Pressure Cookers: brands, sizes, features
#1
Posted 03 November 2002 - 06:31 PM
My mother used one. It was aluminum. It had a little thing on top that looked like the round piece from a tinker toy. It rattled and bubbled and whistled and spun around merrily. I was frightened to death of the thing. To me, it was like a boiler in one of those scary movies.... "Stand back Boys, she's gonna blow!!"
Do you have a pressure cooker?
What kind is it?
What do you use it for?
Any particular successes? Failures?
Can you really put your eye out with that thing?
#2
Posted 03 November 2002 - 06:50 PM
I have my mother's old Model '40' Presto pressure cooker, made by the National Pressure Cooker Company of Eau Claire, Wisconsin, purchased in the late 1940s or early 1950s. The recipe booklet with it is © 1947. The pot is heavy, heavy aluminum, now pitted from years of cooking tomato sauce and stuffed cabbage rolls. Capacity 4 quarts. Boy, is it scary when I close the top and put that little weight on the steam vent!
About the only time I use it with pressure is to make quick chicken stocks. Other wise, it's just another large pot. I don't do any pressure canning, and have the time to cook beans and pot roast in regular cookers. I can't really imagine using it for vegetables, or hot cereal nowadays. Besides, I'm STILL scared of the thing.
#3
Posted 03 November 2002 - 07:17 PM
http://missvickie.co...ary/review.html
You can order directly from Magefesa (by phone) here:
http://www.magefesau...om/magefesa.htm
The newer-modern pressure cookers use a spring-loaded valve instead of the weight used in old models. This makes them safer and much quieter. Most have multiple redundant safety valves, so there is virtually no chance on one exploding. Mine is heavy stainless steel with a thick aluminum sandwich on the bottom. Even if it wasn't a pressure cooker it would be a great stockpot. I'm extremely happy with the pork roast and beef stews I've made so far, but I need to do some more testing before I'm really comfortable with the way it cooks.
A big bonus is the speed of course. This is why they use them so much on Iron chef. There's no other way of cooking meat and other items to a meltingly tender consistency in less than an hour. My last test was a Provencal beef stew with a total cooking time of about 25 minutes. The beef was fork tender, but wasn't mushy and had a good tooth.
The coworker that talked me into buying this thing raved on and on about how well it works for risotto, but I haven't tried it yet.
#4
Posted 03 November 2002 - 07:38 PM
I mostly use it for cooking or pre-cooking dry beans.
#5
Posted 03 November 2002 - 07:57 PM
I swear by them and make almost all kinds of stuff in them. I am not sure what I would do without them.
And I have never had any accidents. (Will touch wood now that I have said that.)
#6
Posted 03 November 2002 - 08:47 PM
Which brand would you recommend, Suvir dear? I've been thinking of buying one, and you just talked me into it.I have 6 pressure cookers.
#7
Posted 03 November 2002 - 09:50 PM
I've never used it. I unpacked it, washed it, and then never used it. I've taken it out of the garage more than once intending just to do something wtih it, but it never happens. I've never even used it as a regular pot. I don't know why, fear probably. Fear of the unknown even though I've seen my friend and her husband use theirs many times (that's what inspired me to get it in the first place). I even bought two pressure cooker cookbooks thinking that would help me get over the block.
Nope. I suck.
#8
Posted 03 November 2002 - 09:59 PM
Cathy, like with most of my cooking, my pressure cookers are humble. I have some Prestige, Hawkins and Fagor.Which brand would you recommend, Suvir dear? I've been thinking of buying one, and you just talked me into it.I have 6 pressure cookers.
The first two brands are those I brought with me from India.
I am sure you will be happy with whatever brand you choose. I am sure the fancier ones are really high tech... But most pressure cookers are quite safe these days.
I have bought one of mine at Zabars.... I am sure the sales staff would be happy to assist you with some feedback.
Pressure cookers are a great thing to have at home. Lentils and beans become easy to prepare. Boiling potatoes cannot be simpler. Making Khitchreee and Mujaddara is easy.
#9
Posted 03 November 2002 - 10:04 PM
Co-founder, Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, sshaw@egstaff.org
Proud signatory to the eG Ethics code
Director, New Media Studies, International Culinary Center (take my food-blogging course)
#10
Posted 03 November 2002 - 10:59 PM
The Kuhn is the one I read many recommendations for and is generally considered the Mercedes of pressure cookers. However, they are rather expensive, so I went for the Magefesa which is about 30% less. That and the fact that Cooks rated it higher than the the Kuhn. The Magefesa is much harder to find, but ordering it on the phone was easy, shipping is free, and it arrived promptly.Has anybody mentioned the Kuhn Rikon Duromatic? It seems that many of the serious pressure cooker people swear by it.
#11
Posted 04 November 2002 - 07:03 AM
TioPacho.com
"I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members." -- Groucho Marx
#12
Posted 04 November 2002 - 09:25 AM
Also great for artichokes, butternut squash, soups!!!, tomato sauces...
Not to mention oxtail and short ribs (requires quick degreasing, but comes out great).
I never thought I would use it so much. A sous-chef friend of mine recommended it. I purchased the Magefesa on Cooks' Illustrated's recommendation.
#13
Posted 16 December 2002 - 01:55 PM
#14
Posted 16 December 2002 - 03:35 PM
I refuse to spend my life worrying about what I eat. There is no pleasure worth forgoing just for an extra three years in the geriatric ward. --John Mortimera
#15
Posted 16 December 2002 - 04:35 PM
Thanks for the link.The Web site.
Has some general information about pressure cookers.
My favorite part from the website for Kuhn Rikon was the quote below. Great to see an Indian chef quoted first for a pressure cooker made in Switzerland.
"Out of all the pressure cookers I tested, the one I liked the best—it really made cooking a breeze—was a Kuhn Rikon, made in Switzerland. It comes in many shapes and sizes. I have the one that resembles a frying pan. The bottom of these pans, even though they are stainless steel, is virtually nonstick and the opening and closing mechanisms work as if they had been freshly oiled. There is no separate weight that has to be placed on the top and no frightening, hissing noises as the cooking proceeds. A truly wonderful gadget."
Madhur Jaffrey
author of Madhur Jaffrey's Quick and Easy Indian Cooking
#16
Posted 17 December 2002 - 09:24 AM
#17
Posted 17 December 2002 - 09:35 AM
What an attractive pressure cooker. I have never seen this kind before. Thanks for the pic and the description.
Do they still make these Nick? I love collection pressure cookers.
I am thinking of getting a pressure canner next. Never done pressure canning.. But that may inspire me to do so...
Does anyone have one?
#18
Posted 17 December 2002 - 09:49 AM
AeternumDo they still make these Nick?
Checked out things. Don't see the red button. Hope they haven't eliminated that as a cost-cutting measure. Actually, I saw some new Aeternums a few years after I got mine and they'd changed - and not for the better I thought. But, they're probably still better than some.
#19
Posted 23 October 2003 - 05:17 PM
#20
Posted 23 October 2003 - 10:00 PM
Last year, my mom finally had to replace the gasket on her Presto pressure cooker. It was a wedding present for her from back in 1955.I 've been using a Presto 6 qt. cooker for the past 10 or so years. While it certainly isn't upscale...it has been dependable.I've never had an explosion.I only recently had to replace the gasket and pressure lock gizmo.Most often I use it for cooking dried beans...makes them almost "fast food". Corn on the cob only takes 2-3 minutes in a PC and I make a great tasting chicken w/veggie gravy in 10 minutes.I'd like to read of other peoples experiences pro or con too.
I wonder how the new cookers (especially the ones with different settings) compare to the oldies-gut-goodies where there is just one setting (cook)?
“Peter: Oh my god, Brian, there's a message in my Alphabits. It says, 'Oooooo.'
Brian: Peter, those are Cheerios.”
– From Fox TV’s “Family Guy”
#21
Posted 07 February 2004 - 03:17 PM
#22
Posted 08 February 2004 - 06:14 AM
#23
Posted 09 March 2004 - 12:47 PM
I follow the directions for cooling: Cool normally, off heat, for 5 minutes when any meat is included in recipe; then cool under running cold water, or sitting in cold water for a few minutes (my sink is not large enough to hold the cooker plus long handle on one side so I cool under running water). When I think the cooker is cooled, I then gently touch the release/top handle. If it is ready the cooker will open, if not the handle will stay tight. For veggies and fruits, the cooker can be placed directly under the faucet of cool water until cooled enough to release the handle. About 2 minutes is usually the right amount of time for cooling mine. I do not worry about transferring the cooker to the sink; hold onto both handles.
I am deaf but I don't think it whistles actually.
It is truly wonderful in the summer when I don't want to spend any more on AC than I can get away with.
Wouldn't be without it.
North of the 30th parallel
One woman very courteously approached me in a grocery store, saying, "Excuse me, but I must ask why you've brought your dog into the store." I told her that Grace is a service dog.... "Excuse me, but you told me that your dog is allowed in the store because she's a service dog. Is she Army or Navy?" Terry Thistlewaite
#24
Posted 09 March 2004 - 08:35 PM
Although someone expressed disdain at their use for making stock, the simple fact is that they are excellent for stock since a higher temperature can be obtained WITHOUT boiling (which emulsifies the impurities and fats), and as a result less water can be used initially which substantially reduces the reduction time after straining. I can toss a carcass or bones in the pot, brown them in oil, toss in the aromatics and water to barely cover, heat until the indicator is at the lower mark (to avoid boiling), an in 30 - 60 minutes have a very decent stock, which has approximately the concentration of a 2:1 reduction and can then be further reduced as needed. Be sure to let the pressure come down on its own after removing from the heat (as opposed to any of the quicker methods such as holdong the closed pot under cold tap water, or releasing the pressure valve). Otherwise the contents which will be hotter than 212F will boil agressively whenthe lid is opened, making the stock cloudy.
I have 3 sizes which share the same lid (though I have 2 lids), and one is always on my stovetop.
Eat well
Geekdoc
#25
Posted 10 March 2004 - 05:17 PM
It's the eGullet Curse. Either that or the eGullet Blessing. Perhaps there was some collaborative encouragement from growing encroachments on available cooking time, or from persistent pleasant memories of my Mom's stuffed rolled flank steak emerging from the cast-aluminum Presto not unlike Botticelli's Venus from the ocean, or from my 12-year-old son being as tall as I am and showing no signs of slowing down in fact speeding up.
But still, I mean to say: Who'da thunken?
Priscilla
OCFoodNation.com
Taste of Orange County, Orange Coast Magazine
In the Daily Gullet: Vegetables, in a Soup
#26
Posted 10 March 2004 - 05:32 PM
http://www.amazon.co...itchen&n=507846
I've had it for 5 years, very nice, I paid 130 bucks at the kitchen store, 90 bucks ain't bad.
#27
Posted 10 March 2004 - 06:32 PM
Oh, it is. Both. Either.OK, this afternoon I caught myself all nonchalant-like comparison-shopping for pressure cookers. eBay, Amazon.com, you know -- the usual suspects.
It's the eGullet Curse. Either that or the eGullet Blessing.
I myself, having been perfectly happy with my good old Presto 6-quart for lo these (count 'em) 30 years, have now gone completely to hell in the name of "research." (Curse you, Carolyn Tillie, for putting this eGCI idea into my head.
Oy, eGullet, what hast thou wrought!
#28
Posted 10 March 2004 - 08:59 PM
(Ooooh, a Fagor, eh? Well, I'm curious to see how it's different from the ones out there now, but there's no special urgency - I really only asked because I wanted to get a sense of how many of these fancy brands people were actually using. BTW I myself still use the old Presto for the foreseeable future; I have myself tallked out of the Kuhn Rikon for now, on the grounds that I have absolutely no need for it.)
#29
Posted 11 March 2004 - 09:30 AM
Fagor Picture and Specs Here.
and Here.
How terribly interesting.... I am SO excited about this. I realize it was a pretty expensive piece of equipment and always felt guilty that I never used it.
#30
Posted 11 March 2004 - 09:38 AM
Ah, Presto.I myself, having been perfectly happy with my good old Presto 6-quart for lo these (count 'em) 30 years...
My mom received a Presto pressure cooker when she married my dad back in '55. Last year she decided she needed a new gasket. She called Presto and they had the gasket that she needed, still in stock, after all these years.
Now that's customer service.
Good luck on your eBayin', balmagowry!
“Peter: Oh my god, Brian, there's a message in my Alphabits. It says, 'Oooooo.'
Brian: Peter, those are Cheerios.”
– From Fox TV’s “Family Guy”




This topic is locked





