Jump to content


Welcome to the eGullet Forums!

These forums are a service of the Society for Culinary Arts & Letters, a 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to advancement of the culinary arts. Anyone can read the forums, however if you would like to participate in active discussions please join the Society.

Photo

Litigious trouble


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 tony h

tony h
  • participating member
  • 1,020 posts

Posted 18 June 2002 - 09:03 AM

Lets face it Tony, your no shrinking violet when it comes to description & opinions - and we all thankful for it.  But I not sure that those on the receiving end, deserving or not, appreciate the critical observations that are made to help them become better people or their establishments better places.

I understand if you don't/can't answer this - but has anyone taken legal exception to your wisdom, has this tempered your attitude or do you just have an excellent set of lawyers?

#2 bourdain

bourdain
  • participating member
  • 759 posts

Posted 18 June 2002 - 02:53 PM

So far, the only people I have clearly and knowingly libelled with intent (to the best of my knowledge) : Steven, my former sous--and Adam-Real-Last-Name--have been dining out and gettin' laid off their notoriety. I informed them in advance that I was planning on revealing to the world their every hideous personal predilection, criminal tendency and disgusting personal habit--and they pretty much grunted--"Okay..cool." Comedy ensued when, for instance, Steven--in a new slick corporate chef job in Florida, was summoned to the dining room by the stately middle-aged female editor of a major food section. She greeted him, glanced down at his clogs (which I had referred to as frequently semen-spattered in KC) and dryly remarked, "they look clean to me."  The books are vetted by legal--and my daily regimen of diatribe has--to date--not resulted in any quality time in court. I feel sorry for anyone who tries--as my wife is a seasoned, self-taught sea-lawyer of the worst kind--with an unbroken string of victories in housing court. And anyone who wants to appear in court to demonstrate they are in fact provably NOT a "chicken stealing, crack smoking, pin-dicked shoemaker--who does regularly to food what Hitler did to Poland" (for instance) would have to read that phrase in the newspaper every day while my wife puts them through a painful, lengthy and intrusive "discovery" process, fully exploring--for the record--any and all potentially inappropriate contact with poultry in their past. So knock wood.
abourdain

#3 Jinmyo

Jinmyo
  • participating member
  • 9,879 posts

Posted 18 June 2002 - 06:18 PM

I love your Vegan statement in the Portugese episode of ACT. Which I've just seen the other day. FN Canada is finally running it.

Funny stuff. But I hope to see more actual cooking rather than just the meals coming out.
"I've caught you Richardson, stuffing spit-backs in your vile maw. 'Let tomorrow's omelets go empty,' is that your fucking attitude?" -E. B. Farnum

"Behold, I teach you the ubermunch. The ubermunch is the meaning of the earth. Let your will say: the ubermunch shall be the meaning of the earth!" -Fritzy N.

"It's okay to like celery more than yogurt, but it's not okay to think that batter is yogurt."

Serving fine and fresh gratuitous comments since Oct 5 2001, 09:53 PM

#4 bourdain

bourdain
  • participating member
  • 759 posts

Posted 19 June 2002 - 03:51 AM

They're showing the "pig episode" in Canada? Cool! They seem to be holding off on showing it here--I was beginning to wonder if they'd decided not to run it.
abourdain

#5 Ron Johnson

Ron Johnson
  • legacy participant
  • 1,530 posts

Posted 19 June 2002 - 05:02 AM

Tony,
Just remember there is always one absolute defense to libel and slander claims:  The Truth.

#6 bourdain

bourdain
  • participating member
  • 759 posts

Posted 19 June 2002 - 08:01 PM

Not in England.
abourdain