Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques & Equipment, 2006-2007


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
724 replies to this topic

#691 e_monster

e_monster
  • participating member
  • 443 posts

Posted 19 December 2007 - 09:41 PM

All this duck talk reminded me that I had a nice plump organic muscovy duck breast in the freezer. I thawed it in the fridge then seasoned with salt and pepper and a little garlic power. I sliced a blood orange from the garden thinly and covered the non-skin side of the breast with the slices and sealed it all up in a bag. I cooked it for just under 2 hours at 128 to 130. I pan seared the skin side and put it under the broiler for a couple of minutes. After removing the breast to a plate, I put the pan (which now had some lovely duck fat) back on a medium flame and added the jus from the bag and reduced.

The skin LOOKED great but was a bit tough. So, I removed it. What I was left with was heavenly. The seasoning and blood oranges had worked better than hoped for. The duck was very tender and infused with a hint of orange which accentuated the flavor rather than over-powered it.

I will have to give some skinless chicken breasts the same treatment.


Pretty clearly I should have removed the skin before cooking and cooked separately as Brian recommended. Other than that, I was thrilled with the result.

I don't know if anyone else is finding this, but I am finding that seasoning with some garlic powder when cooking sous-vide seems to result in better flavors than trying to use fresh garlic.

Has anyone added a little roasted garlic to the bag to infuse with garlic?

#692 slkinsey

slkinsey
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 11,044 posts

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:11 AM

I don't know if anyone else is finding this, but I am finding that seasoning with some garlic powder when cooking sous-vide seems to result in better flavors than trying to use fresh garlic.

I think most SV applications don't attain a high enough temperature to "cook" the garlic in a way that provides the garlic flavor most of us are looking for. In general, meat SV temperatures are not sufficient to cook vegetables. With something highly aromatic like garlic, it's possible that meat SV temperatures might cause unexpected/undesired flavoring results by facilitating certain reactions but not others. In general, I think most people do not like using fresh garlic for SV.

Has anyone added a little roasted garlic to the bag to infuse with garlic?

Yes, but the flavor is quite mild. If you want a more traditional garlic flavor, you might try cooking minced fresh garlic in oil or butter to the appropriate stage, quickly chilling/freezing the oil-and-garlic mixture to stop any further cooking and adding that to your bag.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

#693 Daniel

Daniel
  • legacy participant
  • 4,513 posts

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:09 PM

Uh, I have an embarrassing question, how the hell am I supposed to get the water out of this thing? :biggrin:

ETA: Never mind, I just used a large plastic quart container and then dried it with a few paper towels..

Edited by Daniel, 20 December 2007 - 08:15 PM.


#694 Kerry Beal

Kerry Beal
  • participating member
  • 7,898 posts

Posted 20 December 2007 - 08:13 PM

Uh, I have an embarrassing question, how the hell am I supposed to get the water out of this thing? :biggrin:

View Post

How about the old siphon through a hose into the sink trick?

#695 dougal

dougal
  • participating member
  • 1,279 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 03:55 AM

Uh, I have an embarrassing question, how the hell am I supposed to get the water out of this thing? :biggrin:

View Post


Which raises questions in the mind of this bystander...

... how often *need* the water be changed, not being in contact with the food?
... and would there be any point in dosing the water with a drop of anything to keep it (and any awkward to clean corners - like inside the pump) sanitary?
... what's the laboratory practice here?
"If you wish to make an apple pie from scratch ... you must first invent the universe." - Carl Sagan

#696 Daniel

Daniel
  • legacy participant
  • 4,513 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 06:33 AM

Has anyone tried to make fried chicken using sous vide.. Brine the chicken, sous vide with Buttermilk and spices, then deep fry.. Sounds like it would be pretty damn good to me..

I ask this because one of my favorite Fried Chicken places in Manhattan, Forte Baden Baden, does rotisserie first, then deep fries..

Edited by Daniel, 21 December 2007 - 06:33 AM.


#697 alwang

alwang
  • participating member
  • 246 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 06:36 AM

I change the water whenever it starts looking kind of murky, which is about every other week. It's a bit of a hassle as I have hard water in my area, and so to allow calcium to settle out, I boil a huge stockpot full of water first, and then pour it into my water bath.
---
al wang

#698 Anna N

Anna N
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,515 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 07:16 AM

I always start with fresh, clean water but maybe that's because I have OCD. :biggrin:

Even if the food is not in direct contact with the water your hands/tools are. I don't want to transfer any little bugs to my food by mishandling it after messing in water that I have any doubts about. But that's just me.
Anna Nielsen aka "Anna N"

"It either works fine or not, but what the heck. This is bread, not birth control." Susan of Wild Yeast blog
Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog
My 2004 eG Blog

#699 edsel

edsel
  • participating member
  • 980 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 09:20 AM

Has anyone tried to make fried chicken using sous vide.. Brine the chicken, sous vide with Buttermilk and spices, then deep fry.. Sounds like it would be pretty damn good to me..

I ask this because one of my favorite Fried Chicken places in Manhattan, Forte Baden Baden, does rotisserie first, then deep fries..

View Post


Daniel, I've done fried chicken that way. Cook the chicken on the pink side since it will cook some more when you fry it. You need to drain the juices off of the SV chicken (save 'em for another purpose) and dry it so you can do the dredging / battering. I think it works better if you chill the SV'd chicken before battering. Frying will bring it back to temp, and cook the last bit of pink out (for those who are squeamish about pink chicken).

Crunchy on the outside, moist and steamy on the inside. :smile:

#700 Daniel

Daniel
  • legacy participant
  • 4,513 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 09:31 AM

I am have been serving these fried Sweatbreads at Bite Club and was thinking about doing SV with them first.. Though, I dont want to start experimenting while people are visitng.. I was thinking it would be great for the sweatbreads and then my wandered off to chicken..

Do you but buttermilk in the vacuum pack?

Thanks for sharing that, I will post when I do it..

Edited by Daniel, 21 December 2007 - 09:35 AM.


#701 edsel

edsel
  • participating member
  • 980 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 10:04 AM

I use buttermilk in the marinade, but wipe most of it off before the chicken goes into the SV pouch.

#702 inuyaki

inuyaki
  • participating member
  • 13 posts

Posted 21 December 2007 - 10:06 AM

Has anyone tried to make fried chicken using sous vide.. Brine the chicken, sous vide with Buttermilk and spices, then deep fry.. Sounds like it would be pretty damn good to me..

View Post



Daniel, when I've made it, I've done a simple brine and then sous vide with lemon and herbs. Then I the dredge the chicken in buttermilk and a mixture of flour, garlic powder, onion powder and cayenne. You could probably double dredge this if you want. I haven't tried cooling down the chicken first, but I might soon. I'm making fried chicken for Christmas dinner.

#703 Anna N

Anna N
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,515 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 03:04 AM

So, after running into some difficulties sourcing ingredients (car broke down, snow storm, no duck legs on the store shelves, no short ribs to be found!) I was finally able to return to testing the PID controller and the whole SV cooking thing.

First the duck legs (which Kerry Beal supplied from her freezer!). After an initial 24-hour cure in salt, I packed them in FoodSaver bags with 2 tablespoons each of solid duck fat and into the rice cooker they went for 12 hours at 80C:

Posted Image

I started with water at close to target temperature (78C) and after an initial “wobble” with some overshoot to 81C the PID settled down to 80C after 30 minutes and I placed the packages in the water and left them alone for 12 hours.

Here’s the result:

Posted Image

I made duck rillettes with one leg and the second I intend to freeze unopened for later consumption.

The short ribs proved to be another challenge. Although the package from the store looked “right”, when I opened it the ribs literally fell apart:

Posted Image

Posted Image


I removed the bones, tied up the remaining ribs into what looked about the right thickness. I made a stock from the bones by browning them, deglazing with wine and cooking them low and slow in the oven for a couple of hours. I then defatted and reduced the stock, froze it and added the frozen stock to the package with the ribs.

This time I started with room temperature water in the rice cooker (22C) and again, after an initial overshoot to 56C, it settled after 30 mins to 54C and never waivered for the full 36 hours. I checked twice to ensure that the water level was OK and found that there was negligible evaporation.

Here’s the result:

Posted Image

Posted Image

The colour and the texture are strange to me. Closer to a steak or a roast than to a braise and I am not too fussy about the flavour. Despite cooking off the wine in the deglazing process, it remains a bit too prominent for my liking. However, I am going to slice these ribs up and serve them cold with a horseradish cream on crostini and get an opinion from a variety of people.
Anna Nielsen aka "Anna N"

"It either works fine or not, but what the heck. This is bread, not birth control." Susan of Wild Yeast blog
Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog
My 2004 eG Blog

#704 nathanm

nathanm
  • participating member
  • 821 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 08:15 AM

The colour and the texture are strange to me.  Closer to a steak or a roast than to a braise and I am not too fussy about the flavour.  Despite cooking off the wine in the deglazing process, it remains a bit too prominent for my liking.  However, I am going to slice these ribs up and serve them cold with a horseradish cream on crostini and get an opinion from a variety of people.

View Post


Yes, this is all characteristic of SV.

Low temperture SV, even for 36 hours, is not going to give you a classic braise texture. If you want that, you need to use traditional braising temperatures - 170F/77C to 190F/88C.

Low temperatures - say 130F/54C in tender meat will be medium rare - like a steak or roast. Tender cuts (say a fillet mignon) cooked for a short time (long enough to bring it to temperture) will have at texture exactly like conventional cooking (but with less gray overcooked meat at the edges). A tender cut cooked for a couple hours SV will be more tender than that, but still similar to conventional cooking.

If you cook a tough cut of meat at 130F for long enough - say 36 hours (I have done up to 72 hours on very tough cuts of meat) then you a unique texture - medium rare color and taste, and a tenderized texture that is not the same as a conventional cooking, nor is it like a braise.

Wine or other seasons in the bag can be overpowering - when the meat is in the bag there is no place else for the flavors to go, so they tend to affect the meat more. In conventional cooking the flavors often evaporate into the air (which is why it smells good in the kitchen).
Nathan

#705 Kerry Beal

Kerry Beal
  • participating member
  • 7,898 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 04:31 PM

I did a short rib with bone in for 70º C for 34 hours. I was planning on 24 hours, but I kinda forgot it was cooking.

The colour was just pink, the texture wonderful. Like braised, but a tiny bit more firm.

I browned the rib first, deglazed the pan with some red wine and veal glace viande. Cooked the wine and glace down to a thick syrup. I froze that on a piece of parchment and added it to the bag before sealing.

The PID unit was set at P=15, I=0, D=0 and it held the temperature steadily the entire time.

#706 e_monster

e_monster
  • participating member
  • 443 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 04:38 PM

I was wondering if all the folks with an Auber Instr. (or other) sous-vide set-up could post their basic setup and their thumb's-up thumb's down on the unit.

It seems like everyone is pretty happy so far.

Is there anyone unhappy with their purchase?

Thanks in advance!

#707 Kerry Beal

Kerry Beal
  • participating member
  • 7,898 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 05:34 PM

I'm using a big old crockpot with the sous vide magic PID. It's taken me a little while to figure out the settings, but thanks to the suggestions on this thread and help from manwith8ovens for whom I'm beta testing this unit, I think I have it working quite well.

No thumbs down so far. I'm very happy with what I've accomplished so far.

#708 Anna N

Anna N
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 4,515 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 06:05 PM

The colour and the texture are strange to me.  Closer to a steak or a roast than to a braise and I am not too fussy about the flavour.  Despite cooking off the wine in the deglazing process, it remains a bit too prominent for my liking.  However, I am going to slice these ribs up and serve them cold with a horseradish cream on crostini and get an opinion from a variety of people.

View Post


Yes, this is all characteristic of SV.

. . .

View Post


Nathan - thanks - I totally understand about the different temps to get to braise-like quality but my first concern here is not so much the cooking but the testing - that's what I am doing - as I do more testing I hope to also develop some recipes that suit me. What I am trying to say is that cooking to please my palate is secondary to observing and reporting both objectively and subjectively on the set up that I have and the test requirements that I have been given. Your input is very valuable and I am stashing it away for when the testing is done and the cooking can begin. :biggrin:
Anna Nielsen aka "Anna N"

"It either works fine or not, but what the heck. This is bread, not birth control." Susan of Wild Yeast blog
Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog
My 2004 eG Blog

#709 Quiltguy

Quiltguy
  • participating member
  • 76 posts

Posted 24 December 2007 - 07:56 PM

I was wondering if all the folks with an Auber Instr. (or other) sous-vide set-up could post their basic setup and their thumb's-up thumb's down on the unit.

It seems like everyone is pretty happy so far.

Is there anyone unhappy with their purchase?

Thanks in advance!

View Post

I have the Auber sous vide controller and an 18qt Nesco roaster. Loving it so far, holds steady temp-wise, seems to be well insulated (the nesco, that is). So far I've done short ribs, salmon, a steak (don't remember the cut right now), and last night did the eggs at 150F, they were intriguing...
Guess that makes this a "thumbs up" :biggrin:

#710 e_monster

e_monster
  • participating member
  • 443 posts

Posted 25 December 2007 - 01:56 AM

I did my first experiments with pork tenderloin and was really happy (140F more or less for about 2 hrs) with the results. The meat was very tender and had a great mouthfeel.

One tenderloin was vac'ed with a few tablespoons of a marinade made of roughly equal parts soy sauce, rice vinegar and mirin rice wine and little bit of sugar. The result complimented the sweetness of the pork without overpowering it. The other tenderloin had been rolled in my favorite bbq dry rub and left to sit in the fridge for a few hours before being bagged (with a little bit of cider vinegar added to the bag) and cooked.

I also wanted to add that after a lot of experimentation with chicken breasts (which I prefer done at 140F for enough time to sterilize but not much longer than that since increasing the time doesn't seem to improve the sublime texture) that it is pretty clear that the quality of the chicken makes a much bigger difference in the result than any other form of preparation that I have tried with chicken breasts. So, if anyone is doing chicken breasts with standard grocery store brands, I recommend trying premium chicken from smaller providers. My wife is still raving about the chicken that we had the other night. It came out amazingly well despite the temperature swinging more than usual during cooking (between 138 and 146).

--Emonster

#711 DocDougherty

DocDougherty
  • participating member
  • 101 posts

Posted 25 December 2007 - 12:50 PM

I was wondering if all the folks with an Auber Instr. (or other) sous-vide set-up could post their basic setup and their thumb's-up thumb's down on the unit.

It seems like everyone is pretty happy so far.

Is there anyone unhappy with their purchase?

Thanks in advance!

View Post

I have tested it with a small rice cooker with good results. What I discovered was that if I put the rice cooker into "keep warm" mode, full power is just enough to hold 140°F which gives me an alternate way to more tightly control down around 130°F.

To date, my only concern is with the fragility of the sensor wiring. It does get crimped where it enters the cooker so I need to put some spacers in to keep the lid from resting on the wires.

I am going to use it to control a Hot Tray which has a tendency to overheat. But I am still looking for a good way to thermally couple the sensor to the surface with a low thermal inertia.
Doc

#712 TheSwede

TheSwede
  • participating member
  • 417 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 02:41 AM

I've used my Auber controller with a quite energetic hot plate (2000W/220V) and I initially had problems with overshooting since the reaction time of the plate is long and when it finally gets hot, it gets really hot for quite a long time (high effect and large thermal mass). However, setting P really high (250-300) and D to 60-90 seems to do the trick. Setting I to zero seems to work the best for me.

However I think I'm going to try a new setup with a simple immersion heater (of the USD 10 variety) and a small submersible pump.

#713 zEli173

zEli173
  • participating member
  • 66 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 09:30 AM

Has anyone actually experimented with tender beef cuts such as a strip or rib steak? I've been thinking of trying to do a steak sous-vide. I'm thinking it would be better not to go with a slow cooking approach but rather just an hour to bring the steak to temperature and then a quick aggressive sear in a cast iron skillet to form a crust on one side.

Thoughts?

#714 e_monster

e_monster
  • participating member
  • 443 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 09:43 AM

Has anyone actually experimented with tender beef cuts such as a strip or rib steak?  I've been thinking of trying to do a steak sous-vide.  I'm thinking it would be better not to go with a slow cooking approach but rather just an hour to bring the steak to temperature and then a quick aggressive sear in a cast iron skillet to form a crust on one side.

Thoughts?

View Post


I have cooked many market steaks/rib eyes and even some filets. I cook for about an hour or so at 128 and then toss the steak into a cast-iron skillet that has very hot (on a high gas flame for about 10 minutes prior to putting the steak in). It only takes 30 seconds per side for a very nice crust.


Thickness is important. With steaks 1.5 inches and thicker the result is amazing and much better than simple pan-frying. With steaks 1.25 inches and thinner, the results are less stunning.


With the thick steaks there is a softening of the fat that is otherwise hard to achieve when cooking to rare/medium-rare. I cooked a nice filet at my wife's behest and was amazed that it too improved by being brought to temp sous-vide before crusting.

--E

#715 slkinsey

slkinsey
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 11,044 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 09:47 AM

I have done this with a 6 inch thick porterhouse steak and some other steaks of lesser size. Sous vide it up to temperature, then blast in a hot pan to finish. You can see some pictures of the dinosaur steak here.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

#716 zEli173

zEli173
  • participating member
  • 66 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 10:16 AM

I don't understand why thickness makes such a difference. Is cooking time the issue, because that should be about the same, right? I mean, I guess with more mass the thicker steak might take a little longer to come up to temperature, but can't a thinner steak be left to cook for just as long anyway. Reading through some of the earlier posts, my understanding is that there shouldn't be much difference between cooking a steak for an hour or cooking it for two.

#717 slkinsey

slkinsey
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 11,044 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 10:25 AM

I think the point e-monster was making is that, with <1.5-inch steaks, once you finish browning the steak, the difference is not tremendously different from regular pan cooking. Personally, I'm not sure I agree with that. It depends on how you brown the steak, for one (blowtorch being recomomended if you want good external browning with minimum penetration). I'd also say that 1.5 inches as a reference point is a bit too thick. I've seen a marked difference using this technique for strip steaks as thin as one inch. Below maybe 0.75 inches you're really starting to get so thin that by the time you brown the steak (unless using a blowtorch) you have undone a lot of the careful temperature work you did with the sous vide process.

This is all assuming you would like to brown the exterior of the steak in a hot pan. If you're using a blowtorch or if you do not want to brown the exterior of the steak at all, you could get good results at most any thickness.

Where sous vide is really handy is when you have an extra-thick steak. Then you can get an even medium rare with a nice crust but otherwise very little penetration of "doneness" beyond medium rare that would be extremely-challenging-to-impossible using any other method.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

#718 Daniel

Daniel
  • legacy participant
  • 4,513 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 10:54 AM

I have about 8 lamb hearts.. Anyone have any suggestions on how to cook them?

#719 slkinsey

slkinsey
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 11,044 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 11:40 AM

Suggestions from above:

First question (well..two questions): I'm thinking of cooking ox heart sous vide, since it works so well for tough muscles that are typically braised. What would my cooking time and temperature be for something like this? Also should I pre-slice it into the serving sizes or wait until it's done to cut it up?

Heart muscles is TOUGH because it is constantly in use. I would try 180F/82C for 8 hours. This ought to be enough, but you may need to take it longer. This will create a texture similar to a traditional braise, which is probably what you are familiar with.

I would cut it into serving portion and bag each separately.

You could cook it down to 140F/60C but then it would require days and that may not be what you are looking for.

Some experimentation will be necessary to get the results you want.

Just wanted to report that the ox heart cooked sous vide (per NathanM's 180F/82C for 8 hours suggestion) came out fabulous. The heart was sliced into about 1/2" thick slices. I kept it real simple, just s/p and some frozen cubes of stock. I cooked it the day before, then chilled and reheated just before serving with an orange-cognac gastrique and a mizuna salad with mandarins and crispy pig's ear (see below for more info on that).

Beautiful rose-pink color, fork tender. Although one of my dinner guests who is a big heart lover said it was maybe too tender--that he missed the chewiness. However another guest said you could have served it to anyone without telling them it was heart and they would have had no idea!


Edited by slkinsey, 28 December 2007 - 11:42 AM.

Samuel Lloyd Kinsey

#720 Tri2Cook

Tri2Cook
  • participating member
  • 3,218 posts

Posted 28 December 2007 - 12:44 PM

Hey Kerry, check THIS out. I'm going to have to get around to getting some form of SV equipment. I've looked at the PID/rice cooker stuff and the price is right but I keep telling myself to hold out for the immersion circulator.
It's kinda like wrestling a gorilla... you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is tired.