#1
Posted 18 January 2005 - 06:52 AM
Sadly the tasting menu is virtually the same – the only difference was that the sweetbread cooked in hay had been replaced by pigeon. Arguably better, definitely more complex. The one dish that did stand out as being superb was the salmon in liquorice – stunning last year, equally so this year. The roast foie gras and sardines on toast dishes seem to have undergone significant shrinkage – both very good but you need more that a mouthful or two to really enjoy. Additionally, I asked for an extra starter of cauliflower risotto – it was certainly innovative (cauliflower & coco) but tiny in size – v poor show for £17.
The MD did come & talk at the end to say what a hectic year they had acquiring a lab for HB and the pub next door. They were working on new dishes but didn’t want to introduce anything that would upset smooth running of the duck. The new menus would appear soonish (summer?). Some of the new dishes would be from recipes 200-300 years old (dormouse satay anyone?). I wasn’t sure if this was aimed at the FD or the new place.
I was just worried that they were gambling with the FD too much – great set of dishes but can’t find better alternatives. The nitro dish is great first time – but once you know what’s coming – less so. Also the beet & orange gels – when you in the know, much less interesting.
Anyone else feel that they really need to move on in case they get stuck in a rut/ recipes become tired? I’d really like to visit more often but not until the menu’s had an overall.
#2
Posted 18 January 2005 - 08:09 AM
Anyone else feel that they really need to move on in case they get stuck in a rut/ recipes become tired? I’d really like to visit more often but not until the menu’s had an overall.
I think this is the major gripe with the place, i think a genuine 3 star should change its menu more frequently, it must be over three years since i went and i recognise most of the dishes still.
the salmon and liquorice looked good on tv the other week but wild horses couldn't drag me to eat another bite of cauliflower and cocoa -yuck.
i can't believe they have that many regulars on that basis, as you say the shock is in the new and unexpected.
cheers
gary
#3
Posted 18 January 2005 - 09:36 AM
I had lunch at the Fat Duck last I week and was a bit disappointed. I was asked when I booked if I wanted the tasting menu – which I didn’t as there were a few a la carte that I wanted to try – but in a moment of pure greediness I said yes having enjoyed last years so much.
Does anyone know if they have been asking about the tasting menu when you book for long? I don't recall that we have ever been asked this when booking. And what happens if you change your mind in the days/weeks between making your booking and the actual visit?
#4
Posted 18 January 2005 - 09:48 AM
it was a last minute thing (day before) - maybe that's whyDoes anyone know if they have been asking about the tasting menu when you book for long? I don't recall that we have ever been asked this when booking. And what happens if you change your mind in the days/weeks between making your booking and the actual visit?
needed a lift to get me through january & leeds/anthony's was too far!
#5
Posted 01 February 2005 - 11:11 AM
#6
Posted 01 February 2005 - 05:31 PM
The Fat Duck has been awarded 19 out of 20 by Gault Millau. Full story at caterer-online.com.
That's just plain hilarious. But then again, GM has praised a restaurant in France (2 years running) for it's stunning terrace.( The restaurant in question does not have a terrace
#7
Posted 02 February 2005 - 01:32 AM
I also find it highly amusing that Tom Aitkens gets 18.
Why is that Samantha? Maybe you would like to post a report of your last visit on the Aikens thread?
#8
Posted 02 February 2005 - 03:12 AM
The Fat Duck has been awarded 19 out of 20 by Gault Millau. Full story at caterer-online.com.
It's odd that the Waterside Inn doesn't get a mention. I know it's in Bray on Thames but then so is the Fat Duck and of course neither are in London. Perhaps the hundred yards down to the end of Ferry Lane makes all the difference.
#9
Posted 02 February 2005 - 04:47 AM
My last meal at Sketch, I gave it 17/20 (Gagnaire in Paris I have given a few times 19.5/20); the last at Gordon Ramsay RHR got 18/20 of me. As said, all personal, of course!
#10
Posted 12 March 2005 - 01:50 PM
LOGO !!!
#12
Posted 13 March 2005 - 01:39 AM
Flickr Food
"111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321" Bruce Frigard 'Winesonoma' - RIP
#14
Posted 13 March 2005 - 07:58 AM
Flickr Food
"111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321" Bruce Frigard 'Winesonoma' - RIP
#15
Posted 13 March 2005 - 06:11 PM
Only if he's using it to sell his restaurant, or as a container in which to marinate his Rabbit - something for which hat's are remarkably useful, imparting a certain je ne sais chapeau quoi.
Moby, is that a rogue apostrophe I see? :)
I have not eaten at the Fat Duck, though my head chef has... came back with a silly grin on his face, if that's a positive indication...
"If you're a chef on a salary, there's usually a very good reason. Never, ever, work out your hourly rate."
#16
Posted 14 March 2005 - 05:50 AM
#17
Posted 14 March 2005 - 06:53 PM
Only if he's using it to sell his restaurant, or as a container in which to marinate his Rabbit - something for which hat's are remarkably useful, imparting a certain je ne sais chapeau quoi.
Moby, is that a rogue apostrophe I see? :)
I have not eaten at the Fat Duck, though my head chef has... came back with a silly grin on his face, if that's a positive indication...
That wasn't a grin. It was the grimace left over from when he got the bill.
#18
Posted 14 March 2005 - 11:13 PM
Flickr Food
"111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321" Bruce Frigard 'Winesonoma' - RIP
#19
Posted 15 March 2005 - 03:50 AM
I thought the Fat Duck is the most inexpensive 3 star in Europe (yes yes Dirk - for what that's worth).
What's this supposed to mean?
Anyway, at £97.50 (just gone up) the tasting menu would probably be one of the cheapest in France, but it's the most expensive in the UK, and I think you'll find that the Spanish three stars are also significantly cheaper for both food and wine, with the possible exception of el Bulli.
Which is to not to say that all three star restaurants aren't seriously expensive.
#20
Posted 15 March 2005 - 05:33 AM
Flickr Food
"111,111,111 x 111,111,111 = 12,345,678,987,654,321" Bruce Frigard 'Winesonoma' - RIP
#22
Posted 15 March 2005 - 12:53 PM
Anyone no who the chef is/was?
Tommy Cooper
#23
Posted 17 April 2005 - 02:15 PM
Jamie Maw
Food Editor
Vancouver magazine
www.vancouvermagazine.com
Foodblog: In the Belly of the Feast - Eating BC
"Profumo profondo della mia carne"
#24
Posted 18 April 2005 - 05:42 AM
#25
Posted 20 April 2005 - 02:49 AM
#26
Posted 20 April 2005 - 12:58 PM
Matt was pretty keen, Stacey only liked the pudding and the wine.
#27
Posted 20 April 2005 - 01:20 PM
but not so, spending my time playing not working
www.e-senses.co.uk
#28
Posted 21 April 2005 - 08:05 AM
Lucy Cavendish - just doesn't get it or the voice of reason?
#30
Posted 21 April 2005 - 09:02 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Modernist
The Kitchen →
Pastry & Baking →
Modernist molten chocolate cakesStarted by seabream , 08 Jun 2013 |
|
|
||
Regional Cuisine →
Europe →
Spain & Portugal →
Spain & Portugal: Dining →
Madrid and Toledo Restaurant ExperiencesStarted by Virbonus , 23 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Regional Cuisine →
India, China, Japan, & Asia/Pacific →
Japan →
Japan: Cooking & Baking →
Japanese Kracie Brand Poppin Cookin/Happy Kitchen DIY Snack KitsStarted by GlorifiedRice , 21 May 2013 |
|
|
||
The Kitchen →
Kitchen Consumer →
Food safety – vacuum or fridge?Started by JeffDDS , 20 May 2013 |
|
|
||
The Kitchen →
Cooking →
Bradley smoker broke 1/2way through, still safe to eat?Started by rob1234 , 11 May 2013 |
|
|




This topic is locked





