Momofuku vs. MC short rib technique
#1
Posted 20 December 2011 - 09:49 AM
#2
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:04 AM
This is what they looked like at 60

and That was a little over for me.
Edited by Twyst, 20 December 2011 - 11:07 AM.
#3
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:21 AM
#4
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:29 AM
Essentially it comes down to personal taste - the higher temperature will give a more traditional braised short rib texture, whereas the lower temperature will give it the kind of texture you would expect from a sous-vide piece of meat, i.e. v tender but you probably won't have so much breakdown of the connective tissue that you will get at 48hrs - which is why he prefers 60C:
http://www.cookingis...-primer-part-i/
Maybe try 58C as a comprimise? :)
#5
Posted 20 December 2011 - 11:44 AM
To those of you leaning to 56 C: Do you still do 48 hours or lengthen the cooking time?
Twyst: I must say those look gorgeous at 60 C! Your 56 C results must have been truly epic.
Edited by Mayur, 20 December 2011 - 11:45 AM.
#6
Posted 20 December 2011 - 12:04 PM
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#7
Posted 20 December 2011 - 12:38 PM
#8
Posted 20 December 2011 - 12:49 PM
#9
Posted 27 December 2012 - 04:52 AM
Dave Arnold has covered this a few times on the cooking issues podcast.
Essentially it comes down to personal taste - the higher temperature will give a more traditional braised short rib texture, whereas the lower temperature will give it the kind of texture you would expect from a sous-vide piece of meat, i.e. v tender but you probably won't have so much breakdown of the connective tissue that you will get at 48hrs - which is why he prefers 60C:
http://www.cookingis...-primer-part-i/
Maybe try 58C as a comprimise? :)
MC has in BOLD that they prefer temperature of short ribs at 140F at 72 hours. In the NEW MC at home for some reason they prefer short ribs at temperatures of 144F and 149F for 72 hours.
Seems most of you prefer lower temps and only 48 hours. Has anyone tried 140F or the higher temps and also at 72 hours instead of the 48 hours? Perhaps the 72 hours will also make a difference?
I'm wondering if the New MC at home is a missprint..
#10
Posted 27 December 2012 - 08:16 AM
I've also had it at restaurants, and it had an almost steak-like quality. It was much firmer, but still tender. All the information I gathered from the restaurant was 72 hour water bath. So, is this the texture you get at 133 F / 56C?
#11
Posted 27 December 2012 - 12:04 PM
#12
Posted 27 December 2012 - 02:12 PM
eG Ethics Signatory
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four.
Unless there are three other people." Orson Welles
My eG Foodblog
#13
Posted 29 January 2013 - 09:08 AM
#15
Posted 29 January 2013 - 09:40 AM
I have prepared the MC short rib (from the plated dish recipes, book 5) which was at 140F for 72 hours with some white beef stock. The result was good, but a little softer than I prefer (being very picky here)- had almost the same texture as traditional braised short ribs.
I recently tried the recommended 133 F / 72 hour combination with the meat only (trimmed off most fat, silver skin, removed bones) - this produced the perfect texture. The result was firmer, almost steak-like, but still very tender. Definitely my go to combination now (below)
Edited by Baselerd, 29 January 2013 - 09:41 AM.











