Pressure Cookers: 2011 and beyond
#1
Posted 23 January 2011 - 07:41 AM
I've never had one and haven't a clew about what I'd want. What recommendations do people have?
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#2
Posted 23 January 2011 - 07:52 AM
The advice I have is pretty much like advice given on lots of kitchen equipment - it's better to get one larger than you think you'll use, because undoubtedly it will come in handy.
Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"
Host, eGullet Forums
mweinstein@eGstaff.org
Tasty Travails - My Blog
My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs
Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?
#3
Posted 23 January 2011 - 07:57 AM
Can you just grab a used one off eBay, or are you putting your home and body at risk?
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#4
Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:09 AM
That 10 quart one doubles as a canner, I think, which is a great alternate use. I only have a 6 quart, but we're usually only two.
Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"
Host, eGullet Forums
mweinstein@eGstaff.org
Tasty Travails - My Blog
My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs
Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?
#5
Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:23 AM
alanjesq
#6
Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:22 AM
#7
Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:27 AM
Perfect I was just looking at one at Costco's yesterday. I want for Indian dishes like dal, etc. I've been told by a lot of Indians that a pressure is a must have here since we usually don't have 5 servant girls watching the pots. I didn't know you can use it as a canner though... it was cheap at costco. It was either that or one of the new fangled rice cookers from Japan that cost an arm and a leg.
You absolutely can use the Fagor 10-Qt. as a canner...
Fagor'>http://www.amazon.com/Fagor-10-Quart-Pressure-Cooker-Canner/dp/B0000CFH7X']Fagor Duo 10-Quart Pressure Cooker/Canner
Mitch Weinstein aka "weinoo"
Host, eGullet Forums
mweinstein@eGstaff.org
Tasty Travails - My Blog
My eGullet FoodBog - A Tale of Two Boroughs
Was it you baby...or just a Brilliant Disguise?
#8
Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:33 AM
Can't resist. Just how many servant girls do you have?Perfect I was just looking at one at Costco's yesterday. I want for Indian dishes like dal, etc. I've been told by a lot of Indians that a pressure is a must have here since we usually don't have 5 servant girls watching the pots. I didn't know you can use it as a canner though... it was cheap at costco. It was either that or one of the new fangled rice cookers from Japan that cost an arm and a leg.
learn, learn, learn...
Cheers & Chocolates
#9
Posted 23 January 2011 - 09:41 AM
Today I intend to make a beef stew. I HAVE to get over my reluctance to use PCs.
I also have a Fagor 6 qt or perhaps a bit more, Rapida, which was abandoned in the recycle room of the last apartment building I lived in. I was just starting to use it when I stupidly put the lid upside down on a still-hot electric coil and melted the plastic parts. It works but I am not happy using it in that condition. Calls to Fagor in the US have got me nowhere - they will NOT ship to Canada!
Both Kerry and I have been eyeing an electric PC so I'm curious as to why the advice to avoid them. They have really come down in price.
"It either works fine or not, but what the heck. This is bread, not birth control." Susan of Wild Yeast blog
Our 2012 (Kerry Beal and me) Blog
My 2004 eG Blog
#10
Posted 23 January 2011 - 12:09 PM
alanjesq responds: One of the objects of a pressure cooker is speed. The electric units I had (2 in number) took forever to get to cook pressure. Additionally, a common practice of certain pressure cooks is running water over the lid, for rapid cool down. Neither of my electric pressure cookers recommended that practice. I repeat, rapid cool down is a very common practice. Lastly, while the prices have come down, they are still more expensive than non- electric PC's. They do look neat however. I am sure some folks in need of stove burner space would consider them a good deal. I did not.
#11
Posted 23 January 2011 - 06:12 PM
Dan
Edited by DanM, 23 January 2011 - 06:14 PM.
#12
Posted 23 January 2011 - 08:14 PM
http://www.amazon.co...95838786&sr=8-1
My first night made a delicious (and insanely speedy) wild mushroom risotto in it... Am testing it out with a chicken paprikash recipe tomorrow...
Emily
#13
Posted 03 February 2011 - 06:38 AM
One interesting thing I came across was this post at Cooking Issues. They point out that many pressure cookers (they name Iwatani and Fagor) allow steam to vent in order to indicate that you're at proper pressure, but this can have a deleterious effect on the flavour of (in their case) your stock. They strongly recommend the Kuhn Rikon brand, which works differently. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me, even if it's a little more expensive. (Incidentally, Kuhn Rikon is the same brand recommended in Modernist Cuisine.)
So the only question I'm facing now, besides how to explain this purchase to my significant other, is what size do I need? My preferred online retailer carries 5-litre, 7-litre and 12-litre sizes. I'm leaning toward the 7-litre; does that sound right?
#14
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:02 AM
I have a 5-litre (not the KR), and my understanding is that its the bare minimum size you'd want... Remember that you can only fill your pressure cooker about half way full, so 5 litres isn't its actual cooking capacity. Especially if you are looking to do make larger quantitites of stock, I'd definitely go with the 7 litre...
Emily
#15
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:03 AM
I wouldn't muck about with the old balancing weight "jiggler" type...just seems to negate all the good things about pressure cooking, for no advantage.
#16
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:59 AM
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#17
Posted 03 February 2011 - 08:09 AM
Yeah, that looks like the same model.
#18
Posted 03 February 2011 - 09:28 AM
eG Foodblog: Cooking with Panda
#19
Posted 03 February 2011 - 11:31 AM
The other advantage of Kuhn Rikon is no messing with weights and very quiet and even if it over preasures no mess just a hiss as excess preasure is released.
#20
Posted 03 February 2011 - 11:38 AM
How big is the one you have?ANother vote here for Kuhn Rikon they don't vent like other preasure cookers so keep all the flavours inside wish I'd bought a larger one to make more stock.
#21
Posted 03 February 2011 - 11:52 AM
Manager, eG Forums.
camirault@eGstaff.org
eG Ethics Signatory
I took my potatoes down to be mashed
Then I made it over to that million dollar bash
#22
Posted 03 February 2011 - 01:30 PM
MelissaH
Oswego, NY
Chemist, writer, hired gun
Say this five times fast: "A big blue bucket of blue blueberries."
foodblog1 | kitchen reno | foodblog2
#23
Posted 03 February 2011 - 05:10 PM
ANother vote here for Kuhn Rikon they don't vent like other preasure cookers so keep all the flavours inside...
Can someone explain this? It can't be true, right? Any extra heat that is inputed into the pressure cooker after it's reached the max pressure is going to make steam, which must be vented to prevent overpressure, right?
Does anyone use the low-pressure setting on the dual-pressure models? What for?
#24
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:04 PM
I have the Fagor Rapida. An induction cooktop plus a pressure cooker is a killer combination for the hurried cook--the cooktop brings it up to pressure incredibly fast, then the pressure cooker does its work. Then run it under cold water to quick-release the pressure, and you're done. As noted above, you definitely want to be able to quick-release. I can count on one hand the number of times I've let the pressure come down naturally.
#25
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:12 PM
Also for steamed or even blanched vegetables, especially if you have a steamer insert. It's so fast that vegetables stay colorful and flavorful. You can poach fruit on low-pressure too, though that's something I haven't tried.
#26
Posted 03 February 2011 - 07:45 PM
#27
Posted 04 February 2011 - 06:54 AM
Having never owned one, I can't answer this definitively, but the way I read the link I posted above, it sounds like most models of pressure cooker vent when they reach the desired pressure. The Kuhn Rikon, by contrast, simply indicates that it's reached the desired pressure, and you prevent it from going over by moderating the heat. Obviously, if you let the pressure get out of hand, it will eventually vent for safety reasons. At least, that's how I understand it.
ANother vote here for Kuhn Rikon they don't vent like other preasure cookers so keep all the flavours inside...
Can someone explain this? It can't be true, right? Any extra heat that is inputed into the pressure cooker after it's reached the max pressure is going to make steam, which must be vented to prevent overpressure, right?
Edit: As far as the volume of stock goes, I wonder if the smaller size can be offset by the fact that it takes less time to cook this way. So you may not make as much, but you can make it more often. Heck, it sounds like I could make three batches of pressure-cooked stock back-to-back in the time it would take me to make one batch of stock at atmospheric pressure.
Edited by mkayahara, 04 February 2011 - 07:03 AM.
#28
Posted 04 February 2011 - 07:50 AM
On the Kuon Rucor.. or on any of the pressure cookers!! How do you know the vent is not clogged by liquids perking through ?
Curious.
This has me interested in one!! I do a fair amount of canning and make all my own stocks usually.. What is a good universal size?
Paul
Edited by Paul Bacino, 04 February 2011 - 07:50 AM.
#29
Posted 04 February 2011 - 08:06 AM
#30
Posted 04 February 2011 - 08:24 AM
I have once or twice allowed the valve to get clogged by cooking several things in succession without cleaning the valve area thoroughly enough. When that happened, the cooker simply failed to come up to pressure...in other words, the error was on the side of safety rather than risk.







