Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques & Equipment, 2012


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
917 replies to this topic

#421 Mjx

Mjx
  • host
  • 4,129 posts

Posted 05 May 2012 - 08:48 AM

For whatever it's worth, this illustrates the cut: http://www.fleischth...eineruecken.php
Further image here: http://www.hessen-ne...r-Rippchen.html
Michaela Scioscia, aka "Mjx"
Host, eG Forums
mscioscia@egstaff.org

#422 philie

philie
  • participating member
  • 35 posts

Posted 06 May 2012 - 02:23 AM

thanks to all of you for the information! i will definitely use a lower temperature!
i know that isn't a sous vide needed cut but since we are very limited in terms if cooking material i (its an outdoor location) i thought it would be best just to bring my sous vide device.

@kennteth : its exactly the type of meat pep. showed on wikipedia, but actually there are two types of the frankfurter version, one which has no fat at all and one with a nice marbling which tastes much better in my opinion.

@rotuts: on tuesday is the marked, i will try and am very interested in the answer aswell!

@pep: yes, very very sure its cooked. there also is the regular kotlett which you have to brine yourself but frankfurter rippchen is mostly cooked and not to be mixed with kasseler rippchen ( which is cooked swell i thin )

so thanks to all of you, i will try to reheat it at a lower temperature and experiment with cooking times!

btw. sous vide cash is my favorite iPhone app! unfortunately there is no info about already cooked meat ( which is totally ok since its pretty useless to reheat cooked meat in terms of sous vide qualities )

#423 Neil Smith

Neil Smith
  • participating member
  • 26 posts

Posted 06 May 2012 - 02:25 AM

I tried a (conventionally) slow-cooked meal of pork cheeks in a London pub the other week, and it was great. When I found my local supermarket had them, I though I'd give them a go at home. The conventional pork cheeks were tender, though a little dry. The meat didn't seem to have much collagen in it, so I though I'd be able to get away with a low-ish temperature.

I couldn't find any recipes online, so I had to make something up. I settled on 60⁰C for 36 hours, but scheduling issues meant they had to stay in the cooker for another day, ending up with 60 hours cooking.

I put a bit of sage and ground black pepper on the meat before sealing. After cooking, I dried and shallow-fried the cheeks to brown them. I served them with a sauce made from the pork juices (plentiful), reduced slightly, with some gravy granules and red wine.

They were fantastic. Beautifully tender, but still holding together. I was afraid that the meat would have essentially dissolved given the long cooking times.

I might try them a couple of degrees lower next time as there was a slight stringyness to the meat. You wouldn't call them dry, but they weren't as smooth as some meats I've done.

#424 m61376

m61376
  • participating member
  • 34 posts

Posted 07 May 2012 - 10:24 AM

Silver tip roasts- I know I had posted about a month or so ago inquiring what would be best, so for future reference, since there are several posts on the web inquiring about it but very little advice- vacuum bagged it with a nice spice rub, flattening it to about 2.5". Cooked it at 132.5 for a little over 24 hours. Quick sear and sliced thin like roast beef. It was fabulous- soft, but with a roast beef texture and flavor. Absolutely perfect!

#425 PedroG

PedroG
  • participating member
  • 468 posts

Posted 07 May 2012 - 04:32 PM

Today's rack of lamb 3h/56°C was perfectly pink, fork-tender and succulent as always. And here's the trick how to dispose of the bones avoiding crows and foxes to forage in the garbage bag: vacuum-seal them in the used bag including the paper towels used to dab dry!
Leftover_bones_sealed.jpg

Edited by PedroG, 07 May 2012 - 04:56 PM.

Peter F. Gruber aka Pedro
eG Ethics Signatory

#426 thampik

thampik
  • participating member
  • 148 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 01:07 AM

I am sure I have seen references to a 'mealy' taste mentioned in the context of sous-vide and now I have first hand experience of it.

The (Gressingham) duck breast was vacuum sealed and cooked at 57.2C for two hours followed by rapid chilling. The fat was then rendered and the skin crisped up on a pan at the time of serving. The meat looked perfect in terms of color but there was a distinct (and off-putting) 'mealy' taste.

Is there a way to avoid this - timing, temperature?

Is it specific to duck, or even to this specific type of duck - I have not experienced this with chicken breast certainly.

I was trying to recreate a sublime duck dish that I ate at The Hand and Flowers - from the recipe (http://www.bbc.co.uk...duck_with_87650) it appears that it is cooked as a crown at 62C for 1.5 hrs.

Edited by thampik, 09 May 2012 - 01:08 AM.


#427 EnriqueB

EnriqueB
  • participating member
  • 212 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:17 AM

The (Gressingham) duck breast was vacuum sealed and cooked at 57.2C for two hours followed by rapid chilling. The fat was then rendered and the skin crisped up on a pan at the time of serving. The meat looked perfect in terms of color but there was a distinct (and off-putting) 'mealy' taste.

FWIW, I last cooked Barberie duck breasts at 55ºC for one hour. They were great, though I will likely use a lower temperature next time. Don't know how they are different from Gressingham ducks.

(edited to correct the name of the duck breed)

Edited by EnriqueB, 09 May 2012 - 05:19 AM.


#428 Doodad

Doodad
  • participating member
  • 1,162 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:50 AM

Had great luck for Cinco with pork shoulder cooked at 75 for 17 hours. Delish. Next time I will stop at 12 hours though.

#429 nickrey

nickrey
  • society donor
  • 1,897 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 05:51 AM

Just a note to let you all know that I have been looking at the cooking temperature recommended in Sous Vide Dash and various other sources for chicken breasts, which sits around the 65C mark. Tried this with some chicken breasts recently to see if they were better than the 60C that I normally cook them at. They weren't. The 60C breasts are well-cooked and extremely succulent, just the thing with which you'd convince others to turn to sous vide as a preferred cooking medium. At 65C, they were stringy and disappointing. Be very careful about what temperatures you cook at: even if they come from "reputable" sources, you may be upset with the result.
Nick Reynolds, aka "nickrey"
eG Ethics Signatory
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four.
Unless there are three other people." Orson Welles
My eG Foodblog

#430 KennethT

KennethT
  • participating member
  • 704 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 06:07 AM

I am sure I have seen references to a 'mealy' taste mentioned in the context of sous-vide and now I have first hand experience of it.

The (Gressingham) duck breast was vacuum sealed and cooked at 57.2C for two hours followed by rapid chilling. The fat was then rendered and the skin crisped up on a pan at the time of serving. The meat looked perfect in terms of color but there was a distinct (and off-putting) 'mealy' taste.

Is there a way to avoid this - timing, temperature?

Is it specific to duck, or even to this specific type of duck - I have not experienced this with chicken breast certainly.

I was trying to recreate a sublime duck dish that I ate at The Hand and Flowers - from the recipe (http://www.bbc.co.uk...duck_with_87650) it appears that it is cooked as a crown at 62C for 1.5 hrs.

I usually do magret duck breast (from Moulard ducks) at 131F (55C) until pasteurized and they usually come out very good. I'll bump the temp up to 135F or so if I'm curing/smoking and then slicing and serving cold. Sorry - no experience with Gressingham ducks.

#431 EnriqueB

EnriqueB
  • participating member
  • 212 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 09:33 AM

Just a note to let you all know that I have been looking at the cooking temperature recommended in Sous Vide Dash and various other sources for chicken breasts, which sits around the 65C mark. Tried this with some chicken breasts recently to see if they were better than the 60C that I normally cook them at. They weren't. The 60C breasts are well-cooked and extremely succulent, just the thing with which you'd convince others to turn to sous vide as a preferred cooking medium. At 65C, they were stringy and disappointing. Be very careful about what temperatures you cook at: even if they come from "reputable" sources, you may be upset with the result.

65ºC is too high for breasts, IMO. I started trying at 60ºC when I began "sous-viding", then reduced down little-by-little until 55ºC. Give them a try at 55ºC, they are much much better than 60ºC, you'll be suprised. About one hour for average size chickens, about three hours for pasteurization.

#432 rotuts

rotuts
  • participating member
  • 2,448 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 10:58 AM

Its interesting how tastes differ: I SV beef, pork and duck breasts at 131 until 'tender' including the shoulder. I reheat for 'roasts' and use room temp for sandwiches.

i tried both chicken and turkey breast meat at the Baldwin recommended temp of 140 for 3 hours, and didn't care for it and now do those meats at 145 for 3 hours: for 'roasts' sandwiches and various 'curries': Patak for indian and Thai (maesri and mae ploy)

#433 thampik

thampik
  • participating member
  • 148 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:20 AM

From the responses so far it does not appear as if temperature is the chief suspect.

Has anyone experienced 'mealiness' whilst cooking sous-vide?

#434 rotuts

rotuts
  • participating member
  • 2,448 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:52 AM

Yes. As far as I can tell, 'mealiness' is meat that has sat too long in the SV bath and begun to loose its structure. Ive had this happen with 'chuck' (which are various muscle groups that might be better treated individually) that was kept too long in the bath. Even 131.

i also feel that beef 'on sale' might be overly susceptible to this problem as it has sat for 'some time' to go on sale and the enzymes may have denatured the meat somewhat. This meat is thus not a great candidate for 'long' SV

so I think its a combinations of enzymatic auto digestion that SV might contribute to. Id like to hear more about this but its a 'tough' topic as its so non-specific.

#435 EnriqueB

EnriqueB
  • participating member
  • 212 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:59 AM

I would call 'mealiness' to the texture of a pork shoulder that I cooked at 60ºC for 72 hours. I took one bag out at 48 hours and it was ok, but another at 72 hours was not good. Pork shoulder is also composed of many muscles and some of them may even be considered tender, so this was likely an issue of excessive time.

But 2 hours at 57ºC for duck breast does not look especiallly long....

#436 rotuts

rotuts
  • participating member
  • 2,448 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 12:25 PM

EB: have you tried pork at 131 for as long as it takes to 'get tender' and be 'pasteurized'?

I do this all the time with Loin (not tenderloin) and 'country ribs' which here are loin 'opened up' as far as I can tell

sliced thin, perhaps warm in a sandwich (bocadillo) even charred on the outside first is outstanding

#437 thampik

thampik
  • participating member
  • 148 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 12:47 PM

If it is really about it being too long in the bath - I can't find anything that tells me that 57.2C for two hours is too long.

Plus duck breast is one 'muscle' - right?

Edited by thampik, 09 May 2012 - 12:48 PM.


#438 EnriqueB

EnriqueB
  • participating member
  • 212 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 12:59 PM

EB: have you tried pork at 131 for as long as it takes to 'get tender' and be 'pasteurized'?

I do this all the time with Loin (not tenderloin) and 'country ribs' which here are loin 'opened up' as far as I can tell

sliced thin, perhaps warm in a sandwich (bocadillo) even charred on the outside first is outstanding

Sure, I cook all pork tender cuts (such as loin, tenderloin, ribs or "presa" --see pictures on the Dinner thread) at 55ºC. For me just time for temperature to reach core (i.e. "to get tender"), and for my wife longer pasteurization times as she's pregnant. BTW normal pork is nice, but ibérico pork is just marvellous cooked like this. Both hot and cold in bocadillos!

Tough cuts I have done cheeks (also picture in the Dinner thread) and some part of the shoulder at 60 or 65ºC for 1-3 days. Also excellent (except for the 72 hours shoulder part)

#439 HowardLi

HowardLi
  • participating member
  • 399 posts

Posted 09 May 2012 - 11:14 PM

I'm planning on using a charcoal chimney to emulate a salamander for some burgers coming from an SV bath.

To what degree should I allow the beef to cool before starting to sear? Should I go for uniformity of cooling or do I want just the outside cooled down? Will I get faster browning if I spritz on a glucose solution a la Baldwin? Does it really matter with the heat from the chimney?

#440 philie

philie
  • participating member
  • 35 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:23 AM

hey guys,
just wanted to let you know my first test about the "rippchen" precooked and brined pork.
i just made one piece for 8 hours at 58 celsius and one for just 1 hour.
i have to say that its been hard to tell a major difference, maybe the 8 hour piece was a bit more succulent but both were very nice and tasty. i have to test it with a larger piece, about 5pounds and hope it will work out nicely.
thanks again!

#441 avaserfi

avaserfi
  • host
  • 379 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:54 AM

I'm planning on using a charcoal chimney to emulate a salamander for some burgers coming from an SV bath.

To what degree should I allow the beef to cool before starting to sear? Should I go for uniformity of cooling or do I want just the outside cooled down? Will I get faster browning if I spritz on a glucose solution a la Baldwin? Does it really matter with the heat from the chimney?


Modernist Cuisine suggests submerging the already low temperature cooked burgers in liquid nitrogen then deep frying in very hot oil. The technique freezes the outer layer of the meat, but not the inner. As the burger cooks at a high heat the frozen portion defrosts and browns while the inner portion is insulated from the heat. From all reports, the result is a rare, but extremely crisp burger.

If I were in your situation (assuming you don't have access to liquid nitrogen), I would probably get dry ice, wrap it in cheese cloth and set it on both sides of the burger for 30 seconds to a minute, then grill. This should mimic liquid nitrogen closely. I would also probably skip the glucose. To be honest, I've never found it necessary. I get great maillard reactions without any additional additives, just a smoking hot pan and some high temp oil.
Andrew Vaserfirer aka avaserfi

Host, eG Forums

avaserfirer@egstaff.org



eG Ethics Signatory

#442 HowardLi

HowardLi
  • participating member
  • 399 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 06:41 PM

I wish I could "see" the thermal gradient in the burger throughout the process.

Do you get a better crust on a cast iron skillet or an SS skillet?

Edited by HowardLi, 10 May 2012 - 06:59 PM.


#443 avaserfi

avaserfi
  • host
  • 379 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:50 PM

I tend to prefer cast iron or blue/black steel. Stainless, often sandwiched with aluminum will warp far before it hits the high temperatures that cast iron or blue/black steel can reach.

I also like to fry sous vide cooked meats in very hot oil 400F+. Great, very even results.
Andrew Vaserfirer aka avaserfi

Host, eG Forums

avaserfirer@egstaff.org



eG Ethics Signatory

#444 HowardLi

HowardLi
  • participating member
  • 399 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:56 PM

I tend to prefer cast iron or blue/black steel. Stainless, often sandwiched with aluminum will warp far before it hits the high temperatures that cast iron or blue/black steel can reach.

Makes sense. At those temperatures, though, don't you risk losing the seasoning of the cast iron?

#445 avaserfi

avaserfi
  • host
  • 379 posts

Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:09 PM


I tend to prefer cast iron or blue/black steel. Stainless, often sandwiched with aluminum will warp far before it hits the high temperatures that cast iron or blue/black steel can reach.

Makes sense. At those temperatures, though, don't you risk losing the seasoning of the cast iron?


I was worried the first time I did it, but I've never had a problem. My lodge pan still feels like glass and I've never had an issue with it sticking.
Andrew Vaserfirer aka avaserfi

Host, eG Forums

avaserfirer@egstaff.org



eG Ethics Signatory

#446 Toufas

Toufas
  • participating member
  • 254 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 04:01 AM

Guys is the juan roca book any good?

#447 HowardLi

HowardLi
  • participating member
  • 399 posts

Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:50 PM



I tend to prefer cast iron or blue/black steel. Stainless, often sandwiched with aluminum will warp far before it hits the high temperatures that cast iron or blue/black steel can reach.

Makes sense. At those temperatures, though, don't you risk losing the seasoning of the cast iron?


I was worried the first time I did it, but I've never had a problem. My lodge pan still feels like glass and I've never had an issue with it sticking.

Nice. I picked up some avocado oil today. Will I get a better crust if I press down on the patty?

#448 mgaretz

mgaretz
  • participating member
  • 582 posts

Posted 12 May 2012 - 03:33 AM

A friend of mine who used to own a burger joint always said to never press on the patty. It squeezes all the juices out and you get a very dry burger. Of course he was cooking them conventionally.

#449 rotuts

rotuts
  • participating member
  • 2,448 posts

Posted 13 May 2012 - 03:35 AM

Id like to SV some sausage. Some would be breakfast and some dinner. Chill then freeze for convenience sake.

pasteurize. keep 'juicy' clearly tenderness is not an issue.

145 3 hours? less?

thanks

#450 nickrey

nickrey
  • society donor
  • 1,897 posts

Posted 13 May 2012 - 04:44 AM

Guys is the juan roca book any good?

Expensive book. Try this thread for info.
Nick Reynolds, aka "nickrey"
eG Ethics Signatory
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four.
Unless there are three other people." Orson Welles
My eG Foodblog