Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Ruined my Beef Wellington


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 nextguy

nextguy
  • participating member
  • 78 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 11:02 AM

Hi all,

I made a Beef Wellington yesterday using a recipe I've used before. I seared a beef tenderloin very quickly in grapeseed oil and then let it rest for 30 minutes. I then cooked it sous vide at 128 degrees for 2 hours with some salt, pepper, rosemary, and garlic. I removed the meat from the water bath and let it sit for just a few minutes while I rolled out the puff pastry. I then wrapped the fillet in Serano ham, spread some mushroom duxelle on the puff pastry, placed the meat on top of it, and then rolled the puff pastry up with a few slits on top to let out steam. I brushed the pastry with egg wash and then cooked it on a baking sheet for around 15 minutes at 425 until the dough was golden brown. I must have done something wrong because the fillet bled out like crazy. There must have been at least 3 or four tablespoons or juice that WASN'T absorbed by the pastry dough underneath the beef. Lifting it out of the pan obviously was a challenge and it wasn't very pretty.

As I said, I've made this exact recipe before and didn't have this issue. Should I have baked the Wellington at a lower temperature? The meat was already cooked so the baking was only to brown the dough.

TIA!

Edited by nextguy, 18 January 2010 - 11:08 AM.


#2 nextguy

nextguy
  • participating member
  • 78 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 11:05 AM

It still tasted great by the way... except for the soggy dough underneath.

#3 Prawncrackers

Prawncrackers
  • participating member
  • 1,110 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 01:57 PM

Seems to me that if you did everything exactly the same then it must be your piece of meat. Maybe try a more aged fillet next time.

#4 DTBarton

DTBarton
  • participating member
  • 960 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 02:44 PM

I agree that the cut of meat must have been the difference. I had another question.

I make beef Wellington from time to time and have had good luck with it. Is the effort to do the sous vide step really worth it? I just sear the meat, let it cool, then spread on some pate and wrap it up and bake it.

#5 nextguy

nextguy
  • participating member
  • 78 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:16 PM

I agree that the cut of meat must have been the difference. I had another question.

I make beef Wellington from time to time and have had good luck with it. Is the effort to do the sous vide step really worth it? I just sear the meat, let it cool, then spread on some pate and wrap it up and bake it.


Before I answer that you should know that I am a huge fan of SVing food and would SV toast if it worked :raz:

I think it makes sense in this application though since it ensures perfectly even cooking without the risk of burning the pastry. Since the meat went into the dough already cooked, I never had to worry about the state of the meat or pull out a thermometer.

So does meat of lesser quality or aging retain its juice less?

#6 IndyRob

IndyRob
  • participating member
  • 797 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 05:41 PM

I am a huge fan of SVing food and would SV toast if it worked :raz:


Dang, now I have a new challenge. :biggrin:

I don't have an answer, but in the interest of accuracy, I note that you switched between talking about searing a "tenderloin", and wrapping a "fillet" in short order. I assume there was a slicing step in there somewhere? My internal eyebrow raises around the phrase "sitting for just a few minutes." With a traditionally roasted piece of meat, I'd put my thumb squarely on that. With SV, it might still be an issue.

#7 David A. Goldfarb

David A. Goldfarb
  • participating member
  • 1,301 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 06:44 PM

So does meat of lesser quality or aging retain its juice less?


It's not a matter of longer aged beef retaining the juice, so much as more of the juice being water in meat that hasn't been aged as long. If you're buying a whole fillet in cryovac, you can drain it for about three days in the fridge on paper towels on a platter, covered loosely in plastic, changing the paper towels each day, and it will be substantially improved. The meat will be denser, more flavorful, and will brown better.

#8 Nayan Gowda

Nayan Gowda
  • participating member
  • 185 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 08:04 PM

An old cheffy trick is to lay the beef on a crepe when enclosing it in the pastry. This absorbs the moisture.
Itinerant winemaker

Follow me on Twitter

#9 jk1002

jk1002
  • participating member
  • 203 posts

Posted 18 January 2010 - 08:11 PM

>>With a traditionally roasted piece of meat, I'd put my thumb squarely on that. With SV, it might still be an issue. <<

I believe that with SV that is still an issue, I did pork tenderloin a few times and the first time I skipped resting and it lost a lot of juice (not that it mattered, it was still ultra juicy). Note that I did not pan sear but shuffled it under a broiler for a minute or two to crisp up a pecan maple syrup mustard topping.

JK

#10 KarenDW

KarenDW
  • participating member
  • 617 posts

Posted 19 January 2010 - 12:21 AM

So does meat of lesser quality or aging retain its juice less?


It's not a matter of longer aged beef retaining the juice, so much as more of the juice being water in meat that hasn't been aged as long. If you're buying a whole fillet in cryovac, you can drain it for about three days in the fridge on paper towels on a platter, covered loosely in plastic, changing the paper towels each day, and it will be substantially improved. The meat will be denser, more flavorful, and will brown better.

Or, on a rack over a sheet pan. No paper towels needed :)
Karen Dar Woon