Stove
#1
Posted 16 April 2003 - 01:31 PM
#2
Posted 16 April 2003 - 01:45 PM
#4
Posted 16 April 2003 - 01:53 PM
#5
Posted 16 April 2003 - 02:06 PM
Nick
#6
Posted 11 May 2003 - 06:57 AM
Any guidance and direction would be greatly appreciated.
dave
#7
Posted 11 May 2003 - 09:16 AM
"Having spent most of my life searching for truth in the excitement of science, I am now in search of the perfectly seared foie gras without any sweet glop." Linda LaRose
#8
Posted 11 May 2003 - 09:54 AM
Keba
Oven
#9
Posted 11 May 2003 - 10:20 AM
Between Wolf and DCS the major difference is price -- an equivalent DCS model is a lot cheaper that a Wolf but provides almost all the functionality. A top-of-the-line KitchenAid is not going to be as powerful as either the Wolf or the DCS.is there that much difference between a Wolf or DCS and a top of the line Kitchenaid?
The KitchenAid Architect-series range in say a 30" size will give you two burners at 6,000 BTU/hr (not particularly useful), one at 12,500 (good), and one at 14,000 (better). A DCS in the same size has 5 burners, with the four weakest burners running at 16,000 each and the center burner running at 17,500, which is good enough to do pretty much anything except serious wok cookery (there is no residential range that can really power a wok the way a Chinese-restaurant burner does). A four-burner Wolf (which is now part of Sub Zero on the residential side, I think) also has 16,000 on the burners. These higher numbers aren't just useful when you want to sear a steak; they also make a big difference when you're just boiling a big pot of water.
There are differences in construction as well. The KitchenAid looks and feels like a residential stove, whereas the DCS and Wolf units have more of a commercial feel in terms of sturdiness and controls. They're not real restaurant stoves, but they're decent substitutes.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#10
Posted 11 May 2003 - 10:28 AM
I have also heard Dynasty makes good ranges too.
The GE Monogram Series in stainless is made by DCS, its basically the same exact range.
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#11
Posted 11 May 2003 - 03:59 PM
"Having spent most of my life searching for truth in the excitement of science, I am now in search of the perfectly seared foie gras without any sweet glop." Linda LaRose
#12
Posted 11 May 2003 - 06:08 PM
Does anyone know anything about Imperial? They seem to make both residential and commercial ranges. The range I've been looking at is here but I haven't found anyone who has one or has at least cooked on one.If I had to redo my kitchen again I would get a DCS. The reason being it is the only company left which makes residential stoves that also makes them for commercial.
#13
Posted 11 May 2003 - 07:44 PM
It certainly looks impressive.Does anyone know anything about Imperial? They seem to make both residential and commercial ranges. The range I've been looking at is here but I haven't found anyone who has one or has at least cooked on one.If I had to redo my kitchen again I would get a DCS. The reason being it is the only company left which makes residential stoves that also makes them for commercial.
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#14
Posted 11 May 2003 - 08:31 PM
I don't know anybody with an Imperial range, so that alone would be enough to give me pause. It's a relatively new company, especially on the residential scene, and I don't like being a guinea pig. The reason I got a DCS is that I had seen DCS equipment in a number of restaurants and I knew that chefs I respected had chosen the DCS home models for their homes. Gray Kunz has two of them in his house upstate, for example. Another important issue is service: you want a company that can provide repair service in your area. All these ranges will work well . . . until they break. That's when the brands really start to differentiate themselves.
I've had a DCS range for several years now, and I've had professional chefs in my home really kicking the crap out of it -- using it the way chefs use ranges in restaurants: all burners on full, crashing pots and pans on the burners, slamming the oven door, spilling stuff all over it, etc. It makes me wince to watch my beloved stove get abused that way. But so far I've never had a malfunction. There's one burner that takes a few too many ignition-sparks to light, but I have a feeling that's just because I haven't cleaned it well. All in all, I stand by the product.
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#15
Posted 11 May 2003 - 08:55 PM
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#16
Posted 12 May 2003 - 11:23 AM
Was Thermador included in the obsessive research? What was the verdict?Find out what Fat Guy has. I'm certain he did obsessive research before purchasing, and I'm sure his conclusion was correct.
#17
Posted 12 May 2003 - 11:35 AM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#18
Posted 12 May 2003 - 12:09 PM
Ben
#19
Posted 12 May 2003 - 12:16 PM
http://www.us-applia...m/noname48.html
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#20
Posted 12 May 2003 - 03:07 PM
WorldTable
Recent WorldTable posts include: comments about reporting on Michelin stars in The NY Times, the NJ proposal to ban foie gras, Michael Ruhlman's comments in blogs about the NJ proposal and Bill Buford's New Yorker article on the Food Network.
My mailbox is full. You may contact me via worldtable.com.
#21
Posted 12 May 2003 - 03:47 PM
3 days left and still pretty low. Not many bids. This could turn out to be a good deal.
Sadly, I dont have room for it.
#22
Posted 12 May 2003 - 04:22 PM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#23
Posted 12 May 2003 - 04:26 PM
Beleive it or not Home Depot's Expo stores have good prices, provided you buy a whole bunch of stuff from them if you use them to redo your kitchen. You're gonna need a decent range hood for that puppy too, so you will want to factor that into your costs.I am not really in the market right now, but that 5 burner DCS looks sweet. A brief search on the net only yielded a price of about 3800 bucks. This seems high, is there a better place to look?
Ben
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream
#24
Posted 12 May 2003 - 04:27 PM
#25
Posted 13 May 2003 - 06:06 AM
dave
#26
Posted 13 May 2003 - 08:05 PM
When I was checking out ranges last year (still haven't bought one), Wolf was having problems and had what seemed to be a big recall on them. I can't remember the details but it was enough to make me shy away from them in the future. A significant safety issue as I remember. About the same time Viking was getting in the news for customer unhappiness.
I'm still leaning toward a Peerless which is not known for its great cooking abilities, but which works well with solar electric systems (which I have) and which also works during power outages - including the oven.
I called the factory and talked with an older gentleman (it's an old company) about their ranges. I mentioned the recall Wolf was having and asked him if Peerless had had any recalls. He replied, "We're a small company. We can't afford to have recalls." He was a quiet person with no hype and I said I thought I might get one of his ranges. He said simply and quietly, "I think you'll be happy with it."
#27
Posted 20 May 2003 - 03:52 PM
Edited by davidthomas8779, 20 May 2003 - 03:53 PM.
#28
Posted 20 May 2003 - 04:02 PM
Not too shabby.
Ben
#29
Posted 20 May 2003 - 08:11 PM
dave
#30
Posted 20 May 2003 - 10:10 PM
The real advantage of the middle burner is for boiling water. A large pot of water comes to a boil in a few minutes and it returns to a boil after adding pasta almost instantly.
The burner on high will cause any pot other than a heavy duty one to assume shapes suitable only for frat house kitchens.









