Shake Shack
#31
Posted 01 July 2004 - 01:11 PM
-Chicago Dog: very good, condiments were perfect, only the bun(a bit chewy) and the lack of grilling(a personal preference) prevents it from being truly excellent
-Shack Burger: basically a cheeseburger as seen above with a mayonnaise-y 'shack sauce' liberally applied. the sirloin/brisket mix produces an incredibly beefy flavor for a burger, and the toasted bun provides the necessary contrast in texture.
-Black/White Shake: happy to report that the shakes are consistent with the excellent vanilla custard i sampled during the Q fest and over the course of last week. cant wait to try the concretes, or the 'shack-o-cino' shake
avoid the weekday lunch lines, but get thee to the shack sometime soon
#32
Posted 01 July 2004 - 01:57 PM
I love that they're using Martin's potato rolls. That is also my bun of choice for home grilled burgersCheese is added, the burger is placed on a buttered toasted-on-griddle Martin's potato roll, condiments are added and the burger is wrapped for handheld eating.
Jennie
Gastronome in Training
#33
Posted 01 July 2004 - 03:58 PM
...well, much of what was otherwise can be ascribed to opening day snafus. Most of the kinks will probably be worked through with time, experience, and simple adjustments. But they have a long way to go before Shake Shack is anything like a smoothly running establishment.
First, the lines, which have been alluded to. Taking a page from my Barbeque Block Party experience, I showed up right at noon, when the line was only about 15 or 20 people. But with only two registers and unfamiliarity on the part of both customers and order takers, that translated to over ten minutes in line. The bigger issue was the "line" to get your food. There's really no reason to be standing around waiting for your name to get called, but since no one expects it will take as long as it does and since they have no good way of announcing orders over long distances, everyone ends up crowding the pickup window and a line forms behind them.
They essentially lost my order for a few minutes, so I got a good hunk of time at the pickup window to observe what the trouble was. The problem was not a matter of potential throughput--at least not on the burgers and dogs. There was plenty of open griddle space available. Rather it was a matter of anticipating orders to keep a steady stream of food coming. Instead, they'd grill up a batch of burgers--which wouldn't be quite enough to fill the orders already waiting, and only then once those got handed out get started on a new batch for the orders that came in the meantime.
If they had burgers ready, they didn't have fries, or vise-versa. Meantime my order ticket (held up for lack of fries) happened to be in the hand of the expediter when she was called away for something, and then absentmindedly forgot about it. I didn't mind--it's the sort of thing I would do--but it was indicative of the poor coordination in there this afternoon.
Next, the menu. It's very nice looking and evokes the upscale twist on the greasy spoon feel that Danny Meyer is going for. But it's chock full of cutesy names for things with not a single word in the way of description. I probably heard the question "what the hell is a Shack Burger?" four or five times in my two times through the line. I asked it myself (more politely) when I got to the register. Of course questions like this only make the ordering line move more slowly, and the Shack Burger is far from the only culprit.
What's the difference between a Chicago Dog and a Taxi Dog? What's the difference between a Concreation and a Concrete Jungle? What the hell is in a Shackapalooza to make it worth 10 dollars? No answers posted anywhere, on the menu or otherwise. How much wine do you get for your $13-24? The answer to that question (a half bottle) is only posted by the pickup window, when it's too late to order wine anyways.
And then, in a category by itself in both its physical placement on the menu and its, um, uncertain etymology, stands an item described only as a Poochini. I mean, come on. I'm sorry. Poochini???!?
So the food?
Well my cheeseburger was great. Nice sear on the patty, wonderful meaty taste from the sirloin/brisket mix, perfect melty gooeyness from the American cheese and soft potato bun. Very tasty without losing juiciness; just the right amount of grease. As usual, Fat Guy puts it perfectly. "Totally outstanding for its type" is exactly right.
That type is not Steak 'n Shake, by the way, although there are similarities. The Shake Shack burger is considerably thicker; thick enough that it would make sense to ask for one medium-rare, although with things as disorganized as they were today I wouldn't be confident of recieving it that way. (The idea of a medium-rare burger at Steak 'n Shake is more a matter for abstract philosphy, sort of like contemplating the sound of one hand clapping.) This burger is seared on either side with plenty of meat in between, whereas a Steak 'n Shake burger is essentially all sear. And the edges here are not nearly as irregular.
From what I remember (it's been a while since I was on that coast), the style is much closer to In-N-Out. And I'd be tempted to say the Shake Shack pulls it off better, although I'll have to defer to tasters with more In-N-Out experience than me.
The fries were merely just fine. Very standard crinkle-cut french fries, really nothing special about them. Also nothing wrong: the oil was fresh; they weren't overdone; and they were plentiful and cheap by Shake Shack standards. They make a nice companion to the burger, but wouldn't stand up on their own IMO.
By the time I'd waited for and eaten my burger and fries, the line had about doubled. But I had come there to try a hot fudge-banana concrete, and try it I would. So I get to the window after fifteen minutes or so, and order:
me: "One hot fudge-banana concrete, please."
server: "What?"
me: "A hot fudge and banana concrete?"
server: "Oh! A concrete?"
me: "Yep."
server: "Ok, one Concrete Jungle."
me: "What? Oh. Um, so is a Concrete Jungle, like, supposed to be a concrete with stuff mixed in?" Like there's any other kind.
server: "Uhhuh. Vanilla or chocolate?"
me: "Wha...um..." I realized she meant I could choose to have chocolate frozen custard as the base for the concrete. This was not an auspicious sign. "Uh, vanilla."
server: "One vanilla concrete jungle with hot fudge."
me: ...
server: ...
me: "...uh, and banana."
server: "And hot fudge and banana?"
me: "Hot fudge and banana."
server: "Seven dollars and eleven cents."
First I should emphasize that the problem here wasn't that it was hard to hear, or that I have some sort of speech impediment or something. We were just speaking different languages.
And second, $7.11 (or whatever it was; it was something like that) is a lot of money for ice cream. I know this is New York, but still, we're talking literally almost exactly double the price of a medium two-flavor concrete at Ted Drewes. (This was slightly smaller than a medium, which is a good size.)
I took a nice stroll around the park before I headed over to the pickup window to find a soupy milkshake-consistency contraption being poured into an open cup. That it's sitting there without a lid on it means it's supposed to be a concrete. I realize that after a pretty long while by this point of hanging around the pickup window and also watching people around the Shack, mine is the first concrete I've seen all day. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if I was the first person to order a concrete period.
The person making it clearly knows whatever she came up with isn't right. So does the manager type who comes over to throw it out and make a new one. What she comes up with, though, isn't so much better.
For one thing, the consistency is all wrong. Much much too soupy to deserve anything like the name concrete. If you turned it upside down, it would not even plop; it would pour.
Much of the problem is due to temperature. Ted Drewes gets this way after about ten minutes outside on a hot summer night. The concrete I was served was barely cold; in fact, it was warmer than the bottle of water I'd bought. At Ted Drewes they package every to-go order with dry ice. This is why.
Next, it was very incompletely blended. You could see darker and lighter patches from the start, which is not a good sign. Some bites the chocolate and banana tastes blended together pretty well, but some bites you'd get a clear this-tastes-like-hot-fudge taste, which should never happen, and overall both the fudge and in particular the banana seemed in short supply. I found out why later: probably half of the banana they used was sitting in three huge chunks at the bottom of the cup.
The final problem was the custard itself. For one thing, it's so creamy and smooth that even at a suitable temperature I doubt it could really make for proper concrete consistency. For another, it was the eggy custard that dominated the aftertaste, overpowering the mix-ins that are supposed to blend smoothly and characterize the flavor throughout. Yes, this may have been partially due to half the banana not getting mixed in, but I think the problem is more fundamental than that.
While the blending issue should be simple to fix, the temperature problem might require an infrastrucure upgrade. Or, worse, the custard might be kept at that temperature on purpose for the floats, shakes and cones. I'm sure they make the custard that smooth and eggy because they think it's more ideal for other items. So while I'll try contacting the appropriate people with my concerns, I'm not holding out much hope that my dream of a perfect concrete at every lunch break will come true.
But burgers that good year-round is definitely a reason to celebrate!
(And beer!
#34
Posted 01 July 2004 - 05:14 PM
Then to the waiting for your order area. The glass windows let you see that there are probaably a dozen people in the kitchen/serving area running around like chickens and bumping into each other. Food came out in the sequence it was ordered, though one would think a cup of custard could be prepared more quickly than a complex burger order. They have some funny order system with multiple printout stations. I think they only print so many orders at a time. At least they weren't changing the paper.
So, I get my custard. I didn't think it was so wonderful. It was very smooth, but didn't have a strong vanilla flavor, despite the fact it was already melting around the edges when served. No visible signs of vanilla bean. Sort of like an ultra smooth DQ shake, but one quarter the size for twice the price. I wouldn't want to stand on line a long time to order again. They should consider a separate order window just for custard.
I hope the burgers are better. I'll let you know if I visit again. I would not teach at Washington Irving just for the Shake Shack.
Everybody has Problems, but Chemists have Solutions.
#35
Posted 01 July 2004 - 05:28 PM
These are not your usual Union Square Hospitality Group employees.The staff had trouble even with my order: "single scoop vanilla custard in a cup no toppings." Do you want a cup? Vanilla? Any toppings?
You want to teach them science. Huh.In addition to its culinary mission, the Shake Shack has a social one. It employs 7 students from Washington Irving High School -- one of the roughest schools in one of the roughest public school systems -- and it provides nuts-and-bolts management training for externs from the hotel and culinary schools.
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#36
Posted 01 July 2004 - 05:37 PM
Everybody has Problems, but Chemists have Solutions.
#37
Posted 01 July 2004 - 05:40 PM
The liquidity of your concrete may have been as much due to the heat generated by trying to blend a banana into the concrete. Overblended and poorly blended. Maybe the banana wasn't ripe enough. Maybe the banana was also warm, at room temperature bringing up the temperature of the mix. You'd think hot fudge would do the same. Everything has to be really cold if you're shooting for a finished consistancy of a Concrete.I had come there to try a hot fudge-banana concrete, and try it I would. So I get to the window after fifteen minutes or so, and order:
......
I took a nice stroll around the park before I headed over to the pickup window to find a soupy milkshake-consistency contraption being poured into an open cup. That it's sitting there without a lid on it means it's supposed to be a concrete. I realize that after a pretty long while by this point of hanging around the pickup window and also watching people around the Shack, mine is the first concrete I've seen all day. I wouldn't be terribly surprised if I was the first person to order a concrete period.
The person making it clearly knows whatever she came up with isn't right. So does the manager type who comes over to throw it out and make a new one. What she comes up with, though, isn't so much better.
For one thing, the consistency is all wrong. Much much too soupy to deserve anything like the name concrete. If you turned it upside down, it would not even plop; it would pour.
Much of the problem is due to temperature. Ted Drewes gets this way after about ten minutes outside on a hot summer night. The concrete I was served was barely cold; in fact, it was warmer than the bottle of water I'd bought. At Ted Drewes they package every to-go order with dry ice. This is why.
Next, it was very incompletely blended. You could see darker and lighter patches from the start, which is not a good sign. Some bites the chocolate and banana tastes blended together pretty well, but some bites you'd get a clear this-tastes-like-hot-fudge taste, which should never happen, and overall both the fudge and in particular the banana seemed in short supply. I found out why later: probably half of the banana they used was sitting in three huge chunks at the bottom of the cup.Very very definite no-no.
The final problem was the custard itself. For one thing, it's so creamy and smooth that even at a suitable temperature I doubt it could really make for proper concrete consistency. For another, it was the eggy custard that dominated the aftertaste, overpowering the mix-ins that are supposed to blend smoothly and characterize the flavor throughout. Yes, this may have been partially due to half the banana not getting mixed in, but I think the problem is more fundamental than that.
While the blending issue should be simple to fix, the temperature problem might require an infrastrucure upgrade. Or, worse, the custard might be kept at that temperature on purpose for the floats, shakes and cones. I'm sure they make the custard that smooth and eggy because they think it's more ideal for other items. So while I'll try contacting the appropriate people with my concerns, I'm not holding out much hope that my dream of a perfect concrete at every lunch break will come true.Indeed, the specimen I was served today wasn't even as good as the second-rate Ted Drewes imitators around St. Louis. (Although I have no doubt it will improve.)
I just checked Ted Drewe's menu

and they offer both bananas and hot fudge. I'm guessing Ted Drewe's keep their shake containers iced, semi freeze the milk, and all the ingredients are chilled too
The Shake Shack's going to have to learn the hard way, in full view of crowds of New Yorkers. That's the problem with being a Danny Meyer's operation. No possibility of opening quietly and figuring it out as you go.
#38
Posted 01 July 2004 - 06:07 PM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#39
Posted 03 July 2004 - 03:36 PM
We got back in line to get dessert (again almost no wait), we tried out a single scoop vanilla. Very rich, no melting problems as some had mentioned. I think the whole meal is a very good taste per dollar value. We'll be back.
Jennie
Gastronome in Training
#40
Posted 03 July 2004 - 04:35 PM
#41
Posted 03 July 2004 - 07:57 PM
I'm really not sure there could be any way to improve upon the Shack Burger. Within that genre, I have never had a better burger. I haven't been to every one of the legendary California burger places, but I've been to several. The Shack Burger is I think made to the same standards as the best I've had in California but the beef is of very high quality and the blend of sirloin and brisket is a home run. The buttered potato roll is superb. The garnishes are the highest quality you're going to see at a burger place.
The plain vanilla custard is likewise clearly based on excellent ingredients. There is no identifiable taste of stabilizers or anything like that, yet the texture is luscious and velvety and it just screams with flavor. I don't have the kind of experience with custard that I have with hamburgers, but standing alone the custard seems totally delicious to me.
As for everything else, well, it's going to take awhile to try it all. I've made 5 Shake Shack visits thus far -- almost every day this past week and twice on one day. I haven't had a chance to sample the crinkle-cut fries yet because the two times I wanted to they didn't have any. They certainly appear to be frozen, as they arrive in large brown paper sacks -- but I'll find out for sure. It's possible to make very good fries from frozen, but I hope they eventually graduate to fresh-cut if not twice-fried. The frankfurters are very nice but could be improved upon in a number of ways -- I'll get to that list once I've tasted a few more. And of course the mixed custard items need a lot of work and are in my opinion terribly overpriced.
But it's early still. I'm very optimistic about the Shake Shack. The Union Square Hospitality Group has never disappointed and I bet we will see a sharp curve of improvement through the summer and beyond. And for now, a couple of Shack Burgers with a half-bottle of wine and a vanilla custard eaten in Madison Square Park is one of the most enjoyable eating experiences in New York. Not bad for a place that officially opened two days ago.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#42
Posted 05 July 2004 - 06:39 PM
I liked my 1st Shake Shack experience, growing pains non-withstanding. The custard is velvety in texture, but to me it whispered vanilla rather than screamed with flavor. I'd like to see little flecks of vanilla bean.The plain vanilla custard is likewise clearly based on excellent ingredients. There is no identifiable taste of stabilizers or anything like that, yet the texture is luscious and velvety and it just screams with flavor. I don't have the kind of experience with custard that I have with hamburgers, but standing alone the custard seems totally delicious to me.
Everybody has Problems, but Chemists have Solutions.
#43
Posted 10 July 2004 - 11:31 AM
Right; I ordered hot fudge-banana specifically because that's my classic Ted Drewes order.I just checked Ted Drewe's menu and they offer both bananas and hot fudge.
A good point, which I hadn't considered. The little bits of banana left throughout are always totally thawed, but as you point out that's likely due to the heat produced by vigorous blending. And now that you mention it, I believe that on the few occassions I've recieved a less than completely blended concrete at Ted Drewes the larger banana chunks were still frozen in the center...I'm guessing Ted Drewe's keep their shake containers iced, semi freeze the milk, and all the ingredients are chilled too.
#44
Posted 10 July 2004 - 09:23 PM
The burger was very good. It was well seasoned and had good "beef" flavor.
The crinkle fries was excellent. Very hot, crispy and also seasoned. Finally someone realized unseasoned burgers and fries does not taste good.
I would definitely go back again. The taxi dog looked very interesting. I think I will try that the next time I go.
#45
Posted 11 July 2004 - 06:54 AM
On to the food - both of the burgers we tried were delicious - the Shackburger with lettuce, tomatoes, sauce was yummy, and the plain hamburger which also was quite good and an awesome bargain at $3.25 or so. The fries were simply some of the best I've had in the city - obviously a different style than Balthazaar's or Les Halles or Schiller's, all of which are really thin and wonderful, these crinkle cut beauties came out hot and crispy and fluffy inside and stayed crispy till we scarfed the last one! Diet coke was just like a fountain soda should be - ice cold, fizzy and not overly sweet. Why do most fountain sodas taste like shit? The vanilla frozen custard was just like my wife remembered from St. Louis - but I put the kibosh on her ordering a "concrete" - that'll have to wait till the next visit.
Now for weirdness comes the Chicago hot dog - I don't know about anyone else, but I actually had to ask my wife if the thing (the actual hot dog) was cooked or not. And all that other crap does not belong on a hot dog - sorry. Maybe it's my upbringing, or the fact that I'm a dyed-in-the-wool NYer, but gimme a Nathan's, Katz's, Gray's, Papaya King or even a 2nd Ave. deli kosher style dog with mustard and kraut any day of the week over one of these puppies. But, that's just me after all...
And, for all the food we ate, the bill came to $16.25 - and how great is that!?
So if Danny Meyer isn't one of the best and smartest restaurateurs as well as a marketing genius, please tell me who is.
Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"
Host, eGullet Forums
mweinstein@eGstaff.org
Tasty Travails - My Blog
My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs
Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?
#46
Posted 22 July 2004 - 05:46 AM
Many thanks!
#47
Posted 22 July 2004 - 06:31 AM
#48
Posted 22 July 2004 - 07:38 AM
My big problem with most places that advertise homemade lemonade is that, without fail, the drink is way too cloyingly sweet. I like LEMON in my lemonade, and find the tartness to be part of its thirst-quenching deliciosity.
Shake Shack's lemonade is perfect - tart enough to be a bit puckery, refreshing, cold and flavorful. I'd go out of my way just for the lemonade.
And I'm happy to report that the chocolate custard is smooth, creamy, deliciously chocolatey and rich. it was the perfect lunch.
K
Lobster hamster worchester muenster
Caviar radicchio snow pea scampi
Roquefort meat squirt blue beef red alert
Pork hocs side flank cantaloupe sheep shanks
Provolone flatbread goat's head soup
Gruyere cheese angelhair please
And a vichyssoise and a cabbage and a crawfish claws.
--"Johnny Saucep'n," by Moxy Früvous
#49
Posted 22 July 2004 - 07:53 AM
I like their drink that's half lemonade, half iced tea... it's called the Arnold Palmer I think (definitely named after a golfer).Shake Shack's lemonade is perfect - tart enough to be a bit puckery, refreshing, cold and flavorful. I'd go out of my way just for the lemonade.
#50
Posted 22 July 2004 - 08:07 AM
Interesting...that's an old midwestern drink, first time I've seen it in NY.I like their drink that's half lemonade, half iced tea... it's called the Arnold Palmer I think (definitely named after a golfer).
#51
Posted 30 July 2004 - 12:18 PM
also my dog would love the pooch-ie...ice cream with a dog biscuit but today's sweltering heat would not allow me to make it to my office's freezer....
what do others think? any suggestions for next time???
#52
Posted 30 July 2004 - 02:07 PM
That's an Arnold Palmer you betcha. Arnie said they named the drink after him because he ordered them frequently after a round of golf. He found them especially quenching. 2/3 tea, 1/3 lemonade.I like their drink that's half lemonade, half iced tea... it's called the Arnold Palmer I think (definitely named after a golfer).Shake Shack's lemonade is perfect - tart enough to be a bit puckery, refreshing, cold and flavorful. I'd go out of my way just for the lemonade.
#53
Posted 30 July 2004 - 06:18 PM
blog: The Institute for Impure Science
#54
Posted 30 July 2004 - 08:15 PM
Of course, I may have been spoiled by a recent exposure to Kohr's, down the Jersey shore...
-- Favorite Twilight Zone cookbook
#55
Posted 31 July 2004 - 02:36 AM
#56
Posted 31 July 2004 - 02:47 PM
#57
Posted 01 August 2004 - 02:27 AM
Let me know!
#58
Posted 02 August 2004 - 07:14 AM
this place seems to be the least efficient fast food joint i've ever seen though.. i like the fact that they cook everything to order and i'm willing to wait for the food to be cooked.. what's bothersome is the manner by which they process orders and inform the grill man what he needs to be making.. to my (untrained) eye, it seems that the order is placed at the cash station which then generates a duplicate to the expediter at the pickup window.. she then calls it into the grill man as she lines up trays and bags.. it seems like she's only able to handle about a half dozen orders at any single time though, and, as such, the grill man is rarely working to full capacity while he waits for the expediter to call orders in..
which brings me to my question- why not provide dupes or a screen to each station (grill, dogs, custard, drinks) so they can simply prepare each item as the order comes in?? it's not like the expediter is timing things so that they all come up at the same time and are fresh, i've watched my shake sit there melting for firve minutes while the burger cooks..
#59
Posted 03 August 2004 - 02:55 AM
It seems to be a mayo-based sauce, but I don't know the exact composition. Perhaps the next person to go by The Shack will see what can be learned.Being in Japan limits my chances of having a Shake Shack Burger in person, but after reading the posts I will try to replicate one here. I have all the ingredients down with the exception of their burger sauce. Is it mayo, mayo-based or a style of 1000 Island??
Let me know!
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#60
Posted 05 August 2004 - 07:30 AM
dijon mustard, yellow mustard, mayonaise, tomato puree, onions, pickles, garlic, chipotle..I have all the ingredients down with the exception of their burger sauce. Is it mayo, mayo-based or a style of 1000 Island??
Let me know!
i might have missed something, as she rattled it off pretty quickly, but these were the biggies..







