San Francisco Restaurant Reviews & Recommendations
#1
Posted 12 August 2001 - 10:21 AM
#2
Posted 12 August 2001 - 10:47 AM
#3
Posted 14 August 2001 - 08:38 PM
The Fifth Floor is an interesting restaurant that is producing some good food. It also has an outstanding wine list.
I would recommend that you order dishes that are not too 'tricked up'. A dish of duck done four ways looked good for a magazine shoot but lacked soul. We thought that the chicken baked in clay, however, was a very good dish.
For a food experience, I rate it about the same as Gary Danko which is a bit below Chez Panisse and the French Laundry.
#4
Posted 26 August 2001 - 06:40 PM
#5
Posted 14 November 2001 - 08:00 AM
#6
Posted 12 February 2002 - 04:42 PM
Has anyone eaten at this restraurant? Any thoughts about it?
Thanks bunches,
Cat in Chicago
catchi@ix.netcom.com
Portland, OR
#7
Posted 12 February 2002 - 06:39 PM
It was worth the trip for the dessert alone.
#8
Posted 13 September 2002 - 08:01 AM
We need an idea for a high quality casual place in town. Last time, we enjoyed Fringale. Something along those lines would be great. All suggestions welcomed.
#9
Posted 13 September 2002 - 08:04 AM
Also I am partial to Aliottos on the wharf for basic seafood stuff, their cioppino is really good and have pretty much first shot at the best dungeness.
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#10
Posted 13 September 2002 - 08:08 AM
#11
Posted 13 September 2002 - 09:59 AM
Hawthorne Lane
#12
Posted 13 September 2002 - 10:21 AM
Sunflower (See my other thread on this) -- probably more casual than you want.
Plouf -- In Beldon Alley (A little hard to find, between Bush and Pine/Kearny?) -- best mussels you'll find in SF. The other seafood is also great (but I recently had a slightly overcooked halibut). And the prettiest Tunisian waitress you'll every see. (sigh.)
Russian Hill Area: Baldoria (Northern Italian, specializes in game); Antica Tratoria; I Frascati; Zarzuela (Spanish/Tapas); Luna Rossa (simple, excellent)
Hayes Valley -- Suppenkuche (German beer hall, great food); Absinthe
Hawthorne Lane is great, but I've only been there for lunch. Aqua is excellent. (But in SF, these aren't considered casual. They're pretty high end.)
One more edit -- The Helmand. It's an Afghan restaurant in North Beach (on Broadway, about a block below Columbus, on the left) -- the food is absolutely amazing. Not surprisingly, the food is midway between middle east grilled meats and Moghul curries. Try anything with Kadoo (pumpkin) and the chicken curry is spectacular.
#13
Posted 13 September 2002 - 10:47 AM
Surely you jest. You have a better suggestion for Hunan style food anywhere else in San Francisco?
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#14
Posted 13 September 2002 - 10:51 AM
I only went to Brandy Ho's once and had take out once. Both were much too greasy, along with my other usual complaints about SF chinese food (gloppy, overly-soyed brown sauces, over cooked vegetables, greyish chicken with visible gristle).
#15
Posted 13 September 2002 - 10:54 AM
Youve had to have gone on a bad day. I've been there like 5 times and it was great every time. Their fried dumplings in the spicy chili oil are really quite phenomenal.Henry's Hunan.
I only went to Brandy Ho's once and had take out once. Both were much too greasy, along with my other usual complaints about SF chinese food (gloppy, overly-soyed brown sauces, over cooked vegetables, greyish chicken with visible gristle).
Grease? What the hell is wrong with grease?
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#16
Posted 13 September 2002 - 10:54 AM
Henry's is good. Has a nice cookbook, too.Henry's Hunan.
I only went to Brandy Ho's once and had take out once. Both were much too greasy, along with my other usual complaints about SF chinese food (gloppy, overly-soyed brown sauces, over cooked vegetables, greyish chicken with visible gristle).
#17
Posted 13 September 2002 - 10:58 AM
My Chinese friend (Cantonese) criticizes Schezwan and Hunan for being generally too greasy. I explain that this is where the flavor comes from. But there has to be some limits? No?Grease? What the hell is wrong with grease?
I'll give Brandy Ho's another shot.
Best Chinese food in the near-Bay area, however, is Shen Hua, on College Avenue in Berkeley. (Of course, there's a whole lot I haven't tried.) Erich's (and the copy-cat Alices) in Noe are very good. Eliza's is incredibly overrated.
#18
Posted 13 September 2002 - 11:12 AM
I like Brandy Ho's because its so unlike any other chinese restaurant in SF in terms of the types of dishes they offer. There are so few Hunan and Sichuan places in the bay area, with all of the Cantonese influence. But I'll give Harry's a whirl next time, for sure.
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#19
Posted 13 September 2002 - 11:16 AM
Downtown. Soma. Downtown (close to Transamerica Bldg.)
I agree that the dearth of Szechwan/Hunan is the primary cause of the shitty Chinese food to be had in this city.
#20
Posted 13 September 2002 - 11:18 AM
Not Harry, Henry.The oils are necessary in order to convey the heat of the chiles in Hunan and Sichuan cuisine.
I like Brandy Ho's because its so unlike any other chinese restaurant in SF in terms of the types of dishes they offer. There are so few Hunan and Sichuan places in the bay area, with all of the Cantonese influence. But I'll give Harry's a whirl next time, for sure.
#21
Posted 13 September 2002 - 11:27 AM
Thats pertty interesting that you say that. I had a heated argument on Chowhound a few years ago with many San Franciscans who claim Chinese food superiority in every way to New York. Of course, I told them they were full of shit, but they didn't want to hear it. :)There are a few Henry's:
Downtown. Soma. Downtown (close to Transamerica Bldg.)
I agree that the dearth of Szechwan/Hunan is the primary cause of the shitty Chinese food to be had in this city.
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#22
Posted 13 September 2002 - 11:35 AM
The shitty dearth situation may be overstated. Of course, there's always the San Gabriel Valley in SoCal for mucho Chinese.Thats pertty interesting that you say that. I had a heated argument on Chowhound a few years ago with many San Franciscans who claim Chinese food superiority in every way to New York. Of course, I told them they were full of shit, but they didn't want to hear it. :)There are a few Henry's:
Downtown. Soma. Downtown (close to Transamerica Bldg.)
I agree that the dearth of Szechwan/Hunan is the primary cause of the shitty Chinese food to be had in this city.
#23
Posted 13 September 2002 - 12:16 PM
Edit to get back on topic: This place is beyond casual, maybe go for lunch.
#24
Posted 13 September 2002 - 12:25 PM
There's a lot of great Asian food to be had down south. There's also a lot of great food out in the Avenues.The shitty dearth situation may be overstated. Of course, there's always the San Gabriel Valley in SoCal for mucho Chinese.Thats pertty interesting that you say that. I had a heated argument on Chowhound a few years ago with many San Franciscans who claim Chinese food superiority in every way to New York. Of course, I told them they were full of shit, but they didn't want to hear it. :)There are a few Henry's:
Downtown. Soma. Downtown (close to Transamerica Bldg.)
I agree that the dearth of Szechwan/Hunan is the primary cause of the shitty Chinese food to be had in this city.
The Cantonese/Mandarin v. Hunan/Sichuan debate will rage long after we're gone. The CM crowd will probably never accept that they're wrong.
#25
Posted 14 September 2002 - 06:44 AM
If you don't have a big appetite and you like mussels, go to LuLu's. They have the best oven roasted mussels I've ever had (in a cast iron skillet). The appetizers are better in general than the entrees, but it's a fun place.
#26
Posted 15 September 2002 - 01:01 PM
LuLus does a good pork loin (if I remember correctly).
#27
Posted 16 September 2002 - 12:05 AM
What's your definition of casual (or SF casual)? Mine is that you wouldn't think of needing a jacket. The service is pretty relaxed at Boulevard (although it's excellent).Boulevard is good, but not casual by SF standards. Ozumi, down the block from Blvd, is supposed to have excellent Japanese food.
LuLus does a good pork loin (if I remember correctly).
#28
Posted 16 September 2002 - 03:23 AM
The cooking there is just so assured. The flavours are so real.
If you are looking for a great Chinese meal, however, don't bother. There is no great Chinese restaurant in SFO. Catch a plane to Hong Kong instead.
Foodtourist.com
#29
Posted 18 September 2002 - 05:52 PM
red herring - californian/seafood
eastside west - american
julia - rustic american
curbside too - french
beaucoup - (just opened) french
#30
Posted 18 September 2002 - 05:58 PM
I would be surprised if more than 5 or 6 restaurants in SF required a jacket. I think my post was unclear. I'd consider Boulevard one of the more formal places in town.What's your definition of casual (or SF casual)? Mine is that you wouldn't think of needing a jacket. The service is pretty relaxed at Boulevard (although it's excellent).Boulevard is good, but not casual by SF standards. Ozumi, down the block from Blvd, is supposed to have excellent Japanese food.
LuLus does a good pork loin (if I remember correctly).
McShane is right on about the Chinese food. But if I were you, I'd go to NY.









