Chefs 'going commercial'
#31
Posted 19 March 2003 - 06:15 AM
#32
Posted 22 March 2003 - 07:35 PM
Many of the cooking shows on Food TV are quite good and a lot of help to a budding cook. As has been said before, Sara Moulton is a fanstatic chef. Mario, Ming Tsai, are as well. (i'm sure I'm missing some others)
The shows I hate are - all the "unwrapped"/"best of" fake shows, as well as Gale Gand, Ina Garten, and Paula Deen (she scares me)
Emeril Live is an autrocity which I can barely watch, but regardless of his personality, he is quite a good chef and during his other show - "Essence..." is quite informative - I think they medicate him for that one.
Finally, Bobby Flay is decent, and Rachel Ray - although her personality often makes me want to shoot myself - has given me great ideas for things to cook in between my never ending amounts of school work.
So there you have it - for what it's worth,
-Eric
#33
Posted 23 March 2003 - 09:43 AM
He said that supermarkets had "improved tenfold compared with a decade ago. They never had in-house bakeries or sold vine tomatoes. You could never find red mullet or sea bass. People don't want to traipse around markets and buy potatoes with mud on them."
He also commended Jamie Oliver: "Jamie has been clever and I don't believe he has sold out. You only have to look at the bottom line and the amount of money he puts onto it for Sainsbury's compared with the £500,000 a year he gets for doing it. Personally, I don't think he is getting enough."
I cite this not as a criticism of Ramsay or an accusation that he is "selling out" but simply as an example of the enormous temptation that a chef must be faced with to take years of hard-won expertise and reputation and turn it into money -- and the difficulty of doing so simply by running a restaurant.
"La cuisine, c'est quand les choses ont le go�t de ce qu'elles sont."
#34
Posted 24 March 2003 - 10:34 AM
#35
Posted 24 March 2003 - 05:24 PM
iml
ballast/regime
--Chuck Close
#36
Posted 25 March 2003 - 11:32 AM
#37
Posted 25 March 2003 - 11:36 AM
HEY WHAT ABOUT THE FAT LADIES. GOTTA GIVE SOME FAT GIRLS PROPS. THEY RULE...The lack of a real "celebrity" lady chef has mystified me as well. Call me naive, but I thought the concept of "well, some women can cook, but few are chefs" went out the window with Alice Waters, Lidia Bastianich and some others. If that is indeed the case, then the fault must lie with the marketers.I have seen more than a hint of sexism in the vitriol directed at Rachel Ray, Martha Stewart, etc. I wonder how that figures in to the equation?
Think about it for a sec:
Nigella Lawson - has all the right stuff in as far as looks and charisma, but questionable culinary skill.
Gale Gand - is arguably a fair baker, but has a hard time with the camera and is not particularly engaging.
Rachel Ray - is great in the personality department, but has been ascribed an image that annoys many - I like her.
Ina Garten - don't get me started, there are more than a few lady e-gulleteers who I am sure are better cooks than she is and probably could handle a cookbook and tv show more elegantly.
Sara Moulton - who I adore, suffers an image that belies the high professional level of her attainments and relegates her to the aforementioned "housewife" category.
Fenniger and Miliken - I loved those gals, and I think FTV really dropped the ball with their shows. They certainly had a better than fair balance of personality and culinary ability.
Martha Stewart - the only one who is of "real" celebrity is of course self marketed, but I think many men find her aloof perfection off putting. In addition, she's got so many other things going for her besides cooking.
Martha not withstanding (I am a shameless Martha fan), I am reminded of the tune "Ya gotta get a gimmick"; there's no real marketing tool here to propel these ladies to the status of a Mario or a Bobby Flay (emeril status might be unattainable for anyone - regardless of gender).
This is of course not a complete analysis, but a fair cross section of those who might be able to be "molded" into celebrity status. I wonder if that "sexism" of which you speak affects the marketers as well.
Needless to say - none of the "Three Sopranos" efforts has been as successful as the boys either - but I think that's a different issue. I'm sorry if this veres too far off topic.
#38
Posted 25 March 2003 - 01:30 PM
True enough. C/W Spence.HEY WHAT ABOUT THE FAT LADIES. GOTTA GIVE SOME FAT GIRLS PROPS. THEY RULE...
#39
Posted 29 March 2003 - 06:38 PM
you seem to want to intellectualize everything--which is all fine and dandy but I think you're coming from deep left field with that last inquiry. It appears to me that you're trying to delve into a netherworld of thought that doesn't exist.
i'm not sure what this means, so i have nothing specific to say on it.
Broad culinary learning and availability of new and interesting food stuffs and the genesis of the movement to increase awareness can't be directly correlated to a principal "selling out" that's so vague and unmeasureable.
i'm not the one who believes there's a link between chefs who sell out and the increased availability of food knowledge and products; i assumed it was a general assumption others have made throughout the course of this particular topic.
iml
--Chuck Close
#40
Posted 05 April 2003 - 03:09 PM
IMO to the extent that a chef is able to balance commercial success and culinary creativity, power to him/her. I'm sure that it must be very difficult and those that do, do so because for some reason they are able to get and keep outstanding help.
It is certainly much easier than ever to find great quality and variety of food in the U.S. than ever before. I would bet that a lot of that is due to the high profile achieved by the so-called "sellouts" even if their own products have suffered as a result.
"Remember that a very good sardine is always preferable to a not that good lobster."
- Ferran Adria on eGullet 12/16/2004.
Docsconz - Musings on Food and Life
Slow Food Saratoga Region - Co-Founder
Twitter - @docsconz
#41
Posted 13 April 2003 - 06:41 PM
Eric,Many of the cooking shows on Food TV are quite good and a lot of help to a budding cook. As has been said before, Sara Moulton is a fanstatic chef. Mario, Ming Tsai, are as well. (i'm sure I'm missing some others)
Emeril Live is an autrocity which I can barely watch, but regardless of his personality, he is quite a good chef and during his other show - "Essence..." is quite informative - I think they medicate him for that one.
Finally, Bobby Flay is decent, and Rachel Ray - although her personality often makes me want to shoot myself - has given me great ideas for things to cook in between my never ending amounts of school work.
I like what you have to say. Different people/different tastes. Professional chefs/food writers view things differently than those not "in the biz." Some folks like to watch the Food Network to learn, not just to say "Hey I can do that and much better..."
Working in law and familiar with the inside of a courtroom, I laugh out loud sometimes at the plot absurdities on The Practice... but its TV... its ENTERTAINMENT.... ALL of it.... Even the weather channel can't resist, with specials on tornado chasing...
Like it or not, Emeril put the FN on the map, and its because of him that some very fine chefs have gotten widespread play... Eventually overexposure will winnow down the field of commercialism.... Fashion designers used to put their names on everything... I recall seeing a Bill Blass toilet seat cover at Macy's... And look at the Osbournes (actually try avoiding them, its difficult).... I think Ozzy's 15 minutes are up...again...
Gotta give the public some credit for having some savvy... Graham Kerr (a/k/a The Galloping Gourmet) may have cashed in on his foppishness, but no one mistook his culinary genius for Julia Child's...
Let's have some fun...









