THE BEST: Steak in Manhattan
#121
Posted 16 July 2011 - 07:52 PM
#122
Posted 17 July 2011 - 04:34 PM
- grainfed, dry-aged Midwestern beef
- porterhouse, T-bone, strip steak or sirloin
- older male waiters
- the offer not to look at a menu
- starters of shrimp cocktail and sliced tomato & onion with blue cheese
- sides of hash browns and creamed spinach
- a clubby, masculine ambience
- and probably a location in midtown
If you add other kinds of steak & restaurant into the equation, the possibilities are endless (and less interesting, in my mind).
#123
Posted 25 July 2011 - 03:05 PM
#124
Posted 25 July 2011 - 05:32 PM
#125
Posted 25 July 2011 - 06:13 PM
If you're talking about dry-aged trad cuts, it seems silly to me to eliminate Minetta.
It's not just the cut, it's the menu, the style, and the experience.
#126
Posted 26 July 2011 - 09:04 AM
#127
Posted 26 July 2011 - 01:29 PM
1. The decor is interesting.
2. Service is friendly and attentive; and
3. If your dining companions don't want steak, they have interesting choices and aren't stuck with second-rate salmon.
Makes sense to me.
#128
Posted 28 July 2011 - 05:37 PM
Shrimp cocktail, sliced tomato and onion with blue cheese dressing, steak for 4 medium rare, hash browns and cream spinach. Followed by a chocolate sundae and of course the gold-foil chocolate coins. Wines were a 2007 Groth and a Mondavi Cab. Started with Beefeater martinis.
The steak was very good. The best I've had at Luger? No, but not the worst either. The filets in particular were particularly seared and crunchy, and that's not my favorite part of a porterhouse - but they really stood out this time. The strip was excellent, musty & rich throughout most of the loin on both porterhouses.
Not the out-of-body experience I've had there on occasion, but still joyous & heartwarming. I plan to return again soon.
#129
Posted 29 July 2011 - 01:33 PM
NYC steakhouses fall into two categories: the classics (steaks, along with predictable appetizers and sides) and modern (where the steaks can be great, but the rest of the menu doesn't follow a forumula). He's reviewing the first kind.So, to recap, people interested in eating great dry-aged prime steak should disregard Minetta, even though it has the second- or third-best steak in the City, because:
1. The decor is interesting.
2. Service is friendly and attentive; and
3. If your dining companions don't want steak, they have interesting choices and aren't stuck with second-rate salmon.
Makes sense to me.
Minetta may very well be the best of the second group, and maybe the best overall (if you believe Bruni), but to be fair you would also need to include Strip House, Porter House, Quality Meats, BLT Steak, and BLT Prime among that clan.
Marc Shepherd
http://nyjournal.squarespace.com/
#130
Posted 29 July 2011 - 02:51 PM
(I can't think of a time when the second or third-best steak in New York WASN'T at a steakhouse. This is a significant and interesting new development.)
Edited by Sneakeater, 29 July 2011 - 02:52 PM.
#131
Posted 02 August 2011 - 07:53 AM
#132
Posted 02 August 2011 - 09:57 AM
This is a change.
#133
Posted 02 August 2011 - 07:12 PM
completely agree with sneakeater. while minetta isn't a classic steakhouse, its côte de boeuf is hands down the best steak in the city. we should be comparing cut to cut; not by narrowly defining what a steakhouse is. minetta also serves one of the best burgers in town even though it's not a classic burger joint.
one of the best burgers?









