Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Farewell to Foie Gras


  • Please log in to reply
128 replies to this topic

#121 bigkoiguy

bigkoiguy
  • participating member
  • 34 posts

Posted 24 April 2012 - 05:29 PM

One thing that's being overlooked in the discussion of bans on certain foods -- whether raw milk or foie gras -- is the views of large corporate agriculture. Food production is a slim margin business. Eliminating small farms and producers is key to gaining growth and market share, even if not in the same industry. If you can't eat foie gras, you ARE going to eat something else - maybe a slice of Butterball Turkey instead?

Corporate food producers have to report increased profits to Wall Street every quarter. They realize people can only eat so much. Since the only way to increase profits is to increase consumption, they'd rather have you eating THEIR products instead of foie gras. They've been effectively lobbying legislatures and regulatory agencies for years under many guises in an effort to choke out existing and emerging competitiors. [See Marion's Nestle's book "Food Politics."] Foie gras is a food that has a high profit margin and can keep a small farm alive; this ban will put existing and future small farms out of business permanently - which means fewer players in the overall food marketplace.

As a "wannabe" cheesemaker, I can say that the same is happening with artisan and raw milk cheeses -- the regulations are getting so complex and expensive that only Kraft and Sargento will be able to compete. As an example, look at what happened to Estrella Farm in Washington State (along with many other small cheesemakers that have closed there recently). Corporate agriculture is only too happy for this to occur. They are quite savvy to choke new businesses out before they can gain a foothold -- and regulations are a way to do this.

The more regulations government puts in place restricting food production to all but a few select items, the less likely it is that future competitors will emerge. Our governments are slowly handing our food supply over to corporations. That said, I am not anti-government (in fact, I work for the government) -- but we need smart regulations that favor both large and small producers.

Edited by bigkoiguy, 24 April 2012 - 05:30 PM.


#122 Shalmanese

Shalmanese
  • participating member
  • 3,251 posts

Posted 24 April 2012 - 05:53 PM

Oh please, the consumption of foie gras is such a rounding error that any shift in consumption wouldn't remotely be worth the lobbying effort.
PS: I am a guy.

#123 ScoopKW

ScoopKW
  • participating member
  • 999 posts

Posted 24 April 2012 - 10:47 PM

Oh please, the consumption of foie gras is such a rounding error that any shift in consumption wouldn't remotely be worth the lobbying effort.



I agree that foie isn't exactly a popular item. However, many of these big corporations have the mentality, "It's not enough that I should succeed. Others must fail."

When you get down to it, this is a battle between the artisan salumi makers and Hormel. Between the artisan foie producers and Tyson (chicken livers inna bucket). Between artisan cheese makers and Sargento. They don't WANT an educated market with developed palates.

Knowledge is bad for business. They've got chicken nuggets and hot pockets to sell, after all.
Who cares how time advances? I am drinking ale today. -- Edgar Allan Poe

#124 bigkoiguy

bigkoiguy
  • participating member
  • 34 posts

Posted 25 April 2012 - 04:08 PM

In New York State ALONE, foie gras production is a $17.5 million industry (http://www.shepstone...nomicreport.pdf). I have no doubt that other food producers wouldn't think twice about spending $20-30K to lobby against foie gras so that they can have a piece of that economic pie instead.

#125 Shalmanese

Shalmanese
  • participating member
  • 3,251 posts

Posted 25 April 2012 - 08:45 PM

In New York State ALONE, foie gras production is a $17.5 million industry (http://www.shepstone...nomicreport.pdf). I have no doubt that other food producers wouldn't think twice about spending $20-30K to lobby against foie gras so that they can have a piece of that economic pie instead.


Compared to the 832 BILLION dollar US meat industry, that is indeed, tiny potatoes. To put that in perspective, if the US meat industry were a household earning $50,000 a year, putting Foie Gras out of business would net them an extra dollar.
PS: I am a guy.

#126 DaveJes1979

DaveJes1979
  • participating member
  • 34 posts

Posted 02 May 2012 - 02:44 PM

It looks like online purchases to import foie gras into California is a "gray area" that the law doesn't directly address:

http://foodarts.com/...its-discontents

It is true that back when foie gras was banned in Chicago, there were chefs who still served it because it was "free". That may happen here, too.

#127 ScoopKW

ScoopKW
  • participating member
  • 999 posts

Posted 13 May 2012 - 01:02 AM

The anti-foie people are at it again. This time taking telephoto pictures of California chefs' children and sending the pictures to them. How absolutely creepy.

http://www.huffingto..._n_1509604.html
Who cares how time advances? I am drinking ale today. -- Edgar Allan Poe

#128 janeer

janeer
  • participating member
  • 1,003 posts

Posted 13 May 2012 - 10:50 PM

I think they could get a restraining order for that.

#129 ScoopKW

ScoopKW
  • participating member
  • 999 posts

Posted 30 September 2012 - 01:03 AM

I just wanted to add an update. I work at a high-end restaurant in Las Vegas. Our foie sales have tripled since the California ban. Californians are driving to Las Vegas and plunking down what we're charging just to try the stuff. It's great for our bottom line. But because of the ban, more people are eating foie gras than ever. Prohibition simply doesn't work.

Now we buy our foie from New York, instead of Sonoma. (And I think the Sonoma foie was better, but that's just my opinion.) And we're raking in the cash from Californians who come here to eat the "forbidden fruit" that they think they can't have at home.

Edited by ScoopKW, 30 September 2012 - 01:04 AM.

Who cares how time advances? I am drinking ale today. -- Edgar Allan Poe