Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Sous Vide: Recipes, Techniques & Equipment, 2004-2005


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
427 replies to this topic

#31 twodogs

twodogs
  • participating member
  • 217 posts

Posted 19 March 2004 - 01:57 PM

short ribs 12 hours 190 degrees
pork belly same
veal cheeks same
beef cheeks cooked in tallow for 24 hours at 150 degrees in a pot on the stove
meyer lemons 12 hours 190 degrees
spring garlic 5 hours 190 degrees

these are long term cooking methods
if we had an oven which we could get lower in temperature we would and then extend the time
we also use a water bath of wine or other liquid which benefits from slow reduction; similarly this liquid absorbs the flavor of what is being cooked. our water bath is in a hotel pan topped with two layers of plastic wrap and a layer of aluminum foil

turbot stock is made in bell jars cooked for one hour at 150 degrees then cooled and stained

cheers
h. alexander talbot
chef and author
Levittown, PA
ideasinfood

#32 nathanm

nathanm
  • participating member
  • 821 posts

Posted 19 March 2004 - 05:57 PM

Thanks! What is "carmelized yogurt" and how long does that take?
Nathan

#33 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 12 April 2004 - 04:10 PM

Last week we finally managed to catch up with Doug Psaltis, and we spent a few hours going over various sous vide techniques, tips, and tricks. In the end, though, I was of the opinion that we were going to need some more instruction before being able to create a tutorial that would be useful to eGullet.

Thus, we are planning, in June, to do a sous vide menu project: Doug, Nathan, and I are trying to coordinate our schedules such that we can, on some successive dates, do all the processing and cooking for a five-course menu of dishes -- from cold to hot, savory to sweet -- illustrating different sous vide methods.

So, it will be a while, but we hope to have something nice for eGullet in June.
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#34 twodogs

twodogs
  • participating member
  • 217 posts

Posted 13 April 2004 - 06:35 AM

caramelized yoghurt--drain yoghurt and season lightly
when thick place in a bag and seal
cook 170 degrees for 24 hours
yoghurt caramelizes and breaks a little bit
puree in blender with spoonful of uncooked yoghurt

uses: panna cotta, vinaigrette, chaud froid, dressings, marinade, glazes, bisquits basically anything you want

cheers
h. alexander talbot
chef and author
Levittown, PA
ideasinfood

#35 Ruth

Ruth
  • participating member
  • 428 posts

Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:02 AM

One aspect of sous vide cooking we have not discussed is the difficulty of maintaining very low heat on a gas burner for any length of time, especially without a simmer burner. I have recently solved that problem by buying an induction cook top.
Ruth Friedman

#36 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:16 AM

Even then, Ruth, it's very difficult to maintain a precise temperature in the water bath for, say, 36 hours. There are plenty of instances in sous vide cooking where +/- 2 degrees will make a huge difference in the final product. So if your water bath is fluctuating between 139 and 143 degrees, you won't get the desired result in a recipe where the point is to keep the item at 141 degrees the whole time. That's why restaurants that are deep into sous vide cooking tend to use steam ovens, which can maintain temperature within .1 degree indefinitely. Or they use dedicated laboratory-style water baths with special circulating pumps, so that the water temperature gets maintained throughout the bath rather than through bottom-up heating on a stovetop.
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#37 nathanm

nathanm
  • participating member
  • 821 posts

Posted 13 April 2004 - 07:58 AM

Doing sous vide on a stovetop is hard to do well. In the case of something like fish that you typically only cook for 20 - 30 min it can work, but it is crazy to try to use a conventional stove for multi-hour sous vide because the temperature is not accurate and you risk the pot drying out and having a disaster.

Induction helps, but what you really need is something that maintains accurate temperature automatically. There are two main approaches that people do.

Since the food stays in the vacuum bag, what you need is a constant way to apply heat to the bag - the method does not matter that much.

In restaurants, a lot of people use combi-ovens in low temperature steam mode. Ovens like Rational (which I think is the best one) and others can maintain accurate convection steaming at a wide range of temperatures - so you can set it at 141 degrees F, or some such for as long as you like.

Theoretically you could use a dry oven the same way. However, steam mode has much higher heat transfer than dry air, and the combi ovens have much better temperature control.

The other approach is to use a hot water bath. The best piece of equipment to use there is a piece of laboratory equpment called a circulating water bath. These will maintain a water bath at a constant temperature with very high accuracy. They are expensive to buy new, but fortunately, you can get them on Ebay pretty cheaply - like $200 to $300.

I use both water baths, and Rational combi-ovens.

A slow cooker could be a third alternative, but only if you have a separate digital thermometer to check it becaues they typically do not have very accurate dials.

When Steve and I write up the sous vide tutorial I will include more information on where to get the water baths etc.
Nathan

#38 Ruth

Ruth
  • participating member
  • 428 posts

Posted 13 April 2004 - 05:47 PM

I tried a slow cooker but it could not keep the heat low enough. A good induction cook-top will keep the heat constantly low for at least two hours but I agree with you all that specially designed equipment would be required to maintain a constant low temperature over a long period. However, someone cooking at home is far more likely to be using the shorter cooking times and certainly not on a daily basis.
Ruth Friedman

#39 MobyP

MobyP
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,198 posts

Posted 14 April 2004 - 03:57 PM

What benefit is the vacuum?

Could you do this in a sealable sandwich bag? Or you could glue it shut. Do you need the expensive equipment?
"Gimme a pig's foot, and a bottle of beer..." Bessie Smith

Flickr Food

"111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321" Bruce Frigard 'Winesonoma' - RIP

#40 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 14 April 2004 - 08:18 PM

Moby, I'll give the short answer now and then we'll give a long answer when we write this up formally.

If all you're trying to do is essentially poach something but not have it come in direct contact with water, you should be able to wrap it in plastic and throw it in a pot of water in order to achieve that result. If you want to do anything more than that, you'll need some dedicated equipment.

The issue is that there are quite a few applications grouped together under the heading "sous vide." Some of them can be accomplished quite well with plastic wrap and a pot of water on a stove -- no vacuum or special equipment. Others would be riotously impossible. As you move up the ladder of equipment your options increase, as does the ease of achieving a given desired result.

The vacuum has a preservative effect, preventing bacterial growth (essential in long cooking at low temperatures) and oxidation (critical for, among other things, the appearance of food). It also enhances marinating. And there are a number of other ways in which food behaves differently under vacuum conditions, especially when it comes to the interactions between ingredients. One telling demonstration is to put a piece of meat and a small amount of oil into a vacuum pouch. When the air is removed and the pouch is sealed, the small amount of oil instantly and uniformly gets distributed to coat the entire surface of the piece of meat. It's quite fun to witness. Likewise, if you put a very small amount of an herb -- like a tiny piece of thyme -- in a vacuum pouch with a piece of meat and cook it sous vide for many hours, that little piece of thyme will quite intensely flavor the meat.

The list goes on and on. We'll talk about many more applications in June.
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#41 Ruth

Ruth
  • participating member
  • 428 posts

Posted 15 April 2004 - 06:07 AM

Rocco DiSpirito writes in his book "Flavors" that a boneless chicken breast should be wrapped tightly in several layers of plastic wrap and sealed for 10 minutes in a 200° oven before immersing in a 160° degree water bath for about 45 minutes. Although he implies that you can add herbs and vegetables to the package, this method is obviously much less efficient and certainly less convenient than using the vacuum pack. Moreover, vacuum machines are invaluable in a kitchen for so many purposes (I cannot imagine life without my FoodSaver) that even if you buy one with only sous-vide cooking in mind you will find yourself using it every time you want to freeze something or pack any food item in an airtight container.
By the way, FG, Garland now makes an induction cook top with a probe that constantly monitors the temperature in the pan and adjusts energy as appropriate. That is not the model I have but for anyone who wants to spend the $4000 or so required I imagine that it would keep a constant temperature indefinitely.

Edited by Ruth, 15 April 2004 - 07:48 AM.

Ruth Friedman

#42 nathanm

nathanm
  • participating member
  • 821 posts

Posted 15 April 2004 - 08:17 AM

There are many techniques that you can use that are almost sous vide.

As FG says, vacuum is there for several different reasons, and depending on the result and the circumstance you may not need a vacuum.

On the other hand, the home vacuum packing systems (Foodsaver) are not that expensive, and the smaller commercial commercial ones are more money but may not be terrible...

We'll talk about all this in the tutorial...
Nathan

#43 Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 13,468 posts

Posted 10 June 2004 - 08:50 PM

There was a really cool "Vacuum Cooking" episode of Iron Chef on this week which I just watched. The theme ingredient was scallops -- these were the super fresh, in shell (with all the parts) kind caught off the coast of japan. The challenger chef, Senji Osada, is one of the prime practicioners of the method in Japanese cooking.

http://www.ironchef....96/96_e13.shtml

Overall, the panel didn't like most of his dishes. His approach in cooking is not really to season any of the food, so as to allow the concentrating effect of the vacuum bag cooking to showcase the natural flavor of the ingredients -- unfortunately this didn't really seem to work for the scallops.

It would have been nice to see Osada butter poach some scallops and lobster like the way some fancy French restaurants do -- Iron Chef Sakai chose only to do one Sous Vide dish using Foie Gras -- which was an overwhelming success.

Moderator's note: broken link. -- CA
Jason Perlow
Co-Founder, The Society for Culinary Arts & Letters
offthebroiler.com - Food Blog | My Flickr photo stream

#44 tan319

tan319
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 3,073 posts

Posted 03 July 2004 - 09:38 PM

I just got the Ducasse 'Spooncookbook' and of course wound up here as a result of my sous vide researching.
He's doing meat sous vide for between 12 and 24 hours at 143 f I believe.
From the little I've found on the web so far, it seems sanitation and sterilization are paramount concerns, beyond even what one would usually follow in the kitchen
Vacuam cooking has been especially interesting to be in the dessert area, fruit confits especially.
But I'm a bit nervous to go running out to get a black and decker bagger, lets say.
Would Botulism be a concern?
I need to check it out a bit more.

"The other approach is to use a hot water bath. The best piece of equipment to use there is a piece of laboratory equpment called a circulating water bath. These will maintain a water bath at a constant temperature with very high accuracy. They are expensive to buy new, but fortunately, you can get them on Ebay pretty cheaply - like $200 to $300."(nathanM)
This is damned cool!
I think I might have seen this kind of set up in a Food Arts article about a restaurant in DC, chef is French.
It's like a box mounted on a pole that has a fitting that locks on to the pan sides?

Has the tutorial gone online yet?
Dying to find out more about this stuff!
2317/5000

#45 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 03 July 2004 - 10:17 PM

We've had a bit of a setback on the tutorial because Doug Psaltis, our mentor of sous-vide cookery, headed off to the West Coast to work for Thomas Keller at the French Laundry. So now either I need to find a new guru here in New York, or Nathan needs to visit Doug in Yountville and write the tutorial for us, or I need to win the lottery and open a beautiful little restaurant on my vineyard on the North Fork of Long Island where I can hire Doug to be the chef.
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#46 tan319

tan319
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 3,073 posts

Posted 03 July 2004 - 10:36 PM

Not that he isn't busy enough and all, but maybe chefG could help out?
2317/5000

#47 pungstick

pungstick
  • participating member
  • 5 posts

Posted 04 July 2004 - 07:25 PM

It's good to have a combi oven to cook sous vide. We do a lot of 24 hour braises sous vide in combi ovens(biotherm settings for Altoshams). Anything from lamb shoulder to pork belly to oxtail to short ribs. Combi ovens offer very consistent temperatures to cook at for very consistent results. One of my favorites is making carrot puree sous vide. Just some carrots,honey,cardomom,butter,salt and pepper; cook until very tender in the bag(in a pot of water) and puree in a blender with a little cream.

#48 MobyP

MobyP
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 2,198 posts

Posted 06 July 2004 - 01:43 AM

I came across a dish yesterday at the Ebury - slow roast belly of pork - that was actually done by confiting pork belly for a long time, and then finishing it in the oven. Among other things, I was very impressed by how the method hadn't warped the meat, or oxydized it, and the texture was perfectly gentle throughout. The fat was gelatinized.

But it made me think about densities of cooking fats, and I wondered if it had a similar effect to sous vide. T. Keller writes about how the density of buerre monte is greater than blood, and so he often rests pieces of meat in it - where no blood or juices will escape into the buerre - because of that density differential. If you're cooking in duck fat at low temp for a long time, you're providing a barrier against both oxygen and bacteria due again to the density differential. If it also keeps juices inside the meat, isn't this a fair emulation of a vacuum?

Edited by MobyP, 06 July 2004 - 01:58 AM.

"Gimme a pig's foot, and a bottle of beer..." Bessie Smith

Flickr Food

"111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321" Bruce Frigard 'Winesonoma' - RIP

#49 Ruth

Ruth
  • participating member
  • 428 posts

Posted 06 July 2004 - 06:12 AM

Everything you say seems to make a lot of sense, Moby. I like to cook fish, guinea hen breasts etc. both sous vide and in duck fat and have found the resulting texture to be very similar. It would be great to get Harold McGee's take on this subject.
Ruth Friedman

#50 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 06 July 2004 - 06:34 AM

There are several aspects to sous vide cookery. The "barrier" phenomenon is one of them, but only one. To the extent a differential in density will act in furtherance of containment and exclusion, there are similarities to the barrier that a vacuum bag supplies. But that's not always or exclusively what a cook is trying to accomplish with sous vide equipment. In most cases something is placed in the bag -- seasoning, herbs, sauce, etc. -- in addition to the main ingredient. So there is what you want kept out (the "poaching" liquid) and what you want kept in (all those herbs and such). Sous vide cookery allows you to make both choices. In addition, what is kept in behaves differently under vacuum conditions. Absorption is quicker, deeper, and more uniform -- there is essentially a multiplier effect. On top of that, I think it would be hard to maintain sous-vide-caliber temperature accuracy in fat. Most dishes that are done as confit or poached in fat do not require that the temperature be exactly 141 degrees for 20 hours -- they offer a lot more leeway. In short, it's easy to use sous vide techniques to replicate the confit process; it's a lot harder to use a confit-like process to replicate sous vide cookery.
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#51 tan319

tan319
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 3,073 posts

Posted 17 July 2004 - 10:52 PM

I found something on the International Cooking Concepts site about Roner(s).

http://www.cookingconcepts.com/

The Roner is used in sous vide, correct?
I'd love to know more.
Thanks!
2317/5000

#52 jackal10

jackal10
  • participating member
  • 5,036 posts

Posted 18 July 2004 - 01:27 AM

Does anyone know where I can find a Tilia Foodsaver or similar domestic sous-vide machine in the UK? The usual suppliers (Nisbets, Lakeland etc) don't seem to have them, and its rather over the top to get a full commercial machine for occaisional use...

#53 pedro

pedro
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 1,362 posts

Posted 18 July 2004 - 02:54 AM

This thread almost completely escapes from my radar. I'm afraid that the most comprehensive work on sous-vide cooking at the moment is only available in Spanish. It comes from one of the most interesting chefs in the country, Joan Roca from El Celler de Can Roca (two Michelin stars) and his friend, Salvador Brugués, teacher and researcher in cooking.

The book La Cocina al Vacío has been described to me as a handbook of sous-vide cooking. Really, if you download the pdf which appears at the bottom of the page I linked to, you could get a sense of the depth and scope covered.

It has a detailed master recipe (receta madre, literally mother recipe) for every tipe of vacuum cooking: indirect cooking, immediate cooking and double cooking (how to complement vacuum cooking with other traditional cooking techniques).

If someone is interested in a translation of the table of contents, let me know and I'll post it here.

This is a book that I will eventually buy, so more to come. After the summer, I guess.
PedroEspinosa (aka pedro)

#54 ducphat30

ducphat30
  • participating member
  • 251 posts

Posted 19 July 2004 - 11:25 AM

I know that eventually there is going to be a class on sous vide, but I have a couple of questions, maybe the group can help.

Because the food is in a vacuum, does this change the pressure that it is under, there by altering the temperature and time that it takes food to cook? We were doing short ribs, and they were taking only 2 hours to be meltingly tender at 200 degrees F in a sealed container. I thought that it would have taken more time, given the temperature.

I am making the assumption that some sort of pressure was created because of the sealed environment, got that from a Good Eats episode.

Your input would be appreciated, I am looking forward to the tutorial.
Patrick Sheerin

#55 pedro

pedro
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 1,362 posts

Posted 20 July 2004 - 12:17 PM

Here goes the translation of La Cocina al Vacío table of contents:
  • Preface
  • Introduction
    • Low temperature cooking, mastering an ancient technique, by Hervé This
    • Joan, Salvador and El Celler
  • Chapter 1: The Vacuum
    • Definition and applications
    • Preservation, cooking and cuisine
    • How to apply vacuum techniques to food
    • Techniques and materials
      • Containers. Types of containers
      • Gases
      • Packaging tools
      • The process of vacuum packaging
  • Chapter 2: Vacuum and food preservation
    • Introduction: How many days vacuum packaged food last?
    • Altering food factors: Temperature and vacuum preservation
      • Coldness
      • Coldness tools
      • Heat
    • Complementary processes to vacuum
    • The Packaging in Protecting Atmosphere technique
    • Vacuum as a complement of other traditional cooking methods
  • Chapter 3: Vacuum cooking
    • Introduction
    • Advantages
    • Types of vacuum cooking
      • Indirect cooking
      • Immediate cooking
    • Double cooking
      • Complementing vacuum cooking with other cooking techniques
    • Indirect cooking Master Recipe
      • Milk fed shoulder lamb with sheep milk (paletilla de cordero lechal con leche de oveja)
    • Immediate cooking Master Recipe
      • Warm cod with spinaches, Idiazábal cheese, pine nuts and Pedro Ximénez reduction
    • Double cooking Master Recipe
      • Foie gras with honey, citrus and vanilla and saffron infused milk
      • Vacuum cooking and food
      • Chemical alterations
      • Physiological alterations
      • Other alterations
    • Technical fundamentals
      • Zero Oxygen atmosphere
      • Hermetic containers and pressure effect
      • Time/temperature relationship
      • Determining factors of the time/temperature values to apply
      • Cooking temperatures of different ingredients
    • Cooking tools and thermometers
  • Chapter 4: Vacuum cuisine
    • Introduction
    • Working system
      • Stages of the process
    • The step-by-step of vacuum cooking
      • Fish
      • Meat
      • Vegetables
    • Danger analysis plan and critic control points
    • Organizational advantages and complementary applications of vacuum techniques
  • Recipes
    • Fishes
    • Meats
    • Special cooking and vacuum without cooking
    • Desserts
  • Indexes
    • Analitical
    • Tables
    • Graphics
    • Flow diagrams
    • Highlighted charts
  • Basic bibliography
  • Acknowledgements

Looks like a quite comprehensive book, if you ask me.
PedroEspinosa (aka pedro)

#56 edsel

edsel
  • participating member
  • 980 posts

Posted 20 July 2004 - 01:04 PM

Because the food is in a vacuum, does this change the pressure that it is under, there by altering the temperature and time that it takes food to cook?  We were doing short ribs, and they were taking only 2 hours to be meltingly tender at 200 degrees F in a sealed container.  I thought that it would have  taken more time, given the temperature. 

If the food is in a flexible container (e.g. plastic bag) the internal pressure will be the same as the ambient pressure. It would be more accurate to say that the air has been evacuated, rather than the contents being "under vacuum". When you hook the bag up to the vacuum-gadget machine it sucks the air out of the bag. But since the bag itself is flexible the pressure will equalize - you just have an absence of air inside the bag.

If you use a rigid container (like a ball jar), it's possible to maintain a lower pressure inside the container. Not sure what happens when you heat it up though - wouldn't steam expansion just raise the pressure again?

The Food Saver vacuum has an attachment for evacuating ball jars. Put a flat lid on the canning jar, then put the attachment over that and run the vacuum pump. When you achieve the vacuum you just remove the attachment and the lid stays in place (no ring required to hold it down). I'd think that if you heated it up the pressure would increase until the lid came loose.

Time to call in the scientists. :smile:

#57 Fat Guy

Fat Guy
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 29,291 posts

Posted 20 July 2004 - 02:12 PM

Does anyone know where I can find a Tilia Foodsaver or similar domestic sous-vide machine in the UK? The usual suppliers (Nisbets, Lakeland etc) don't seem to have them, and its rather over the top to get a full commercial machine for occaisional use...

I know Amazon.co.uk sells the Russell Hobbs 9926. Is this the level of product you're after?
Steven A. Shaw aka "Fat Guy"
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)

#58 pedro

pedro
  • eGullet Society staff emeritus
  • 1,362 posts

Posted 20 July 2004 - 02:28 PM

If you use a rigid container (like a ball jar), it's possible to maintain a lower pressure inside the container. Not sure what happens when you heat it up though - wouldn't steam expansion just raise the pressure again?

The old Boyle's law still applies here: Pressure x Volume = n x R x Temperature

In a rigid container, the volume is constant. I mean, since it can't contract or expand itself, the volume can't change. Therefore, given that the volume can't change, if you increase the temperature, the pressure will increase proportionally.

As we all remember from high school, Boyle's law is only applicable for gases.
PedroEspinosa (aka pedro)

#59 chefdg

chefdg
  • participating member
  • 371 posts

Posted 21 July 2004 - 07:52 AM

So who's right, fatguy or edsel?
"He could blanch anything in the fryolator and finish it in the microwave or under the salamander. Talented guy."

#60 edsel

edsel
  • participating member
  • 980 posts

Posted 21 July 2004 - 09:15 AM

Chefdg, I wasn't arguing with FG, just quibbling over terminology. :smile:

There's clearly something about the sous vide treatment that differs from other cooking methods. I'm curious as to why the temperature is so hyper-critical (+/- 2 degrees?). Hopefully Nathan and FG will put together the eG tutorial at some point.