Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques & Equipment, 2010
#1021
Posted 21 November 2010 - 06:45 AM
That, gentlemen, is the whirlingest dervish of them all." - The Professionals by Richard Brooks
#1022
Posted 21 November 2010 - 07:35 AM
Food safety is a statistical phenomenon - if food is very contaminated you can get sick even if you follow the guidelines; if it is not contaminated with pathogens then you can get away with a lot. That is, until you find some contamination.We're serving an Atlantic Ocean Trout at the moment and I want to be sure that it is as safe as possible...
Upon arrival the trout is cleaned, then cured with citrus, herbs, salt, sugar, and honey for 3hrs. Next it is portioned and cooked sous-vide in clarified butter @45C for 25min. We use a chamber type professional vacuum pac machine and a Polyscience 7306. Calibration is routinely checked with infrared and digital stick type thermometers. The trout is immediately chilled in an 80% ice bath, then is held on ice for a maximum of 48hrs. Any unsold pcs are discarded. For service, they are re-heated in a 45C bath for 5min and served. The portions are generally 15-20mm thick, around 50g. Guests are advised that the trout is served mi-cuit; not for pregnant ladies or immune compromised individuals.
Cheers.
Personally, I would not recomend the process you are using - I don't use cook-chill sous vide unless you cook to sterization/pasteurization temperatures and times. I would NOT recommend doing cook-chill at 45C. There are many pathogens that can survive that temperature, and then they will continue to slowly grow in the refer for up to 48 hours. This is not a good idea. Yes, you can get away with it if you fish isn't contaminated, but if you encounter some Listeria (or many other pathogens) your approach is not good.
Instead what I would do is just cook the fish at 45C and serve immediately. That is actually much safer than what you are doing. The 45C cooking period will not kill most pathogens, but it will accelerate their growth. Food safety wise you are better off storing the trout raw and cooking it to order than sous vide cooking first and chilling because your first cooking is NOT sufficient to kill many important pathogens.
In my own personal preference I think 45C is fully done fish with respect to texture and taste, not mi-cuit. If I really wanted mi-cuit, that is more like 38C - at that temperature salmon won't change color, and most white fleshed fish won't become opaque. However, the aspect of warning people on the menu is always a good idea.
One odd thing in your description is that you cook the fish for 25 minutes the first time, then reheat for 5 mintues. Are you serving it cold? In general for fish you do not need to cook it by holding it at a temperature - you only cook it long enough reach the desired core temperature. For fish pieces the size you describe 25 minutes should do that. In general for tender food cooked sous vide the reheat time is the same as the cooking time. Obivously that is not true for tough meats cooked for hours or days, but in general reheating takes the same amount of time as the cooking step. The 5 minute reheat won't possibly be enough to reheat the fish all the way through, so my conclusion is that you are serving it cold.
So, my recommendation is to cook to order. You can leave the fish in the bath at 45C during service (for up to 2-3 hours), but then discard what is left afterwards.
As I said in starting this point, it is always statistical so I don't doubt that you have gotten away with the approach you are using now for a while. The trouble is, you don't know that will always be the case, and your current process could make things worse when and if you do have some contamination.
#1023
Posted 21 November 2010 - 08:02 AM
My other question is about serving temperatures. If I am doing a steak at 140 for dinner F a la minute, I remove it from the vacuum bag, pat it dry and sear in a hot pan for the maillard reaction, then plate. However, by the time I put the steak on the plate and walk into the dining room, the first bite does not seem 'hot'. If I were at a steakhouse where they broil under significant temperatures, then the first bite is what we have come to expect for serving temperatures. Logically, I know an item prepared sous vide can never exceed the temperatures we have set. Is it our expectation or memory that when we see a steak that the first bites should be hot?
That, gentlemen, is the whirlingest dervish of them all." - The Professionals by Richard Brooks
#1024
Posted 21 November 2010 - 08:40 AM
Thanks for your advice!
#1025
Posted 21 November 2010 - 09:15 AM
#1026
Posted 21 November 2010 - 09:53 AM
See FOOD SAFETY HAZARDS AND CONTROLS FOR THE HOME FOOD PREPARER page 19-20. If you get your food below 40°F/4.4°C within 14 hours (USDA) you are on the safe side an may keep it refrigerated for 5 days.Since we are discussing food safety, I would like your opinion on the following. My wife is a do ahead fanatic, especially for Thanksgiving. This morning she made a sweet potato streusel mixture and after boiling the potatoes and such, spied my chamber vac machine. She vac'd her mixture and put it in our 36 degree F fridge. I suggested she put it in a ice bath first but I was overruled. Given the fact that the product was boiled, she probably has nothing to fear, but what do u all say?
eG Ethics Signatory
#1027
Posted 21 November 2010 - 10:11 AM
Reheating times depend on thickness, see Douglas Baldwin's tables. If primary heating was just to bring the food (tender meat) to temperature, reheating time is the same, in contrast to the case of primary LTLT cooking to tenderize tough meat. In LTLT cooking cook-chill-store-reheat makes sense. In the case of tender meat, reheating after refrigerating makes sense only for leftovers, not for in-advance-cooking.Nathan, first thank you for all you are doing and for being available for questions and problems. In your last post, you suggest that reheating times should equal original cooking times. So a protein at say 140 F cooked for 90 minutes would then need the same time and temperature in the water bath after removing from the refrigerator?
With very hot and very short searing, we miss the temperature and texture gradient of traditional cooking. I quit searing at 240°C (smoke point of rice bran oil is around 247°C) in favor of 180-200°C (temperature in the skillet measured with an infrared thermometer), resulting in a thicker overdone layer (maybe 3mm instead of 1mm).My other question is about serving temperatures. If I am doing a steak at 140 for dinner F a la minute, I remove it from the vacuum bag, pat it dry and sear in a hot pan for the maillard reaction, then plate. However, by the time I put the steak on the plate and walk into the dining room, the first bite does not seem 'hot'. If I were at a steakhouse where they broil under significant temperatures, then the first bite is what we have come to expect for serving temperatures. Logically, I know an item prepared sous vide can never exceed the temperatures we have set. Is it our expectation or memory that when we see a steak that the first bites should be hot?
eG Ethics Signatory
#1028
Posted 21 November 2010 - 04:17 PM
Cooking to pasteurize or tenderize meat involves bringing it up to a core temperature and then holding it at that temperature for a pre-determined time. That is, minimum time to temperature plus some constant.
For re-heating you only need to have it in the bath for the minimum time to bring it up to temperature (what Nathan referred to as 'time to cook').
eG Ethics Signatory
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four.
Unless there are three other people." Orson Welles
My eG Foodblog
#1029
Posted 21 November 2010 - 09:48 PM
#1030
Posted 22 November 2010 - 12:56 AM
I had thought that by curing the trout first it would significantly improve the safety issue. Quite sobering to read your response on this...
I will definitely take your advice from this point and cook to order. It seems a few more trials are in order; will also try at 38C.
You're also correct re the temperature of the fish but it is served as a cold starter. It was only meant to bring the fish to room temperature.
Thanks again.
#1031
Posted 22 November 2010 - 09:39 AM
This year for Thanksgiving, I was thinking of trying to do a Turkey breast "porchetta style" based on Mario Batali's recipe. I was thinking to stuff the breast with a turkey leg sausage and the appropriate seasonings and then cook it sous vide. Is this possible? If I do this can I still cook it to 140-145 like I would the breast itself or will that not work because of the leg meat? Do I need to to cook the sausage first?
Thanks for your advice!
I was considering doing the exact same thing and came here to ask the same question.
I was going to base mine off this. That has you butterfly the breasts, make a sausage from the leg meat then cook it all. He cooks it at 275 for 3-5 hours until it hits 145.
He says that if you are careful in removing the silverskin and getting just the dark meat from the legs, then you don't have to worry about cooking it to a higher temp, and it will be 'done' at 145 with the rest.
My main concern is if SVing the breasts takes too long. I know some protiens get mushy and unappetizing after too long in the bath. If these take 3-5 hours in a 275 oven I have no idea how long they would take in a 145 water bath. On one hand the water bath is a better way to transfer heat, but it's a much lower temperature. I think if the time scale is similar it would be doable, but if it takes 6-10 hours or something then it might not come out too great.
Edited by Phaz, 22 November 2010 - 09:40 AM.
#1032
Posted 22 November 2010 - 11:18 AM
I am planning on serving shrimp remoulade as a starter for thanksgiving; ideally what I'd like to do is SV poach the shrimp the day before, and just toss the whole bag in the fridge (after ice bath) to serve cold the next day. I was probably going to go for about 50 min at 60C with a little oil and maybe some flavoring.
Any suggestions/thoughts? Do you think the shrimp will hold up well the next day with this treatment? Any other ideas on cooking temp/time (I've never done shrimp SV and never done any seafood in advance)
#1033
Posted 22 November 2010 - 01:48 PM
Dave Scantland
Executive director
dscantland@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics signatory
Eat more chicken skin.
#1034
Posted 22 November 2010 - 02:05 PM
Dave Arnold over at CookingIssues.com likes the ziploks too.
Awesome, can't wait to use that technique. Great timing, I was about to plunk down $200 on a food saver. I might still but I want to spend the money on the SV equipment to experiment first so it doesn't end up in the little-used equipment hall of fame (next to my panini grill and baguette bread pans).
[size="3"]I have simple tastes. I am always satisfied with the best - Oscar Wilde[/size]
The Easy Bohemian
#1035
Posted 22 November 2010 - 02:17 PM
#1036
Posted 22 November 2010 - 03:03 PM
On a side note, surely some manufacturer can step up to the plate and make a $500 vacuum chamber machine? I'll pony up for it.
#1037
Posted 22 November 2010 - 04:00 PM
alanjesq
#1038
Posted 22 November 2010 - 04:36 PM
Douglas Baldwin's book page 210-211 recommends 60°C/for 30-40 minutes (assuming your shrimps are not thicker than 20mm, this is pasteurizing conditions).I think that sounds reasonable; the only issue is that I would prefer to pasteurize them if I can without a significant degradation in quality (I really don't want to poison my breastfeeding wife) - that's really what led me to 60C for 50 mins. I would love to hear if anyone has tried that and not turned their shrimp to mush or overcooked?
eG Ethics Signatory
#1039
Posted 22 November 2010 - 05:07 PM
On a side note, surely some manufacturer can step up to the plate and make a $500 vacuum chamber machine? I'll pony up for it.
There is at least one vacuum chamber sealer close to your price. The Ary VacMaster VP-112.
I have seen the VacMaster VP-112 as low as $670 including shipping (at www.qualitymatters.com). There is a VP-112 demo video on the Kodiak Health site (kodiakhealth.com).
The other source for deals in chamber vacuum sealers is to watch for used units on ebay and craig's list. I purchased a large unit in perfect condition for less than 20% of the new price for an equivilent model from craig's list. (A Bizerba 350)
#1040
Posted 22 November 2010 - 08:16 PM
I think that sounds reasonable; the only issue is that I would prefer to pasteurize them if I can without a significant degradation in quality (I really don't want to poison my breastfeeding wife) - that's really what led me to 60C for 50 mins. I would love to hear if anyone has tried that and not turned their shrimp to mush or overcooked?
I once tried shrimp 60C for ~1 hour (a single layer in the bag) and they were not mushy. I think you should be OK.
#1041
Posted 22 November 2010 - 08:24 PM
I think that sounds reasonable; the only issue is that I would prefer to pasteurize them if I can without a significant degradation in quality (I really don't want to poison my breastfeeding wife) - that's really what led me to 60C for 50 mins. I would love to hear if anyone has tried that and not turned their shrimp to mush or overcooked?
I once tried shrimp 60C for ~1 hour (a single layer in the bag) and they were not mushy. I think you should be OK.
What would be the advantage of cooking shrimp SV? Why not just saute or boil - it just takes seconds?
I'm blogging as the Fabulous Food Fanatic here.
#1042
Posted 22 November 2010 - 10:14 PM
What would be the advantage of cooking shrimp SV? Why not just saute or boil - it just takes seconds?
I enjoy being able to control the doneness level, especially to prevent them getting overdone and rubbery. But I like sauted shrimp too.
#1043
Posted 23 November 2010 - 09:12 AM
Monday we will be posting a recipe for turkey wings to the Modernist Cuisine blog for turkey wings cooked sous vide - you cure them with salt first (as for duck confit) then you cook them 12 hours at 58C/137F for 12 hours.
It's up. Nathan, why 58C for the wings? I'm doing legs and thighs with duck fat SV and keep seeing temps up near 80C. Is the latter more confit and the former less so?
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#1044
Posted 23 November 2010 - 10:04 AM
Do you think there would be an issue with them being bagged vs. in the water? Is that a good or bad thing?
#1045
Posted 23 November 2010 - 10:12 AM
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#1046
Posted 23 November 2010 - 10:23 AM
Has anyone done the retrograde starch mashed potatoes sous vide? I've always just done them with a pot and a thermometer, but it would be simpler to bag a bunch of potato slices and do them in the waterbath (at least the first cook, but probably both).
Do you think there would be an issue with them being bagged vs. in the water? Is that a good or bad thing?
Ok, I admit it, I am the dummy....what are "retrograde starch mashed potatoes?"
I have done potatoes sous vide at 80C for about 2 hours. I used yellow/waxy ones. They are GREAT for later use on the griddle but otherwise, they were too solid to mash or puree.
I'm blogging as the Fabulous Food Fanatic here.
#1047
Posted 23 November 2010 - 10:27 AM
To fix the starch you need to go through a process called "retrograde", wich fixes it in its granules, rather than leaking out. Cook the potato slices at 70C/160F for 30 mins, then cool quickly to room temperature, under a running tap, for example.
You can then cook them normally and beat the sh*t out them without getting glue.
You can also reheat them with a little more hot milk.
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#1048
Posted 23 November 2010 - 10:36 AM
Info here in Jackal10's great post and eGCI course.
To fix the starch you need to go through a process called "retrograde", wich fixes it in its granules, rather than leaking out. Cook the potato slices at 70C/160F for 30 mins, then cool quickly to room temperature, under a running tap, for example.
You can then cook them normally and beat the sh*t out them without getting glue.
You can also reheat them with a little more hot milk.
WOW what a great thing to know! Thank you. Is one kind of potato better to use that another? I often use a mixture of waxy (red or yellow) with your basic Russet to get the consistency I want but I do this mostly to avoid that "glue" effect.
EDIT: Thanks for the link to the potato primer. I will read it all. I never met a potato I didn't like!
Edited by Merridith, 23 November 2010 - 10:38 AM.
I'm blogging as the Fabulous Food Fanatic here.
#1049
Posted 23 November 2010 - 11:09 AM
Info here in Jackal10's great post and eGCI course.To fix the starch you need to go through a process called "retrograde", wich fixes it in its granules, rather than leaking out. Cook the potato slices at 70C/160F for 30 mins, then cool quickly to room temperature, under a running tap, for example.
You can then cook them normally and beat the sh*t out them without getting glue.
You can also reheat them with a little more hot milk.
WOW what a great thing to know! Thank you. Is one kind of potato better to use that another? I often use a mixture of waxy (red or yellow) with your basic Russet to get the consistency I want but I do this mostly to avoid that "glue" effect.
EDIT: Thanks for the link to the potato primer. I will read it all. I never met a potato I didn't like!
That primer may have been the first thing to bring me to eGullet - it's spectacular, and the mashed potatoes work great.
#1050
Posted 24 November 2010 - 06:58 AM
Has anyone done the retrograde starch mashed potatoes sous vide? I've always just done them with a pot and a thermometer, but it would be simpler to bag a bunch of potato slices and do them in the waterbath (at least the first cook, but probably both).
Do you think there would be an issue with them being bagged vs. in the water? Is that a good or bad thing?
I used to do it quite a bit - until I got out of my potato puree phase.... I think I wrote about it about 40 pages ago... haha... I sliced the potatoes about 3/8" thick, bagged, and into the bath - I think I let mine go for about an hour, then cooled. I did the second cook in barely simmering water. The results came out pretty good - but there were always a few granules that never cooked through, so I always had to run the puree through a tamis to get rid of the grittyness. The basic procedure was:
1) retrograde starches/cool
2) simmer until cooked through
3) run through ricer
4) dry potatoes in skillet over low heat
5) add butter
6) run through tamis
7) add starchy potato water to adjust consistency
8) season




This topic is locked



