21
Posted 25 March 2005 - 08:13 PM
How was the sauvignon blanc?
I should make an effort to get to Pumpkin sometime soon. It's right around the corner, and I used to go all the time back when I didn't really need a reservation...
Yeah, I think Pumpkin would be a great restaurant to have in the neighborhood, since you would probably never eat the same thing twice.
I really enjoyed the SB, but I like most of them anyways. It had that "cat's pee on a gooseberry bush" smell to it...can't remember any of its other characteristics.
#22
Posted 05 May 2005 - 02:58 PM
Evan
#23
Posted 14 May 2005 - 05:46 AM

Well I finally made it to Pumpkin with some good company! Even though the menu changes daily, I posted to show pricing and the style of the restaurant.
I started out with the grilled Quail. It was simply and artfully prepared with the tartness of the balsamic and fruit mixing nicely with the sweet fig and grilled kissed quail.
The wife had the mussels which were quite good - an excellent vehicle for bread soaking.
I thought the winner appetizer was the grilled salad, interesting warm lettuce with grill marks topped with a very creamy blue dressing vinagrette. Figures, that was chosen by Katie. She must've known.
The crabcake was well received but I didnt try it.
For entree, I had the lamb with what was israeli couscous darkened by sautee. Interesting flavor. The lamb was not the winner as it was not as tender as I would have hoped. Nonetheless it all worked well together. I should have ordered the chicken (I have learned that chicken in a fine restaurant is nothing like at home but I resisted since I was FINALLY at Pumpkin and wanted something else. It looked excellent and if you see it - get it and think of me.)
I did taste the veal chop which was simply prepared and very tasty. It showed up with artichoke and mashed papas.
My personal fave lay across from me - the waluu with fennel scented saffron broth. Not much of a fennel fan when overdone - I thought this was very nice and I had more than a gentleman's bite of it. I praise the smaller appetite of some who dine with me
For dessert - I was voted down on ordering all of them. Reason prevailed (well maybe). We tried everything but the napoleon and it turns out everything was a great ending to the meal. My wife's absolute favorite dessert is when a restaurant has a cookie selection and some java. She was elated.
The service was impeccable to say the least. The initial server who left early was a friend of one of the group but doesn't matter. You should expect the same royal treatment. The place is tiny and there is a great deal of attention paid to each table.
I would sum up Pumpkin as a restaurant that features fresh ingredients - prepared simply but artisanally. Low on flair and on unusual ingredients, it was worth the wait. Good company makes any meal better and the wine bottles were empty by the end as well.
Total bill with 25% tip was $200 even. I would go back anytime.
Evan
#24
Posted 16 May 2005 - 06:02 AM
#25
Posted 16 May 2005 - 06:26 AM
#26
Posted 16 May 2005 - 06:32 AM
i don't see the chicken liver appetizer on that menu. why must everything i love be taken from me?
I don't know how much it'll sooth your broken heart, but the nice thing about those livers is that the recipe is ridiculously easy to reverse engineer. Since I had it at Pumpkin in the fall, I've made it once a month or so.
The other good thing is that since chicken livers are almost cheap as free, you can make a ton and eat the leftovers in sandwiches. Which is amazing.
#27
Posted 16 May 2005 - 06:46 AM
#28
Posted 30 June 2005 - 09:41 AM
It's a cute, VERY small space, but the hostess was nice about making sure our table wasn't too tight of a fit. We decided to start with the grilled romaine salad (basically a wedge of about half a head of romaine grilled and served with a caesar-like dressing), and the pan-roasted black figs with goat cheese. Both were excellent, though I paid for the garlic-heavy dressing on the romaine later on that night
For entrees, we both went for the fish. BF had the whole Poconos trout, which was served with pea sprouts (yummy!), cherry tomatoes, and a sherry-based sauce. Excellent, sweet fish, with a nice sauce that didn't overwhelm the trout. I had the cripsy salmon, which was an absolute explosion of flavor and texture. First it came on a bed of spicy pineapple salsa, then it was topped with a cilantro/onion sauce, then it was covered in crisp little sweet potato crisps. Some might have called it overkill, but I thought it was terrific. Not a bit of food was left on either plate!
Somehow we still had room for dessert--BF had the strawberry charlotte with lady fingers. Very light, with some melon-type flavor as well (glad I didn't order it because I'm not a melon fan, but if I was I probably would have loved it.) I had the Chocolat Pot Du Creme, which I declared as the first chocolate dessert I've ever had that I would truly call orgasmic.
Total bill came to $82 before tip--not bad at all considering how we indulged. If I had any quibbles at all, it would be that the bread we were served before the appetizers was pretty non-descript (and sparse--only one thin slice each). I *might* also say that I felt the slightest touch rushed, but they also had two larger parties that night, and walking in without a reservation I didn't feel like I had that much room to complain anyway.
All in all, I'm thrilled they're in the neighborhood and hope it's a good sign for things to come. I confess I was hesitant to try them for a while because of the bad reviews on the citysearch website, but either they've gotten their act together a lot since then or those reviews were just from some folks with serious axes to grind, for whatever reason.
#29
Posted 01 July 2005 - 04:48 PM
All in all, I'm thrilled they're in the neighborhood and hope it's a good sign for things to come. I confess I was hesitant to try them for a while because of the bad reviews on the citysearch website, but either they've gotten their act together a lot since then or those reviews were just from some folks with serious axes to grind, for whatever reason.
As someone who has dealt repeatedly with citysearch on the issue of allowing suspect "reviews" written by people with axes to grind, allow me to add a few thoughts on this, especially for Ian, if you are reading this.
If you find yourself questioning the veracity of the poster, click on his/her profile to see how many other restuarants they have reviewed. If your restaurant is the only one lucky enough to have been reviewed by the user, odds are you have been targeted for one reason or another (in my case, it appeared to be because I had the gall to open up a place that charged more than $10 for an entree in University City).
Reversing the posts is far from easy, but it is possible. If you want to know how, I would be happy to share. The one thing you won't get is the satisfaction of confronting your detractors, because they are allowed to remain anonymous while slandering your restaurant and, quite likely, dissuading potential customers from trying your place.
Citysearch is fine for basic info most of the time, although six months of repeated emails still has not resulted in getting my reservations policy correct. As for the user reviews, caveat lector.
#30
Posted 02 July 2005 - 05:19 AM
All in all, I'm thrilled they're in the neighborhood and hope it's a good sign for things to come. I confess I was hesitant to try them for a while because of the bad reviews on the citysearch website, but either they've gotten their act together a lot since then or those reviews were just from some folks with serious axes to grind, for whatever reason.
As someone who has dealt repeatedly with citysearch on the issue of allowing suspect "reviews" written by people with axes to grind, allow me to add a few thoughts on this, especially for Ian, if you are reading this.
If you find yourself questioning the veracity of the poster, click on his/her profile to see how many other restuarants they have reviewed. If your restaurant is the only one lucky enough to have been reviewed by the user, odds are you have been targeted for one reason or another (in my case, it appeared to be because I had the gall to open up a place that charged more than $10 for an entree in University City).
Reversing the posts is far from easy, but it is possible. If you want to know how, I would be happy to share. The one thing you won't get is the satisfaction of confronting your detractors, because they are allowed to remain anonymous while slandering your restaurant and, quite likely, dissuading potential customers from trying your place.
Citysearch is fine for basic info most of the time, although six months of repeated emails still has not resulted in getting my reservations policy correct. As for the user reviews, caveat lector.
Not to comingle threads but if the same malarkey truly happened to Rx in citysearch, then I wouldnt even bother looking there (I personally never have). As an unbiased gulleteer, I thought Rx was terrific, Greg, and so have many on this board. I also seriously question a "scathing" review of pumpkin. If its not your thing fine - but downright awful reviews? cumon..... I didnt like Django and Vetri but they also dont deserve "bad reviews" - they just werent my style.
Evan










