Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques & Equipment, 2008
#181
Posted 05 February 2008 - 06:34 PM
How many people prefer the idea of cooking at the core/final temp, thus eliminating the risk of overcooking, vs. the higher SV temps, and thus shorter cooking times.
I am a big proponent of the cooking temp=core temp approach, just because of the ideal core temp results. Any input, anyone?
Michael T.
***************************************
My flickr collection
#182
Posted 05 February 2008 - 07:53 PM
#183
Posted 05 February 2008 - 08:00 PM
SV'd some beef chuck eye steaks tonight, browned and cooked with wine, tomato paste and herbs for 7.5 hours @ 131F. Powerful good.
#184
Posted 05 February 2008 - 08:27 PM
Same here. Cooking at target temp also avoids the need to recalibrate if starting temperature is different from that used by Nathan and the possibility of overcooking portions of cuts that are of varying thickness (e.g., chicken breasts).
SV'd some beef chuck eye steaks tonight, browned and cooked with wine, tomato paste and herbs for 7.5 hours @ 131F. Powerful good.
Rob,
did you have wine in your SV bag, or did you use it just during the searing process?
Michael T.
***************************************
My flickr collection
#185
Posted 05 February 2008 - 08:34 PM
Would you consider sharing your smoked bacon stock recipe?
Here's mine that I think works pretty well...
1 lb Applewood smoked Bacon
2 lb chicken wings or backs
3 Liters of water
1 Onion
1 Carrot
3 thyme sprigs
10 black peppercorns
2 cloves
1 clove garlic
1 star anise
1 tsp coriander
½ cinnamon stick
Brown the bacon and then sweat the vegetables and spices in the fat for a bit, then add the chicken and water. I would estimate probably 2 hours of simmering but I'm not 100% sure because I've been using Heston Blumenthal's pressure cooker method for stock lately. If you have a pressure cooker, let it go for 30 minutes, take it off and let it sit until the pressure goes down. After straining and defatting you can either use it or clarify it, depending on what you're using it for.
I add bay leaves and leeks.. But, thats pretty much my recipe.. I also use a 6 pound piece of double smoked bacon and no necks.. I then press the bacon, peel it, and then cover in a dry rub for another dish.. But that stock I then cook down and save..
Edited by Daniel, 05 February 2008 - 08:34 PM.
#186
Posted 05 February 2008 - 08:38 PM
The wine was frozen and placed in the SV bag.Rob, did you have wine in your SV bag, or did you use it just during the searing process?
#187
Posted 05 February 2008 - 08:46 PM
Global question: does wine/alcohol belong in SV bags?
Michael T.
***************************************
My flickr collection
#188
Posted 05 February 2008 - 09:02 PM
#189
Posted 06 February 2008 - 06:50 AM
#190
Posted 06 February 2008 - 10:27 AM
#191
Posted 06 February 2008 - 11:13 AM
#192
Posted 06 February 2008 - 12:37 PM
I have a lot of SV equipment! Many water baths - both immersion circulators and integral baths. I also use Rational combi-ovens to use low temperature steam for SV. I have a couple vacuum packers, but my current favorite is Henkelman (a Dutch company that is not distributed very much in the US).Nathan, I am curious - what kind of equipment do use in your SV set-up?
I recently got one of the Auber Instruments units to test, and it seems very useful for an inexpensive approach to SV.
I also have a couple smokers and a lot of other kitchen equipment.
#193
Posted 06 February 2008 - 01:05 PM
- buy the individually vacuum packed frozen fillets from the local grocery or Costco
- put directly from the freezer into 118deg water for 20min (or longer, I've left it in there for up to 40min with little difference in texture)
- season with salt & pepper, dredge in flour -> egg -> Penko
- pan fry in HOT oil till the Penko "looks right"
serve with whatever works for you.
This really shows off the power of sous-vide for me, we have cooked these at least 5 times and the results are exactly the same each and every time (moist flaky fish, crisp breading). No worries about undercooked thick parts, or overcooked thin parts.
we have a large rice cooker and a PID controller (bought it before Auber released their pre-built unit)
Edited by henri, 06 February 2008 - 01:06 PM.
#194
Posted 06 February 2008 - 02:14 PM
#195
Posted 06 February 2008 - 03:53 PM
#196
Posted 06 February 2008 - 05:46 PM
I have a question for anyone that has experience with both those FoodSavers with the PulseVac option vs. those with the extended seal time option. Costco has one with the PulseVac option for around $100. Tuesday Morning has an older model that has no PulseVac option but has an 'extended sealling time' button.
Any thoughts of the relative merits of these options -- especially vis-a-vis packing food for sous vide?
#197
Posted 06 February 2008 - 05:50 PM
#198
Posted 06 February 2008 - 05:51 PM
#199
Posted 06 February 2008 - 05:55 PM
#200
Posted 06 February 2008 - 06:02 PM
Bud
#201
Posted 06 February 2008 - 06:04 PM
I dont understand the extended seal. My old old foodsaver almost overmelts the bags when sealing, i cut it off before it does...i can't imagine extended seal.
It's helpful when sealing liquids. If you have good control you know when and how much liquid is going to get sucked into the spill trough. If you make a seal and there is liquid in the way the extra sealing time helps to get a good seal.
Also, if you use bags that aren't FS and are heavy duty they can take a little more time.
I sometimes seal commercial packaging like chips and dried fruit packages without using vacuum. If you have folds and multiple layers etc the extra time helps get a seal all the way through.
#202
Posted 06 February 2008 - 06:06 PM
["Few hours" for shellfish is a certain overkill - there is simply not enough connective tissue to justify that kind of cooking time.
When cooking below 130F, you basically need to keep the cooking time as short as is necessary to get the food up to temp. It can be held a little bit longer (as long as you keep it within the safe limits for food in the hot zone) but you don't want long cook times. (All items that cook for a long time are done so at temps that are outside of the danger zone).
A few hours at under 120F is dangerous rather than overkill. At 113F to 130 F (especially under 120F), your bath is an incubator -- the pathogens will multiply much faster at these temps than at room temp.
So, take a look at Nathan M's tables up-thread and base your cooking times on the time to get the food up to temp.
Also, find Nathan's posts where he discusses the safe time that food can be in the 'hot zone'. He lays out valuable little understood information very well. [Maybe a FAQ or thread that contains just that information could be started? Everyone should really have that info on hand.]
Well, my waterbath arrived last week, and I just got a consumer-level vacuum sealer, so I'm finally ready to go.
I'm looking for advice re: prawns and scallops. I've looked upthread, and noted that Nathan cooks prawns to 45C / 113F -- I'm assuming the same would work for scallops? And, how long should they cook for after reaching core temp? I know with temps this low, it shouldn't be more than "a few hours" but that still leaves a lot of lee-way.
Has anyone tried cooking shrimp or scallops at a higher temp for longer?
Thanks! Any input would be valued.
Guys try this:
The first thing I ever SVed was shrimp. The recipe I used was:
Shrimp (Fresh Tiger Shrimp is my next test project)
Ginger
Lemon
Sea Salt
Pepper
25 mins @ 140
Excellent. Best shrimp ever. Incredible texture!
I have not tried the 113 yet but will in the future.
#203
Posted 06 February 2008 - 08:20 PM
#204
Posted 07 February 2008 - 09:40 AM
I actually buy my smoke salt, simply because it's so much cheaper than the amount of work it takes to make it. I get mine at World Spice Merchants here in Seattle. (http://worldspice.co...edseasalt.shtml)
But, I have made liquid smoke, and I imagine that the process would be quite similar. Just put some brine (either salt water or other) in a smoker until it evaporates and you get salt.
#205
Posted 08 February 2008 - 08:22 AM
Organic rare breed etc... flavoursome but potentially tough.
I have in mind to serve it with caper sauce, as the sous vide equivalent of boiled leg of mutton.
What time and temperature to do it justice?
12 hours at 76C? 24 hours at 58C?
Flavourings? (some of garlic, rosemary, bay, pepper)
Advise please...
Edited by jackal10, 08 February 2008 - 08:26 AM.
#206
Posted 08 February 2008 - 08:33 AM
#207
Posted 08 February 2008 - 08:45 AM
The classic thing to do with mutton is to cook it to death - meaning braise for a long period of time to to get very tender, grey meat with a texture similar to other long-braised (osso bucco) or confit cooked meat.
Part of the reason to do this is to tenderize the meat, which can be tough, but part of the reason is that most old-time traditional recipes cooked meat to death.
To get this effect you would cook at roughly 80C (or 76C if you prefer - the exact temperture is not critical but something at above 75C) for 12 hours. If you want confit like texture put some oil in the bag.
If you cook at 55C to 60C, you will get a less-cooked-to-death texture, but you will need to cook much longer to get it tender. 24 hours at least, and it could easily take 36 or even 48 hours. I have cooked some tough beef cuts up to 96 hours. The lower temperture will eventually convert colagen to gelatine and this is an important aspect of tedenization.
However, tenderization is not the only reason to braise meat at high temp - if you do pork shoulder or other fatty cuts one can cook them at 55C, and get them tender, but the fat does not render at that temperature, which can be a bit of a surprise. I don't know to what extent that is a problem with your mutton.
I don't know how tough the mutton is, so it is pretty hard to say what you should do here. One approach is to throw it in for a period, take it out, test it, and if it is not to your liking put it back in for a while. There is no reason you can't rebag and cook sous vide. Obviously this wouldn't work if you are planning it for a dinner party.
Good luck, and by all means post your results so we can all learn from them!
#208
Posted 08 February 2008 - 10:04 AM
Anyone have any suggestions?
#209
Posted 08 February 2008 - 10:15 AM
Try a really big thick steak. Would only take a couple of hours and then you take it out and sear it nicely. Very tender and a really nice effect to see a couple of inches thick steak perfectly evenly cooked all the way through with a nice crispy outside.
#210
Posted 08 February 2008 - 10:16 AM
I picked up a nice leg of MUTTON at the butchers Mutton, not lamb.
Organic rare breed etc... flavoursome but potentially tough.
I have in mind to serve it with caper sauce, as the sous vide equivalent of boiled leg of mutton.
What time and temperature to do it justice?
12 hours at 76C? 24 hours at 58C?
Flavourings? (some of garlic, rosemary, bay, pepper)
Advise please...
As an s-v spectator (for now), may I ask whether it'd be usual to cook this whole (as seems to be implied) or to portion it before 'bagging' -- which I had understood to be the restaurant practice ???




This topic is locked




