Cobblers
#31
Posted 28 July 2003 - 07:32 AM
I think the current definition of Clafoutis extends from the baked custardy sort to the ones with a crisper batter, more like a fruit version of toad-in-the-hole, with fruit instead of sausages.
#32
Posted 28 July 2003 - 07:46 AM
Like clafoutis, toad-in-the-hole is made with an eggy batter, essentially the same batter as used for Yorkshire pudding. If you ask on what authority I base this assertion, I'll have to admit I lived in Oxford, England, for a while, am a great lover of English foods, and sometimes cook toad-in-the-hole as comfort food.Eggs are good, and should be used, However
I think the current definition of Clafoutis extends from the baked custardy sort to the ones with a crisper batter, more like a fruit version of toad-in-the-hole, with fruit instead of sausages.
#33
Posted 29 July 2003 - 12:26 AM
Do you have a pancake recipe that doesn't call for eggs?What is your authority for that?Not to worry. It's NOT a clafoutis, which requires egg in the batter.
The original Limousin dish may have been cherries in a flan custard (with or without a pastry base), but modern usage (e.g. Larousse 1984) defines it as "[fruit] arranged in a buttered dish and covered with a fairly thick pancake batter". No mention of eggs, and I submit fairly close toIt's a milky (no egg) batter that is poured into a pyrex dish in which you have melted butter hot (kinda like Yorkshire Pudding). It is topped with peach slices
Larousse goes on to say
" The Academie Francaise, who had defined clafoutis as a "sort of fruit flan" were faced with protests from the inhabitants of Limoges and changed their definition to "cake with black cherries". Never the less there are numerous variations using cherries or other fruits. The word comes from the provincial dialect word clafir (to fill)"
Yorkshire puddings always have egg in the batter - that is what gives the rise. Maybe the pudding described would be even better with an eggy batter...
And anyway, in the clafoutis, the batter is poured over the fruit, in the Central Texas Cobbler, the fruit is placed over the batter. So it's the complete opposite. hehehe
#34
Posted 29 July 2003 - 01:05 AM
But the fruit sinks...Do you have a pancake recipe that doesn't call for eggs?
And anyway, in the clafoutis, the batter is poured over the fruit, in the Central Texas Cobbler, the fruit is placed over the batter. So it's the complete opposite. hehehe
There are many pancake and batter recipes that do not need eggs:
Very low fat pancakes
or indian jalebi (sweet pancake spirals)
or tempura batter (flour + fizzy water)
or yeast-raised pancakes
or chinese pancakes and wrappers
or tortillas...
#35
Posted 29 July 2003 - 06:44 AM
These so-called pancakes without eggs -- now you're really reaching!But the fruit sinks...Do you have a pancake recipe that doesn't call for eggs?
And anyway, in the clafoutis, the batter is poured over the fruit, in the Central Texas Cobbler, the fruit is placed over the batter. So it's the complete opposite. hehehe
There are many pancake and batter recipes that do not need eggs:
Very low fat pancakes
or indian jalebi (sweet pancake spirals)
or tempura batter (flour + fizzy water)
or yeast-raised pancakes
or chinese pancakes and wrappers
or tortillas...
I doubt that the Larousse definition of "clafoutis" that you originally cited uses the term "pancake" in a sense that includes all these eggless batters and wrappers that you now cite.
Why not stop trying so hard to limit the definition of cobbler? Let's not begrudge people of various regions in the U.S. the privilege (perhaps the right?) of calling their concoctions "cobblers." Face it: there ARE regional variations of the American cobbler. Could we, in an expansive spirit, show some tolerance for, even celebrate, our regional differences?
#36
Posted 29 July 2003 - 02:36 PM
Is it proper use of the word "irony" to note that an expanded definition of "pancake" is being used to restrict the definition of "cobbler?"These so-called pancakes without eggs -- now you're really reaching!But the fruit sinks...Do you have a pancake recipe that doesn't call for eggs?
And anyway, in the clafoutis, the batter is poured over the fruit, in the Central Texas Cobbler, the fruit is placed over the batter. So it's the complete opposite. hehehe
There are many pancake and batter recipes that do not need eggs:
Very low fat pancakes
or indian jalebi (sweet pancake spirals)
or tempura batter (flour + fizzy water)
or yeast-raised pancakes
or chinese pancakes and wrappers
or tortillas...![]()
I doubt that the Larousse definition of "clafoutis" that you originally cited uses the term "pancake" in a sense that includes all these eggless batters and wrappers that you now cite.
Why not stop trying so hard to limit the definition of cobbler? Let's not begrudge people of various regions in the U.S. the privilege (perhaps the right?) of calling their concoctions "cobblers." Face it: there ARE regional variations of the American cobbler. Could we, in an expansive spirit, show some tolerance for, even celebrate, our regional differences?
#37
Posted 30 July 2003 - 01:45 PM
Pancake???? Jalebis? Very interesting.indian jalebi (sweet pancake spirals)
#38
Posted 20 August 2003 - 11:12 PM
http://www.bayarea.c...ood/6574823.htm
Posted on Wed, Aug. 20, 2003
Fruit cobblers a cakewalk to prepare
By Kathleen Purvis
KNIGHT RIDDER NEWSPAPERS
Posted on Wed, Aug. 20, 2003
Fruit cobblers a cakewalk to prepare
By Kathleen Purvis
KNIGHT RIDDER NEWSPAPERS
Take fruit, usually peaches, cook it in a syrup, cover it with a top crust and bake it. That's a cobbler.
Or you can take fruit, usually peaches or blackberries, toss it with a little flour, sugar and butter, top it with soft biscuits, and bake it. That's a cobbler, too.
Or you can cover any fruit, from peaches to blackberries to cherries, rhubarb or apples, with a thin batter and bake until the topping is puffy. Yep, that's a cobbler, too.
Sometimes the fruit is put on the batter, which rises to cover it. Sometimes the batter is put on the fruit and flows down to enrobe it. Sometimes there's a bottom crust. Sometimes there's a biscuit dough covering the whole thing.
So just what in the heck is a cobbler?
[material omitted]
And as far as defining a cobbler, what's a food writer to do?
Only this: Admit that a cobbler is whatever you think it is, which is probably whatever your mother or your grandmother told you it was. And when summer fruit is at its height, when every corner of every country highway has a stand filled with peaches and blackberries, a cobbler is a mighty fine thing to consider.
#39
Posted 21 August 2003 - 02:42 AM
#40
Posted 21 August 2003 - 05:08 AM
Could she have gained some information from this thread? She's a smart lady, so she probably did!!!
VarmintBites









